Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6211 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
are there any drawbacks to hitting a lower compression ball with a higher swing speed?

specifically, im talking about the bridgestone e5 vs the e6. i have been playing the e6, and it feels nice, but i feel like i need more spin. i noticed that the e5, while not a 3 piece, has a urethane cover which gives it more spin than the surlyn covered e6 - the issue is that its designed for a player with a slow swing speed.

are there any issues with this? and no, i dont want to spend any more than $25 a dozen.

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
specifically, im talking about the bridgestone e5 vs the e6.

It's my understanding that the e5+ is higher compression than the e6+, so you've actually been playing a low compression ball already. The e5+ is definitely Bridgestone's mid priced high spin offering, so if it's spin you're after then the e5+ may well be the ball for you.

Nike Vapor Speed driver 12* stock regular shaft
Nike Machspeed 4W 17*, 7W 21* stock stiff shafts
Ping i10 irons 4-9, PW, UW, SW, LW AWT stiff flex
Titleist SC Kombi 35"; Srixon Z Star XV tour yellow

Clicgear 3.0; Sun Mountain Four 5


Posted
It's my understanding that the e5+ is higher compression than the e6+, so you've actually been playing a low compression ball already. The e5+ is definitely Bridgestone's mid priced high spin offering, so if it's spin you're after then the e5+ may well be the ball for you.

so am i getting my terminology wrong? a softer ball is has a higher compression? my question still remains, are there any issues with performance in hitting a softer ball at a high swing speed?

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I was pretty sure the e6+ is the softer-core of the two balls. Feels pretty buttery to me anyway.

Posted
it feels soft to me too, but im pretty sure that the e5 is softer (for people who cant compress a firmer ball).

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
so am i getting my terminology wrong? a softer ball is has a higher compression?

No you've got it right. A "softer" ball has lower compression. And the e6+ is Bridgestone's low compression mid priced ball. The only problem you'll have swinging fast on a low compression ball is that you would lose some distance. A harder ball will go farther with a higher swing speed. Inversely a slower speed will lose distance with a harder ball because they can't compress it enough for optimal launch conditions. Personally I imagine these differences are minor unless you're really swinging fast (say 120mph or more).

It also sounds like you believe the e5+ to feel softer than the e6+. I've never noticed any difference in feel between the two balls, but I don't notice much difference between any balls, so I'm not the guy to ask about that. Still Bridgestone maintains that the e5+ has higher compression than the e6+ or e7+.

Nike Vapor Speed driver 12* stock regular shaft
Nike Machspeed 4W 17*, 7W 21* stock stiff shafts
Ping i10 irons 4-9, PW, UW, SW, LW AWT stiff flex
Titleist SC Kombi 35"; Srixon Z Star XV tour yellow

Clicgear 3.0; Sun Mountain Four 5


Posted
It also sounds like you believe the e5+ to feel softer than the e6+. I've never noticed any difference in feel between the two balls, but I don't notice much difference between any balls, so I'm not the guy to ask about that. Still Bridgestone maintains that the e5+ has higher compression than the e6+ or e7+.

i havent felt much difference in the feel of the ball (i only played with the e5for about 2 holes) but i was thinking that with the urethane cover it would spin more. golf digest did some testing and it showed that the e5 spins significantly more than the e6

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I know in the past a lower compression ball would have a tendency to balloon a bit when used by a higher swing speed player, but I cant speak to whether or not that is the case with the Bridgestone. In any case, if you like the way the ball feels and performs, then that is all that matters.
Driver: FT-3 Fusion w/ YS-Power X-flex
3-wood: McHenry Metals 12 degree with UST comp X
2 iron: MP Hi-Fli 18 degree
Irons: MP-60 3-PW w/ Rifle 6.5
Wedges: Vokey Oil Can 52,58 degreePutter: Red X 35X3Ball: ONE Platinum

Posted
While I don't know the technical answer to your question, I am playing the e5+, and I do have a high swing speed, and I don't see any real issues with using this ball. My distance has been fine using this ball. They are worth a try for sure.

I started using them because of the cover, and I'm happy with the decision. You get less spin than the higher end Bridgestone balls, and the Pro Vs, but its an improvement over surlyn balls IMHO.
Bag: Flight SS
Driver: 10.5* r5 draw with Pro Launch blue 65 Stiff
Irons: CCi Forged 3i-pw
Wedges: 56* CG12 black pearl and 60* low bounce RTG 900
Putter: i-Series Anser 35"Ball: e5+Tee: Zero FrictionGlove: FootJoy WeatherSofRangefinder: MedalistShoes: Sp-6 II, Adidas 360Scores this year:92 91...

Posted
so am i getting my terminology wrong? a softer ball is has a higher compression?

you won't be hitting the ball as far as you would if you used a harder ball. As at impact the ball absorbs the energy from the club and thats how it moves. With a softer ball it absorbs more of the energy than a firmer ball so it doesn't have that extra energy to go further.

Basically physics tells you it will go further if you have a high swing speed and use a harder ball.

In The Bag:
Driver: r7 460 (9.5)
Fairway Woods: r7 CGB Max (3,5)
Hybrid:r7 CGB Max
Irons:AP2Wedges:Vokey Spin Milled Tour Chrome (52/8, 56/14, 60/4)Putter: Studio Select Newport 2Balls:Pro V1x 2009


  • Administrator
Posted
Basically physics tells you it will go further if you have a high swing speed and use a harder ball.

To add to this, here's how it goes: a firmer ball will ALWAYS have more ball speed than a softer ball.

The only reason to use a softer ball for distance off the tee is if you don't generate enough spin with the firmer ball(s) - something that's highly unlikely with a high swing speed.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
No you've got it right. A "softer" ball has lower compression. And the e6+ is Bridgestone's low compression mid priced ball. The only problem you'll have swinging fast on a low compression ball is that you would lose some distance. A harder ball will go farther with a higher swing speed. Inversely a slower speed will lose distance with a harder ball because they can't compress it enough for optimal launch conditions. Personally I imagine these differences are minor unless you're really swinging fast (say 120mph or more).

Good answer chief broom.


Note: This thread is 6211 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 37, June 10.  Today was primarily WFH, so I had several practice sessions (indoors, off a mat, into the net).  At least one each of U, 9, and 6-iron full swings with the usual priority.   I also tried a few times a putting type stroke with my 4H, as something I should probably learn how to hit (and what it does), but the mechanical shot at home off a mat doesn't tell me much of what it's doing.  That's something I should probably try on a real green, not during a round until I've tried it.
    • Day 10 (10 Jun 26) - Played in the midweek shootout at my home course - on aerated and sanded greens - day of trying to figure tempo to get the best roll on the greens.  Approach game was decently solid as was shots off the tee.  
    • Ok, I'm trying to find a feel to hit a consistent ball flight (irons).  My current predicament.  1. I try to do the arms down stuff better, with the club feeling like it is way behind me more. It's just a cluster of results. Most of the time, I can't get any speed on the swing. If I get my arms down faster, I just throw them out.  2. I focus all my attention on turning better. Pushing off with my left leg and getting my right side through better. On the DTL view, this doesn't produce anywhere close where the hands and club should be. The result is usually ball first contact, lower ball flight, more centered contact.  At this point, I am going with option 2. Stop thinking about what the hands do. Just make a shorter backswing, keep it wide, turn through. Somehow, the club head finds the ball. My focus is so much on just making sure I turn, it's like, "Oh, that contact was better.... Oh, that bell flight looks playable." If not, I will just be practicing my entire summer.       
    • Nope, they spent too much money. They are in over 28 million on the football roster and related NIL compensation at this point. Boosters associated with any Texas college football team has HUGE sway. The AD is between a rock and a hard place. They put a lot of money into Sorsby, at the chance of winning a NC this year. If you move on, you basically wasted a lot.  This is why Ohio State wants 3 QB's they feel can start. That is why the backups the past 5 years at some point transfer. Texas Tech has no backup near the quality of Sorsby. If they move on, they are screwed for 2026. 
    • Maybe there's something I still don't understand about the situation. Wouldn't Texas Tech do itself a favor to move on from Sorsby at this point?      
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.