Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5986 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I bought a Samsung 58" Plasma. Highest rated TV that Consumer Reports ever tested. All my friends have had HD TV's for a few years and they've all been blown-away watching the Patriots games on my new TV.

Posted
Depends on if you have a reflection issue. Get LCD in a bright room and Plasma in a dark room. Plasma is better picture but the glare could be too much.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Here is the glare I mentioned.



the tv pivots back to the left getting even more sun but it does not show up at all.

We are very pleased with this Sony. Football has never looked so good in our house....forgive the cell phone camera.



I decided to go ahead and use this as an excuse to update our system....found a great deal on some new Polk speakers.



Just getting them hooked up now.



Went to Best Buy and found a swivel stand that is very handy.


it's been too cold to golf the few chances I've had...but I've needed the time on this project.....getting the old stuff out and running all new speaker wire has been time consuming...almost done now.

909D Comp 9.5* (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-6)
Burner Superfast 3 & 5 woods (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-4.8)
G15 Hybrid 23* (AWT shaft)
G5 5 iron-PW-46*, UW-50*, SW-54 & LW-58 (AWT shaft)
Studio Select Newport 2 Mid SlantGrips: PING cords & Golf Pride New Decade Multi-Coumpound Bag: C-130...

Posted
For that big I'd definitely go plasma. Better picture at this size. I love my 50" panasonic.

It's in the hole.


Posted
if you are in darkish type room or have shades plasma is a no brainer...They are the bomb. I have the 50" Pioneer Elite and freakin love it!!!

if you are in a room with skylights or large wall windows you may want to go with LCD. they are brighter and during daylight conditions eastier to see.

Bottom line is if you spend enough money you will be very happy with either!! Don't go cheap!!

Driver- Callaway Razor somthing or other
3W- Taylor Made R11S
3H Rocketballz
4I-PW- MP-59
Gap- Vokey 54

Lob- Cleveland 60

Putter- Rife

Skycaddie SG5  


Posted
I have the cheapest Panasonic plasma they make and I couldn't be happier. Panasonics are king now that Pioneer is out of the game. It is a great TV, I have it in a reasonably lit room and I have noticed any glare issues.

You can get a hell of a 50 inch TV for 700 bucks now.

Brian


Posted

Just like everything else i buy, I heavily researched this very issue a little more than a year ago. At that time, LCD black levels could not even come close to those of a plasma. They always looked washed out and grey. I bought a Panasonic plasma. And since I couldn't stop there, I got some Monitor Audio BR2s and a Denon 1909.

Another thing I notice is that on the newer LCDs, the super high refresh rates make some HD TV shows look too real to the point where the filming looks raw and without any cinematic effect. It's very hard to describe, but my friend just got a Samsung LCD and we were watching a show on cable with the refresh rate bumped to 120 HZ and I couldn't bear to watch it.

Check out this forum: http://www.avsforum.com

In a staff blue  Aerolite III

Razr Hawk 10.5* (BB 63 S)
Orig Steelhead 4W 16.8* (F)
Orig Steelhead 7W 20* (M-10)

 JPX-800 Pro 4-pw (XP S300)

 MP-T Blk Ni 51.06, MP-T Blk Ni 56.14, MP-T Blk Ni 58.10

  Bettinardi BC-1 (34")

TM TP Black


Posted
Am I the only one who went with HD ILA?

:tmade: R15 14* Matrix Black Tie 7m3

:adams: Speedline Super S 3w & 5w Matrix Radix HD S VI

:callaway: X-12 4-PW Memphis 10

IONNOVEX  Type S GDT 50*, 54* & 62* Mitsubishi Rayon Kuro Kage Black 80ir

:odyssey: Tri-Ball SRT

-Landon


Posted
I few months ago i bought a 55 inch Samsung LCD. Can;t beat the picture. It is in direct sunlight most of the day and it is still looks good. ..

