Jump to content
Note: This thread is 4982 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Thought this would make a really good topic for discussion. My golf instructor really favors an open stance to the ball, with all clubs, loaded into the left side. The downswing is initiated with breaking the knees towards the target and then just turning to the finish. The club just drops to the ball. It reminds me so much of Lee Trevino's swing it's crazy. Best of all, I am starting to hit shots so solid, with little effort, I can hardly believe it.

What is everyone's opinion of Lee's swing and the open stance setup? I noticed looking at youtube videos that even Tiger sets up with an open stance, left foot flared and back about 2 inches from the line. Hogan did the same. I am wondering if it wasn't just for conjuring a fade, but to promote overall great ball contact.

I read a very interesting article a while back talking about how it was a shame that what Lee Trevino discovered in his swing, more amateurs don't use. Lee's swing could actually be very easy for the amateur, because it promotes body movement, and not a really high degree of athleticism. I'll see if I can find the article. In the meantime, thoughts anyone?
Favorite Practice Course:
Z Boaz Municipal, Fort Worth <<< Ben Hogan grew up playing here!
--------------------------------------------------

In the bag: 983E 9.5*, Fuji Speeder S RPM LP, 4W, Neutral Bias STAFF Ci6 irons, S (going up for sale soon) Tom Watson PVD 08 Wedges (G.S,L)... and a 4...

I think it's a good method, for sure! Especially if you're swinging back outside & closed as Trevino stated. I guess his knees sliding forward pulled his club back to the inside slot where he could rotate through.

I'm wondering if he flared the left foot to help get his knees & hips rotated out of the way with his knee slide maneuver. I thought Hogan flared his foot to across the ball in order combat his hook as well.


I noticed looking at youtube videos that even Tiger sets up with an open stance, left foot flared and back about 2 inches from the line. Hogan did the same.

If you go by his book, Hogan used an open stance for the shorter clubs, but a closed stance for the longer clubs. But yes, he flared his left foot.


I flare my left foot, but just realized I setup with a closed stance. This was pointed out at a local pro shop. the guy then predicted I would hit low and a little left. He was right, but I'm not sure how he knew. I have to aim right about 10-15 yards with my irons and wedges and pull the ball back to the target. Maybe I should look into the open stance and Trevino style. I know I play with a closed face, flat swing and laidoff backswing position. And I take a fair divot with everything up to the 7 iron.

(Thanks, that was a thoroughly enjoyable clip. What a character, very likeable guy.)

But wow, his feet and legs are very active. I'm trying to reduce the variables. However the flare of the front foot makes it easier to rotate for me.

........................................
McGolf-Doggie's stand bag & new and used club emporium:
Putter :ping: 1/2Craz-e | Irons :TaylorMade: RAC MB, 4i-PW (DG S300) |Wedges :Cleveland: SW&LW 56*DSG+RTG; 60*/4* DSG+RTG |Woods :Cobra: S1 5W; Adams TIght Lies 3W |Driver :TaylorMade: Burner 9.5 Fujikura Reax S | Maxfli Practice


many people play with open stances because it is easier to rotate the hips through impact. a pro suggested i do it, but when i tried it a hit consistant slices... this might be because of my flat semi-swing though. works for some people, but not for others... best try everything and see what works for you, just like putting.

I am not sure but I think that Lee Trevino's right foot was parallel to his open left foot so that both feet we pointing toward the green.

Taylormade Driver HT
Taylormade 3 HT

Mcgregor 7w
Vulcan irons 5-P
Solus 53 61

Vokey 56

Scotty Caneron Flange/ Ping Cushin

Srixon ZStar

71 gold tees

bring cash


If you go by his book, Hogan used an open stance for the shorter clubs, but a closed stance for the longer clubs. But yes, he flared his left foot.

You are right, in both cases. In my opinion, based on results with golf students, Hogan has a swing worth copying. Trevino's was effective for him, but is NOT worth imitating. I watched him play 18 holes in an exhibition in Old Forge, NY, in 1972, and observed him close up. As we all know, he had very noticeable lower body action in order to get his hands "in the slot" on the downswing. If a player has a good backswing, there is no need for such an exaggerated action to get into good position at impact.

BUT let me tell you this-----I may tell people "Do NOT copy Lee's swing", but he was a great ball striker, and his record attests to that.

Mitch Pezdek------Dash Aficionado and Legend in My Own Mind


^Pez is correct in my view. Trevino is to be admired for hard work enabling him to repeat his moves at will, but there are just too many of them to try to start the learning process with. The flared lead foot serves to ease hip clearing and is employed by near all top strikers.

  • 2 years later...

just wondering if people have formulated these post with or without knowledge of how trevino himself described in his own words (with the help of an editor and illustrator) in one of his books? This book which I speak of is a masterpiece. Has anyone read it?


I do this when I hit finesse shots into greens. I flush it almost every time and can hit the little baby cut I prefer into a tight pin. The only bad thing is that, once in a while, I'll hit one dead on the line I'm lined up 'open' towards.

