Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1324 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm currently playing with my Mizuno MP-25 PW which I don't hit much unless I need a full swing around 110 yards or have a really specific short chip.  It's got a decent amount of wear on the face and I don't hit it consistently with partial swings so I usually reach for my 52° Vokey SM7 instead.  I also have a repeatable 50-60 yard shot with it.  My other wedge is a 56° cleveland tour something-or-other from about 2001 that I love.  I'm eying a 50° to somewhat replace the PW and also be more consistent with partial swings and more useful for chipping, but I'm also wondering how much difference there really is in a 48° PW and a 50°.   If there's some sort of article/guide that can help me, that would also be appreciated.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The main issue I'm seeing is gapping. The 50° and 52° would be very close, with probably too much overlap, especially on full swings. It seems to me like the 52° is doing a pretty good job for you already for what you want the 50° for. I would recommend looking for another 48° to have consistent gapping. Unfortunately I don't have ready access to any guides or anything, but I'm sure if you search for wedge buying guide something will pop up. 

  • D1-SIM MAX D 9° Diamana pd 50 reg lofted down 1 click 
  • D2-SIM MAX D 10.5° project x riptide cb 50 reg lofted up 2 clicks
  • 5w- Radspeed motore f3 
  • 3H- Tour Edge Exotics e722 kbs hybrid stiff
  • 4-5h tour edge exotics ex9
  • 6-AW- Cleveland launcher xl Nippon Zelos 7
  • 56°-Cleveland CBX Zipcore
  • P-Odyssey eleven tour lined slant neck

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, roejye said:

The main issue I'm seeing is gapping. The 50° and 52° would be very close, with probably too much overlap, especially on full swings. It seems to me like the 52° is doing a pretty good job for you already for what you want the 50° for. I would recommend looking for another 48° to have consistent gapping. Unfortunately I don't have ready access to any guides or anything, but I'm sure if you search for wedge buying guide something will pop up. 

That's a good point, I should just replace the pitching wedge, I treat it like an extra-short iron, not a wedge and I feel like I could use something longer than the 52° that I'm confident playing with a wedge swing.  I don't think I have the attack for a 60° which would be the other way I could go.

Also "wedge" no longer looks like a real word after all this repetition.

Edited by barooo
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

As said, knowing your gaps is important.  I use my PW and GW primarily as if they are #10 and #11 irons, but I also know a quarter shot (sort of, I'm really not doing a lot of full swing stuff when I make a "quarter shot" with these) distance ranges from my 58 through my 8-iron.  

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

@barooo I have a set of MP25s.  Unless you’ve had the lofts adjusted, the PW loft is 46 degrees.  If you do have the standard 46 degree loft, I’d recommend a 50 degree GW.  When I was playing them, my 50 degree Vokey gapped perfectly with the PW.  From there, you can dump the 52.

The other option could be to bend your 52 to 51, then you’d have a 5 degree gapping between PW, GW, SW

Edited by Denny Bang Bang
Bend 52 to 51
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
6 hours ago, Denny Bang Bang said:

The other option could be to bend your 52 to 51, then you’d have a 5 degree gapping between PW, GW, SW

Hey Denny, as I'm sure you know, "gapping" your set doesn't just mean choosing equal steps in the loft of the clubs. Gapping is referring to the distance gaps. Gapping is getting the correct gaps in how far you hit said clubs. It's not uncommon that many people will have a greater difference in distance between how far they hit a 56 and how far they hit a 54 than the difference in distance gap between how far they hit their 45 and their 50 degree clubs. 

This kind of thing may also occur at the top of the bag as well. 

When "gapping" your set, go off of the DISTANCE you hit your clubs not off what is stamped on them. Then if you are constantly coming up with a distance you cannot hit or perhaps cannot comfortably hit, you may need to find a club for that distance as well. 

I also know many golfers who carry two wedges of similar (not the same but within 2 degrees) lofts, but have different bounces. Therefore they do different jobs. But that might be outside the scope of what the OP is asking. 

But in general @barooo you want to seek nice consistent "distance" gaps, don't worry as much about consistent "loft" gaps. (Although, obviously loft plays a role in distance.) ... See, this is why golf and club selection discussions are so much fun. 👍😁👍

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, ChetlovesMer said:


But in general @barooo you want to seek nice consistent "distance" gaps, don't worry as much about consistent "loft" gaps. (Although, obviously loft plays a role in distance.) ... See, this is why golf and club selection discussions are so much fun. 

I think the main "gap" in my clubs I'm feeling is something I'm confident doing wedge things with (half shots, chips, etc.) that has a consistent half-shot distance over about 50-55.  Inside about 55 or so I feel pretty confident and 90-115 I feel pretty confident.  I could also work on a second partial swing that's a little more than arms to parallel so I have 3 stock shots (including full-ish swing) instead of just two.  I'm not sure if my PW is 46° or 48°, I just googled the specs for MP-25 PW.  Maybe my issue more with the grind/bounce aspect.  Or maybe it just has really dull grooves, the face isn't in great shape (got the set used a few years ago and that was the only club with any real wear when I got them).

