Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5919 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. When the manufacturer labels your irons, how would you prefer they did it?

    • With only the loft angle
      5
    • With only the classic iron number
      30
    • With both the loft angle and the iron number
      32


Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted
The problem with the shrinking lofts is that it's a stupid game that can't be won. TM lowers their loft, so now every other company

TM isn't targeting you with their Burner irons. They're targeting the non-discerning golfer who can't look up a loft measurement and who doesn't know by heart the loft of each of the irons in their past four sets.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I voted classic iron number and my vote created a tie to date, lol.

Actually, I wouldn't care if they put the loft on the club as well, but I'd want to keep the number.

I have always felt like I was a little "underpowered" with my irons, but finally realize at my level, it doesn't matter. I don't know the lofts on my old blades, but I know how far I hit each one with a good swing. I have had them bent to even up the gaps and am about to get the lofts measured--not so much to know what they are but as a point of reference to maintain them. I am pretty happy with the spread right now.

My "new" set of Titleist DCI's, which I bought new in 1992 have both number and loft on the club. The 5 iron is 28*. All the shafts are about .5" longer than my old Wilsons. Shanks is right; TM really did not start the original "hot irons" war, it was going on back in the early 90's. I went to the golf shop to buy some Tommy Armour 845's and they were out of stock, so I got the DCI's which had just been introduced. The 845's had the same 28* 5 iron which was considered "hot" at the time. Now TM, Callaway, and others are just "kicking it up a notch".

As many of you have said, the important thing is knowing how far YOU hit your clubs, and having the right mix to get you around the course.

Don

In the bag:

Driver: PING 410 Plus 9 degrees, Alta CB55 S  Fairway: Callaway Rogue 3W PX Even Flow Blue 6.0; Hybrid: Titleist 818H1 21* PX Even Flow Blue 6.0;  Irons: Titleist 718 AP1 5-W2(53*) Shafts- TT AMT Red S300 ; Wedges Vokey SM8 56-10D Putter: Scotty Cameron 2016 Newport 2.5  Ball: Titleist AVX or 2021 ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I vote for numbers only (i.e., 3 - P). I wouldn't want loft numbers because if I had them bent at all, the lofts listed on the clubs would be inaccurate, and this would really bug me for some reason. It isn't hard to google the specs ... plus, any pro shop will have the specs on hand.
Driver: Callaway Diablo Edge 10*
Woods: Mizuno F-60 (15*, 18*); Hybrids: Callaway FT-iZ 21*, Callaway X 24*
Irons: Mizuno MX 25 (5I - GW)
Wedges: Mizuno MP T Chrome (56/10), MP T-10 Black Satin (60/8)
Putter: Odyssey White Hot Tour #9

Posted
The evolution of iron number and distance is both a loft and ball question with shaft thrown in. It is the evolution of equipment. Hogan was pretty clear... he played a 5 iron from 155 yards. His five iron and the ball he hit has very little in common with any club or ball made today.

I don't care about loft or number... I want spacing and trajectory, and I want to know these things well. I also want to know how certain irons and balls will make the ball fly or penetrate in differing wind conditons. I have my clubs set up to favor a certain profile that I like to play... and someone looking to see what I have hit on a shot will probably not have a club whose number matches up well with mine. Spacing is the key, you do not want gaps and you do not want longer clubs bunching up with less distance spacing than your shorter irons -- if anything, you want it the other way. That is one reason to play forged blades -- you can adjust lofts to get the spacing you prefer -- I have a guy who does set-ups for tour players do my set ups.

Finally, the iron choices will also dictate the woods you carry. If my wedge is set up 48 or 49 degrees and has a certain shaft, that choice reflects all the way up into my 3 wood where, depending on long iron spacing, I might carry a 13 or 15 degree loft. An old pro once told me to write down all the numbers: loft, lie, swing weights, weights, shaft frequencies, shaft lengths, etc., of sets that one gets dialed in hitting -- so you know exactly what changes you are making when new stuff comes out. That used to work fine, but now you also need to know the golf ball and temperature because flight path can change dramatically with different balls. I find an equally difficult choice is shaft length. If I need a higher ball flight with a wood, I use a slightly longer shaft length and loft, and get the same distance but with a different flight path. Probably a little more compulsive type answer than the question of club number and/or loft.

RC

 


Posted
I am fine with just the numbers, although I wouldn't be opposed to the loft being there. It wouldn't mean much to me, a club goes how far it goes. It would be nice to have a degree to compare different sets, but I know where to find that info if I need it.

If you stop and think about it, the numbers really don't mean anything other than to be a reference point. You could take 8 irons with no identifying marks at all and we could figure them out. It would just take extra time and thought to determine which club was which, having a number makes it eaisier. As B-Con mentioned, it could be Greek symbols (or colors, or any symbol, or different shapes of tree leaves, etc.) on the bottom so we would know which one was which, and how far we hit each one, as long as it was consistent from each manufacturer.

I don't care what the number is, I just want to know how far I hit each one.

