Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Why do Titleist let so many top guys go?


Note: This thread is 6000 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Tiger Woods, David Duval, Phil Mickelson, Ernie Els, Sergio Garcia, Paul Casey and now Martin Kaymer

TaylorMade R9 460 9.5°
TaylorMade R9 13°
TaylorMade RAC TP MB 3-PW
TaylorMade RAC TP 54°.10 / 58°.10
Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2

Posted
Tiger Woods, David Duval, Phil Mickelson, Ernie Els, Sergio Garcia, Paul Casey

I guess they give the players a decent contract, when they are new and relatively cheap. Later when they become better, they dont compete with what Nike, TM and Callaway pay.

If I did not forget someone, I'd say Robert Karlsson is the highest ranked player having Titleist on his hat. (16th)

In my Tour Combo Bag:

Driver: Superquad 9.5°
5W: 2008 Burner 18°
3H: Idea Pro Gold 20°4H: 2008 Burner Rescue 22°Irons: MP52 R300 5-PWedges: Vokey SM 50.08, 54.11, 58.04, 60.11Putter: Itsy Bitsy SpiderBall: TP Red


Posted
I guess they give the players a decent contract, when they are new and relatively cheap. Later when they become better, they dont compete with what Nike, TM and Callaway pay.

Yeah, right now this leaves Titleist with:

Karlsson, Scott, Stricker, Watney, McIlroy, Johnson, Curtis
TaylorMade R9 460 9.5°
TaylorMade R9 13°
TaylorMade RAC TP MB 3-PW
TaylorMade RAC TP 54°.10 / 58°.10
Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2

Posted
I'd venture to say they're not after the folks who get tricked into marketing gimmicks, you know. I don't think the "good and aspiring golfer" is gonna play a brand name just because some PGA touring player does (well maybe sometimes), I think those types of players are gonna play what's best for their game.
What's In My Stand Bag...
Driver: R9 TP 9.5*
3W: R9 15*
Hybrid: Rescue Dual TP 2H 16*
Irons 3-P: MP-62Wedges: Vokey 52* & 58*Putter: 34" Newport StudioBall: Pro V1x

Posted

Titleist may just not offer as much money as some of the other companies do? Maybe Titleist sets the limit on what they pay and at that point they want players playing their equipment because of the equipment, not because of how much money they're getting to do so. Could be smart... or dumb on Titleist's part. On one hand it's good that they're not getting into a money fight with other companies to out bid contacts for players, but on the other hand it may hurt them slightly as a lot of new golfers seeing more of the Nike, Callaway and Taylor Made since more golfers shown on TV seem to play them. Golfers newer to the game (and some experienced) like to play what the pros play rather than what may be best for their game.

This is of course all speculation as I really have no idea.

There's still some pretty big names playing their equipment though: http://www.titleist.com/players/


Posted
Because the name speaks (and sells) for itself. They don't need the best golfers to endorse their products to get more sales.

:P
In the bag Nike SasQuatch SuMo 10.5* {} Tiger Shark Hammerhead 3w, 5w, 3h {} Nickent 3DX Pro 5i-PW {} Titleist Vokey 250.08* {} Cleveland CG11. 54* {} Callaway X-Tour 58.11* {} Carbite Tour Classic Putter {} Titleist ProV1x


Posted
Because the name speaks (and sells) for itself. They don't need the best golfers to endorse their products to get more sales.

I fully agree.

Until last june, I was totally not interested in golf. Never had a club in my hand. I only knew Titleist, and that's what I bought after I got hooked. But I am old (33 ), and not sure if the young folks tick like this. It would surely not hurt Titleist to have a player in the Top 5.

In my Tour Combo Bag:

Driver: Superquad 9.5°
5W: 2008 Burner 18°
3H: Idea Pro Gold 20°4H: 2008 Burner Rescue 22°Irons: MP52 R300 5-PWedges: Vokey SM 50.08, 54.11, 58.04, 60.11Putter: Itsy Bitsy SpiderBall: TP Red


  • Administrator
Posted
Tiger Woods, David Duval, Phil Mickelson, Ernie Els, Sergio Garcia, Paul Casey and now Martin Kaymer

I think a lot of the players are over-rated.

