Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6424 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. Will You Be Putting A 'Cutting Edge' Putter In Your Bag?

    • Yes, I Already Have One
      15
    • Probably Soon, I Can't Resist
      7
    • Maybe Some Day, But I'm In No Rush
      11
    • No, I Like the More Traditional Putters
      17


Recommended Posts

Posted

Just recently bought a TaylorMade Rossa Monza Spider putter, can't believe I did it, looks like some kind of space station. Tried out a lot of the new 'cutting edge' putters including the heavy putters and they all worked well, but the Monza Spider really was an eye opener. Without a doubt it is the best putter I've ever used.



I didn't know it was so popular on tour, but now I see why, this putter really performs, I don't think I can go back to my Newport blade, technology has made a better putter IMO.

What is your opinion about the new hi-tech putters, will you be getting one?

2009 Burner R
FT-I Fusion Squareway 3W 15* Fujikura Speeder Fit-On R
5W R7 R
FT Fusion Hybrids Draw 3/21*, 4/24*
G5 5-PW X-forged Vintage: 52.12, 56.14MDScotty Cameron: Newport 2 ProV1


Posted
I have a Never Crompromise GM2 #3. It is not quite as fugly as some of the new high end high tech ones but oh my god, the feel! I used a Yes! putter that really worked before, great spin right away as stated & great ball path, but zero feedback to me. The NC Gm2 #3 gives a perfect soft feedback feel when one hit the ball right, which is all I want from a putter. The hit inlay looks rather nice, overall really fugly boomerang club, no discussion about it. They make their series with a more traditional look, but I didn't get the same feedback, not same inlay.
Putter: Never Compromise - GM2 3
Driver: Ping G10 10,5° / Aldila DVS 60 S
Hybrid: PP Select 5000 - 15° / True Temper Dynamic Gold x300
Irons: Titleist AP2 - 3-PW / True Temper Dynamic Gold x100
Wedges: Titleist spin milled oil - 52, 56, 62° / True Temper Dynamic Gold S300Ball: Titleist ProV1

Posted
I used to have a Nike Oz black for awhile, but I didn't know if I should golf with it, or wear it as a sneaker! The putter I have right now was really inexpensive and is the best putter I've ever had. Slotline has come out with their million series putters, and I really like them. Mine is a mallet nickel-plated. It is a beautiful putter, and lines up great at the ball.

Driver-Callaway FT-5 Draw 9.5"

3WD-Callaway Hawkeye 15*

Hybrid-Callaway FT 21*

Irons-Callaway Steelhead X-16 4-P

Wedges-Callaway Big Bertha Tour 52* 56* 60*

Putter-Odyssey White Hot #1


Posted
I shoot a Heavy Putter A2-M. I like being able to change the weights in the head to match green conditions, fast\slow. Its been kinda wet around here lately, so I have the heavy weights in for now.

Definately a different feeling, big and bad. Chased the odys. white hot 2 ball right outa my bag:)

Twas love at first putt.

Posted
I've been a traditionalist with putters (blade) my entire life and I just gave up my Mizuno TP Mills grain flow forged blade for a Ping i-Series Craz-E putter. I love the weight of it and although the thing looks much like the space craft you describe with your TM Monza the increased MOI as a result of the shape is definitely a stroke saver. You can hit the putt on the toe or heal and it will go towards your intended target line without loss of speed. There is so much momentum built up behind the heavy head it really does feel like it's doing all the work. All you're doing is lining it up. I had a few short lag putts that didn't reach the hole as a result of not knowing how to gage the momentum. But I think I have a handle now and I'm hoping it will help me sink a few more putts for me per round.

What's In my bag:

Driver: TaylorMade R5 Dual 9.5* UST Proforce V2 77g S
3Wood: Mizuno F-60 13.5* Mizuno Exsar 75S
Hybrid: Adams Idea Pro 3/4 Aldila VS Proto 80SIrons: Adams Pro Forged (5-PW) True Temper Black Gold SWedges: Cleveland 588 (3) 50, 588 (DSG) 54 & 60Putter: Ping i-Series Craz-EBalls:.....


Posted
I was going to comment on the TM Spider..lol It is a very futuristic looking putter and reminescent (sic) of the Cameron Futura. For me, it's just got too much going on. I prefer clean, looking, styles. But all that matters is that you can put a good roll on the rock.

Posted
I find the new putters being released to be too distracting to my eye... the only putter that has ever drawn me away from my scotty blade is a two ball my friend had where he customized his fill, this is before the fill was made available, and whatever he used made the putter just have this amazing feel and balance

maybe someday...

Daniel Duarte
905R UST Proforce V2 76g 44" S
904F 15, Graphite Design YS6+
MD Hybrid, 19 Degree, UST V2 Hybrid S
Pro M Gunmetal 5-PW, Nippon 1150GH Pro SVokey Oil Can 52 - RAWVokey Spin Milled Oil Can 56, 60 - RAWTEI3 Newport II - Torch Copper- Prov1x


Posted
I have tried a couple of new putters (the spider, and the yes! Tiffany) and really like them, but just when I am about to pull the trigger and buy one, I have a great putting round with my old ping blade putter and I decide to keep it. It is like a vicious cycle.
In the blue and tan grom Bag:

Driver r7 460 10.5*
Fairway Woods '07 Burner 15* and 18*
Irons 4-PW r7 XDWedges 47*, 52*, 58* CG14,Putter TiffanyBall One Tour D

Posted
I was using a Tour Edge mallet, which worked pretty well considering its cheapness, but I always wanted to move up to a nice blade since that's what Tiger and other really great putters use. I recently went out and got the Taylormade Rossa Classic Imola 8 -- just fell in love with the simplicity of the club and the 'click' of the ball when it comes off the face. Maybe one day I'll step up to a Scotty, but for now I'm perfectly content with my choice.

