Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6495 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
What price range are you looking for? I have the Oakley Canteens, they are not dark at all and the ball is easy to see.

The Oakley brand has such nice sunglasses, check out their website. I recommend the "Gas Cans" or the "Canteens"
In My Bag

Driver: Sasquatch 460 9.5°
3 Wood: Laser 3 Wood 15°
5 Wood: r7 19° (Stiff)Irons: S58 Irons 4-PW Orange DotWedge: Harmonized 60°Wedge: Z TP 54°Putter: Tiffany 34"Balls: Pro V1 Shoes: Adidas Tour 360 IIThe Meadows Golf Coursewww.themeadowsgc.comAge: 16

Posted
Is there anything for <$50?
What I Play:

Driver: Sasquatch SUMO² 9.5º Stiff
Hybrid: HiBore 16º (3W replacement)
Irons: Staff Ci6 3-PW StiffWedges: Vokey Spin Milled 54.10 60.04Putter: Newport Studio Style 35"Ball: Pro V1xAge: 15

Posted
I am looking to spend no more than 175.00. Do they feel light? I will check those out.

I prefer the Canteens over the Gascans, they are really light. Half of the time when i put them on my hat I don't even realize they are there. They lenses are very light and have a nice blue colour to them. I got mine for $120 CAD

In My Bag

Driver: Sasquatch 460 9.5°
3 Wood: Laser 3 Wood 15°
5 Wood: r7 19° (Stiff)Irons: S58 Irons 4-PW Orange DotWedge: Harmonized 60°Wedge: Z TP 54°Putter: Tiffany 34"Balls: Pro V1 Shoes: Adidas Tour 360 IIThe Meadows Golf Coursewww.themeadowsgc.comAge: 16

Posted
I have Oakley Radar 'Pitch' and have 2 sets of lenses. The black iridium for when it is really bright and the G30 vented (a rose color) for more medium light. The G30 lenses really bring out blue and greens and are great for golf, bu they let in a fair amount of light (25%), so I use them more in fall and spring. The black Iridium only let in 10% of light, so I use them now. I got an excellent deal on them (under $200 for the frames and 2 sets of lenses from a local pro) as they are on The Golf Warehouse for $175 with only one set of lenses. Oakley charges around $90 the other lenses, so I got about a third off on them.

As for less expensive glasses, look at Bolle; they are very solid and not as much money as Oakley.

Ping G 410 10.5 ˚ Driver Ping Tour Stiff Shaft
Ping G 410 14.5˚ 3 Ping Tour Stiff Shaft
Ping G 410 19˚ Ping Tour Stiff Shaft
i 500 irons 4-UW 1/2 inch over, blue dot, NS Pro Modus 105 Stiff Shafts
Ping Stealth Wedges Wedges  54˚ 58˚

Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 34" 


Posted
I wear contacts...so getting wraps really do help to keep the wind out. I happen to like the Callaway brand personally. Just make sure you don't get the polarized lenses....as they will create some distortions. Oakleys....ok for me...just that they aren't golf specific.

As for the interchangable lenses...one prob....they get loose after about a year and the glasses aren't really usable after they get loose.

Spend some decent money on glasses...you have only one pair of eyes.

Posted
I haven't had any problem with the changing of lenses making them loose. Maybe on some brands, but the Oakley stay tight. Not like I'm popping them in and out on a regular basis either.

Ping G 410 10.5 ˚ Driver Ping Tour Stiff Shaft
Ping G 410 14.5˚ 3 Ping Tour Stiff Shaft
Ping G 410 19˚ Ping Tour Stiff Shaft
i 500 irons 4-UW 1/2 inch over, blue dot, NS Pro Modus 105 Stiff Shafts
Ping Stealth Wedges Wedges  54˚ 58˚

Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 34" 


Posted
I haven't had any problem with the changing of lenses making them loose. Maybe on some brands, but the Oakley stay tight. Not like I'm popping them in and out on a regular basis either.

