Jump to content
IGNORED

Clones broke!!


Note: This thread is 4945 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I haven't seen too many people with clones make it that far. I've seen a lot of bad golfers with new OEM irons too, so there's no guarantee you'll get to a level of "not sucking", with any iron.

Shooting low 90's now.... I'll be there by the end of the summer. Practice is key.... I bet Phil or Tiger could use my irons and still shoot under par. So the clubs aren't the issue buddy.

LIVING A DREAM
BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY #56

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 210
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Shooting low 90's now.... I'll be there by the end of the summer. Practice is key.... I bet Phil or Tiger could use my irons and still shoot under par. So the clubs aren't the issue buddy.

I didn't realize you're already shooting in the low 90s. You'll be shooting in the 80s in no time.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I didn't realize you're already shooting in the low 90s. You'll be shooting in the 80s in no time.

Yeah, the majority of my problems come from being within 70yds of the pin like most high handicappers. I'll get it straightened out though. I've actually started trying to lay up about 120yds away so I can have a PW onto the green so I don't have to touch my SW/AW.

LIVING A DREAM
BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY #56

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I tried a set of G2 irons (G10 clones) and thought they were inferior to the real thing. I wanted to like them, they would have saved me $200-300, but the Pings were just far better in my opinion. I say play what works best for your game that you can afford.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'm going to go out on a limb and say whatever manufacturing agreement someone like Ping has with any factory will specificly state that the dies used to make Ping clubs can not be used to make any other brand.

You are correct. Clones are not made with the same dies as brand name clubs. They are made with dies designed by taking measurements from brand name clubs, then almost (but not quite) copying them. Counterfeits are usually made from stolen dies, and are marketed as the real deal. Clones are not.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

There are many reasons high profile companies have to charge much more for their clubs than the clone companies. One being the market research that is involved in manufacturing equipment.

Market Research drives their costs? I'm assuming this was a typo as actual market research costs are a mere fraction of the cost associated with product development, engineering and marketing. Yes, those big dollar for name-brand equipment go to pay for advertising and sponsorships, but they also pay the many engineers and solidworks drafters working in labs, continually testing and optimizing new products.

I'm simply stating that I, along with 90% of non-pro golfers are not good enough to notice what may be a slight difference.

Man, I'd love a reference to that article...

I agree with the others. Clone clubs are not about the "sharing of ideas or technology." It's a ploy on you, the consumer, to convince you that those big, bad manufacturers are charging too much for identical clubs. Let's face it, you aren't buying a perimeter-weighted iron with an elastomer dampener, you are buying a club that looks like a ping club.... and that's likely why you bought it. Even the Giga Golf stuff is designed to look like someone else's actual product. If these clubs are anything more than a reverse engineered club using a CMM machine and an underpaid CAD jockey, then why not position them as independent and reputable products rather than the red-headed stepchild of the real thing. That's my beef... the misrepresentation of product. We don't buy cloned cars, we buy new or used reputable cars... With thousands of sets of yesterdays best clubs on eBay for the same price of clones, it makes no sense to buy a clone of anything... It totally stumps me. But who am I kidding... Lord knows there are plenty of retards who would jump at a cloned Honda Accord while stocking up on Oakleys, Coach bags, Faux Ed Hardy Tees and other douche paraphernalia while visiting Mexico.

In the Bag: TaylorMade R11 TP - TaylorMade R7 TP TS - Cleveland Halo - TM TP 2009 3-PW - Vokey SM 52 - Vokey SM 60 - Rife Barbados CS - ProV1x 


On the Computer:  Analyzr Pro 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


But who am I kidding... Lord knows there are plenty of retards who would jump at a cloned Honda Accord while stocking up on Oakleys, Coach bags, Faux Ed Hardy Tees and other douche paraphernalia while visiting Mexico.

First off, LMAO!!

