Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1175 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Here is a crazy one...  in order to create clubhead speed, you need torque.  Where does this torque come from?  I believe it is the force against the ground with your lead leg.  This is reaction torque.  The quicker you can transition to your left side (right handed golfers) then you are set to release the club with the hands.  I don't think the best way is a longer, wider, more turn blah blah blah.  You need torque to create angular acceleration!   That's the only place you're gonna get it.  From the ground.

Let me know what you guys think about where the power comes from.

 

Shanks


Posted
11 minutes ago, Jarrod Hanks said:

I don't think the best way is a longer, wider, more turn blah blah blah. 

Turn matters. 

For those who just do not turn, like 20 degrees of hip turn, and 60 degrees of shoulder turn, they could do more. It is hard to generate the required rotational speed while taking such shorter turns. You would have to be so arm dependent. If you take away the club from an amateur, have them turn their hips 40 degrees, and their shoulders 80 degrees, I think mostly all golfers can do this. 

13 minutes ago, Jarrod Hanks said:

You need torque to create angular acceleration! 

It isn't that simple. There are multiple levers in the golf swing that can cause acceleration.

Using the lead leg properly, and having good timing with all the stuff before doing that, ramps up the turn rates more. You can absolutely keep your left knee soft, and have your hips stall out, and have high clubhead speed. I raise my hand to this. 

Sliding properly and then extending the lead knee properly helps with hip rotation.  

29 minutes ago, Jarrod Hanks said:

The quicker you can transition to your left side (right handed golfers) then you are set to release the club with the hands. 

I wouldn't put it that way. Transitioning correctly, and with proper timing has a lot of benefits. It controls the backswing length. It sets you up to allow you to push off your left foot to keep those turn rates up.

As for what a golfer should feel, it might be completely different. 

Golfer A: Very short swing, little turn in the backswing. They might need to feel MUCH more turn in the backswing and feel a weight shift much later. 

Golfer B: Very long backswing through tons of turn. They might need to feel the weight shift happening sooner to control the backswing. 

For some, they might not want to transition to the lead side sooner. It could be costing them. They are losing potential power by not optimizing their backswing turn. There is a reason why partial wedge shots go shorter than full swing shots. It is much less turn. A quicker transition could cause a loss in power. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Jarrod Hanks said:

 You need torque to create angular acceleration!   That's the only place you're gonna get it.  From the ground.

How do you mean? Like twist against the ground to create torque? It is not that absolute if that's what you are suggesting. There is a lot of good info out there to debunk and clarify lot of this stuff. Dr. Kwon's research and publication (you can Youtube) is great and somewhat simplified if you are interested.   

Edited by GolfLug

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
3 hours ago, Jarrod Hanks said:

Here is a crazy one...  in order to create clubhead speed, you need torque.  Where does this torque come from?  I believe it is the force against the ground with your lead leg.  This is reaction torque.  The quicker you can transition to your left side (right handed golfers) then you are set to release the club with the hands.  I don't think the best way is a longer, wider, more turn blah blah blah.  You need torque to create angular acceleration!   That's the only place you're gonna get it.  From the ground.

Let me know what you guys think about where the power comes from.

 

Shanks

It’s a bit of an oversimplification but I generally disagree, mostly on the fact that it’s possible to shift forward incorrectly and not actually use the ground well. Time is a factor - as in time to both generate and transfer the energy from the body to the club head - and some of that is related to having more turn and wider levers. There’s a reason you don’t swing 120 mph if you start from A2.

A lot of the force from the body is rotational though, which is aided by how we use the ground. It’s just kind of how our body works. It’s how you swing a club fast, a baseball bat, throw an uppercut, hit a tennis serve, etc.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
On 10/24/2022 at 9:36 AM, ellamia said:

You need torque to create angular acceleration!   That's the only place you're gonna get it.  From the ground.

That doesn't sound right. You can create torque by rotating your body while sitting in an office spinning chair. Your lower body will of course spin in the opposite direction, but I don't think you need the ground to generate rotational force.

Edited by iacas
fixed quote
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1175 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 22 - 2026-01-11 More mirror work. Back outdoors tomorrow.
    • Day 11, 1/11/26.  Today was putting, along about 6' of carpet, with coins on the ground to keep me cognizant of what I'm doing.  I think this is the at-home drill from LSW. (Ugh, missed two of the last four days -- 1/10 and 1/8)
    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.