Two belong in the "got too expensive" category: Tiger, Phil Several belong in the "have sucked since leaving Titleist" category: Duval, Els, Sergio (still no majors - only except is the "big event" PLAYERS win) The rest you listed don't really rate with U.S. viewers: Casey, Kaymer I'll second what others have said: Titleist doesn't need a bunch of big names to get the recognition. They seem to pay more for ball contracts so they can tout "#1 ball in golf" and pros seem to choose to play Vokeys and Scotty Camerons enough that they do okay in those categories, too.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
The Titleist way has always been brand first, player second. I find it somewhat refreshing for a company to not sell out to an individual and stick to its guns. Obviously, an athlete like a Jordan under contract can elevate your brand and sales to a new level, something Tiger's still striving for, but these kind of athletes are so rare that a company can't just invest too broadly. Titleist has done a great job in establishing itself as the premier clubmaker without an iconic pitchman.
905R 10.5* - Speeder (S) ::: 909F2 15.5* - VooDoo (S) ::: 909H 19* - VooDoo (S) ::: Vokey Spin Milled 52.08, 56.11 & 60.07
MX-25 4-P - Dynamic Gold (S300)
Studio Style Newport 2 - 33/350
Pro V1Tour V2

Posted
Because the name speaks (and sells) for itself. They don't need the best golfers to endorse their products to get more sales.

Agreed. Whatever their marketing strategy is, I think it has worked.

Whether or not it is true I guess I subconsciously think of the ProV1 as the premier ball - played by virtually everyone at the highest levels of golf - the only choice for a serious golfer. I know that Tiger plays with Nike stuff but for whatever reason I still don't think of Nike as a brand for truly serious golfers. I actually think it's a matter of quantity over quality. I see Tiger playing Nike, but I don't see anyone else playing with their stuff. So I say to myself, "well, it's obviously just because they pay him a lot, besides he could win with anything." Then I see 80% of the rest of the guys on Tour playing Titleist and I say to myself, "that many guys can't be wrong." Tim

Posted
Agreed. Whatever their marketing strategy is, I think it has worked.

You mean in the opposite way that a lot of folks suggest that there are too many

TaylorMade money 'clones' on the tour?
TaylorMade R9 460 9.5°
TaylorMade R9 13°
TaylorMade RAC TP MB 3-PW
TaylorMade RAC TP 54°.10 / 58°.10
Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2

Posted
...I know that Tiger plays with Nike stuff but for whatever reason I still don't think of Nike as a brand for truly serious golfers.

I wouldn't go as far as saying that Nike isn't for truly serious golfers. Plus they got a whole lot of other golfers donning the swoosh (Stewart Cink, Justin Leaonard, KJ, AK, etc).

Sure they got Tiger to beef up their image. With that came a whole lot more money for Nike to spend on R&D.; Consequently, I think they have pretty good equipment now and its only getting better. I love their new drivers (still not a fan of the square models though) and I'm actually starting to warm up to their golf balls too

:P
In the bag Nike SasQuatch SuMo 10.5* {} Tiger Shark Hammerhead 3w, 5w, 3h {} Nickent 3DX Pro 5i-PW {} Titleist Vokey 250.08* {} Cleveland CG11. 54* {} Callaway X-Tour 58.11* {} Carbite Tour Classic Putter {} Titleist ProV1x


Posted
Agreed. Whatever their marketing strategy is, I think it has worked.

seriuosly? you dont see anyone else using their stuff?

dude, ever watch a tournamenet lately, Nike is starting to dominate both the PGA and LPGA Nike Athletes - if the link doesnt bring you to the page, click "athletes" on the top of the page i would say their are some pretty major names carrying Nike in their bag
"My swing is homemade - but I have perfect flaws!" - Me

Posted
I know that Tiger plays with Nike stuff but for whatever reason I still don't think of Nike as a brand for truly serious golfers.