I understand the beef with clones. I just feel that not all clones market themselves as the "same" club as the real club it is cloning. Many market themselves as offering similar or most of the same benefits as the more expensive clubs for a lot less $$. If you want to use car manufacturers as an example, look at Hyundai, this is their exact business model. They claim to offer the same benefits and luxury as BMW, Lexus, ect. without carrying the high $$ price tag. Even though, I drive AMERICAN!!!

LIVING A DREAM
BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY #56

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Lots of "high horses" in this thread. I say play whatever you enjoy and can afford. Noone but you has to hit them. If a person is happy and content with "clone" clubs or "clone" sunglasses why should anyone else care?
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Lots of "high horses" in this thread. I say play whatever you enjoy and can afford. Noone but you has to hit them. If a person is happy and content with "clone" clubs or "clone" sunglasses why should anyone else care?

Seriously. I can gaurentee most of you do things much worse than hit clone golf clubs, like speed in your car, lie, take more than one, etc. It's one thing to talk big about being moral, but another to actually do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Lots of "high horses" in this thread. I say play whatever you enjoy and can afford. Noone but you has to hit them. If a person is happy and content with "clone" clubs or "clone" sunglasses why should anyone else care?

Dude, it's not a question of cost when it comes to clubs - there's plenty of reasonably priced used clubs out there on Ebay and the like. I just can't imagine what's going through somebody's head to make them wany to buy a set of rip-off Pings / Callaways / TM, when you can get them for a song.

The original poster could get himself a set of real Ping G10s for not much money, but instead he chooses to buy a set of Pong Q10s or whatever the hell they're called - plus just to make him look doubly foolish, now he has to get the damn things repaired - for christs sake, real G10s don't even have a ferrule on them! The moral of the story is if you want quality, you have to buy quality, it doen't have to be this years model and it doesn't have to be new, so it doesn't have to be expensive. Brands cost money and have brand equity for a reason. You think the lenses on some shades made in a sweatshop in China will protect your eyes like Oakleys will? In this life, you get what you pay for.
In the bag...

G10 9° Driver
G10 17° 4 Wood
G10 21° Hybrid i15 4-PW Tour-W Wedges 50/12 & 56/10 Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 (35")Balls - Bridgestone B330-RX
Link to comment
Share on other sites


The original poster could get himself a set of real Ping G10s for not much money, but instead he chooses to buy a set of Pong Q10s or whatever the hell they're called - plus just to make him look doubly foolish, now he has to get the damn things repaired - for christs sake, real G10s don't even have a ferrule on them!

His G10 clones' ferrule didn't break, his clone Vokey ferrule broke. So much for the reading.

Brands cost money and have brand equity for a reason. You think the lenses on some shades made in a sweatshop in China will protect your eyes like Oakleys will?

Yep. And you look a lot smarter seeing as you didn't pay $200 for a pair of sunglasses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


His G10 clones' ferrule didn't break, his clone Vokey ferrule broke. So much for the reading.

There is a good amount of technology in a good set of sunglass lenses (oakley or other) that can be crucial to protecting your eyes. Perhaps not $200... but let's line up apples with apples.

I don't particularly care about people playing clone clubs, but I feel bad when I see young golfers wasting money of poor equipment under false pretenses. Yes, they are new and shiny and look like the real deal, but good luck ever getting your dollars worth out of these clubs like you can a name-brand iron. There is a 1-year old set of Giga Golf clubs in our marketplace that the owner is practically giving away for $75... These are over $250 new, and last time I checked they were still for sale and he was bumping his thread for attention. Old sets of various ping, Titleist, Callaways and other great irons can be bought and sold for less than $200 on eBay. People still seek out and play clubs like the Ping Eye2 and the 962B. So what gives? To the OP, whats your stance?

In the Bag: TaylorMade R11 TP - TaylorMade R7 TP TS - Cleveland Halo - TM TP 2009 3-PW - Vokey SM 52 - Vokey SM 60 - Rife Barbados CS - ProV1x 


On the Computer:  Analyzr Pro 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


His G10 clones' ferrule didn't break, his clone Vokey ferrule broke. So much for the reading.

