Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Ryder Cup Pairings


Note: This thread is 7202 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Who do you think should be paired, and in which formats. Should Lehman front load the singles or maybe the back?
I would pair Tiger with Furyk and Phil with Dimarco at least once each day I would try to go with as many of the vetrans as possible during alternate shot. But I would try to make sure that everyone had played at least once before singles. I might pair some of the rookies together to take some of the pressure off.

1W Cleveland LauncherComp 10.5, 3W Touredge Exotics 15 deg.,FY Wilson 19.5 degree
4 and 5H, 6I-GW Callaway Razr, SW, LW Cleveland Cg-14, Putter Taylor Made Suzuka, Ball, Srixon XV Yellow


Posted

I'll have to do a lot of thinking on this one, and I've already started that thinking process (I'm probably not getting much accomplished at work).

I'd have Tiger and Furyk paired up in the foursomes each morning, and I'd have them going out in the first match. I would have DiMarco and Mickelson also paired in the foursomes each morning, and I would have them going out last.

I'm still wondering if I would have Furyk and Woods paired together in the fourball competitions, or if I would have Woods and Henry together and Furyk and Wetterich (or something like that). Furyk and Woods are playing so well right now that they are going to make a lot of birdies regardless of who they are teamed with.

I'll get back to this topic after I get more than my original two pairings.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I would try to go with as many of the vetrans as possible during alternate shot. But I would try to make sure that everyone had played at least once before singles. I might pair some of the rookies together to take some of the pressure off.

I like the idea of pairing the rookies together. What do we have to lose? Our veterans got nothing done in previous Cups.

Driver: 9.5° 905R Stiff Aldila NV 65
3 Wood: 15.° Pro Trajectory 906F4 Stiff Aldila VS Proto Blue
Hybrid: 19.0° 503 H Stiff Dynamic Gold S400
Hybrid: 21.0° Edge C.F.T. Ti Stiff Aldila NVS
Irons: 775cb 4-GW w/S300 Sand Wedge: Vokey 58° Puttter: Laguna Mid-Slant Pro PlatinumBall: ProV1Bag: Li...

Posted
I'm still wondering if I would have Furyk and Woods paired together in the fourball competitions, or if I would have Woods and Henry together and Furyk and Wetterich (or something like that).

I think that's one of the worst things we can do this time around. I remember reading an article somewhere that talked about not putting rookies with vets because the rookies feel added pressure instead of less, especially when they play with Tiger. It's more of an "oh I better not screw up attitude" rather than a "I've got Tiger, we're going to kill them" attitude.

Put rookies together in 1 of the 4 matches each session and tell them "hey, no one expects you guys to do well since you're rookies but I've got faith in you guys. Go out and prove that our young guys have game!" Let them have a "hey, we're in this together (as rookies), let's do it" attitude.
In My Bag:
Driver: Titleist 983K 9.5°, Harmon HTD CB-65R
3-Wood: Mizuno MP-001, 13°, Harrison Striper Titanium
Hybrid 1: TaylorMade Rescue Mid TP, 16°
Hybrid 2: TaylorMade Rescue Mid TP, 19°Irons: Ping S59 Tour 4-PWWedges: Mizuno Black Nickel 51.06 / Cleveland Black Pearl 58.08Putter:...

Posted
Put rookies together in 1 of the 4 matches each session and tell them "hey, no one expects you guys to do well since you're rookies but I've got faith in you guys. Go out and prove that our young guys have game!" Let them have a "hey, we're in this together (as rookies), let's do it" attitude.

Very good logic. If they win it's like stealing points. If they lose, it's no big deal because they were supposed to.

Driver: 9.5° 905R Stiff Aldila NV 65
3 Wood: 15.° Pro Trajectory 906F4 Stiff Aldila VS Proto Blue
Hybrid: 19.0° 503 H Stiff Dynamic Gold S400
Hybrid: 21.0° Edge C.F.T. Ti Stiff Aldila NVS
Irons: 775cb 4-GW w/S300 Sand Wedge: Vokey 58° Puttter: Laguna Mid-Slant Pro PlatinumBall: ProV1Bag: Li...

Posted
I did some thinking at lunch, and here is what I come up with. I'm no captain, but this is how I would do it.