Current Gear Setup: Driver: TM R9 460, 9.5, Stiff - 3W: TM R9, 15, stiff - Hybrid: Adams Idea Pro Black, 18, stiff - Irons: Callaway X Forged 09, 3-PW, PX 5.5 - SW: Callaway X Series Jaws, 54.14 - LW: Callaway X Series Jaws, 60.12 - Putter: PING Redwood Anser, 33in.


Give it a try at the range and mess with several variables to see what it does for you.  I'm one of those people that if stuff isn't working, I'll tweak it in a heartbeat (nothing extreme).  I had been using a closed stance for everythnig for a long time and gradually kept hitting on the toe, to the point I was ligning the ball up in the heel of the club.  I switched to a slightly open stance (I mean ever so slightly opened) and bam, center strikes and I was clearing my left hip out so nicely.  I was pulling my shots left, so I had to manipulate my aim point a tad, but it worked out nicely.

The most difficult distance in golf is the six inches between your ears.



I do it on my shorter clubs, I don't on the longer clubs because if I do I tend to double cross and hit a big hook. Might be a balance issue. I did start doing it because I have a bad left hip and it seems to help.

Originally Posted by pshizz

many people play with open stances because it is easier to rotate the hips through impact. a pro suggested i do it, but when i tried it a hit consistant slices... this might be because of my flat semi-swing though. works for some people, but not for others... best try everything and see what works for you, just like putting.



1W Cleveland LauncherComp 10.5, 3W Touredge Exotics 15 deg.,FY Wilson 19.5 degree
4 and 5H, 6I-GW Callaway Razr, SW, LW Cleveland Cg-14, Putter Taylor Made Suzuka, Ball, Srixon XV Yellow



Quote:

just wondering if people have formulated these post with or without knowledge of how trevino himself described in his own words (with the help of an editor and illustrator) in one of his books? This book which I speak of is a masterpiece. Has anyone read it?


Yes. I got a copy recently and have gone through it several times. There are just a few new things you to have to put into your swing. It's not that hard. I'm trying it out just for fun. When I get them right, I hit balls that are wicked straight.

The open setup makes ball position and aim problematic, and he doesn't address these well or at all in the book.

Also, he says in the book he stands open 30-40 degrees. That makes you pull your left foot back a LOT more than 2 inches. It's more like 10. I'm not copying that.

As for my bad back comment above, if someone were to hit many thousands of golf balls with this swing, I still think so, but so far I haven't felt anything and my back is quite sensitive to that stuff.


