Jump to content
IGNORED

Jack vs. Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?


sungho_kr

Greatest Golfer (GOAT)  

220 members have voted

  1. 1. Tiger or Jack: Who's the greatest golfer?

    • Tiger Woods is the man
      1629
    • Jack Nicklaus is my favorite
      819


Recommended Posts

Thats said well marpr...if we go back twentyfive years ago when Jack played his style of golf I cant see putting Tiger style in there anywhere...it seems too cut-throat for that period of time...dont get me wrong tour players were competitive...Tiger was cultavated out of watching style from the early to mid eighties...yes he does hold some superior ability&technique; although it just would not be possible if there were wasnt ever a Golden Bear.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Right now, Lost Ball is going with Jack.

Lost Ball doesn't like to use dollar amounts made as some since it would be absurd to think that dollars 30 years ago could compare to today.

Lost Ball looks at Jack's Major record, 2nd place finishes, and competition around him.

In 5 years, it most probably will be Tiger
Golf is so popular simply because it is the best game in the world at which to be bad.

- A.A. Milne
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Tiger for sure. And anyone who says Jack had better competition is wrong. In jacks day the 100-300 best golfers in the world had 0% chance of winning any major or even an event for that matter.

Today there is a much higher caliber of play from the 100-300 best in the world. The Top 100 quality is about the same, but the depth of fields is so much greater now.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Tiger for sure. And anyone who says Jack had better competition is wrong. In jacks day the 100-300 best golfers in the world had 0% chance of winning any major or even an event for that matter.

Sorry but I don't get your point.

What do you mean by "...the 100-300 best golfers in the world had 0% chance of winning any.." I never noticed that. Why is Charles Howell III a bigger threat than Doug Sanders?

Best, Mike Elzey

In my bag:
Driver: Cleveland Launcher 10.5 stiff
Woods: Ping ISI 3 and 5 - metal stiffIrons: Ping ISI 4-GW - metal stiffSand Wedges: 1987 Staff, 1987 R-90Putter: two ball - black bladeBall: NXT Tour"I think what I said is right but maybe not.""If you know so much, why are you...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


If they played in the same era probably go 50-50. Jack being a little "meaner" the reason for the split.

Replace Phil with Jack at the same age today and "let him loose".

Always easier to chase a record then set one...

PS. Not a big fan of Jack, just my opionion.

In the Bag...Ping Hoofer

3dx Tour Square - UST V2 HMOI X Flex
3dx 15* - X flex
Baffler DWS 20* Aldila NV Stiff 4-GW 600XC Forged Irons- S Flex 55* SW - Burner XD 60* LW - Burner XD Craz E Putter <----ProV1x---> Pellet

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I know this has long been a debate and make no mistake as to the greatness of jack during his era. The most common arguments are equipment, and ball. What people in general forget to take into account is how different the game has become over the last 50 years. No one wants to or will ever admit that their time has been past by, but the fact is that it has. Not only is the equipment light years ahead but so is the difficulty of all of the courses. Watch the golf channel which plays a series showing great championships from the past and check out the conditions of the tracks. Stemp meter was a non factor back then because all of the greens back then were lke the 2nd cut of the rough. As in every sport there has been a huge level of increase in the players abilities not to mention the level of golf as a business. Even Jack himself has been quoted when asked about Tiger's game, "he plays a game for which I am not familiar". bwgolfer

TaylorMade Burner TP 9.5* stiff shaft Driver and Taylormade 15* medal
Cleveland utilities 22*
Taylormade tour prefered irons with rifle flighted 6.0
Taylormade z groove tp wedges 52* and 58*
Rife Antigua blade putterTitlest Pro V1X, Bridgestone 3000s Black

Link to comment
Share on other sites


How can anyone make a legitimate response. If Tiger were in Jack's era he would have had the likes of the big three. Plus equipment has changed dramatically. Strength training was really non existant. But if Jack was in Tigers' era who knows what could be happening. What Jack has done to date is a tremendous goal for anyone . But as we all know records were made to be broken . Tiger has every shot in the bag because the courses are longer and very difficult . It would be a very hard to decide. To me they are dead even.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Jack Vs. Tiger Lets Compare

Driving Ability Even Best In Their Era
Long Iron Play Even Ditto
Short Iron Play Tiger
Scrambling Tiger By A Mile
Mental Toughness Even
Marketability Tiger By A Mile
Putting Jack Very Slightly
The Winner Tiger Via Scrambling
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Marketability Tiger By A Mile

Lost Ball asks, who cares about Marketability?

Lost Ball sees John Daly as a top draw marketability wise as well
Golf is so popular simply because it is the best game in the world at which to be bad.

- A.A. Milne
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'm going with Jack for a few reasons.
First, he had legendary rivals he had to beat. Trevino, Palmer, Player, Watson, you name it.
Second, traveling back then was much more grueling. No private jets and long layovers, etc.
Third, He was a family man. Playing golf with family stress is much more difficult.
Fourth, Jack was a great Ryder Cup player. More stress there, many say, and Tiger is a bust in that arena. Tiger needs to make hay in that event and I don't think he can, or will.

