Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

2022: A Year to Remember in Women's Golf


Note: This thread is 1049 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

2022: A Year to Remember in Women’s Golf

When Michael Whan took over as Commissioner of the LPGA in 2010, one of his initial goals was the make the LPGA a “global tour.” Whan is no longer with the LPGA, having left last year after 11 seasons, but it has never been more apparent how successful he was in achieving that goal.

The LPGA had a record breaking fourteen countries that had at least one player that won a tournament in 2022. Yes, it was surely a year to remember in women’s golf.

For the second consecutive year the USA was the country with the most wins. Its eight wins were double any other country. Here is a list of every country that had a winner this year:

United States – (8 wins) – Jennifer Kupcho (3 wins, one with Lizette Salas as partner), Danielle Kang, Marina Alex, Ally Ewing, Andrea Lee, Nelly Korda.

Republic of Korea (4) – Jin Young Ko, Hyo-Joo Kim, Eun-Hee Ji, In Gee Chun

New Zealand (3) – Lydia Ko (3 wins)

Thailand (2) – Atthaya Thitikul (2wins)

Japan (2) – Nasa Hataoka, Ayaka Furue

Australia (2) – Minjee Lee (2 wins)

Canada (2) – Brooke Henderson (2 wins)

South Africa (2) – Ashleigh Buhai, Paula Reto

England (2) – Charley Hull, Jodi Ewart Shadoff

Ireland (1) – Leona Maguire

Denmark (1) – Nanna Koerstz Madsen

Sweden (1) – Maja Stark

Mexico (1) – Gaby Lopez

Scotland (1) – Gemma Dryburgh

Atthaya-Thitikul-at-the-2022-US-Womens-O

Atthaya Thitikul at the 2022 US Women’s Open.

 

There were also five major championship winners from five different countries:

The Chevron Championship – Jennifer Kupcho – USA

U.S Women’s Open – Minjee Lee – Australia

KPMG Women’s PGA Championship – In Gee Chun – Republic of Korea

Amundi Evian Championship – Brooke Henderson – Canada

AIG British Open – Ashleigh Buhai – South Africa

Yes, it was quite the year to remember.

First Time Winners

There were also a record breaking eleven first time winners:

Leona Maguire – LPGA Drive on Championship

Nanna Koerstz Madsen – Honda LPGA Thailand

Atthaya Thitikul – JTBC Classic and Walmart NW Arkansas Championship

Jennifer Kupcho – The Chevron Championship, Meijer LPGA Classic, Dow Great lakes

Ayaka Furue – Trust Women’s Scottish Open

Ashleigh Buhai – AIG Women’s Open

Maja Stark – ISPS Handa World International

Paula Reto – CP Women’s Open

Andrea Lee – Portland Classic

Jodi Ewart Shadsoff – LPGA MEDIHEAL Championship

Gemma Dryburgh – Toto Japan Classic

The Rolex Player of the Year was Lydia Ko

The Vare trophy was won by Lydia Ko

The Rolex Rookie of the Year award was won by Atthaya Thitikul

Lydia Ko and Jennifer Kupcho led the tour in wins with three

Atthaya Thitikul had the most top tens with sixteen

Lydia Ko led the tour in putting with 1.72 putts per greens in regulation

Maria Fassi was the longest driver on tour averaging 279.3 yards

The player who finished the highest on the money list (6th) without a win – Hye-Jin Choi

The player that finished the lowest on the money list with a win (49th) Nanna Koerts Madsen

Atthaya-Thitikul-2022-US-Womens-Open-Ben

Atthaya Thitikul – 2022 US Womens Open

 

Other Notes

Lydia Ko picked up two more Hall of Fame points at the end of the season for winning Player of the Year and the Vare Trophy. She now has 25 points. Twenty-seven is needed for induction.

There were five players who did not miss a cut all season on the LPGA Tour: Lydia Ko, Hye-Jin Choi, Hannah Green, Georgia Hall, and Danielle Kang.

The final field of eight countries for the 2023 Hanwa Lifeplus International Crown is now set.The eight countries were determined by the combined Rolex Women’s World Rankings of the top four players from each country as of November 21st.The USA and Korea tied with 35 points followed by Japan (85), Sweden (120), Thailand (183), England (187), Australia (298), and the Republic of China (446). South Africa just missed getting in with 475. The players that will represent each country have not yet been determined. That will be finalized on April 23, 2023. The top four Rolex ranked players from each country on that day will qualify.

The LPGA announced their 2023 schedule. There will be 33 official tournaments plus the Solheim Cup and the International Crown. They will be playing for a record breaking $101.4 million.

Congratulations should also be given out to Linn Grant who was the winner of the Costa Del Sol title, which is given to the player of the year on the Ladies European Tour.

  • Like 1

  • 2 months later...
Posted

Yeah and the international favour continues with the latest LPGA event in Thailand.. certainly not so USA centric like the PGA

 

Go Foxy Go


Posted

I actually had no idea that Lydia Ko had such a good year

  • Thumbs Up 1

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Yeah sadly she fell away on the last day in Thailand ... Sentosa Golf Club - Tanjong Course in Singapore up next.. 

Go Foxy Go


Posted

So outside of the fact that a large number of countries were represented in tournament winners and someone from a different country won every major, what exactly about the 2022 women's golf season made it a year to remember? There were multiple women who won multiple times so it wasn't like someone came out and won 6 times or completely dominated or something.

If a guy from a different country won every men's major and a large number of countries were represented in tournament winners I wouldn't call it a season to remember just based on those things alone. So far in 2023 Rahm has already matched Lydia Ko's 2022 season win total with 3 and he has half as many (7) top tens in his first 7 starts as Ko (14) did in 22 starts.

You just rattled off a bunch of facts about the season without really explaining what made it a year to remember, but a writeup similar to this could be done every single season on both the men's and women's years regardless of if it was a year to remember or not. 

What made 2022 unique in the women's game? I'm not meaning to be argumentative here, I don't follow women's golf that closely so I'm genuinely curious what, in your opinion, made the 2022 women's season a year to remember? What made it stand out over other years?

Driver: :titleist:  GT3
Woods:  :cobra: Darkspeed LS 3Wood
Irons: :titleist: U505 (3)  :tmade: P770 (4-PW)
Wedges: :callaway: MD3 50   :titleist: SM9 54/58  
Putter: :tmade: Spider X

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Tony J. writes about women’s golf and posts his articles on numerous websites. Headlines seek to capture our attention. “2022: A Year to Remember…” catches one’s eye more than “2022: Another Year of Women’s Golf”  😉

  • Like 1
  • Funny 2

Brian Kuehn

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1049 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I have a couple of trips planned, although golf was a secondary component in each.  In February we're going to visit some friends near Naples, so Mary Anne and I have added on a few days to stay and play at Streamsong.  Then In March we're going to Hawaii (again), and will almost certainly get in a few rounds there.
    • My next golf trip will probably be a short one, but I’m really looking forward to it. I’m thinking of staying relatively close, picking a spot with a few solid courses and making a long weekend out of it. For me, the best golf trips are about good courses, relaxed vibes, and time away with friends.
    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.