To KingFisher,

Yep, there was no mention of a ferrule on the clones or anything about repairing the Z-10 (Ping clones). Your beliefs lead me to believe you are one of these people who think because you spend a lot of money on an item, its the best quality. Is this correct? If so, shouldn't we all be living in the most expensive houses and driving the most expensive cars, afterall, wouldn't they offer more protection?

LIVING A DREAM
BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY #56

Link to comment
Share on other sites


There is a good amount of technology in a good set of sunglass lenses (oakley or other) that can be crucial to protecting your eyes. Perhaps not $200... but let's line up apples with apples.

I believe there are clones out there that do come close to offering the same quality as the real deal. I understand the technology will not be exact and the real deal will have an edge. Frankly, I know I'm not good enough to tell the difference at this time. As stated earlier, I've hit both my clones and the real G-10s side by side at a Ping demo day and both responded the exact same. I had my golf instructor hit my clones as well, he too said they performed just fine.

Will I eventually purchase a more expensive set of clubs? Heck yeah!!! when I am playing better and reach my goal of consistently shooting in the mid 80s, I'll buy a set I intend to keep for years to come. As of right now, spending $200 on clones thay perform just as I thought they would works just fine for me. Who cares about the resale value? I don't!! It's $200, I most definately will get my money's worth out of this set even if I only keep them for a season and sell them for $75 or sell them at all. Come to think of it, I spent $200 just playing this past month. Ouch!

LIVING A DREAM
BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY #56

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Dude, it's not a question of cost when it comes to clubs - there's plenty of reasonably priced used clubs out there on Ebay and the like. I just can't imagine what's going through somebody's head to make them wany to buy a set of rip-off Pings / Callaways / TM, when you can get them for a song.

I missed that the ferrule was from the Fauxkey wedge too. How crappy would that feel? The real ones aren't exactly "butter".

Anyway, my daughter's ophthamalogist highly recommended not buying cheap sunglasses. She says you're better to wear a hat with a brim, go with no sunglasses and squint, than wear cheapos that don't do what they claim. But, did you know knock-off speakers and guitars sound exactly like the originals? True story.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


At least this guy can admit the clubs don't swing him. I've seen more club hos around golf forums than I can care to count. They're all obsessed with the newest, latest, most expensive club on the market, even though they're a handicap golfer. Every 3 months, they have to have the new Taylormade driver, and they rave on and on about how great Miura forged clubs are, and why don't all the tour pros play them... on and on.

I was once down at the driving range, and there was this guy with the most atrocious swing I've ever seen, reverse pivot, over the top, chicken wing, no balance, etc. He was just blasting away at this driver, a brand new, super forgiving Adams Insight A4OS driver.

This guy actually says to his group, "I just need to get a good club and I'll hit it better. This club isn't very good."

Everyone thinks the clubs make the golfer. Not true. Tiger could beat anyone on this forum playing the cheapest pot metal clones ever made. I would be more ashamed to take out a set of expensive forged blades, and fail to break 100 than playing cheap clones and shooting 80. He plays what he wants, and you guys don't have any right to tell him he's wrong. His clubs are perfectly legal, and he has every right to use them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


At least this guy can admit the clubs don't swing him. I've seen more club hos around golf forums than I can care to count. They're all obsessed with the newest, latest, most expensive club on the market, even though they're a handicap golfer. Every 3 months, they have to have the new Taylormade driver, and they rave on and on about how great Miura forged clubs are, and why don't all the tour pros play them... on and on.

