Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Xt1ncT

Tiger's Irons

30 posts in this topic

I'm sure I read somewhere that Tiger has weak lofts in his irons - in other owrds that his nine iron would equal a PW for someone else.

Does anyone know if that's correct - makes how far he hits them even more impressive if it is.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

I'm sure I read somewhere that Tiger has weak lofts in his irons - in other owrds that his nine iron would equal a PW for someone else.

As far as I know, this is a true statement. He's kept the same lofts on his irons from when he 15 years old.

Updated to add the following from a Tiger Woods press conference last year:
Q. When it comes to what you keep in your bag, are you a guy that likes to tinker with loft and lie and swing weight and things like that, and if you do, what kind of thinking goes into those decisions? TIGER WOODS: To be honest with you, my lofts, my lie, my length on my irons haven't changed since I was 14 years old. So to answer your question, no. Q. Why not? TIGER WOODS: Why? Because they have worked (smiling). I've won a lot of tournaments since I was 14. I'm not going to change. But I have changed my 3 wood obviously and my driver over the years and trying to keep up with everybody off the tees, but my irons are still very weak compared to today's standards. They are the standards back in the 60s. People have that so called gap wedge. Well, my pitching wedge is like 51 degrees. My 9 iron is like 45, and that's like most people's gap wedges. A lot of the guys' pitching wedge is like my 9 irons, so I play with very weak lofts, but they have worked so far.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty sure that's correct as well... I remember reading somewhere that Mickelson's PW was like 44 or 45 degrees (at least it was when he played Titleist clubs) because he wanted to hit it further.

So yes, I'd believe that statement.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty sure that's correct as well... I remember reading somewhere that Mickelson's PW was like 44 or 45 degrees (at least it was when he played Titleist clubs) because he wanted to hit it further.

This doesn't really make since to me, maybe i'm too simple minded but why would he have his 9 iron put at 44 or 45 degrees? If he wants to hit it further pull an 8 iron, what is tigers 8 iron and or what are our 8 irons? That statement just got me thinking, hey that doesn't really seem logical but you know what he's on tour and i'm not so there must be something too it right.

ZEBRA
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This doesn't really make since to me, maybe i'm too simple minded but why would he have his 9 iron put at 44 or 45 degrees? If he wants to hit it further pull an 8 iron, what is tigers 8 iron and or what are our 8 irons? That statement just got me thinking, hey that doesn't really seem logical but you know what he's on tour and i'm not so there must be something too it right.

Agreed. .

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Top golfers strike the ball quite perfectly with a lot of club head speed and have no problem getting the ball up. They almost always have their clubs delofted. I am guessing that is one reason guys like Phil or Tiger can hit an "8 iron" 200 yards.

With my swing and swing speed, I'd never get the ball up with a low lofted club with a short shaft.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pros aren't Pros cause they can generate a lot of club head speed or hit an 8 iron 200 yards, they're pros cause they can think on the course and execute the shot they want or need to execute when they need to do so. Every players swing is different and every players attack angle is different so saying that every pro hits the ball perfectly with a ton of club head speed is probably not accurate but I may be wrong. I'm not trying to start an argument I'm just stating my point of view as well.

ZEBRA
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This doesn't really make since to me, maybe i'm too simple minded but why would he have his 9 iron put at 44 or 45 degrees? If he wants to hit it further pull an 8 iron, what is tigers 8 iron and or what are our 8 irons?

A normal 9-iron would be around 43 or 44 degrees or so... most regular retail pitching wedges are around 47 or 48 degrees with about 3-4 degrees difference between clubs. The idea being that 1 degree of loft equates to roughly 2-3 yards difference in ball flight.

I think you were getting a little confused over my post... the point of the thread is that Tiger's clubs are more highly lofted than most players. So, where my PW is 48 degrees, Tiger's might be 51 degrees - thus making it evem more impressive that he hits his PW 140 yards. Mickelson, on the other hand (at least when he was obsessed with hitting it further), de-lofted his clubs, so his PW might be closer to 44 degrees (equivalent to a 9-iron for most players) and thus he could hit it further (theoretically a lower launch angle) with more control (theoretically due to the shorter shaft). The significant swing speed of a tour pro means that its easier for them to get the ball in the air compared to us normal folk (as SubPar pointed out). I'm sure there's a point I'm missing somewhere with regards to the iron's center of gravity, etc but I think that was the gist of the situation.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pros aren't Pros cause they can generate a lot of club head speed or hit an 8 iron 200 yards,

It does help though...

so saying that every pro hits the ball perfectly with a ton of club head speed is probably not accurate but I may be wrong.

