Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5895 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I am in need of new irons. I had my first foray with forged iron last weekend and will NEVER go back to cast. I tried out the Mizzy MX-300's and really liked them a lot. I am a 13 handicapper looking to get to the single digits. The strong part of my game is making solid iron contact which is why I think I enjoyed the forged clubs so much. I was set to get the MX-300's but then I found a good deal on some MP-57's. They appear a little more 'blade like' but I hear they are still forgiving. Does anyone here have any experience with both clubs? They oth have the DG 300s shaft in them which I was fitted for.

I know the response will be....hit them both and decide for yourself. The fact is...i can't hit the 57's....can't locate them and there are VERY few Mizzy dealers in Maine. So unfortunately trying the 57's is not possible......

Any advice you can offer would be great!

What's in my bag:
Superquad Driver
19* and 22* Rescue Hybrids
4-PW MP 57 Irons
CG14 52* Gap Wedge CG12 56* SW CG12 60* Lob Wedge CO3-hI push them around with my Linksmen X-7 cart.


Posted
I have the MP 57s but I have been very impressed with the MX 300s. If you can hit the MX 300s and like them, I would go in that direction. They are a GI club, but they aren't huge and clunky.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I found a review of the mp57 from sandtrap below:

http://thesandtrap.com/clubs/mizuno_mp-57_irons_review

I would improvise by going to your local golf store and trying hitting anything that resembles a mp 57 even hitting a blade. This will help confirm that you can actually hit them.

I jumped into my mp33 blades after buying the mp30 and have not looked back. One thing that made me buy the blades was the price. I got a good deal for the mp33s for $250, also, just remember that you can play your the blades from PW - 8 irons and play your Taylor Made LCG irons on your mid to longer irons.

I would lean towards the mp57s and just the fact that you are considering the mp57, I believe deep down inside you want to purchase the mp57s and grow into them. Believe me, blades or mp57s are easier to hit then you think, I have played my best round of golf and lowered my handicap with the mp33s. I must disclosure that I play at least once a week and sometime twice and understand my swing and always have been working on my swing for 24 years of playing.

In summary take the acid test and test drive the blade like club similar to the mp57s at your local store and let us know what you decide

Titleist 910 D2 9.5 Driver
Titleist 910 F15 & 21 degree fairway wood
Titleist 910 hybrid 24 degree
Mizuno Mp33 5 - PW
52/1056/1160/5

"Yonex ADX Blade putter, odyssey two ball blade putter, both  33"

ProV-1


Posted
First, there are tons of Mizuno fans on this site, myself included. I switched to the MP-57s when I was in the mid-20s handicap-wise (and, I guess, age-wise, now that I think of it). If you're a good iron striker, you'll do fine with these.

Also, since you're ordering not-off-the-rack, you don't have to go all in one or the other. Brian Gay, for example, won at Hilton Head with a mix of MX and MP irons in his bag. Link about Brian Gay's bag: http://blogs.golf.com/equipment/2009...ing-clubs.html

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Tour Edge Exotics C723 21 degree hybrid.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
The 57's are not going much if at all harder to hit. Being that they are a players cavity they will be alot more accurate than a forged GI iron, which will get you to your goal faster and will be better in the long run.

Posted
I've been using MX 25's for over 3 years now. The MX-300's look to be an updated version of my 25's and I really like them. But lately I've been considering some new Game Enhancement Mizuno's myself.
Not sure your Golf game or trouble area's, but if Irons are one of the stronger area's, I think the 57's might be a slightly better choice. If you tend to toe or heel it, then the 300's will help you out a bit more.

Note: This thread is 5895 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 254 5-4 Arms off chest in backswing and downswing. Short swing, pause and then hit.  Hit foam balls. Keeping arching of wrist a focus as well. 
    • I would think of it in terms of time. The time it takes to get the arm angle into a good position to deliver the club with proper shaft lean. Another component is rotation, but that is also a matter of timing. It relates to how the body stalls to give the golfer time to hit the ball. If you have to get 80+ degrees out of that right elbow in one third of a second versus 50 degrees in the same time then you have to steal time from somewhere. It is usually body rotation. That does not help with shaft lean.  I agree in that amateurs tend to make the swing more complicated than pro golfers. 
    • I haven't been able to practice like I wanted and won't for the next week.  1. The weather sucks in Ohio this year. I have been mostly inside hitting foam balls. Just kind of my basic stuff.  2. I woke up last Saturday with a left side rib muscle on fire. If I turned or leaned a certain way it would spasm that almost buckled my knees. I have been taking a break to let that settle. I don't want to get a long term injury. I think I pinched a nerve or just aggravated a muscles.   3. I am going on a mini-vacation to Florida (screw you Ohio weather) with a friend, and rolling that into a work conference I have next week. I will be with out my clubs for a week.  I will be back next in two Fridays to hit the ground running with some warmer temps and better weather in Ohio, hopefully. I would really like to get more out on the course and the range.     
    • Day 580 - 2026-05-04 Played eight holes. Sometimes golf kicks you in the nuts. 😉 
    • I work with a lot of golfers who want more shaft lean at impact, who currently have AoAs that range from +2° to -2°, and who love to see the handle lower and more "in front of their trail thigh" from face-on at P6. And a lot of these golfers try to solve the issue by working on the downswing. They do something to drag the handle forward. Or they just leave their right thigh farther back so the same handle location "looks" farther forward. Or they move the ball back in their stance. Or they push themselves down into the ground to get the handle lower and increase (decrease?) their AoA (to be more negative). The real fix is often to get wider in the backswing. To do LESS in the backswing. To hinge less, fold the trail arm less, abduct the trail arm less. I had a case of this over the weekend. Before, the player had 110° of trail elbow bend, "lifted" his trail humerus only a few degrees, etc. The club traveled quite a bit around him, and he tended to "pick" the ball from the fairways. In the "after" swings below (which are mild exaggerations — this golfer does not need to end up at < 70° of elbow bend. These were slower backswings with "hit it as hard as you normally would" intent downswings), you can see that he bent his elbow about 70° instead of 110° and lifted his right arm an extra ~15° or more. You can't see how much less this moved his hands across his chest (right arm abduction), but it was also decreased. His hands stayed more "in front of" his right shoulder rather than traveling "beside" them so much. The two swings look like this: The change at P6, without talking about the downswing one little bit (outside of him telling me that he tends to pick the ball), is remarkable: Without 110° of elbow bend to get out (which he gets to 80°, a loss of 30°), the golfer actually loses slightly less elbow bend (70 - 50 = 20), but delivers 30° less elbow bend, lowering the handle and letting the elbow get "in front of" the rib cage… because it never got "behind" or "beside" the rib cage. If you look at this video showing the before/afters of P6, you'll note the handle location (both vertically and horizontally) and the shoulders (the ball is in the same place in these frames). This golfer's path was largely unaffected (still pretty straight into the ball, < 3° path and often < 1.5°), but his AoA jumped to -5° ± 2°. I've always said, and in talking with other instructors they agree and feel similarly, that we spend a lot of time working on the backswing. This is another example of why.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.