There are 4 or more schools of thought on this:

1.) play what you want - or rather what looks like what you want, but is more in your price range 2.) who cares, because I suck either way 3.) I'd like to play something that's quality, even if it's slightly used or from the clearance rack 4.) counterfeiting anything is kinda douchey 5.) who friggin' cares Since I'm partly #3, but mostly #5, I should bail on this thread.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 4945 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I kind of figured that might be part of the problem. I’m still guilty of it myself at times and you’re a better ballstriker than I am. I imagine the temptation to go for the flag grows as you get more control over your wedges. Might want to think about shot selection, too. I don’t know how you typically play short game shots but I see a lot of people default to hitting high pitch shots from basically everywhere, to every hole location, without regard for how the green is contoured and how the ball might release depending on where it lands. I know my short game has been steadily improving from expanding my shot selection, overall. Though to be honest, part of that is from necessity because I was really struggling with pitch shots so I started hitting more chips from everywhere, but it taught me a lot more about how to play short game shots in general. NP man. We’re all learning and improving together. It is a really good tool.
    • 2 rounds this weekend, one at my home course and another course that I know well.   Played well for 3 of the 4 nines.    Ended up with an 80 and an 88.  Breaking it down by 9, it was 38, 42, 41, and a tough 47 where I somehow ended up with chipping/pitching shanks where I dropped at least 6 strokes on the last 6 holes.
    • Yikes, how time flies. Here we are, almost ten years later. After prioritizing family life and other things for a long time, I'm finally ready to play more golf. Grip: I came across some topics on grip and think my grip has been a bit too palmy, especially the left hand. I'm trying to get it more in the fingers and less diagonal. Setup: After a few weeks of playing, this realization came today after watching one of Erik's Covid videos. I've been standing too far from the ball, and that messes up so much. Moved closer on a short practice session and six holes today, and it felt great. It also felt familiar, so I've been there before. I went from chunking the bejesus out the wedges to much better contact. I love changes that involves no moving parts. Just a small correction on the setup and I'm hitting it better and is better suited for working on changes. I'm a few years late, but the Covid series has been very useful to get small details sorted. I've also had to revise ball position. The goal now is back of ball in the middle of the stance as the farthest back with wedges, and progressively moving forward the longer the clubs get. Haven't hit the driver yet, but inside left foot or at the toe I suppose. Full swing: It's not terrible. I noticed my hands were too low, so got that to work on. Weight forward. More of the same stuff from earlier days. Swing path is now out-in and I want the push-draw back. When I get some videos it'll be easier to tell. I've also had this idea that my tempo or flow/rhythm could improve. It's always felt rushed around the end of the backswing into the transition, where things don't line up as they should. A short pause as things settle before starting the downswing. Some lessons might be in order. Chipping and pitching: A 12-hole round this week demonstrated a severe need to practice, but also to figure out what the heck I’m trying to do. I stood over the ball with no idea of what I wanted to achieve. On a four meter chip! I was trying the locked wrists technique, which did not work at all. As usual when I need information, I look for something Erik has posted. I’ve seen the Quickie Pitching Video before, but if I got it back then, I’ve forgotten. After reviewing that topic, some other topic about chipping and most importantly, the videos on chip/pitch from his Covid series, I felt like I understood the concept. I love the idea of separating those two by what you are trying to achieve, not by distance or ball flight. With one method you use the leading edge to hit the ball first. With the other, you use the sole to slide it under the ball. I was surprised he said that he went for the pitch 90% of the time while playing. I’ve always been scared of that shot and been thinking I have to hit the ball first. Trying to slide the club under usually ended with a chunked or skulled shot. After practicing in the yard the last days I get it, and see why the pitching motion is more forgiving. It’s astounding how easy the concept and motion is. Kudos to Erik, David and anyone else involved for being an excellent students of the game and teachers. With those two videos, my short game improved leaps and bounds, without even practicing. Just getting the setup right and knowing what motions you are trying to do is a big part of improving. Soft hands and floaty swings feels so much better than a rigid “hinge and hold”, trying