Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

What is the handcap of shooting in the mid 90's?


Note: This thread is 6082 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
This was my first year playing and usually shot in the mid 90's. I never kept any score cards so I can't calculate it. Does anyone know what a rough estimate would be of someone shooting in the mid 90's? I tried googling it but could not find a number, ha ha.

Thanks.

10.5* Adams Super Fast 10
17*, 21* Adams Black Super Hybrid
X-24 irons
Jaws 52*,56*,60* Wedges
White Ice #9 Putter

Top Flite Gamer v2


Posted
A 95 would be about a 23 or 24 on most courses. It depends on what par is for the course. If it's a Par 70 and you shoot a 95 every time it would be 25. Par 71 shooting a 95 would be 24 and so on. A handicap just tells you how many shots over par you are on average per 18 holes.

Career Bests:

9 Holes--37 @ The Fairways at Arrowhead-Front(+2)

18 Holes--80 @ Carroll Meadows Golf Course(+9)

 

Home Course:

1) The Fairways at Arrowhead

2) Mayfair Country Club


Posted
A handicap just tells you how many shots over par you are on average per 18 holes.

actually a handicap is what your best round should be relative to the course rating.a par 72 course might be rated anywhere from 64 to 80.


Posted
Awesome. Thanks for the info. Once spring comes around, I am going to start keeping all the scorecards and get my handicap dialed in.

10.5* Adams Super Fast 10
17*, 21* Adams Black Super Hybrid
X-24 irons
Jaws 52*,56*,60* Wedges
White Ice #9 Putter

Top Flite Gamer v2


Posted
My typical round is from 90-95 but I have shot an 89 and 87. My handicap hovers around a 16.9-17.1. I think in order to be the most accurate you have to have 5 rounds logged.

Kyle Paulhus

If you really want to get better, check out Evolvr

:callaway: Rogue ST 10.5* | :callaway: Epic Sub Zero 15* | :tmade: P790 3 Driving Iron |:titleist: 716 AP2 |  :edel: Wedges 50/54/68 | :edel: Deschutes 36"

Career Low Round: 67 (18 holes), 32 (9 holes)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I have another question similar to this - sometimes signs for holes will say par 5 then underneath that it will say handicap 15 - what does that number mean? it varies greatly from hole to hole - one will be like 4 and another will be in the teens. Is that just the slope rating broken out by hole?

Driver: '09 Burner
3Wood: Burner
Hybrids: 3 hybrid and Austads Pickle 26 degree
Irons: Rac os2 PW-4
Wedges: Vokey 48, 52 and 56 degreePutter: RossaBag: Sasquatch TourPushcart: 2.0Ball: Prov1 GPS: freecaddie software running on cellphone


Posted
the handicap on the hole is how it is ranked 1-18. If your playing a hole and its ranked #1 handicap, its the hardest hole on the course, vise versa for #18 handicap.

Kyle Paulhus

If you really want to get better, check out Evolvr

:callaway: Rogue ST 10.5* | :callaway: Epic Sub Zero 15* | :tmade: P790 3 Driving Iron |:titleist: 716 AP2 |  :edel: Wedges 50/54/68 | :edel: Deschutes 36"

Career Low Round: 67 (18 holes), 32 (9 holes)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
the handicap on the hole is how it is ranked 1-18. If your playing a hole and its ranked #1 handicap, its the hardest hole on the course, vise versa for #18 handicap.

Never knew that! Thanks

Posted
Figuring out your golf handicap is a little like trying to figure out a QB passer rating. Here are the steps:
1- Take an average of your most recent 5 scores(18 holes)
2- Subtract the course rating from your average score
3- Multiply that number by 113
4- Divide that number by the slope of the course
5- Multiply that number by 0.96 and you will have your handicap

You can do this for each of your most recent 5 rounds individually or as an average.

:cobra: Amp Driver 10.5*(R)
:tmade: Burner 3W 15*(R)
:tmade: Burner 2.0 Rescue 3-4
:titleist: 714 AP1 Irons 5-pw, gw(Steel XP95 R300)
:callaway: MD3 Wedges 56, 60
:nickent:Omen Long Putter(un-anchored)


Posted
Figuring out your golf handicap is a little like trying to figure out a QB passer rating. Here are the steps:

Is there an official way to calculate handicap if you only play 9 holes ?


