Jump to content
Note: This thread is 5008 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

hmm well i guess i am doing the weight transfer wrong on the downswing, i have been having a lot of lateral movement on the downswing. is that bad?

BAG:Nike ExtremeSport 2
DRIVERTaylormade R11
WOODAdamsgolf Insight
IRONSMizuno MX-100's
WEDGEPing 60 & Mizuno MP R Series 56 PUTTERSeemore FGPLOWEST 9:36LOWEST18:74


hmm well i guess i am doing the weight transfer wrong on the downswing, i have been having a lot of lateral movement on the downswing. is that bad?

Every swing is different. It isn't nessesarily "bad," it's just difficult to repeat every time. The less lateral movement you have on the backswing, the less lateral movement you need on the downswing to get back to a good impact position. It really depends on how much lateral movement you have though. Too much lateral movement isn't good.


Great Video!!! This is exactly what I've been told my problem is. I have a hard time squaring the club because when I sway foward, my club is essentially behind me and this prevents me from squaring it at impact.

LIVING A DREAM
BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY #56


hmm well i guess i am doing the weight transfer wrong on the downswing, i have been having a lot of lateral movement on the downswing. is that bad?

I don't think it is BAD but as described by O'Hair, it's harder to find the consistent impact position every single time. Golf is a game of simplifying. Avoiding unnecessary movements is the key.

  • Upvote 1

Golf: Agony & Love over 3 Generations


okay so i get that too much lateral movement is bad but it seems like without a lot of weight transfer i cant really hit down on the ball very well

BAG:Nike ExtremeSport 2
DRIVERTaylormade R11
WOODAdamsgolf Insight
IRONSMizuno MX-100's
WEDGEPing 60 & Mizuno MP R Series 56 PUTTERSeemore FGPLOWEST 9:36LOWEST18:74


  • Administrator
Every swing is different. It isn't nessesarily "bad," it's just difficult to repeat every time. The less lateral movement you have on the backswing, the less lateral movement you need on the downswing to get back to a good impact position. It really depends on how much lateral movement you have though. Too much lateral movement isn't good.

The problem with that is that it's wrong. Every good player - EVERY good player - pushes laterally towards the target on the downswing. They all hit the ball with their weight already shifted dramatically to the left. You don't the weight from the right side to the left side simply by rotating. You do it by driving the pelvis forward, the knees forward.

I don't think it is BAD but as described by O'Hair, it's harder to find the consistent impact position every single time. Golf is a game of simplifying. Avoiding unnecessary movements is the key.

Sean's not even correct in this video.

1) First, his right leg does straighten (I'm not starting this debate again - he retains some flex, he doesn't lock his knee, but he does decrease the amount of flex. 2) Second, he's completely wrong about what Stack and Tilt is on the backswing. There's no leaning towards the target like he demonstrated - it's about keeping the upper center "stacked" over the lower center. 3) He's completely wrong about how much he pushes forward laterally on the downswing. Look, part of the reason I kinda hope Sean Foley ends up coaching Tiger Woods - Foley is O'Hair's coach too - is because Sean Foley has been teaching Sean O'Hair Stack and Tilt without calling it Stack and Tilt. Sean Foley has texted Mike and Andy, he's pestered them with questions constantly (they're nice guys, so "pestered" is my characterization) on the range, and the language Sean O'Hair and Foley use in articles is straight out of the Stack and Tilt playbook. To put it basically, Sean Foley's been teaching Stack and Tilt to Sean O'Hair. And may soon be teaching pieces of it (inward hand path, PLEASE) to Tiger Woods. Look at the pictures, read the language, and decide for yourself. This one's pretty clear, and it's not a case of seeing what you want to see... spend time with Mike and Andy and you're going to hear the SAME phrases, the same words, and see the same pictures. http://iacas.org/f/ohair_article.jpg Sean O'Hair's swing is as close to the S&T; model as almost any other golfer. Whether O'Hair knows it or not.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Thats exactly what i am trying to work on, when i was with my instructor i was just striping irons one after another, and i didn't concern myself with lateral movement, which i do sometimes if i think i am not getting over. Its a bad habit i created. But i have the issue that he didn't discuss much, how to get to the left side with out lateral shifting to much.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The problem with that is that it's wrong. Every good player - EVERY good player - pushes laterally towards the target on the downswing. They all hit the ball with their weight already shifted dramatically to the left. You don't the weight from the right side to the left side simply by rotating. You do it by driving the pelvis forward, the knees forward.

I guess I misread the question that I replied to originally. My response was for lateral movement in the backswing but I see now he was asking about downswing. A lot of golfers do have lateral movement the backswing but the more lateral movement you have, the more you'll need on the downswing to get back to impact. This is why I said "too much lateral movement [away from the target] isn't good."


  • Administrator
A lot of golfers do have lateral movement the backswing but the more lateral movement you have, the more you'll need on the downswing to get back to impact. This is why I said "too much lateral movement [away from the target] isn't good."

Yes, I agree with all of that.

The O'Hair video is yet another great example of "do as I do, not as I feel like I do and thus say I do."