I wear Oakley polarized Gascans. They are great for when it's really sunny. I've never noticed a problem seeing the ball or reading the greens with them on, but I've been wearing them for 3 years so I'm used to looking through them just about any time I'm outside.


Posted
I wear Smith Toaster Slider's, they're the most comfortable glasses I've ever owned. I've got 2 pair, one I've had for 7 years, the other for 4 years.

For golf, I put a set of their Ignitor lenses in, and they do help quite a bit.

http://www.smithoptics.com/Toaster_18_214.html


Another brand that makes golf specific eyewear is Tifosi

http://www.tifosioptics.com/golf/index.html

In my Sasquatch Tour Bag:

Driver - G10 10.5°: UST Pro Vorce V2 Shaft, Regular flex
Hybrid - G10 21° & 24°: TFC 129H, Stiff flex
Irons - S57 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, PW - Nippon 950GH stiff shaftsWedges - Tour 52°, 60° 56°Putter - 34" TracyBall - Treosoft


Posted
I haven't had any problem with the changing of lenses making them loose. Maybe on some brands, but the Oakley stay tight. Not like I'm popping them in and out on a regular basis either.

I think it depends on the climate. Maybe not up in the Pacific Northwest...but in year round warmer climates they tend to get loose with the heat. However...during the non-summer months...they would be snug.

I had Oakleys also...playing twilight golf (skipping out of the office early) where I would switch out lenses as it was very bright when I started and darker later in the day..and they got loose.
I wear Oakley polarized Gascans. They are great for when it's really sunny. I've never noticed a problem seeing the ball or reading the greens with them on, but I've been wearing them for 3 years so I'm used to looking through them just about any time I'm outside.

I wore my Serengeti polarized glass lensed sunglasses accidently one round. My thoughts were that the gradiated lenses altered my depth perception on the greens. Not much on the full shots...but on the greens I couldn't get the same reads on a course that I am very familar with....even though I know how the greens broke and where the green spines are. Maybe it took away the surface contrast.

Also...if you look at golf specific glasses...don't think many are polarized. Must be a reason. Any case...go with what works.

Posted
I have a pair of Sundog Focus shades. They dont so much make everything darker as much as it seems they just polarize everything while taking away some of the sunglare. Light patches of green seem like they turn yellow with those things. Ive worn them for an entire round and not even noticed they were on my face. I even putt with them on sometimes. Pretty cheap as well, I only paid $50 for mine.
THE WEAPONS CACHE..

Titleist 909 D2 9.5 Degree Driver| Titleist 906f4 13.5 degree 3-Wood | Titleist 909 17 & 21 degree hybrid | Titleist AP2 irons
Titleist Vokey Wedges - 52 & 58 | Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 Putter | ProV1 Ball

Posted
The Oakley lenses are made of the polarized material. Most other sunglasses are just dipped in it.
In My Bag

Driver: Sasquatch 460 9.5°
3 Wood: Laser 3 Wood 15°
5 Wood: r7 19° (Stiff)Irons: S58 Irons 4-PW Orange DotWedge: Harmonized 60°Wedge: Z TP 54°Putter: Tiffany 34"Balls: Pro V1 Shoes: Adidas Tour 360 IIThe Meadows Golf Coursewww.themeadowsgc.comAge: 16

Posted
The Oakley lenses are made of the polarized material. Most other sunglasses are just dipped in it.

I wouldnt say that "most" are just dipped in it. Many of the top sunglass makers use polaraized material.

Posted
I wouldnt say that "most" are just dipped in it. Many of the top sunglass makers use polaraized material.