Posted
Figuring out your golf handicap is a little like trying to figure out a QB passer rating. Here are the steps:

very well put

Omega V cart bag

Driver- i15 9.5 degree UST AXIVCORE 69 S

Woods- big berthaIrons- MP-32 s300 shaftsWedges54* Vokey56* Spin Milled Vokey60* Mp SeriesPutter-Pro PlatinumBalls- ProV1


Posted
the handicap on the hole is how it is ranked 1-18. If your playing a hole and its ranked #1 handicap, its the hardest hole on the course, vise versa for #18 handicap.

Close but not true. It is actually the #1 hole is the hole that a high handicapper would most likey need strokes on compared to a low handicapper. The odd handicap amd even hadnicap holes are split between the front and back of the course.

The course has to collect scores from high handicappers and low cappers to figure it all out. Here is a few notes about what I am talking about : http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m.../ai_112366873/ http://www.ncga.org/handicap/strokehole.php
Driver R7 Superquad NV 55 shaft or Bridgestone J33 460 NV 75 shaft
3 and 5 Wood X
Hybrid original Fli Hi 21* or FT 22*
Irons AP2
Wedges Vokey 52* - 8 , 56* 14, 60*-7Putter California CoranodoBall TP RedGPS NeoRange Finder- Bushnell Tour V2 When Chuck Norris puts spin on the ball, the ball does not...

Posted
1- Take an average of your most recent 5 scores(18 holes).

This is the correct formula, but an "official" handicap is made up from your last 20 rounds of 18 holes where the 10 lowest differentials (scores that have been run through the above calculation) are then averaged and that number is multiplied by .96. Most handicap trackers ("Scorecard" is one you can download from here that will do all this for you) will generate a handicap after 5 scores but that handicap probably will change after you get the full 20 scores logged. 20 scores gives you a much broader sample base to accurately base you potential from, which is what a handicap is, a measure of your potential to score.

You can use 9 hole scores to generate your handicap too. You would match up each 9 hole score with the next one sequentially. Courses will provide you the course ratings and slopes for each 9 (they aren't always the same). Given the rating and slope for each 9 hole score you would then add the 2 scores together (and the 2 9's don't even have to be from the same course), add the two ratings together, average the 2 slopes (add them together and devide by 2), and that will give you the numbers you need to determine what your differential is for the 2 nine hole scores. That differential is then added to your index of differentails and become part of that calculation which is your handicap. Usually courses don't provide the 9 hole ratings and slopes on their score card (so do some don't) but all you have to do is ask the course pro or knowledgable person in the pro shop and they can provide it.

Nike Vapor Speed driver 12* stock regular shaft
Nike Machspeed 4W 17*, 7W 21* stock stiff shafts
Ping i10 irons 4-9, PW, UW, SW, LW AWT stiff flex
Titleist SC Kombi 35"; Srixon Z Star XV tour yellow

Clicgear 3.0; Sun Mountain Four 5


Posted

Based on this, I may have to get a real handicap... I just guessed at mine. I uusually shoot high 80's, low 90's, with an 83, a couple of 84's and 85's thrown in there for good measure. Then again, I even those out with an occasional 97-98 also, depending on my putter.

My typical round is from 90-95 but I have shot an 89 and 87. My handicap hovers around a 16.9-17.1. I think in order to be the most accurate you have to have 5 rounds logged.


Posted

Another interpretation of the question.
Your ability to beat your handicap by several strokes on any given day handicaps low index guys from being able to beat you in tourneys!

Current Bag
Ogio Synchro cart
'07 Burner Driver, 3 Fairway, and Rescue 5
Early Titelist Cavities
200 56, Spin milled 60 , Rossa  Suzuka


Posted
Figuring out your golf handicap is a little like trying to figure out a QB passer rating. Here are the steps:

Or you just sign up for a handicap service on line and they do it for you.