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Why don't more teachers to the pros give Master Classes? Or better yet, why don't they do dual Master Classes with the pro just there to hit shots and talk about feel (and be the big name draw) and the coach actually talk through mechanics and drills?

Driver: 909D3 9.5*
Wood: 909F3 15*
Hybrid: a4 3-4H
Irons: MP-57 5-PW
Wedges: MP R 50.5 SM 54.12 MP R 58.10Putter: Pro Platinum Newport 2 Mid SlantCorrect me if I'm wrong Sandy, but if I kill all the golfers, they're gonna lock me up and throw away the key...


Yes, I agree with all of that.

Precisely. Here's a good angle showing his lateral movement, and this is with an iron. He does it whether he realizes it or not.

 - Joel

TM M3 10.5 | TM M3 17 | Adams A12 3-4 hybrid | Mizuno JPX 919 Tour 5-PW

Vokey 50/54/60 | Odyssey Stroke Lab 7s | Bridgestone Tour B XS

Home Courses - Willow Run & Bakker Crossing

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

hmm well i guess i am doing the weight transfer wrong on the downswing, i have been having a lot of lateral movement on the downswing. is that bad?

no, you can move as far laterally on the downswing as your lower body will let you without your upper body(shoulders and head particularly), moving forward. you have to shift your hips laterally unless you plan on hitting the ball from the outside. i focus on keeping my chin slightly behind the ball at all times.


Look, part of the reason I kinda hope Sean Foley ends up coaching Tiger Woods - Foley is O'Hair's coach too - is because Sean Foley has been teaching Sean O'Hair Stack and Tilt without calling it Stack and Tilt. Sean Foley has texted Mike and Andy, he's pestered them with questions constantly (they're nice guys, so "pestered" is my characterization) on the range, and the language Sean O'Hair and Foley use in articles is straight out of the Stack and Tilt playbook.

Thank you. I have been seeing this for a while now as well. There a lot of players with S&T; swings and that are being taugh S&T; fundamentals but they are being called something else so there isn't that negative conotation to it.

It's quite funny.

In my bag:
Driver: R5 TP Diamana 83s Shaft
Fairway: Burner 15 degree Fujikura REAX
Hybrid: Custom 19 degree
Irons: DCI 990 S300 4-PW

Wedges: NF 52.04*, Spin Milled 56.10* and 60.08*

Putter: Red X3

Ball: ProV1

Shoe: Tour 360 LTD


After these comments, I'm beginning to think my instructor is teaching me S&T;! He loves to compare to Sean Ohair during the lesson, lol. And what Sean said in the video sounds just like one of my lessons.

So is sean O'Hair's swing the stack and tilt?