The consistent contact though does contribute to their ability to hit the ball the same distance every time. If you ever look at a pro's clubs up close, you'll see a small circle right in the sweet spot of the iron that looks like it's just been worn off by hitting the ball in the same spot time after time after time. It's really quite depressing that I'll never get to that point.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I found this info, but have no idea how accurate it might be...

In the bag (Tiger)
Driver: Nike SasQuatch 460 cc driver (8.5 degree)
Fairway Woods : Nike Ignite T60 3 Wood (15 degrees) and Nike T40 5 Wood (19 degrees) *Tiger will put his 5 Wood or 2 Iron in the bag depending upon the course setup and conditions
Irons: Nike Forged Irons (2-PW) (all irons are 1 degree upright, have D4 swingweight, standard size Tour Velvet Cord grips and True Temper Dynamic Gold X-100 shafts)
Wedges: Nike 56 degree Pro Combo SW and 60 degree Flatback TW LW
Putter: Scotty Cameron By Titleist Studio Stainless Newport 2 putter (standard loft and lie, 35 inches long)
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It does help though...

I just re-read my post and the perfect contatct was not intended to be in there so thats my bad, my point was not everyone on tour swings as fast as Tiger and Phil

ZEBRA
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just re-read my post and the perfect contatct was not intended to be in there so thats my bad, my point was not everyone on tour swings as fast as Tiger and Phil

ZEBRA

I think you're missing the point of the thread. Tiger's irons aren't de-lofted. They have MORE loft. In other owrds his 3 iron is equivlanet to Phil's 4 iron, his 4 iron equivalent to Phil's 5 iron and so on. Which means that it's even more impressive that he can hit his 8 iron (or Phil's 9 iron) 198 yards on a par 3 to 3 or 4 feet.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ZEBRA

Xt1ncT, I do understand how impressive it is for Tiger to be hitting de-lofted clubs but I think you're missing the point of my posts being that I don't see the poing of Phil, and probably many other touring pros hitting a stronger lofted clubs, seems like they are just having the engraver put a 4 on their 3 iron or a P on their 9 iron etc...

sorry if i'm not being clear about what I don't understand ZEBRA
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Xt1ncT, I do understand how impressive it is for Tiger to be hitting de-lofted clubs but I think you're missing the point of my posts being that I don't see the poing of Phil, and probably many other touring pros hitting a stronger lofted clubs, seems like they are just having the engraver put a 4 on their 3 iron or a P on their 9 iron etc...

Zebra, if I gave you a set of clubs that were all one club longer than your current set, would you want to buy them? After all, they're longer and yet probably just as accurate...

Many equipment companies do this by marking their 44° club "PW" even though, in reality, it's a 9-iron. There's that "club longer." A lot of the pros play de-lofted clubs because they are looking to hit long par threes, reach par fives with irons, and so forth. So that 4-iron that plays as a 3-iron is good. On the top end, they add a sand and a lob wedge to fill the gaps between their PW and whatever short-game shots they need. They rarely leave themselves an awkward distance on a layup, so they really don't need too much height (with a true PW, for example). Tiger plays pretty standard lofts. His PW isn't 51, last I heard - but more the "old" industry standard of 48 or 49. Titleist still sticks to pretty standard lofts, but look at this review and you'll note I talk about the decreased lofts for a few paragraphs.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

well to me it just doesn't make since to have a 4 iron that plays like a 3 iron because it is de-lofted instead of just playing a 3 iron. I guess I am just over thinking this whole topic but it just doesn't make since to me. As far as you giving me clubs that play one club longer, I would be real mad the first few rounds cause I know that the distance difference would slip my mind and I would hit everything long but heck yeah of course I would take free clubs but it would make more since to me to say hey here's a 2 iron, it will go furthur than your 3 iron. Sorry if it seems like I am being difficult this concept just doesn't make since to me. If you want the length of a 3 iron then hit your 3 iron.

ZEBRA
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't care if I hit 6 or 7, I care about how close it went. At the level Woods plays at and it's true for many low handicap players as well, distance control is far more important than distance.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One difference between a delofted 8 iron verses a standard 7 is shaft length. In theory the 7 would still be longer even if the lofts are the same, but the 8 might be more accurate due to the shorter shaft.
I would guess the pros play less loft for a few reasons:
They hit the ball hard enough to get it in the air,
They have better control (as mentioned above),
It might alter a competitors club selection, especially on par 3's,
It sounds cool on TV to hit a 8 iron 200 yards from the rough!

