Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Lakeland 6-year-old dies after fall from golf cart


Note: This thread is 5646 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just a little more on zegs post. You say you would not wear a seat belt for moving a cart up a short distance. Now i agree that i dont wear a seatbelt in a car in a parking lot. This is because in a parking lot Im going at low speeds (20 mph or less). Now a golf cart is ALWAYS going 20 mph or less so it seems to me that your agreeing that seatbelts are not necessary at low speeds (which is a golf cart 100% of the time).

No, I'm not agreeing that they're not necessary at low speeds. If that's what I'd meant, that's what I'd have said. What I said was 30 feet (i.e., a very short distance) over flat ground. In these situations, the risk is low enough that I might not bother. That said, when I get into a car, even to move across a parking lot, I usually do put on my seat belt. It takes a couple seconds and is done before the car is even ready to put in gear, so I'd be likely to use a well-designed seat belt in a golf cart virtually every time...

Seat belts are helpful any time you may be thrown from your seat. An unexpected sudden stop (faster than the lousy brakes on a golf cart I mean) at 20mph will plaster you into the windshield if you're not holding on to something. Furthermore, golf courses are known to tip or roll; I doubt safety studies have been done with them, but I'm willing to bet you're as safe or safer if you stay in your seat where you're not going to worry about than falling out and hoping you don't get rolled over by the cart. And yeah, if your idea of a seat belt is a rope tying you in such that you can fall off to the side and be dragged due to the seat design in a cart, then obviously it's going to be unsafe. I'm pretty sure I specified a well-designed seat belt.... it's not an insurmountable engineering problem....

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"


Posted
Golf Carts were meant to be used on the Golf Course, not cruising down the road in a subdivision.

Posted
Zeg-- plain and simple, seatbelts in golf carts is an incredibly stupid idea. You arent going to change my mind (and probablly just about everyone elses). If you want one then by all means install one in your cart but to me personally it isnt worth it. Statistically you are actually more likely to be killed or injured by a golf ball, or club than by a golf cart. Maybe we should all wear helmets out to the course. Another interesting tidbit to consider you are over one million (1,000,000%) percent more likely to be killed on the car ride to the course than in the golf cart.

Now am i saying that a golf cart with seatbelts wont improve safety, NO. Im just saying that it is not reasonable, logical, practical or necessary. But if a seatbelt makes it safer than why stop there, why not install a nascar style safety harness, neck brace and roll cage? Because its not necessary. I could go on all day with statistics showing how unlikely golf cart deaths are but if you havent caught on by now then im not sure if you will.

Carry Bag
Hyper-X 9 Degree Stiff
Redline 13 Degree Stiff
Halo 19 Degree Hybrid Stiff
BH-5 3-PW Stiff SV Tour 52 Degree Stiff Rac Chrome 56 Degree Stiff Scotty Cameron Oil Can Santa Fe 33" Burner


Posted
A couple months back I was playing my course one evening. I drove up to the green and there was a cart on it right side Beside it stood a Dad and two 8 yr old girls who were crying with skint knees and elbows. The dad had screwed up his knee and couldn't walk. Not sure how he done it but he flipped that cart with the girls in it, and at a level place where they should be starting and stopping. GO figure.

Note: This thread is 5646 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
    • Hi Jack.  Welcome to The Sand Trap forum.   We're glad you've joined.   There is plenty of information here.   Enjoy!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.