I will judge my rounds much more by the quality of my best shots than the acceptability of my worse ones.


Posted
I just don't understand the stigma of it or the anger people have...

Not me. Of course I play the delofted clubs and knew it when I bought them.

 Sub 70 849 9* driver

:callaway:  Rogue 3 & 5 woods, Rogue X 4 & 5 hybrids

:tmade: SIM 2 6-gap irons

:cobra:  King snakebite grove wedges 52 & 58*

 :ping: Heppler ZB3 putter

 

 


Posted
I don't care. I know what lofts my clubs are and realize they are strong. I personally like the stronger lofts. And when the pro delofts his 47 degree wedge into 42 degrees, what degree should they put on the club?

Brian


Posted
Whenever anyone buys new clubs, one of the first orders of business is to learn how far you hit each one. Once you know this information, the only issue I can see is how the new clubs fit into the rest of your set. For me, the Burner 6i mates up perfectly with my Nike 5h; and I don't have an excessive gap between my Burner 9i and my CG14 46*. So I think the stronger lofts is a non-issue. That being said, I will get fit for the first time soon and I'll see if my Clubfitter agrees.

driver: FTiQ
3w-5w: FTi Squareway
4h-5h: SQ Sumo^2
6i-9i: Burner 09
42*, 52*, 56*: CG14 Black Pearl Wedgesputter: Hannaball: bags: cart: 3.0


Posted
They're targeting the non-discerning golfer who can't look up a loft measurement and who doesn't know by heart the loft of each of the irons in their past four sets.

That is a little harsh, I researched the lofts of my old Titleists, considered the gaps of the rescues I bought, factored in my 56 and 60 and knew exactly what lofts I was buying. I bought safe clubs that would allow me to get back into the game with nothing to blame on hardware. I think burner buyers deserve a little more credit. We didn't buy Hibores!

Current Bag
Ogio Synchro cart
'07 Burner Driver, 3 Fairway, and Rescue 5
Early Titelist Cavities
200 56, Spin milled 60 , Rossa  Suzuka


Note: This thread is 5919 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I work with a lot of golfers who want more shaft lean at impact, who currently have AoAs that range from +2° to -2°, and who love to see the handle lower and more "in front of their trail thigh" from face-on at P6. And a lot of these golfers try to solve the issue by working on the downswing. They do something to drag the handle forward. Or they just leave their right thigh farther back so the same handle location "looks" farther forward. Or they move the ball back in their stance. Or they push themselves down into the ground to get the handle lower and increase (decrease?) their AoA (to be more negative). The real fix is often to get wider in the backswing. To do LESS in the backswing. To hinge less, fold the trail arm less, abduct the trail arm less. I had a case of this over the weekend. Before, the player had 110° of trail elbow bend, "lifted" his trail humerus only a few degrees, etc. The club traveled quite a bit around him, and he tended to "pick" the ball from the fairways. In the "after" swings below (which are mild exaggerations — this golfer does not need to end up at < 70° of elbow bend. These were slower backswings with "hit it as hard as you normally would" intent downswings), you can see that he bent his elbow about 70° instead of 110° and lifted his right arm an extra ~15° or more. You can't see how much less this moved his hands across his chest (right arm abduction), but it was also decreased. His hands stayed more "in front of" his right shoulder rather than traveling "beside" them so much. The two swings look like this: The change at P6, without talking about the downswing one little bit (outside of him telling me that he tends to pick the ball), is remarkable: Without 110° of elbow bend to get out (which he gets to 80°, a loss of 30°), the golfer actually loses slightly less elbow bend (70 - 50 = 20), but delivers 30° less elbow bend, lowering the handle and letting the elbow get "in front of" the rib cage… because it never got "behind" or "beside" the rib cage. If you look at this video showing the before/afters of P6, you'll note the handle location (both vertically and horizontally) and the shoulders (the ball is in the same place in these frames). This golfer's path was largely unaffected (still pretty straight into the ball, < 3° path and often < 1.5°), but his AoA jumped to -5° ± 2°. I've always said, and in talking with other instructors they agree and feel similarly, that we spend a lot of time working on the backswing. This is another example of why.
    • We had a member of our senior club who developed a mental block on pulling the trigger. I played with him to see what the membership was talking about. I timed him a few times when he would get over the ball. 45 seconds. He knew he had a mental block and would chide himself, “Just hit it!” Once on the green he was okay and chipping was a bit better. It was painful to watch him struggle. Our “bandaid” was to put him in the last tournament  tee time with two understanding players. We should have suggested to him to take a break from our tournaments. I agree with the idea that when a player realizes they have a problem, the answer is to go fix it and not return until they are able to play at an acceptable pace.
    • Day 56 (4 May 26) - Worked on some ball-then-ground drills - going from P3 thru impact - with a slowed tempo, working to keep all parts in sync.   
    • Wordle 1,780 3/6 🟩⬜🟨🟨🟨 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,780 4/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 ⬜🟨🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟨🟩🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.