If you have light leakage into the viewing room, the LCD is the way to go. Also, match screen size with how far you will sit from the TV.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha B16 OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:  image.png.0d90925b4c768ce7c125b16f98313e0d.png Inertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  :srixon: QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Go with LED. Much better than either LCD or Plasma. Best Buy had a great price on Samsung LED during the holidays, and I think they will again for the Super Bowl.
LED's are the next generation. It uses much less energy, gives better color, contrast and is brighter. Also, the entire TV weighs much less compared to the same size LCD or Plasma.

I know what I am talking about because I am a research scientist on these subjects.

Don

:titleist: 910 D2, 8.5˚, Adila RIP 60 S-Flex
:titleist: 980F 15˚
:yonex: EZone Blades (3-PW) Dynamic Gold S-200
:vokey:   Vokey wedges, 52˚; 56˚; and 60˚
:scotty_cameron:  2014 Scotty Cameron Select Newport 2

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Then you should know better than to call it a LED TV, when it is a LCD TV with LED backlight (or sidelight perhaps, on some models). A LED monitor is one found on a calculator.
You probably know it, but people not knowing better might think they actually own a LED TV.

I agree that they are better than their fluorescent bretheren.

The money saved on energy is one thing, what I like more is that they don't get as hot and need lots of fans to cool them down. They may have fans, but surely the manufacturers would put in some which makes less noise. Less weight makes them easier to hang up on a wall. Sidelight contributes to very slim TVs, also suitable for wall mounting.

When it comes to size, I say the bigger the better, depending on usage and quality of video feed. The size is something you quickly get adjusted to. Lots of people regret after a few weeks they didn't buy a bigger one. I've got a 46" at about 2 yards distance, and it works very well.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Then you should know better than to call it a LED TV, when it is a LCD TV with LED backlight (or sidelight perhaps, on some models). A LED monitor is one found on a calculator.

No it is LED. They are made of light emitting diodes (hence LED). LCD's are liquid crystal displays. LED's are completely different from LCD's. LED's use much less electricity. New versions they are working on are organic LED's which is suppose to give even brighter colors and pictures.

Don

:titleist: 910 D2, 8.5˚, Adila RIP 60 S-Flex
:titleist: 980F 15˚
:yonex: EZone Blades (3-PW) Dynamic Gold S-200
:vokey:   Vokey wedges, 52˚; 56˚; and 60˚
:scotty_cameron:  2014 Scotty Cameron Select Newport 2

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
My wife wanted me too get a 42, we got a 50. She is now very happy we did. It is amazing how much heat comes off a plasma. The picture is amazing but it is like a little big heater. I still couldn't be happier though. It is a moderate light room and I haven't noticed any glare issues.

Brian


Posted
No it is LED. They are made of light emitting diodes (hence LED). LCD's are liquid crystal displays. LED's are completely different from LCD's. LED's use much less electricity. New versions they are working on are organic LED's which is suppose to give even brighter colors and pictures.

Could you show me a TV of size 40+ on the market today that use LED not only as backlight?

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
My wife wanted me too get a 42, we got a 50. She is now very happy we did. It is amazing how much heat comes off a plasma. The picture is amazing but it is like a little big heater. I still couldn't be happier though. It is a moderate light room and I haven't noticed any glare issues.

LCD unit had some heat output, too. Probably always a good idea to go larger, as you did, when space permits. I'm most likely going to put a plasma in the bedroom.
909D Comp 9.5* (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-6)
Burner Superfast 3 & 5 woods (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-4.8)
G15 Hybrid 23* (AWT shaft)
G5 5 iron-PW-46*, UW-50*, SW-54 & LW-58 (AWT shaft)
Studio Select Newport 2 Mid SlantGrips: PING cords & Golf Pride New Decade Multi-Coumpound Bag: C-130...