Driver- Callaway Razor somthing or other
3W- Taylor Made R11S
3H Rocketballz
4I-PW- MP-59
Gap- Vokey 54

Lob- Cleveland 60

Putter- Rife

Skycaddie SG5  


Posted
Close but not true. It is actually the #1 hole is the hole that a high handicapper would most likey need strokes on compared to a low handicapper. The odd handicap amd even hadnicap holes are split between the front and back of the course.

Correct. It's amazing how many golfers don't know that. They come up to the number one handicap hole and assume it's the toughest hole against par on the course. The only thing you can really take away from it is:

1. That when compared to single digit handicap golfers versus higher handicap golfers that particular hole has the largest differential on the front nine. I think that the USGA course handicap system is an antiquated joke. Most golfers whether they play in a league or just in their weekend match - they play against golfers of comparable ability. Not always, but this is more often the way. Yet, they are competing against net scores based on something that is apples and oranges to how matches are flighted. This leaves the USGA system as useful only when single digit handicappers have cash matches against 26 handicappers. Is that really how most of us play golf? For example, at my course the 17th hole is the number 2 handicap hole. It's a pretty easy par 5 that gives higher handicap golfers trouble because they choke on the approach shot over the water to the green. For a single digit handicapper, this hole involves bunting your second shot down to clear the dogleg and then wedging into the green. So, if someone were giving me 2 shots in a match, I'm getting one here - which is a total joke. Naturally, any group can come up with their own course handicap approach so they can avoid these issues.

Driver: G10 9.5*
Fairway Woods: 3 & 5
Hybrid: 21*
Irons: I10 4 - 9
Wedges: 48* + Spin-Milled 54 & 60*Putter: Rossa FontanaBall: B330-RX