to fight gravity and momentum by squeezing the life out of the grip. At least how I took to understand the “hold” part. I also think the chipping motion will help in the full swing. Keeping pressure on the trigger finger to ensure the hands are leading the clubhead and not throwing it at the ball. I've also tried looking in front of the ball at times when chipping, which helps. That's something I've been doing on full swings for a long time, and can make a big difference on the ball flight. Question @iacas: You say in the videos that you want the ball somewhere near the middle of your stance, and that for pitching it's the same. On the videos you got a fairly narrow stance, where inside of the left foot is almost middle of the stance, but the ball looks more inside the left foot than middle of the stance. Is that caused by the filming angle or is the ball more towards the inside of the foot? I often hit chips and pitches from uphill and downhill lies, where a narrow stance would have me fall over. What is your thought process and setup for those shots? The lowpoint follows the upper body, around left armpit IIRC, so a ball position relative to the feet may not be in the same spot relative to the upper body with a wider stance. Practice: I've set up my nets at an indoors location where I can practice at home. I did a quick search on launch monitors (LM), but haven't decided on anything yet. We're probably buying a house in this area in the near future, so I may hold off a purchase until I see what I can get going there. At some point I'd love to get a proper setup with a LM that can be used as a simulator. Outdoors golf is not an option 4-6 months a year here, so having an indoors option would be great. That would also be a place to use the longer clubs. My nearest course is a shorter six hole course where I don't use anything longer than a 21º utility iron. To play longer 18 hole courses I have to drive 1-1.5 hours each way, which I will do now and then, but not regularly. The LM market has changed a lot since Trackman arrived, and more people are buying them for personal use, but it's still need to spend a lot of money for a decent one that can fi. track club path. The Mevo at £305 could perhaps be something to consider. Maybe they have lowered the price to get out units before a new model is launched? It is almost six years old, though perhaps modified since then. It's got limited data and obviously isn't an option as a simulator, but could provide some data when hitting into a net. I'd have to read more about it first. It has to be good enough to be useful for indoors practice. As long as I frequently hit balls on the range or course, I'll get feedback on any changes there.
    • I'm pretty good at picking targets with mid/long irons in hand, but yes lately I have been getting more aggressive than I should be, especially from 100-150. The 50-100 deficiency is mainly distance control, working on that mechanically with Evolvr, but the 100-150 is definitely a result of poor targets.  6,7,8 iron in my hand I have no problem aiming away from trouble/the flag, hitting a very committed shot to my target, but give me PW, GW, and some reason I think I need to go right at it (even though I know I shouldn't). Like here from my last round. 175 left on a short par 5 to a back right flag. Water short right and bunker long. Perfectly fine lie in sparse rough, between the jumper and downwind playing for about 10yds of help. I knew to not aim at the flag here, aimed 40 feet left of it, hit my 165 shot exactly where I was looking, easy 2 putt birdie.   But then there's this one. I had 120 left from the fairway to a semi-tucked front left flag. Not a ton of trouble around the green but the left and back rough does fall off steeper than short/right rough. For some reason I aimed right at this flag with my 120yd shot, hit it the exact proper distance but pulled it 5yds left and had a tough short sided chip. Did all I could to chip it to 8 feet and missed the putt for a bad bogey. Had I aimed directly at the middle of the green maybe 5yds right of the flag, a perfectly straight shot leaves me 20 feet tops for birdie and that same pulled shot that I hit would have left me very close to the hole.    So yeah I think the 50-100 is distance control and the 100-150 is absolutely picking better targets. I have good feels and am strong with distance control on those I just need to allow for a bigger dispersion.    This view is helpful. For the Under 25yds my proximity is almost double from the rough vs the fairway which reinforces that biggest weakness right now being inside 25yds from the rough. But then interestingly enough in the 25-50yds I'm almost equal proximity from fairway and rough, so it looks like I need to work on under 25yds from the rough and then 25-50 from the fairway. The bunker categories are only 1 attempt each so not worried about those.   Thanks as always for the insight, it's been helpful. I'm really liking ShotScope so far.
    • Wordle 1,053 4/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 🟨🟨⬜🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟩⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...