Chris
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • He started off playing the first hole exactly how he should: fairway, 20-footer for birdie to the fat side of the green, tap-in par.
    • @iacas-Tho it is nice to be able to take your time and type out what you mean to say this is one of the downsides to a forum too-You have to respond to a whole bunch of crap and a person can get all of their thoughts out uninterrupted. If you were been sitting in a room with @natureboy and he started drawing that entirely stupid picture with the lines you could have cut him off and spared all of us the pain of having to watch him so badly miss the point. I bet @natureboy is still going to look at the response-And I bet he is still not going to see where he went wrong. But that is because he is just that way and he is unable to see how stupid his own posts are and how little they actually deal with golf swings. His stick drawing is exactly why you asked for a video-Even though he posted it after you asked. His errors and flaws and stupid thoughts would have been even more evident if he had actually tried to make a vid.
    • Or… golf is hard, and he got hot for awhile. Wouldn't be the first flash in the pan. We'll have to wait to see what the true version is. He could be quiet for ten years and then win a few majors.
    • That makes a great third bullet point. Or a first bullet point, bumping my two down.
    • This photo and the text above illustrate pretty well exactly why I and the entire moderation team is now done with you. The image fails on two levels: The center image is not representative of an actual good golf swing. The right hip is closer to the right foot in the center image, yet you maintain that it's farther away. Whether the second thing is done intentionally or accidentally I don't know. I don't care to know. But it's very representative of how you argue, and why you're now going to be prevented from arguing. You pervert arguments to the point where we're no longer discussing the golf swing. You get basic facts or concepts wrong (like when arguing about course rating, misunderstanding the radius vs. diameter in faulting the rating process for higher handicappers). You focus on some small thing - which often isn't even something anyone else has said - and lose sight of the forest or the big picture. You're not here to help golfers. You're here to "win" an argument, a goal that as yet is unmet, and you have to post absolute crap like the above to try to do it. I had a bit of free time this morning. So I responded to your last post in some detail. It, as one would expect, contains a number of typical @natureboy traits: cherry picking a photo while ignoring the concept, failure to understand basic points, perversion of the statements of others, putting words in the mouths of others, use of vague words like "a lot" (often in combination with the "putting words in the mouths of others), and hyper-focus on some small largely negligible point. Nobody else should waste their time to read the below, or open the spoiler and read that. It will not shed light on anything, it will not help you with your golf swing, and you will not glean any useful information. It exists simply as my last effort at illustrating to @natureboy a small part of the reason why we're tired of him… even though as I post it I know with certainty it too will fail. I gave you twenty warning points last night. It was made clear to you what you had to do, and you failed to do so, flaunting the requirement in several posts. The entire moderation team - @mvmac, @RandallT, @boogielicious, @jamo, @billchao, @nevets88, @mchepp, others - and myself have simply gotten sick and tired of your entire persona here. You're constantly and never-endingly arguing stuff to the point where you bastardize things so much you're no longer even talking about the golf swing, and you fail to comprehend or respond to what's written to you in response. You have two real choices once your current suspension is over: You can ignore these warnings, continue to be a belligerent arguer, and receive a final 50-point warning that will result in your permanent ban. You can avoid behaving in the manner that infuriates the entire moderation team. That will likely mean limiting the topics in which you post quite a bit, because though you fancy yourself to be capable of discussing the golf swing from a theoretical perspective, you've proven that you are not. Now, I want to be very clear about something. You're not being warned or "handled" because you disagree. You're being handled here because you contribute nothing positive. You're belligerent. You don't help people. You don't demonstrate anything. You pervert and distort topics in order to make a point that often has little or nothing to do with how people actually play golf. You're on a mission to "win" an argument, not to further the understanding. You speak as if you know and fail to ask questions, despite the holes in your logic and posts being constantly exposed as gaping. You quite often fail to read what's written, take a beat, and try to understand it. P.S. This requirement is anything but arbitrary. The list of reasons are long, the surface of which was only scratched in this post. Arbitrary would have been to say something like "to continue posting here you must dress up in a purple outfit and post a photo of yourself diving from a diving board into a pool of jello." Asking you to post a video illustrating your point is the opposite of arbitrary.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Catcher20
      Catcher20
      (27 years old)
    2. JD15
      JD15
      (52 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon