Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6541 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I don't keep an official USGA handicap, instead I use software to calculate it. I'm sure there are some of you out there that also do this.

Recently I started using a website that tracks all my statistics and also calculates handicap. It uses 2 digits after the zero, whereas the other program I have must round to the nearest tenth (I'm not certain, I only know the output is to the nearest tenth).

With identical scores, ratings, and slopes entered, the difference between these two is significant. Currently, the program calculates a 19.8, while the website calculates a 20.48.

Does anyone know what level of precision the USGA uses to calculate handicaps?

--------------------------
"There are only 3 kinds of people in this world -- Those who can count, and those who can't."


Posted
Just had this conversation with someone.

USGA rounds DOWN to the lowest tenth.

So if your handicap index is calculated to a 20.48. You are a 20.4.

Perfect example is my USGA handicap, if I take my best 10 score differentials, add them all up, multiply by .96 and then divide by 10, it comes out to 12.9984. But I am still a 12.9, not a 13.0.

Still doesn't explain the more than 1/2 stroke difference in your numbers though. Could be how they calculate the differentials from par for each round. One program may round and the other may not.

USGA uses normal rounding. If you play a round and your differential from par is 13.78, they round to 13.8. If it was 13.72 for example, they'd round to 13.7.

Posted
Just had this conversation with someone.

Good info. I think you have hit it on the head. The website calculates each differential, keeping two decimal places. I think the other software rounds each differential. The cumulative difference equates to a half-point.

This happens to be a very important half-point for me, because the break point for the ESC rule is 20!

--------------------------
"There are only 3 kinds of people in this world -- Those who can count, and those who can't."


Posted
Good info. I think you have hit it on the head. The website calculates each differential, keeping two decimal places. I think the other software rounds each differential. The cumulative difference equates to a half-point.

Yup, every little bit matters!! For ESC and also for calculating course handicaps.


Posted

$2 Nassau is spot on. If you want to know how to calculate your own handicap, be sure to visit the USGA's page. It breaks it down:

http://www.usga.org/playing/handicap...n_10.html#10-1

Enjoy!

underparnv

That's how I like my golf. A kick in the face. -Ben

Driver: 983E 8.5* w/ stock stiff flex shaftIrons: MP60 - 2 through 9 irons (swap out the 2 iron for my three wood at some courses)Wedges: 588 Chrome - 47* Pitching Wedge, 53* Gap Wedge, 56* Sand Wedge MP-T Black Ni - 60* Lob WedgePutter:.....

Posted
This happens to be a very important half-point for me, because the break point for the ESC rule is 20!

You do know that you use your *course* handicap for the ESC rule, not your raw handicap, right? Your course handicap could be much greater than or much less than 20, depending on that course's slope.

Bill


Posted
You do know that you use your *course* handicap for the ESC rule, not your raw handicap, right? Your course handicap could be much greater than or much less than 20, depending on that course's slope.

Good point. I usually don't take the time to calculate course handicaps. When I bet with friends, we negotiate strokes, and up until now it hasn't mattered much since my course handicap is almost always a little higher than my straight handicap for the courses I play.

But I'll have to start doing that. What is the easiest way?

--------------------------
"There are only 3 kinds of people in this world -- Those who can count, and those who can't."


  • Administrator
Posted
But I'll have to start doing that. What is the easiest way?

Handicap Index * (slope rating / 113)

Round up or down to the nearest full stroke.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
If you don't want to do the math, most courses have a two columned chart available in the pro shop or locker room that lists the course handicap for every index.

Posted
The USGAdoes not "round" down, they simply drop everything after the tenths when determining your index. Each individual score differential is rounded normally to the tenths digit.

in my grom stand bag:

Driver: HiBore 9.5* fujikura stiff
3w: HiBore 15* fujikura stiff
2i hybrid: HiBore fujikura stiff3-sw: MP-57 +1/2 2* up stiff steelPutter: 2ball SRT 36"GPS: SG3 Sky caddieCart:Clicgear 2.0Home Course: Lake Spanaway http://www.lakespanawaygc.com


Posted
The USGAdoes not "round" down, they simply drop everything after the tenths...

Well technically, that's what "rounding down" is.

Otherwise though, you're correct: Normal rounding for differentials, rounding down for the index.

Bill


Posted
Well technically, that's what "rounding down" is.

I knew someone would say that....

in my grom stand bag:

Driver: HiBore 9.5* fujikura stiff
3w: HiBore 15* fujikura stiff
2i hybrid: HiBore fujikura stiff3-sw: MP-57 +1/2 2* up stiff steelPutter: 2ball SRT 36"GPS: SG3 Sky caddieCart:Clicgear 2.0Home Course: Lake Spanaway http://www.lakespanawaygc.com


Note: This thread is 6541 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Thank you.  I'll cross it off the list since it isn't going to achieve what I want. 
    • While it does turn out that both Tiger and Phil are less squeaky clean than I previously believed, I don't think golf quite has the worst in professional sports.  Or maybe they're better at image management.   Obviously I'm not fond of Phil's issue we're discussing in this thread (or his involvement with LIV) or Tiger's choices of how to drive.  I used to really like Dustin Johnson and, even before the LIV situation, we started to hear rumors that he bought more snow than Seward, although I don't think those stories were ever substantiated.  Meanwhile, I did think of Anthony Kim as the "good, bad boy" of the tour for a while fifteen years ago because of his party persona -- and if it turns out the worst he did was show up hung over to play (barring what one thinks of LIV), that's pretty good.  And I'm still happy he found a way to get his life clean. If we contrast that with some other sports I enjoy, I'm sure we could find a nice long list of NFL players that, at one point in my life, I was quite fond of, we get far worse disappointments (to put it mildly).
    • Answering that properly would land me in hot water, so I'm not going to. I don't think that many people would do that. I think that in certain circumstances many people would be willing to overlook someone doing that. But I was really referring to what I assumed was Tiger's transgressions (cheating on his wife) not Phil's.
    • No! Is a large part of the human population selfish, apathetic and cuts corners in the name of self-preservation 'more than they would like to admit', yes. Degenerate, scum, etc?.. no!! Most humans/men would not grope a woman like Phil is accused of doing (I think he absolutely did). That is scum. I mean what % of men do you think would do that? Seriously?? 
    • I don't think that is true at all. That is off-topic here, I think. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.