Note: This thread is 4982 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 307 - Mirror swings, focusing on rotation. That seems to take pressure off my lead hip. 
    • With a lot of help from @iacas, I was able to take a great trip down to Pinehurst this past week. Took advantage of having a day off because of Veteran's Day and spent 4 days in the Pinehurst area. @iacas, @Hardspoon, @GolfLug, and @NCGolfer joined me for at least 1 round on the trip. I got in 2 courses in Pinehurst proper - Southern Pines and Pine Needles - and then the Duke golf course in Durham and Tobacco Road. All of the courses were new to me, and I really liked all of them. I am going to add more to this later when I have some time, but I wanted to post a quick recap/thoughts for each course. Duke Golf Club I really enjoyed this course. It's a big ballpark that goes up and down a couple of hills. The front 9 starts off going straight downhill, with 1 and 2 being similar dogleg left, downhill par 4s. You make your way to the bottom of the hill with a par 3 that plays over a lake, and then you creep up slowly. The best hole on the front is the 7, the first par 5. It's a dogleg right goes downhill to a small green protected by a creek and bunkers. If you can get your ball to the fairway, you should have a chance at going for the green in 2. That shot was probably the most memorable one I had on this course. You then crest the hill again with the tee shot on 9, which is a par 5 that goes down the hill and then the green is back on top of the hill by the clubhouse.  The back only goes up and down the hill once, so it's slightly more tame than the front. I really liked 11, which is another par 5. The tee shot plays down the hill, and if you hit a good one, you could have a mid iron into your hand with your second shot. The green is huge, but protected by a creek that runs in front of it. The closing stretch of holes are pretty good. 16 is a short par 4 playing straight up hill. Distance control with a wedge is really important. 17 is slightly uphill, but the trick is navigating the uneven lies in the fairway. 18 is fairly straightforward but a stout par 4 to end the round. The only negative is that there were a lot of holes with forced carries to the green. 4, 7, 11, 12, and 13 all had ponds or creeks fronting the green. Most of those required hefty carries.  Bottom line, I liked the course and the setting. I would be happy to play here regularly. Pine Needles I loved this course. The setting reminded me a lot of #2, and it feels like a mini #2 with a lot of small, turtleback-type greens. The opening 5 holes were outstanding. 1 was a really cool par 5 that was no gimme. The green was pretty wild. 2 was a long, downhill par 4. 3 was one of my favorite par 3s that we played - over a lake with bunkers framing the green. 4 was a short uphill par 4 that I really liked. 5 was an excellent but tough par 3, sitting on a shelf well above the tee. It's a great opening stretch. And again, the feel and look of the place is unique to the Pinehurst area. It feels like something you wouldn't find anywhere else. Other highlights - the green site on 9 was really cool. There is a big run off area to the right of the green that you want to avoid. It reminded me a bit of the second hole at Sand Valley - you don't want to be right of that green either. 12 was a great hole. You can't see the green from the tee, as the tee shot plays over a hill. When you see the green, it looks tiny, with a huge runoff and bunkers to the left of the green. The fairway is pretty wide, so the trick is accuracy with your approach shot. 18 was an extremely cool finishing hole. You can't really see the fairway off the tee, but it turns out to be fairly generous when you get there. And then the green site is fantastic - sitting at the bottom of the hill, but still requiring precision to be on it. I really want to get back and play this course again. There are a few shots that I want to try again (the drive on 10, the approach on 12, the drive on 18). And I just really loved the look and feel of the place. A great course and a fun day of golf. Southern Pines I thought this was the best course of the 4 I played. It's wider than Pine Needles, and the greens are bigger. But the greens are much more undulating. The land here is truly excellent. There is a ton of land movement, and seemingly every hole has elevation changes you have to navigate. I really like both par 5s on the front. If you hit good drives on both, you will get a big kick down the fairway. If you don't, you're going to be faced with a long 2nd shot just to have a wedge in. 2 plays down the hill with the tee shot and then back up the hill with the approach. You have to be careful about club selection and distance control there. 7 was a good, fairly long par 3 with a green perched on a ledge. 11 was a driveable par 4 with a wild green. 15 was really cool as well - the tee shot is downhill, but then the green is back uphill. This is a course I would love to play everyday. It's a thinking man's course, because you have to be really careful with all the elevations changes there. You constantly have to play and commit to a club longer or shorter than the distance. And I don't really think there are any bad holes. Only negative is that a few holes are a bit repetitive - 4, 16, and 18 are all shorter par 4s where you're hitting an uphill approach wedge or short iron. This is a very minor nit, though. One of the best courses I've played. I'd have to think about where exactly to rank it, but easily within the top 10. Possibly cracking the top 5. I will play this again next time I'm in Pinehurst. Tobacco Road I had a blast at this course. It is unique and pretty wild. You start out with these massive dune-like hills pinching in on your tee shot on 1. And then the entire round feels like you're going around these massive dunes. There are a lot of interesting shots here. You have long carries over bunkers, blind tee shots, shots into tiny greens, shots into huge greens, carries over deep bunkers, downhill shots, uphill shots, you name it. The setting is incredible. It is a huge course, and the fairways and greens tend to be very generous. I want to write more about individual holes later. But I really liked 7, 9, 10, and 16. I want to play a couple of the par 3s again with different hole locations and/or different tee boxes. 6 and 17, in particular, could play like wildly different holes with a different hole location (for 17) or coming from a different tee box (for 6).  While I had a lot of fun seeing this course, I do feel like a smart golfer could get bored here. To me, it was fairly obvious that Strantz was trying to bait you into trying a bunch of hard shots. On 11, for example, if you hit a good drive to the right side of the fairway, you could have a shot at the green in 2. But the green is over a massive bunker that has to be 40 feet below the green. And the green is narrow, essentially facing perpendicular to you. The only chance you really have is to hit a perfect shot. The alternative is an easy lay up to a wide fairway, leaving you with a wedge at the perfect angle. Maybe I try going for it with a 7 iron or something shorter, but that's about it. I felt similar on 5 - the direct line to the green is not that far and the green is driveable, But if you miss, you're going to have a 40ish yard bunker shot or a lost ball. Meanwhile, if you play to the right, you have a massive fairway and you'll likely be left with a wedge in your hand. I think it would be fun to play with 2 balls on some of these holes and try the shots. If you are a LSW disciple, though, you are not going to try the crazy risky shots Strantz is trying to bait you into. In the end, I really enjoyed this course. But I think it's below PN or SP. It's still awesome, and it was fun to see and play. I would come back here, but it's a lower priority than other Pinehurst courses. Well, that ended up being longer than I was anticipating. I may add some more thoughts about specific holes later, but this is a good starting point. I do want to think more about course ratings out of 10 for these, too. More to come...
    • Day 123: did a stack session.
    • Day 48 - 2024-11-17 A little work before Junior Elite. Left thumb and the compensating left wrist are better; still not great.
    • I watched a re-release of The Fifth Element.  I am going to give this movie a tap in Eagle. It's a wells shot movie. The actors are great. The story is interesting, and the setting is fascinating. For it being just over 2 hours, the pacing is phenomenal. I really enjoyed watching this sci-fi classic. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...