What's in my Datrek MSU Dawgs bag -

Driver - Predator Ti 9.5* Stiff
3 Wood - Predator Ti
5 Wood - Predator TiHybrids - 3DX DC Ironwood 18*/21*Irons - 3DX Red ComboWedges - 588 49*, Raw 56*Putter - Rossa Classic Imola 8Ball - Gamer


Posted
I personally use the Odyssey White Hot XG #9. I had my doubts about it but I finally realized that it's not the putter, it's the putter. In my opinion a putter that has good balance will perform well with someone who is good at putting. I would rather invest in a putting training device than a new "Cutting Edge" putter.
In my bag:
Driver: Tour Burner 10.5 re*ax
3 Wood:R5 XL
Irons:FP Irons 5-GW
Hybrids:Baffler DWS 3,4 Wedges:588 RTG DSG 56º, 60ºPutter:White Hot XG #9 34"Grips: Lamkin Crossline CordsBall: Pro V1x

Posted
I definitely agree that putters with new technology can be very beneficial for your game. But, just like in the blades vs. cavity back debate, I still think that less forgiving putters are better for me. I should train myself to make perfect contact and be punished if I don't. Ben Crenshaw never had a Taylormade Spyder or a high MOI putter. Ben Hogan didn't use cavity backs.

Posted
I recently bought a Mitchell Brass Cup Mallet. That thing's awesome. Made an immediate improvement in my game and my putting is still improving as I get more comfortable with it. I know there are a lot of traditionalists who refuse to use anything but a blade and, to each his own. I just figure this game's hard enough as it is. If there's technology out there that will help me play better I'm all for using it.

In the Bag:
Driver: Cleveland Launcher Ultralight XL 270

FW: Taylor Made 300 17 degree 
3-PW: Mizuno MX-23

AW: Mizuno TP-T11 52/07 (Bent to 50)
SW: Mizuno TP-T11 56/10

LW: Mizuno TP-T11 60/05

Putter: Original Ping Zing

Ball: Wilson Staff FG Tour


Posted
I had the Guerin Rife putter (s) but didn't like them over the long haul. I went to the Yes but had little feedback. I switched to a blade which has the feel/feedback that I wanted.

STR8 Dymo 10.5
Dymo 3W
Mid Rescue 3
MP-33 4-PW
Eidolon 52* GW LW, SW Titleist Bullseye Putter


Posted
I don't doubt that someday soon these new putters will be as common as the 460cc driver has become because they do provide an advantage, if not I'd throw mine in the trash. The engineering going into these putters is very impressive, with less restrictions on putters, this is an area where innovation is taking place rapidly.

Benefits of TM Rossa Monza Spider
1) Extemely smooth tracking, ball acts like it's on rails
2) Maintains tracking and line on off center strokes
3) Balance and weight of putter enables very fluid stroke
4) Alignment capability is second to none, they really did a number here

When functionality is so strong, form is accepted as a necessary part of functionality.

2009 Burner R
FT-I Fusion Squareway 3W 15* Fujikura Speeder Fit-On R
5W R7 R
FT Fusion Hybrids Draw 3/21*, 4/24*
G5 5-PW X-forged Vintage: 52.12, 56.14MDScotty Cameron: Newport 2 ProV1


Posted
depends on what you like but i think the stroke is more important then the club.
G5,9
F-50,13.5
MP33(2-9)
200,48.06
SM,54.11MP-T,60.05Anser 2

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
I assume the Yes! Nicky with C grooves constitutes "cutting edge", so I voted that I already have one. Nice, classic putter with good feel.

Driver: Cobra S2 9.5 Fubuki 73 Stiff | Wood: Titleist 909H 17 Aldila Voodoo Stiff | Irons: Titleist ZB 3-5, ZM 6-PW DG S300 | Wedges: Titleist Vokey SMTC 50.08, 54.11, 60.04 DG S200 | Putter: Scotty Cameron Fastback 1.5 33" | Ball: Titleist Pro V1x


Posted

Putting is all about confidence and consitency....whatever gives you that is "the best".

One of the things I love about the putting game is that there is no "right" or "wrong" method or style.

Played around in the store the other day with one of those Taylor Made putters like yours. The results were impressive.

Things have come a long way since the Bullseye putters!!!!!

909D Comp 9.5* (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-6)
Burner Superfast 3 & 5 woods (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-4.8)
G15 Hybrid 23* (AWT shaft)
G5 5 iron-PW-46*, UW-50*, SW-54 & LW-58 (AWT shaft)
Studio Select Newport 2 Mid SlantGrips: PING cords & Golf Pride New Decade Multi-Coumpound Bag: C-130...

Note: This thread is 6424 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6 ⬜🟨🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.