Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6040 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I currently play with irons 3 (20*) and up. I also carry a 3w(15*) and a 5w(18*). I rarely hit a 3I. I would opt for the 5W which I can hit pretty well, and I have gotten decent at open it up a bit to shorten the flight while at the same time hitting it higher. Sometimes when I am in the rough though, with 200+ to go this is not the best club to hit.

So my question is, if I were to get a hybrid to replace the 3iron, what degree would I be looking for? What I mean is what degree would replace a 20* 3 iron distance wise? And would a hybrid be easier to hit from the rough?

I guess what I am getting at is would it be pointless to have a 5w and a hybrid? Or would it be better to just drop the 5w, and get a hybrid? But in that case I still have the 3i which i almost never use.
TM R7 SuperQuad - 9.5* Stiff || TM V-Steel 15/18* Stiff || Mizuno MP-52 3-PW PX5.5 || Titleist Vokey OC 52/58* || Odyssey White Hot #1

Posted
I've never carried a 5w, always had a 2I and a 3I. I could hit both really well off the tee but needed a perfect lie in the fairway. I switched to an 18 and 21 degree hybrid to replace the 2I and 3I and while it was an adjustment the hybrids are much more versatile

Posted
Spacklers, I would get a 21 degree hybrid to replace your 20 degree 3 iron. It will be easy to hit from any situation especially from the rough. You won't regret it.

in the bag

Driver: 909D2 9.5° Oban Devotion Shaft

3 Wood: G10 15.5°
Hybrid: 3dx RC 20° Ironwood 

4-PW: MP-57's S300

Wedges: 51° MP-T Black Nickel 56° Vokey Spin Milled 

Putter: Tracy II 35" Iomic Grip 

Ball: Pro V1x


Posted
personally, i will never get rid of my 3 iron, but funnily enough, i keep a 3 hybrid. reason being, from just about any lie i know i can put my hybrid out 220, in the general direction where i want it to go, and i'm fairly accurate with it. but, off the tee, or on a good lie when i want a precision shot, i'll use my three iron all day.

Posted
I would get a 4 hybrid or something with a slightly higher loft than your 3-iron (maybe 22ish?). From personal experience, I hit hybrids about 15 yards further than an equally-lofted iron. Thus, if it were me, I'd club down with the hyrbid.
Driver: Taylormade Tour Burner 9.5° | Fairway Wood: Adams Speedline Fast 10 15° | Irons: Mizuno MP-57 3-PW | Wedges: Cleveland CG11 52° 56° 60° | Putter: Odyssey White Hot XG Rossie

Posted
I would get a 4 hybrid or something with a slightly higher loft than your 3-iron (maybe 22ish?). From personal experience, I hit hybrids about 15 yards further than an equally-lofted iron. Thus, if it were me, I'd club down with the hyrbid.

That's because your nickent hybrid is a 2iron + which means a stronger loft.

in the bag

Driver: 909D2 9.5° Oban Devotion Shaft

3 Wood: G10 15.5°
Hybrid: 3dx RC 20° Ironwood 

4-PW: MP-57's S300

Wedges: 51° MP-T Black Nickel 56° Vokey Spin Milled 

Putter: Tracy II 35" Iomic Grip 

Ball: Pro V1x


Posted
I agree, 21º hybrid would be good to replace your 3i.
Each club, the hybrid and the 5w both have their place in your bag and on the course.I personally like my hybrid from tight lies or fairways and wood from the rough. I hit both bout same distance but not from same lie or situation.
You'll enjoy the game more with a hybrid that gives you more options.

Hit'em Long and Strong
Big Tazz

 


Posted
I would go for a 21* hybrid to replace your 3 iron, you definatly wont regret it. All the hybrids i have owned have worked amazing out of the rough and even better from the fariway.

In my Xtreme Sport bag
'09 Burner 9.5*
F50 15* 3 Wood
Burner 18* 5 Wood
MX-19 4-GW SV Tour 54.12 & 58.08 White Hot 2-Ball SRT


Posted
That's because your nickent hybrid is a 2iron + which means a stronger loft.

I purchased the 2+ to give me more range. This gives me a moderate gap between my 3i and 2+ hyrbid, but the hybrid essentially serves as my 3-wood. I hit it much better and it has proven more versatile. I used to have a nickent 3DX 4 hybrid with 23* of loft and hit it about the same as my current 3-iron (21*), hence my previous suggestion. Just my personal experience.

Driver: Taylormade Tour Burner 9.5° | Fairway Wood: Adams Speedline Fast 10 15° | Irons: Mizuno MP-57 3-PW | Wedges: Cleveland CG11 52° 56° 60° | Putter: Odyssey White Hot XG Rossie

Posted
I would got 21* as well. Since everything else you have is Taylormade Im going to assume a Rescue is in your future, but alot of guys on here myself included stand by the Nickent hybrids. Might be a good place to look. All hybrids are great out of the rough or sand. They also double as a bailout club when you need to punch.

In my Sun Mountain MPB bag:
Burner 07 9.5w/ Prolaunch Red
SZ Fairway Woods 4+ and 7
Rescue TP 3 hybrid
200 series irons 4-pwcg11 wedges 52*,56*,60*White Hot 2-BallDT RollHome Course: www.bodegaharbourgolf.com/


Note: This thread is 6040 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.