Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6337 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Smash factor is a ratio of clubhead speed to ball speed.

You can swing 200 mph and have a huge smash factor but if you come over the top and don't have the proper launch conditions and angle of attack into the ball you still aren't gonna hit the ball very far. The speed the ball the ball leaves the clubface means jack if it is not launched properly and your angle of attack isn't correct because you'll just hit a 80 yard slice with a smash factor of 1.5 and what good is that.


  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
You can swing 200 mph and have a huge smash factor but if you come over the top and don't have the proper launch conditions and angle of attack into the ball you still aren't gonna hit the ball very far. The speed the ball the ball leaves the clubface means jack if it is not launched properly and your angle of attack isn't correct because you'll just hit a 80 yard slice with a smash factor of 1.5 and what good is that.

Make your mind up. In the previous post you said;
I've heard of smash factor but I'm guessing that measures the amount of force applied to the ball.

All I have done is explained smash factor, and said surely ball speed is more important than swingspeed. Now you are telling me swing speed is not important.

I never questioned launch angle, spin rate and angle of attack. All I asked, and am still asking is how can the speed the club travels at impact be better than the speed the ball travels at impact in calculating the distance travelled by the ball? However say you do have a 200mph swing with a smash factor of 1.5, the ball will go amazingly far. However this far may be in the wrong direction, or far up in the air depending on the other factors.

Posted
Smash factor is a direct product of swingspeed so they are one in the same unless there is some special club out there that magically increases your ball speed with a lesser swingspeed. The ball can only travel off the face of the club in direct proportion to the speed in which it is swung so yes, in that regard swingspeed is more important than smash factor unless you are talking about balls which are not stuck on the sweetspot because then there is a loss of distance with a given swingspeed. I didn't say that swingspeed wasn't important at all because swingspeed is what creates smash factor and not vice versa.

Posted
Smash factor is a direct product of swingspeed so they are one in the same unless there is some special club out there that magically increases your ball speed with a lesser swingspeed.

I think you are not fully understanding my statement, and so you have missed the point I am getting at.

Although the ball speed is related to the swingspeed, the ball speed is actually faster, due to the compression and expansion of the golf ball onto and off of the golf club. Take this example two golfers both swing at 100mph. One of them has a ball speed of 140mph, the other 150mph. As they have the same swingspeed will they both hit the ball the same distance?

Posted
I just had a launch monitor session and the results were that my swing speed was 107 mph on average and ball speed was 148. My factor is 1.38.

So is it the ball? The clubface? Mishit?

Well I ruled out mishit because I put impact tape on the face and hit 5 and they were mid to upper on clubface. Impact tape was not left on during the testing session on the launch monitor. I was satisfied.


So now I am wondering why I cannot get that extra juice of ball speed.

BTW, my average driver yardage is about 270-275 carry.

Nike SQ 9.5 w/ ProLaunch Red
Titliest 906F2 15
Miura 202 3-5 Irons
Miura Blade 6-PW Irons
Mizuno MP 51 & 56Yes! Tracy IINike One Black


Posted

From the Titleist website News: Tradition and Technology, Myths About Golf Equipment And Performance.

5. Most of the PGA Tour professionals swing at 120 mph or more. False. The average swing speed on the PGA Tour is approximately 113 mph. There are some who swing at or higher than 120 mph, but they are clearly in the minority. ... 7. The average distance for 5-irons on Tour is more than 200 yards. False. The PGA Tour Shotlink system, which records virtually all shots throughout the season, shows that the average 5-iron shot from fairway to green is approximately 185 yards. From the tee on par threes, the average 5-iron distance is about 197 yards

Personally I would start with these numbers as a reference, with leaves me ~10 mph and 10-15 yards short respectively.

Mike


Titleist 905T 10.5°, 5W Golfsmith SuperSteel 17°, 4W MacGregor Tourney laminate 21°, 3-P MacGregor Colokrom M85 reissue, Snake Eyes 54° and 58° wedge, Odyssey Dual Force 330 blade

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 6337 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • It sucks to carry around a lot of water, but ideally it should be way more than we think.  I buy those gallon jugs of water and hang them from my pushcart when I walk. I agree with the electrolytes as well. You don't just sweat out water, but you lose electrolytes as well. 
    • A 2010 study from the Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research compares the effects of different pre-round stretch routines for competitive golfers. Active Dynamic Warm-up: Swing Medicus driver, hit 3 shots each with selected clubs. Passive Static Stretches: Various athletic stretches such as hamstrings, chest stretch and reverse trunk twist. The subjects were collegiate golfers with a HDCP index of 5 or less who engaged regularly in strength and fitness routines. All golfers had two test days: one with active dynamic (AD) warmup, a second with AD followed by static stretches (SS). The results were then compared, within golfers and across golfers. For performance testing after the warmups, golfers hit three driver shots at time 0, 15, 30 and 45 minutes after the warmup. The study shows that static stretch formats produced poorer performance outcomes in the four measures shown in Table 5, which shows Time Zero results. The performance deficits under the PSS protocol decreased over time. Some suggestions on why the passive protocol was tied to lower performance than the active protocol: The passive stretches routine induced excessive range of motion,  basically producing wobbles in the golf swing. Other research indicates that the stretching produced slack in the tendons, lessening the amount of muscle force that could be transferred into the shot. One caveat: The study had good scientific controls and balancing of treatments (test routines). This was, however, an exploratory study and raises as many questions as it answers. Also, although the study was done back in 2010, it is still cited as a primary work in recent reviews. A quick online search did not reveal any follow-ups on the study. For those interested, the study PDF is below. PassiveStretchGOLF.pdf  
    • I have trouble with vertigo on occasion, but have gotten nutritional and biofeedback tips to keep it at bay. Dehydration can help trigger v-like symptoms so one recommendation, along with maintaining overall hydration, is to start with 8 oz. of water early in the morning. A meta-analysis on Golf As Physical Activity indicated that golf is rated as a moderately intensive physical activity. This scientific literature review came from the University of Edinburgh. The physical activity level ties into hydration. A former university colleague was a marathon runner who had published a couple of articles on endurance training. He likewise said that golf was a moderate physical activity especially when the round stretched past  the two-hour mark. For hydration he recommended switching from water to electrolyte drink on the back nine (past two hour point of exercise) to prevent cramping. At the two-hour point of moderate activity, water starts flushing electrolytes out of the body, which can lead to fatigue and cramping. (I have had trouble with leg cramps in the past during exertion.) During a round, I start out with water on the front nine and switch to sports drink on the back nine. If the day is unusually hot, I may drink 8 oz. of Pedialite concentrate before going to the course. Maintaining overall hydration plus on-course boosters keeps me going.
    • Personally I’d try booking direct first - either via the Vidanta golf reservations number/email or through the resort concierge - especially for Christmas/New Year. Vidanta’s main courses (Greg Norman and Nicklaus designs) are popular and can book out fast this time of year, so direct often gives you the best shot at your preferred tee times.
    • Wordle 1,677 5/6* ⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟩🟩 🟩⬜⬜🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.