Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 7488 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Would anyone seriously try Radargolf's stuff? I should say, any serious golfer?

They have a nice looking web site, but the product just doesn't seem to fly with me. That is unless they embed their microchip in a Pro-V1x. Then I might consider it. Switching balls is too drastic of a change to me. But there might be others that would consider it and I shouldn't dismiss it so quickly.

Fairways and Greens.

Dave
 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
Would anyone seriously try

Yeah, uhh, no. I think that their long-term business plan

has to include trying to lobby Titleist, etc. to include their chips in the golf balls, but then again that cuts off their stream of revenue. This is one of those things that seriously make me wonder what the heck these people are thinking. I can't see this as a valid business. Titleist (et al) like selling balls to people who lose them, people probably don't want to pay $10 for a radar-chipped Pro V1x they may dunk in the water anyway (or lose in a canyon, or really deep in the woods, or scuff off a cartpath, etc.), and Titleist probably doesn't want to pay to change the assembly line system to incorporate a little microchip. Just dumb.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I agree with Erik, that with significant cost attached it won't fly... however - I'd buy it if I had the money to throw away. How many times you hit the ball just off the fairway, that should be "right here!"... and never find it. I think that's great idea. Remember - nobody was able to afford (or didn't think it's feasible to get it) a computer just 10 - 20 years ago.... Maybe they're just a bit ahead of their prime.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I interviewed the CEO of Radargolf for my blog a while back: http://www.hookedongolfblog.com/?p=202 Their thoughts about where it can go are primarily with a company who doesn't have a huge market share of the golf ball world. They know that Titleist would never do it, but they theorize that someone like Nike might. Nike has a tiny market share and could use the buzz or publicity or whatever you want to call it to help try and increase their market share.

Posted
I'm really surprised, that USGA stiffs are ok with it (according to radargolf.com they're "approved"). The "Lost Ball" is a siginificant part of the game and scoring - this device will virtually eliminate it?
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I don't think they are approved but maybe that has changed. Originally they'd hoped that with the implementation of GPS approval they'd be another couple years away from approval...

Note: This thread is 7488 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Oh man. As you can see above, Manavian mocked me for not realizing they were getting the 130° from BOTH shoulders. Apparently, though, Manavian is also wrong, as Andy said I was lying when I cited what Manavian had written: The next thing Andy says that's both accurate and clearly stated will be the first. I replied to that post with something like: Tell Manavian who said "only counting the abduction/adduction of one shoulder rather than 2." One of the issues with “bad” information is that y’all can’t even get on the same page. You've not shown that Bryson has 130° range of motion in either shoulder separately P1 to P7. I’ve shown the numbers. You’ve name-called and just said “nuh uh” repeatedly. Did you see the AMG IG video? Of course you have. Wrapping your head around the distance the shoulder travels yet, Andy? Andy later commented to explain how he got his range of motion number (apologies to whoever @iacac and @icaca are on Instagram, who are going to be wondering just what in the hell they've gotten themselves into). Oh boy. Adding the numbers in one direction and then adding them again going back is not a "range" of motion. If I can bend my knees 140°, I don't claim to have 280° range of motion because I have two knees nor because I can also extend my knees 140° after bending them. Bryson (with a driver, again — I used his iron swing) abducts about 65° (and bends his elbow a ton) with the driver. Then he adducts 50… and then another 15°… to end up right back where he started. This is exactly the equivalent of saying that I bend my knees 140° and then straighten them, creating a range of 280°. It's so silly I don't even have much of a response. It falls down completely on its own. It doesn't need even a nudge.
    • Can't remember who but some wise guy said "Arms up, body around"..😉. Anywho, been working on pinning my lead arm less and less to my chest in the BS. Decent progress with the arms, need a lot of work and trust for the 'body around' part. 
    • Wordle 1,823 6/6 ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟩 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟩⬜🟩 🟩⬜🟩⬜🟩 🟩⬜🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,823 5/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜🟩 ⬜⬜🟩⬜🟩 ⬜⬜🟩⬜🟩 ⬜⬜🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,823 4/6* ⬛🟨⬛⬛🟩 ⬛⬛🟩⬛🟩 ⬛⬛🟩⬛🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.