Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5856 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
how do you like the Titleist wedges?

The only other wedges I have tried were the A4 ones that came with my irons however I felt the Vokey's were easier to hit, especially on rock hard surfaces.

The 64 is my favorite club in the bag and love when I can take a full shot with it from 40-50 yards. Sorry for the late reply.

Posted
I currently have 13 clubs in my bag and am looking for a 14th. I was looking at a lob wedge (Vokey SM or CG14) Could anyone tell me the advantages (or disadvantages) of getting a lob wedge.

In your sig it says you have a "Vokey 258.12". What is that??? I have several Vokey wedges, and I've never seen a "258". If that is a typo and it's supposed to be 58.12, then I don't know why you would look at a LW. 58° is already in LW range. You do have a gap from 50° to 58°, so it seems to me that a 54° would fill that gap and be of more use to you.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
What makes a 60 so hard to hit? I have heard this a lot before on here and am unsure why.

With a 58 and a 64 you actually have 2 lob wedges. Why would you need 2 of them? If you are like some of the higher handicappers that I've played with, you may well be using them too much and in the process actually hurting your game.

I personally don't even carry a LW. My 56° is the highest lofted club in my bag, and it more than serves the purpose. I try not to leave myself in that danger zone of 50 to 20 yards out. I either lay up shorter (70-100 yards) or I am expecting to be green high with only a short chip or pitch left.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
just looking at your bag, it seems like that would be the perfect club to add.

I think he has a 58???

someone on here posted a mini reviw saying the cg15 wears out super fast like three rounds they returned it and got the vokey

they actually only said the miro face grooves wore down quick... they also said they returned the vokey and went back to the cg15... they liked the feel better despite it wearing down the insignificant face grooves pretty quick.

In your sig it says you have a "Vokey 258.12". What is that??? I have several Vokey wedges, and I've never seen a "258". If that is a typo and it's supposed to be 58.12, then I don't know why you would look at a LW. 58° is already in LW range. You do have a gap from 50° to 58°, so it seems to me that a 54° would fill that gap and be of more use to you.

same Q about the 258... assumed you had a 58... 54 would be perfect choice if you have 58 already... would be nice gaps then.

My Clubs: Callaway FT-i Tour LCG 9.5° w/ Matrix Ozik Xcon 6 stiff; Sonartec GS Tour 14° w/ Graphite Design Red Ice 70 stiff; Adams Idea Pro 2h(18°) & 3h(20°) w/ Aldila VS Proto 80 stiff; Adams Idea Pro Forged 4-PW w/ TT Black Gold stiff; Cleveland CG12 DSG RTG 52°-10° & 58°-10°; Odyssey...

Posted
Haha sorry for the delay guys
I decided to go with a 58 and get the 50 bent to 51 or 52 but that will happen later.
This leaves me with 13 clubs. Either i dont bend the 50 and get a 54, or bend it and grab a Cleveland Launcher DST 5 Wood. Neither will happen in the near future---just wishful thinking.

Driver:Taylormade Burner 10.5 with Aldila NV 65S
FW Wood: Nike Dymo 3 Wood with Aldila VooDoo
Hybrids: Adams Idea A7 3 Hybrid
Irons: Ping i15 4-P
Wedge: Cleveland CG15 52.10 and Titleist Vokey 58.12Putter: Bettinardi BC3Ball: Callaway Tour i(z) and Titleist Pro V1x


Posted
In your sig it says you have a "Vokey 258.12". What is that??? I have several Vokey wedges, and I've never seen a "258". If that is a typo and it's supposed to be 58.12, then I don't know why you would look at a LW. 58° is already in LW range. You do have a gap from 50° to 58°, so it seems to me that a 54° would fill that gap and be of more use to you.

Haha sorry. Its the Vokey 200 series and on the back of the club, its says 258.12.

Picture here --- http://www.golfhq.com/catalog/images...ing%202005.jpg

Driver:Taylormade Burner 10.5 with Aldila NV 65S
FW Wood: Nike Dymo 3 Wood with Aldila VooDoo
Hybrids: Adams Idea A7 3 Hybrid
Irons: Ping i15 4-P
Wedge: Cleveland CG15 52.10 and Titleist Vokey 58.12Putter: Bettinardi BC3Ball: Callaway Tour i(z) and Titleist Pro V1x


Posted
With a 58 and a 64 you actually have 2 lob wedges. Why would you need 2 of them? If you are like some of the higher handicappers that I've played with, you may well be using them too much and in the process actually hurting your game.

The 58 is a 56/14 bent to 58. I use it as my sand wedge.

I went with this set up because I was able to pull off better shots around the green with a 64 vs a traditional 60. It is very well possible I use it way too much. With alot of work on my swing this winter so far I hope to work on the course management/short game aspects this spring/summer/fall.

Posted
I've got a handicap similar to yours. I used to play a 58 with a 5-wood, but I dumped the 5-wood that I hit maybe once a round at most for a 51, 56 & 60 wedge set and I like it much more. I'd either get a 54 or get the 58 bent back to 56 and get a 60. I don't like wedges past 60 for anyone not named Phil Mickelson, they're just too tough to hit for the minimal benefit you get over a standard 60-degree wedge. Around the green, I use the 56-degree wedge 80% of the time. If I've got a ton of green to work with, I'll bump & run a pitching wedge, and if I've got a bunker shot or no green at all, I use the 60.

What's in my Sun Mountain C-130 bag:

Driver - Taylormade Superfast 2.0 TP 10.5
3 Wood - Taylormade Burner 15* REAX
Hybrid - Adams Idea Pro 18* GD YSQ-HL

Irons - Callaway X-18 4-PW

GW - Cleveland 588 51*

SW - Cleveland CG 12 56*

LW - Cleveland CG15 60*

Putter - Cameron Studio Style Newport 2

Bushnell Medalist rangefinder


Posted
With wedges, the higher the loft, the more I need to practice to be effective. When I used a 60 deg I had to constantly practice chip for feel or else I hit it thin and chunked it. I use a 58 deg now and I still have to practice a lot. If I just use the SW it's easier to hit (but offers fewer shot options).

Driver: Nike Ignite 10.5 w/ Fujikura Motore F1
2H: King Cobra
4H: Nickent 4DX
5H: Adams A3
6I 7I 8I 9I PW: Mizuno mp-57Wedges: Mizuno MP T-10 50, 54, 58 Ball: random


Posted
IMO, the LW is a specialty club. I carry one and use it in green side bunkers and for when I short side myselft and need minimal roll out, or just no roll out. I'm starting to use it more from 70 and in, again when I don't want roll out, or very little. My LW has taken more practice than my other wedges and I've found that how ever hard you think you should hit the ball, hit it a little harder.

If you can and / or comfortable opening up a SW then the need for a LW is less.

Note: This thread is 5856 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.