Also I'm in no real rush here I'm just sort of thinking about what I should get next.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

@ChetlovesMer yea, I agree with you that I used “gapping” two different ways, so it may have been confusing.  But the intention was distance gapping.  Having played the MP25 personally, the 50 degree Vokey fits right in with the 46 degree MP25 from a distance gapping perspective.  With that, I’m sure bending the 52 to 51 will work out reasonably well.  Maybe some people do, but I’ve never met anyone who carries a GW in anything other than a typical fairway grind.

Folks can certainly get as extreme as they want on all of this.  Shafts of course make a difference as well.

First thing first, the best advice is probably to work on flighted shots before even worrying about gapping from a club perspective.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Lol guess what I did when I played about a month ago...  I left my 56° at the course.  Just noticed today when packing up for a lesson, the first since playing...  So I guess my more immediate problem is getting another 56° to replace the missing one.  The really funny part is the last time I played this course (Harborside near Chicago) I left the same club behind, but realized it and went back the next day.  Extra mad because it was the first club I bought (my initial set was a gift) myself.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1324 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Yea, I think it is just human nature. It could be subconscious as well.  The studies on Belief Perseverance, Cognitive Dissonance, Confirmation Bias, Motivated Reasoning are all interesting topics in psychology.  Being that people are probably on a spectrum regarding how susceptible they are to these behaviors; I am not shocked by his response. It helps me cope with this sort of thing as well. I am like; Oh, they can't help it. Honestly, they probably can't with out some sort of major pattern changes in how they process information. I wish, I would be like 80-lbs lighter than I am now! 🤣 I am glad the GEARS avatar doesn't blow up in size to match the person's outline.       
    • Hasn't happened yet but there's a lot of smoke now, I guess.
    • Nailed that one right on the head. Force the data to match the theory, not the other way around. Come on people!
    • Andy Plummer (@andy_plummer) • Instagram photos and videos 32 likes, 3 comments - andy_plummer on April 15, 2026: "Rory Mcilroy. What do you see? 2 images of the same player. Masters Champion Rory Mcilroy. One is a still photo from a video, the other Is an AVATAR from a... The text is: Rory Mcilroy. What do you see? 2 images of the same player. Masters Champion Rory Mcilroy. One is a still photo from a video, the other Is an AVATAR from a 3D system of the same player. The 3d system AVATAR fails to represent the reality of the trail shoulder, arm, or wrist position. Or much else for that matter. This raises the question, Which is a more accurate representation of reality the still photo or the cartoon? Next, To demonstrate the value of systematically comparing still photos I have included 2 images of Rory to train your eyes. Is the trail shoulder the same? The trail arm? The trail wrist? :sigh: I love when people think they’re punching back, but they’re just punching themselves in the face. The rest of this post is a compilation of some text conversations. 😄  Andy, and all of S&T have, for years now sought to diminish the role of measurement tools in the game. Whether that's force plates, 3D, perhaps HackMotion, etc., they continue to rely on their interpretations of 2D photos and video to "show" what the game's best players do. In reality, they do very little of what S&T teaches, and often do the exact opposite of what S&T teaches. With the post above, Andy continues to find new ways to demonstrate his stupidity. With this post, he's effectively comparing… a 2D photo to a 2D photo of a 3D avatar. GEARS owners/users know… it's not about the avatar. It's about the numbers, the measurements, etc. GEARS doesn't capture your exact body dimensions. The trail elbow has been a little goofy for a long time. But you can compare one swing to another, and compare the data. And the data continues to show that golfers do not move like S&T or Andy Plummer insist that they move. Either Andy doesn’t know that, which is a big concern, or he’s lying about what he’s saying. Andy is essentially saying that no numbers are good because no avatar will match his random still image. Who can blame him? The last time Andy tried to use numbers, we got… stuff like this: How do S&T "network" folks and GEARS owners like Manavian and Sales feel about being pooped on by their "leader"? How will Andy (or will he at all) moonwalk this one back with them? How do GEARS users use GEARS? To get the numbers, to compare the numbers. Occasionally you can compare a "before" avatar against an "after" avatar, but in those cases, you know the "camera angles" are perfect and, more importantly, consistent or uniform. With GEARS Hybrid, too, you can put the numbers right on the actual person. My two color cameras are pretty close to FO and DL views, so… I see the pretty common angles. Other times, you're just looking at the data, and the avatar is "just for show." To put that together: The GEARS Avatar is a representation. Occasionally you compare the “before” avatar to the “after” avatar, and you can rest assured when doing that the camera angles are perfect and consistent… but that it’s more about the measurements and data/numbers. I'm reminded of this quote: It Is Difficult to Get a Man to Understand Something When His Salary Depends Upon His Not Understanding It (or variations at the link). It doesn't fit perfectly, because outside of a shrinking band of devotees, S&T has a horrible reputation amongst golfers and golf instructors. It likely has more to do with a desire to "be right" than to "get it right." And a healthy dose of good old-fashioned stupidity. I hate poor golf instruction. It grinds my gears, no pun intended. It works against what I've spent the last nearly 20 years of my life doing: helping golfers to play better golf. I hate it when people do not advance their knowledge. They dig in, insist that they "got it right" fifteen years ago, and ignore all advances in technology. They keep their heads in the sand and reject everything that doesn't match what they think they saw years and years and years ago. They don't adapt or grow. They make up "data" and hold golfers back from getting better. It's sad, and frustrating as a golf instructor trying to help golfers to battle the misinformation put out by the stubborn and ignorant. And… that's enough time spent on this.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.