Posted
My 46" LCD gives off 310W, so I can pretty much use it to heat up my living room when it gets cold. A waste of energy during the warmer seasons, but LCD with LED backlight was not an option when I bought it.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5986 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • No one should measure a joint mobility away from that joint. If you go to physical therapy, they are not measuring your knee mobility based on your midline. It is based at the joint. Shoulder mobility should be measured in reference to the shoulder joint. 
    • He's using a driver swing, while I used the iron swing. Bryson goes from about 65° B to 15° B, hence the 50°. If you bend your right elbow, you're going to pull your hands across your chest some. Conversely, if you abduct your right arm and hold onto a grip with your left arm, you can see how extending the right elbow as we do in the golf swing during the downswing will "pull" the right shoulder/humerus forward (adducting it, as going from 65° to 15° of abduction is). Even people who pull their right shoulder WAY too far around them eventually get it "back in front" when their right arm/elbow extends. So, such a motion shows up as shoulder adduction even though the movement that causes it is just widening the trail elbow. The left hand on the grip almost "pulls" the hands forward as the left arm can't stretch much (there's some shoulder protraction, but that's almost maxed out at P4). Oh, I downloaded it and watched it (and commented there) before he blocked me. It's what led to him posting the comment in the "update" above. 😄  Single shoulder range of 75°, and that's going out well into the follow-through. 50° Max range up to impact. Manavian's video is bad. He keeps saying "midline" which is just a horrible way to look at it. He also kept saying that the club was moving that amount — also wrong. Adding left and right together is really freaking dumb. Another golf instructor said "That's like saying the player has 100 degrees of knee bend (adding left knee bend to right knee bend) 🤦‍♂️" (similar to what the biomechanist said about squatting). Also, see my post above about elbow bend. That's why Plummer’s alignment stick demo is so intellectually dishonest. A golfer can't get anywhere near that position on the left with his left hand on the alignment stick (quoted below).  
    • That makes no sense at all.  so, I watched that Instagram. Here is a summary...  Bryson.... Address: Trail Shoulder 0 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 65-deg abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 15-deg abduction. P9: 10 degrees adduction. Rory... Address: Trail Shoulder 16 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 26 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 0 degrees abduction.  P9: 18 degrees of adduction.  DJ... Address: Trail Shoulder 4 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 42 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 2 degrees abduction.  P9: 15 degrees of adduction.  Their point is that arm doesn't stay on the trail side. That the arms have to get across the chest from P4 to P9. I mean they do. What matters is the rate of which it happens relative to the position of the swing. The trail shoulder at P9 is not abducted a lot. The range of that total abduction movement is like 40 to 70 degrees. Bryson might be an outlier. Rory might be an outlier as well.  A couple of points.  1. None of them had any adduction at impact. So, this tells me the trail arms stays on the trail side of the body at impact. Is it moving towards lead shoulder, yes. It doesn't happen till post impact. The right side of the body is moving towards the target, so the arms don't have to as much as people think.  2. Trail shoulder adduction from Impact to P9 is 18 to 25 degrees.  3. P9 adduction of the trail shoulder is only about 2 to 12 degrees more adducted than at address. The arms/hands stay in front of the chest a long-time post impact. If Rory, from his address position just rotated his body towards the target and raised up his arms so he is at P9. He basically didn't have to move his trail arm further across his chest than where he started at address. Visualize that for a bit. I bet for people who tend to stall and drag their arms across their body to hit the ball, that would emphasize how much the arms stay in front of the body and how much you have to turn.             
    • Do you know how Manavian is measuring his shoulder adduction-abduction that purports to demonstrate 50 degrees or motion in Bryson's downswing? I know the broader biomechanics research/scientific literature on this suggests shoulder adduction-abduction is only a modest contributor of force generation in the downswing, so I'm definitely not convinced by anything he's arguing, I'm just curious how different people can be claiming to use ostensibly the same "data" to tell a much different story.
    • I have an update… I don't have much of a response, because the fact that they would ADD the numbers for the lead and trail shoulder together… I mean, wow. I was giving them too much credit. Nobody would think to assume they were doing THAT. That's beyond comical. One of the biomechanists I talked to put it this way: "So if I squatted down and went from 180 to 90 deg knee angle, then I would say 180 deg range of motion because I have two knees?" I'd type more (maybe), but honestly, I'm laughing a bit too hard. 🤣 Update: Mini Manavian blocked me on Instagram, so I cannot see his post showing Bryson with about 50° of range of motion (with a driver) from P4 to P7, and 75° only if you go out to the mid-follow-through. What a terrible loss for me. 😉 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.