To quote Mr. John McEnroe, you cannot be serious. I'm honestly not saying this because I play Nike equipment. FWIW, I also play a Titleist wedge, and plan on gettig another. The U.S. Open champion isnt a truly serious golfer? Neither is Cink, Ames, Kim, etc.?

I understand having brand loyalty, I really do, but dont let that brainwash you into thinking that all of the big manufacturers dont put out good equipment. I've read quite a few very positive reviews on the Dymo Str8 Fit, the VR irons, and the VR wedges. I guess the guys writing these reviews arent serious golfers either. My point is this - having your loyalty is fine, but that belief is totally unfounded. Looking the top 10 payers in the world, it looks to me like the big manufacturers are pretty evenly distributed with Nike, TM, Callaway, Titleist. Though I dont see a Ping player in the top 10 (top 20 for that matter), I certainly dont think that they're not a brand for serious golfers. I have a serious question for you, and I'm not trying to be snarky or anything like that, but have you ever tried any of Nike's equipment?

 
Follow me on Twitter - TST_Justin
 -  -  - 
 
This Week's Bag Drop - Miura Passing Point 9003 Forged Irons and Adams Idea Pro a12 Irons and Hybrids  - Sweet new forged cavity backs from Miura (do they make any irons that arent simply beautiful?) and irons/hybrids from Adams created with...


Posted
To quote Mr. John McEnroe, you cannot be serious. I'm honestly not saying this because I play Nike equipment. FWIW, I also play a Titleist wedge, and plan on gettig another. The U.S. Open champion isnt a truly serious golfer? Neither is Cink, Ames, Kim, etc.?

Whoa, whoa, whoa...

I think you guys misunderstood what I was saying. I did not mean to imply that I think Nike equipment is bad or that players who use Nike equipment are not serious golfers. I'm talking specifically about Nike vs. Titleist marketing and the effect it has had on my subconscious. Nike has not yet gotten through to my subconscious. Titleist has. I actually use Nike Slingshot irons, though I didn't buy them for myself. I was given them as a gift. They work just fine for me. But I also don't consider myself a "serious" player. I only shoot bogey-golf on my best days, and not because of inferior equipment. I just always assumed (again, because of the effect of marketing ) that if I were a scratch golfer I would probably buy ProV1 balls and consider playing another brand of clubs like Titleists or Mizunos. As far as the other players using Nike, I guess I've just never noticed because Tiger so overshadows all of them (as would be the case no matter who sponsored him). When I think Nike, I think Tiger. EDIT: This, by the way, is brilliant marketing... http://www.pgatour.com/r/stats/info/wm1.html?103 Tim

Posted
Whoa, whoa, whoa...

I think I got what you're saying now.... And for that link you posted, you're talking about the next to each name, right? I had noticed that before and thought that was a pretty good way of marketing as well. I always wondered what was the criteria for that though. Is it if they play any piece of Titleist equipment, as in anything from the ball to a putter to a driver, or is it just people that have contracts with Titleist? The reason I ask that is because Kenny Perry has it next to his name, but he's a TM guy. But then, if that label goes to anyone using any piece of Titleist equipment, shouldnt Tiger have it next to his name becase he uses a Scotty?

 
Follow me on Twitter - TST_Justin
 -  -  - 
 
This Week's Bag Drop - Miura Passing Point 9003 Forged Irons and Adams Idea Pro a12 Irons and Hybrids  - Sweet new forged cavity backs from Miura (do they make any irons that arent simply beautiful?) and irons/hybrids from Adams created with...


Posted
I think I got what you're saying now....

i think it's the ball they use?

"My swing is homemade - but I have perfect flaws!" - Me

Posted
Don't forget about Johnson, as well as Ogilvy and Villegas with Cobra.

FTi 10* Draw w/ ProLaunch Blue 65g Stiff
5 Wood
Walter Hagen Ultradyne Blades 3-PW
52*
X-Tour Vintage 56.13 X-Forged Chrome 64.09 Dual Force BladeBall: B330Rx or Pro V1


Note: This thread is 6000 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.