Honorable mention- Jack placed 6th at the Masters at age 58. Enough said...

My draw is your cut.

My bag-
Driver- Callaway X460 Tour. 9.5 degree, Fujikura stiff.
3-Wood- Taylor Made V-SteelUtility- Nickent 3DX 17 degreeIrons (3-PW) Ping S59'sWedges Cleveland 900 series 58 degree, Titleist Vokey 54 degree SWPutter- Scotty Cameron Circa #2Ball- Taylor Made Tour Red

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I have to go with Tiger, he just seems like the kind of guy who you wouldn't want to have biting at your heels in a tournament and he has fought through a lot of stuff on the tour being a black member. Jack is awesome but I think Tiger has worked harder.

Titleist 913 D3 10.5*

Adams Super XTD 17*

Adams DHY 21*

TaylorMade TP MB 4-PW

Titleist SM4 54*/58*/62*

Bettinardi SS 11

Leupold GX-3i Rangefinder

Titleist ProV1 Ball

Link to comment
Share on other sites


If Tiger stays healthy he will surpass all of Jack's records. The level of competition that Tiger faces is higher than what Jack faced. That makes Tiger's dominance that much more impressive.
Bill Coulter
Harrod Ohio

www.billcoulterart.com
What's in my bag:Driver SasquatchFW woods Irons X14Wedge's Putter
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Day 63: Priority piece work with 6-iron, half-ish swings (9-3), Mevo+ to check ball flight. Average path is a bit left (1.2 deg) and average face is open (2.9 deg), so mostly fades. Will need to work on face, but overall happy with how this is going. Also hit 20 balls for short game practice - 10 each pitching and chipping
    • Day 6:  Played my 6th 9 hole game and beat my best score by 1.  Yay. 
    • I need to find a 200 yd club. I am playing sTM speed blades right now and I like them due to trajectory. I get them up really high. But my 4 iron is 20* and flies185 in the air. My 3 wood averages 215. I am looking for a  club, preferably an iron , that will go 190-205 cuz I got a gap there. I got an old Adams idea 3 hybrid that if I swing like an iron,goes 185. If I swing it like  wood it will get to 200 but I lose accuracy. I would really like to replace the hybrid with an iron that will get me 10-15 more yds. is there a super hot 2/3 iron out there that  could get me there with more consistency ? That gap comes up usually every round or two.
    • I've been enjoying practicing with the GCQuadMAX lately. I thought I'd take a little time to talk about how I use it during my practice. I practiced tonight with a 6I (my trust Nike VRII Pro/TW blade). First, I'll just say this: it's not about the ball flight or the shot. I'll pick a target on the range that's close to the distance I normally hit it, but it's just… because hitting it into a field is a little boring. And occasionally I hit a "shot" but the bulk of my practice is not about hitting shots, but working something specific. Here's the data in my default display (I'm using GSPro often for this type of stuff): Clubhead and ball speed are self explanatory, as is smash factor and spin (this was a 6I with a lower spinning premium ball). Club path is 4.3° right on this shot, with a spin axis of -6.9° (nice!), or a draw. The ball started 1.9° right, launched at 19.4° (a bit high, because…) AoA was 0.2° up. The ball reached a peak height of 117.2 feet, carried 183.1 yards, and was 5.7 feet left of the target line. A decent shot… if the ball was on a little tee or was sitting up in a lush fairway. 😄  Anyway… The only number I cared about for the first 20 or 25 shots today is the path. Since I care about the path, I use my alignment stick to make sure the QuadMAX is aligned, and I don't care much about what the face is, etc. This shot, like almost every shot I hit today, was a two-step swing. I'd swing back, pause, then swing down. I'm trying to do two things: take it back without folding my right wrist back a lot, then throw the club "behind" me with the elbow pit staying facing out longer. After my path was consistently 2-5° out, I'd start to care a little about the AoA. I moved the ball back a smidgen in my stance, and worked on feeling my chest stay down a little. I also slightly shortened the swing, as that would result in the hands getting to impact zone a bit earlier relative to the rest of my chest. Not surprisingly to me (but perhaps to others), my speed typically goes up when I do this. Here's a fuller screenshot with the number son the left made larger (and replacing the mini map in the GSPro software on the right side of the screen): As you can see, a similar shot. Path was still out, spin axis was still a bit left (barely), AoA was a bit better, offline was still pretty small… and the ball went a bit farther with more ball speed because I got up to 94.2 MPH clubhead speed with a still decent smash factor. This ball was a slight push a touch toward the toe - if my path is 3.1° right and the start line is 3.7° right… and the ball draws, that's a slight toe hit. A look at the QuadMAX screen confirmed that. At one point, I made the shortest swing I could, with the fastest downswing piece (what I'm trying to do) that I could. I really didn't care about the face on this one: Path and AoA are good. Speeds are good. Smash wasn't bad considering the face was wide open.
    • I shot a 34 on a Podunk par 3. got 5 pars in a row but skulled 2  "pitches" off of dried mud. killed my round. I guess I'll bump and run whenever I am on hardpan from now on
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...