Polarized lenses aren't dip...they have a physical filter to transverse waves


Posted
Look in

+1 on the Oakleys. Mine are similar to these: http://oakley.com/pd/4681 but certainly didn't cost what the website says. The key is the polarized lenes which block nearly 100% of the sun's UV light making it possible to keep your eyes wide open even on the nastiest of sun days. dave

The ultimate "old man" setup:

Ping G30 driver
Ping G Fairway woods - 5 and 7 woods
Callaway X-Hot #5 hybrid; Old school secret weapon
Ping G #6-9 irons; W and U wedges
Vokey 54 and 58* Wedges
Odyssey Versa Putter
Golf Balls

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 6495 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • StuM,  I have, in the past, added a left handed club. (Ususally a 7 iron) However, I usually take a stroke penalty and move the ball to where I want it.  I play for fun and in a pinch can use theback side if my club if I don't want the penalty stroke.    RetiredOldMan,  Terry 
    • So, Brendan Sorsby, Texas Tech transfer QB, was found guilty of sports betting by the NCAA. He admitted to it. He placed thousands of bets over multiple years while at Indiana and Cincinnati. This included betting on his own teams.  The NCAA rules ban athletes from betting on any sport (college or pro).  A retired visiting judge from Tarrant County, Texas has put an injunction on the NCAA ruling. He is a visiting judge because the first judge was a graduate and big fan of Texas Tech, and he recused himself. The judged ruled the following... "Under Curry's order, Sorsby is permitted to play for Texas Tech's 2026 season on the condition that he continues his treatment for a gambling and anxiety disorder and serves a two-game suspension (missing games against Abilene Christian and Oregon State)."  Don't get me wrong, I don't particularly care for the NCAA. That still doesn't mean that a college can choose when or where to say, "Yea we agree to these rules for all our sports, well except in this case." Here is a breakdown from S&W. The Hidden Weapon in Sorsby’s Injunction: How a Lubbock County Court Order Quietly Neutralized the NCAA’s Most Powerful Enforcement Tool - Law Offices of Snell & Wilmer By Ryan J. Regula On June 8, 2026, Lubbock County District Court Judge Ken Curry issued a temporary injunction in Brendan Sorsby v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, Cause No. DC-2026-CV-0791 (99th Judicial District... The main judgement made sense. Sorsby, I am going to have all this harm done to me if I don't get to play. The Judge, I agree. The penalty for gambling is too harsh, so here are all these things you must do, and I will grant this injunction against the NCAA. Basically, an analogy would be when a person goes into court for a DUI and they agree to all these other things to not end up in jail.  What sucks for the NCAA is the NCAA has appealed to Texas’ Seventh Court of Appeals, based in Amarillo. All four justices that preside over the court are graduates of Texas Tech University School of Law. It would be hilarious if all four of them had to recuse themselves 🤣. For those who like to read legal rulings...  
    • The chatter in my brain is when the distance is between clubs since I am pretty weak at shortened backswings, etc. I try to simply decide if being long or short is the better outcome and choose my club based on that and simply not even try for the “real” distance.  For me a full normal swing is what I strive for.
    • I saw this comment made in a golf article... "Most golfers stand over a 4- or 5-iron still negotiating with themselves. They think about how hard to swing, whether they have the right club, if they have the aim correct and more. It’s a lot to deal with and long irons punish the “half-in” golf swing." I am not sure the "most golfers" is correct regarding the bolded part. I can understand if there is a bunker, water, and/or OB that a lot of golfers would be fixated on that. I am not sure that leads to ending up more times there. Pending your level in golf, the variance is so large in outcomes, it could be just with in the expected outcomes. I can understand if have a big lake on the right side of the hole being one of the most terrifying shots for right-handed amateur golfers.  I am not sure many golfers are standing over the ball talking to themselves, "Ok, maybe I should step back and pull the 4-iron. Am I lined up right? Oh, the wind came up, should I swing harder? What am I going to have for dinner tonight, maybe steak. (Joking, somewhat 😛)" A question is that how much chatter do you get while standing over the ball. Are you questioning the everything about your golf shot?   
    • Wordle 1,816 5/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.