Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6181 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
On every shot, imagine that there is a water hazard just in front of your ball. The size of the hazard is such that you can carry it if you hit the ball only half as far as you expect to. Now, do you swing hard, risking putting the ball in the water, or do you:

Concentrate on technique, perfect timing, and precise contact. Get those three correct and you will clear the water hazard. Don’t even think about the rest of the distance. It will take care of itself.

Posted
I like this picture. What you are saying is a balanced swing with solid contact is the most important thing. That about says it all with every shot in golf.

I always feel pretty dumb when I try a hero shot and come up short, or miss-hit the shot entirely -- especially when the numbers on the score card say nothing about how many hero shots you hit that day. Well, maybe it does say something about how many overswings you tried that day.

RC

 


Posted
In the last few months, I've gotten to the place where i understand what you describe. That feeling of effortless power is glorious. However, some days I have it on the first swing, and some days I can't seem to find it. I know by my ball flight that I'm swinging too fast and jerking my arms ahead of my body, but I can't seem to find the right feel. Then when I find it, it seems so easy that I wonder how I could have lost it. If anyone remembers having this problem, when learning to play, I'm interested in how you got your tempo back. Thanks.

Posted
In the last few months, I've gotten to the place where i understand what you describe. That feeling of effortless power is glorious. However, some days I have it on the first swing, and some days I can't seem to find it. I know by my ball flight that I'm swinging too fast and jerking my arms ahead of my body, but I can't seem to find the right feel. Then when I find it, it seems so easy that I wonder how I could have lost it. If anyone remembers having this problem, when learning to play, I'm interested in how you got your tempo back. Thanks.

Whenever i lose it and i'm on the range, I will go back to my wedges to work on my partial swings and that usually does the trick...

Taylormade R9 TP 9.5*w/ Diamana Kai'li 70 S (SST PURE)
Callaway FT 3 Wood
Adams Pro Black Hybrid 20* w/ Voodoo NV8 S
MP-68 3-PW irons w/ KBS Tour X-flex (softstepped 1x)
Cleveland CG-12 52.10Cleveland CG-15 DSG 56.08 Vokey Limited Edition 60-V w/ KBS black nickel S-FlexCircle T Beached Center Shaft...

Posted
At the range yesterday I had the same experience. I hit a partial wedge (80yds) and it DID get to the target no problem, but I said to myself after the shot: "That seemed like way too much effort to get that result" I felt like I rushed the shot and I put a lot of power into the downswing just to get it 80yds.

I then took another shot at the same target. I made sure to focus on my tempo and lengthened the swing just a tad. I watched as the ball landed on the same spot, but I had this feeling of "boy that was easy". It was like slow motion, but there was more power. Awesome feeling.

I really want to try and bring this process to the rest of my clubs. Especially the driver!!

Posted

Camillo overswings every time and things seem to be working out OK for him...

Driver: SQ DYMO STR8-Fit
4 Wood: SQ DYMO
2H (17*), 4H (23*) & 5H (26*): Fli-Hi CLK
Irons (5-6): MX-900; (7-PW): MP-60
Wedges (51/6*): MP-T Chrome; (56/13): MP-R ChromePutter: White Hot XG 2-Ball CSPreferred Ball: e5+/e7+/B330-RXGPS Unit: NEOPush Cart: 2.0

Posted
Camillo overswings every time and things seem to be working out OK for him...

I suppose his small size pushes him to gain power. You could really see him lashing at the ball with his driver during the Buick. I couldn't imagine the scores he'd shoot if stayed out of the rough just a little more often.

Guy's got some serious scrambling ability.
909D Comp 9.5* (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-6)
Burner Superfast 3 & 5 woods (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-4.8)
G15 Hybrid 23* (AWT shaft)
G5 5 iron-PW-46*, UW-50*, SW-54 & LW-58 (AWT shaft)
Studio Select Newport 2 Mid SlantGrips: PING cords & Golf Pride New Decade Multi-Coumpound Bag: C-130...

Posted
At the range yesterday I had the same experience. I hit a partial wedge (80yds) and it DID get to the target no problem, but I said to myself after the shot: "That seemed like way too much effort to get that result" I felt like I rushed the shot and I put a lot of power into the downswing just to get it 80yds.

It is a success only if you can bring it from the range to the course.

My wedges have higher swing weights that help to supress the "overpowering". I found them helpful for doing a few practice swings whenever there is waiting time to hit the next shot.

Posted
Kinda the same approach to hitting the ball into a strong wind off the tee on a long par 4. The tendency is to over swing because you are telling yourself the wind is going to make this hole even longer unless I really muscle one. We all know how this story usually ends.

I always learn things about the game and myself most every round I play. The picture described above has taken quite some time to learn, understand and trust. When you do practice this approach, it does oddly enough simplify most efforts.

Driver -Callaway Diablo 10 deg
3 Wood - Callaway Big Bertha
Utility - TaylorMade Rescue 22 Deg
Irons - Wilson PI 7, 4-PW
Wedges - Vokie SM 52.08, 56.14, 60.10 Putter - Scotty C NewportBall - Titleist Pro V1


Posted
I have a big problem with this and it's quite a hard to habit shake. I know that when I swing smoothly and don't try and hit the ball too hard I hit it with a lot more power and ease and it goes further but time after time I still swing too hard. I find It's just a matter of concentrating and reminding myself not to over swing but I let that concentration slip too often.

Posted
At the risk of being controversial, let me introduce a side thought. There are times when you feel or know you can kill it. Maybe a better way to say it is there are times when you know your shot is going to go further. The problem is when you try to artificially manufacture those moments. Just swinging harder trying to kill it does not work. What seems to work is recognizing the moments when you know going big will work -- does this make any sense to you guys?

It is hard to explain... I used to play with a favorite caddie who was very good at not arguing about this if he thought I was building up to a big shot. However, he knew when I was not ready and would calmly remind me to club down and make good contact, handing me the right club (say the seven rather than the eight) before I could make the mistake of trying to force a big shot.

RC

 


Note: This thread is 6181 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.