I am wondering because its not anything like what S&T; was described in Golf Digest. I am sure there are variants, but i put Sean O'Hairs swing as just want modern athletic golfers are using. Anthony Kims is very similar, and so is Rory's, were you don't try to make it a point to move laterally left, but the natural shoulder turn is there, staying central in teh golf swing and using all rotation.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5008 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 307 - Mirror swings, focusing on rotation. That seems to take pressure off my lead hip. 
    • With a lot of help from @iacas, I was able to take a great trip down to Pinehurst this past week. Took advantage of having a day off because of Veteran's Day and spent 4 days in the Pinehurst area. @iacas, @Hardspoon, @GolfLug, and @NCGolfer joined me for at least 1 round on the trip. I got in 2 courses in Pinehurst proper - Southern Pines and Pine Needles - and then the Duke golf course in Durham and Tobacco Road. All of the courses were new to me, and I really liked all of them. I am going to add more to this later when I have some time, but I wanted to post a quick recap/thoughts for each course. Duke Golf Club I really enjoyed this course. It's a big ballpark that goes up and down a couple of hills. The front 9 starts off going straight downhill, with 1 and 2 being similar dogleg left, downhill par 4s. You make your way to the bottom of the hill with a par 3 that plays over a lake, and then you creep up slowly. The best hole on the front is the 7, the first par 5. It's a dogleg right goes downhill to a small green protected by a creek and bunkers. If you can get your ball to the fairway, you should have a chance at going for the green in 2. That shot was probably the most memorable one I had on this course. You then crest the hill again with the tee shot on 9, which is a par 5 that goes down the hill and then the green is back on top of the hill by the clubhouse.  The back only goes up and down the hill once, so it's slightly more tame than the front. I really liked 11, which is another par 5. The tee shot plays down the hill, and if you hit a good one, you could have a mid iron into your hand with your second shot. The green is huge, but protected by a creek that runs in front of it. The closing stretch of holes are pretty good. 16 is a short par 4 playing straight up hill. Distance control with a wedge is really important. 17 is slightly uphill, but the trick is navigating the uneven lies in the fairway. 18 is fairly straightforward but a stout par 4 to end the round. The only negative is that there were a lot of holes with forced carries to the green. 4, 7, 11, 12, and 13 all had ponds or creeks fronting the green. Most of those required hefty carries.  Bottom line, I liked the course and the setting. I would be happy to play here regularly. Pine Needles I loved this course. The setting reminded me a lot of #2, and it feels like a mini #2 with a lot of small, turtleback-type greens. The opening 5 holes were outstanding. 1 was a really cool par 5 that was no gimme. The green was pretty wild. 2 was a long, downhill par 4. 3 was one of my favorite par 3s that we played - over a lake with bunkers framing the green. 4 was a short uphill par 4 that I really liked. 5 was an excellent but tough par 3, sitting on a shelf well above the tee. It's a great opening stretch. And again, the feel and look of the place is unique to the Pinehurst area. It feels like something you wouldn't find anywhere else. Other highlights - the green site on 9 was really cool. There is a big run off area to the right of the green that you want to avoid. It reminded me a bit of the second hole at Sand Valley - you don't want to be right of that green either. 12 was a great hole. You can't see the green from the tee, as the tee shot plays over a hill. When you see the green, it looks tiny, with a huge runoff and bunkers to the left of the green. The fairway is pretty wide, so the trick is accuracy with your approach shot. 18 was an extremely cool finishing hole. You can't really see the fairway off the tee, but it turns out to be fairly generous when you get there. And then the green site is fantastic - sitting at the bottom of the hill, but still requiring precision to be on it. I really want to get back and play this course again. There are a few shots that I want to try again (the drive on 10, the approach on 12, the drive on 18). And I just really loved the look and feel of the place. A great course and a fun day of golf. Southern Pines I thought this was the best course of the 4 I played. It's wider than Pine Needles, and the greens are bigger. But the greens are much more undulating. The land here is truly excellent. There is a ton of land movement, and seemingly every hole has elevation changes you have to navigate. I really like both par 5s on the front. If you hit good drives on both, you will get a big kick down the fairway. If you don't, you're going to be faced with a long 2nd shot just to have a wedge in. 2 plays down the hill with the tee shot and then back up the hill with the approach. You have to be careful about club selection and distance control there. 7 was a good, fairly long par 3 with a green perched on a ledge. 11 was a driveable par 4 with a wild green. 15 was really cool as well - the tee shot is downhill, but then the green is back uphill. This is a course I would love to play everyday. It's a thinking man's course, because you have to be really careful with all the elevations changes there. You constantly have to play and commit to a club longer or shorter than the distance. And I don't really think there are any bad holes. Only negative is that a few holes are a bit repetitive - 4, 16, and 18 are all shorter par 4s where you're hitting an uphill approach wedge or short iron. This is a very minor nit, though. One of the best courses I've played. I'd have to think about where exactly to rank it, but easily within the top 10. Possibly cracking the top 5. I will play this again next time I'm in Pinehurst. Tobacco Road I had a blast at this course. It is unique and pretty wild. You start out with these massive dune-like hills pinching in on your tee shot on 1. And then the entire round feels like you're going around these massive dunes. There are a lot of interesting shots here. You have long carries over bunkers, blind tee shots, shots into tiny greens, shots into huge greens, carries over deep bunkers, downhill shots, uphill shots, you name it. The setting is incredible. It is a huge course, and the fairways and greens tend to be very generous. I want to write more about individual holes later. But I really liked 7, 9, 10, and 16. I want to play a couple of the par 3s again with different hole locations and/or different tee boxes. 6 and 17, in particular, could play like wildly different holes with a different hole location (for 17) or coming from a different tee box (for 6).  While I had a lot of fun seeing this course, I do feel like a smart golfer could get bored here. To me, it was fairly obvious that Strantz was trying to bait you into trying a bunch of hard shots. On 11, for example, if you hit a good drive to the right side of the fairway, you could have a shot at the green in 2. But the green is over a massive bunker that has to be 40 feet below the green. And the green is narrow, essentially facing perpendicular to you. The only chance you really have is to hit a perfect shot. The alternative is an easy lay up to a wide fairway, leaving you with a wedge at the perfect angle. Maybe I try going for it with a 7 iron or something shorter, but that's about it. I felt similar on 5 - the direct line to the green is not that far and the green is driveable, But if you miss, you're going to have a 40ish yard bunker shot or a lost ball. Meanwhile, if you play to the right, you have a massive fairway and you'll likely be left with a wedge in your hand. I think it would be fun to play with 2 balls on some of these holes and try the shots. If you are a LSW disciple, though, you are not going to try the crazy risky shots Strantz is trying to bait you into. In the end, I really enjoyed this course. But I think it's below PN or SP. It's still awesome, and it was fun to see and play. I would come back here, but it's a lower priority than other Pinehurst courses. Well, that ended up being longer than I was anticipating. I may add some more thoughts about specific holes later, but this is a good starting point. I do want to think more about course ratings out of 10 for these, too. More to come...
    • Day 123: did a stack session.
    • Day 48 - 2024-11-17 A little work before Junior Elite. Left thumb and the compensating left wrist are better; still not great.
    • I watched a re-release of The Fifth Element.  I am going to give this movie a tap in Eagle. It's a wells shot movie. The actors are great. The story is interesting, and the setting is fascinating. For it being just over 2 hours, the pacing is phenomenal. I really enjoyed watching this sci-fi classic. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...