Note: This thread is 6082 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Day 41, June 14.  I spent 10 minutes, half hitting W half hitting 6-iron, practice shots (indoors, off a mat, into a net)
    • Day 620 - 2026-06-14 Got some work in before and after lessons. Definitely didn't adduct my arms 130° in doing so.
    • Day 79: played 18. Shot a +5 76. Iron play was much better - 11 GIR. Hit a drive 380. Normal day. 
    • Day 14 (14 Jun 26) - Continued work with irons (8i-Pw), hard foam balls and getting consistent impact - same as previous drills - using gates for 1/2 and “simulated” course conditions on the second half.  
    • I like discussing the golf swing. Whether you call it "swing theory" or what, I like to talk about things that can expand the potential for what I know and understand. As a scientist, I like being shown that I'm wrong, too, because as I've said a bunch of times… "you're wrong and here's why" is an instant opportunity to upgrade my knowledge. I also like to help golfers, and one of the things I'm most glad to have moved away from from 15 years ago was the "Hands In" idea from S&T. Jim Waldron is often credited (probably rightly so) with explaining why so many Tour players and good players talk about "keeping their hands in front of themselves" while it appears that they're moving their arms around their bodies. From over 30 years ago: I've also got videos like… this (Instagram link here😞 I'm happy to say that I've become friends with Shaun and Mike at Athletic Motion Golf (AMG), too. I tend to get along with other smart folks who measure things, who look critically at information, who don't assume that what they thought 20 years ago holds true today. I get along with folks who look for chances to instantly upgrade their knowledge. Andy Plummer remains one of the people who does not look for these opportunities. He didn't care in early 2013 when we had evidence that the information in their S&T 2.0 DVDs was bogus, and they seemingly don't care now. They've been attacking (it's their favorite pastime) AMG in particular for the better part of a year now. There have been a few shots back at them from AMG (like… this), no doubt. But as is typical of the AMG fellas, it's with measured data. Well, recently, Andy took yet another shot at AMG: https://www.instagram.com/p/DZfHe0DuPXC/. Andy demonstrates that true power in the golf swing comes from doing stuff like this: Andy claims that the idea that the arms mostly lift and lower, while the body turns, is bogus. What golfers should be doing is using "angular velocity" to abduct and adduct their shoulders to move the club fast like this (above). Then he makes a ridiculous example of what AMG supposedly teaches, but misses by a mile. Now, it doesn't take a biomechanist to know that you can't possibly swing as Andy demonstrates. His right arm is so far around and behind him that his left arm would have to grow several feet to reach the grip of the club (or alignment stick), and a follow-through with the right arm position like that would be absolutely silly. But, it's a demonstration, so let's not read too much into it. However, I find ideas like this dangerous. Again, I like to help golfers, and in my opinion, the idea that you should abduct and adduct your arms a lot is a dangerous one. There's some adduction and abduction going on, but… it's not much. Anyway, this statement was posted: 130 degrees of dynamic range of horizontal abduction and adduction is quite the claim! I posted some comments to Andy and others, and was issued a challenge: Well, okay then. Here's Bryson's lead shoulder adduction: This measures the angle between the "virtual spine," the left shoulder, and the elbow. Bryson has a 97.34° "adduction angle" at P1, a 62.53° angle at P4, and returns to an 89.21° angle at impact. Rounding, that's a change of 34° from address to the top, and then a change (back toward the angle at address) of about 26° from the top to impact. If we want to worry about only horizontal abduction and adduction (where D = adduction and B = abduction): Left shoulder: 8.33° D, 38.74° D, 14.67° D Right shoulder: 1.03° D, 55.75° B, 14.04° B If we call moving the arms farther around you as negative, those are changes of -30.41° from P1 to P4 for the left shoulder and +24.07° from P4 to P7 for the left shoulder and -56.78° and +41.71° for the right shoulder. I have no idea on earth where he gets 130°. From the last frame of Bryson's swing where he's at 126.98°? But the lowest that number gets is 62.53°, for a range of 64.45, or less than half of the 130° claimed (plus it includes part of the swing, post-impact, that has no bearing on what the ball does). For good measure, another pretty good player: Left: 22.55° D ➡️ 33.35° D (∆ 10.8°) ➡️ 17.36° D (∆ 15.99° from P4, 5.19° from P1) Right: 15.03° D ➡️ 24.29° B (∆ 39.32°) ➡️ 1.93° D (∆ 26.22° from P4, 13.1° from P1) Of the biomechanists and experienced 3D users (on any platform), none of them have seen anything like 130° of dynamic adduction/abduction from a good player P1 to P7. And, like my little joke above, even if you go to the end of the swing, you rarely get much more than a little over halfway there. Maybe Andy is adding them? He does say in the video "and then add it to that with the lead arm." (I think that's what he says, but this isn't an additive type system.) I regularly coach golfers out of positions with a lot of adduction and abduction. I regularly work golfers away from moving their arms around their bodies. Even my juniors (the ones who have paid attention anyway! 🤣) can recite "arms = up/down, body = around." Like this: So, I don't know where this leaves us. Andy claims to have seen something on GEARS that shows 130° of dynamic adduction/abduction. I'm open to being wrong, but… I don't think I am here on this one. And, until that comes to be, I will continue to stand up for what I think is the best information, and do my best to work with golfers toward simpler, easier moves that don't get them stuck. Simpler, easier moves like the moves Tour players and great players tend to make, not complicated, difficult moves. Shaun and Mike said it in a video once where they demonstrated that the average Tour player adducts their lead arm 20° across their chest from the top to impact (P4 to P7), while the amateur often tries to go 40°. They said something like "the amateur is trying to move their arm TWICE the distance in the same amount of time as the professional athlete." Yep. The swings of great players are often easier and simpler. They are not abducting and adducting their arms much in comparison to average golfers. As a smart man once said: "Why would you teach something (abduction in this case) that bad golfers already do?" On a related note… the S&T crowd continues to be… well, who they've been as long as I've known them. Take this comment for example: I mean… I would think that this is pretty self-explanatory, but then again… I didn't think it needed explaining to begin with. P.S. As I was finishing up this article, another biomechanist replied with something so simple I hadn't even thought of it as I had immediately jumped into looking at the actual measurements: "90 doesn’t even seem physically possible.“ No, sir. It doesn't.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.