Friday Foursomes
Woods/Furyk
Johnson/Taylor
Campbell/Verplank
Mickelson/DiMarco

Friday Fourball
Woods/Henry
Furyk/Wetterich
Campbell/Toms
Mickelson/Cink

Saturday Foursomes
Woods/Furyk
Toms/Verplank
Johnson/Taylor
Mickelson/DiMarco

Saturday Fourball
Woods/Furyk
Campbell/Verplank
Toms/Cink
Mickelson/DiMarco

Sunday Singles
Tiger Woods
Jim Furyk
Zach Johnson
Brett Wetterich
Chad Campbell
David Toms
JJ Henry
Scott Verplank
Stewart Cink
Vaughn Taylor
Phil Mickelson
Chris DiMarco

This would put Woods, Furyk, and Mickelson out in all five matches. They are the top three, and they are going to have to lead by example. I'd live with the top three and die by the top three.

Also, it puts DiMarco, Verplank, Toms, and Campbell all out four times each. They are the next guys in line as far as I'm concerned, and they need to be out a lot as well. Verplank mostly goes out four times because of his accuracy for the foursomes. Verplank and Campbell both have similar ball flight and will play well together. All of these guys mix and match well together.

That allows Cink (putter is still iffy to me), Johnson, and Taylor to play three matches, and Henry and Wetterich two matches. Johnson and Taylor are good friends, and their games are similar. They will work well in the foursomes competition, hence the reason they get three matches.

It may not look good to everyone else, but that's how I'd do it. And of course it would change according to who is playing well, and what injuries arise (Verplank's ribs possibly).

Also, for the singles, I started quickly with Woods and Furyk and ended strong with DiMarco and Mickelson. Other than that, I mixed in the rest of the team with the rookies being sprinkled throughout.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Fri. 4-Ball Sat. 4-Ball
Campbell/Henry Cink/Wetterich
Mickleson/Toms Mickleson/Toms
Woods/Taylor Woods/Taylor
Furyk/DiMarco Campbell/Henry

Fri. Alt. Shot Sat. Alt. Shot
Johnson/Verplank Verplank/?
Mickleson/Toms Furyk/DiMarco
Woods/Taylor Woods/Taylor
Furyk/DiMarco Mickleson/Toms

Fri. 4-Ball Note: Woods/Taylor, because of Taylor's hard nosed attitude.
Fri. Alt. Shot: EU often wins cup on the 1st day. US needs 4 pts.
Sat. 4-Ball: Take risk sitting Furyk/DiMarco, let them recharge.
Sat. Alt. Shot: Mix & match.

Pairing that win stay together.
Pairs that lose get split apart. (Unless a 1-up loss, pair playing well)

Posted
Toms Really Worries Me!!!!!! He Has Not Played Well As Of Late And I Think We May Be Better Off With Henry Who Has Played Well Lately. As Far As I Am Concerned Tw, Lefty, Furyk, Dimarco, Cink And Henry Should Play Every Round And Alternate As Needed Everyone Else.

Posted

Here's an interesting quote from

this article :
...while Garcia's pinpoint accuracy off the tee looks ideally suited to complement Olazabal's peerless iron play.

Pinpoint accuracy? I wouldn't call

129th on the tour pinpoint. Maybe if the pin is the size of a building.

Fairways and Greens.

Dave
 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
OK, maybe something from the Europe team. These pairs are just guesses of course and you never know what Woosie is up to, but i think they seem logic:

Harrington/McGinley
Garcia/Olazabal
Montgomery/Donald
Howell/Casey
Clarke/Westwood
Stenson/Karlsson

Probably he will play the top players in foursome and for the fourball the best and the rookies. It sure will be interesting!

Posted
Fri 4-Ball Fri Alt. Shot
Harrington/Stenson Westwood/Howell
Montgomerie/Clarke Montgomerie/Clarke
Garcia/Olazabal Garcia/Olazabal
Donald/Casey Donald/Casey

Sat 4-Ball Sat Alt. Shot
Karlsson/McGinley Harrington/Stenson
Montgomerie/Clarke Donald/Casey
Garcia/Olazabal Garcia/Olazabal
Harrington/Stenson Montgomerie/Clarke

If I were EU captain, that how I'd do it.
Of course for Day 2, adjustments would have to
be made based on Day 1 results

Note: This thread is 7202 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • StuM,  I have, in the past, added a left handed club. (Ususally a 7 iron) However, I usually take a stroke penalty and move the ball to where I want it.  I play for fun and in a pinch can use theback side if my club if I don't want the penalty stroke.    RetiredOldMan,  Terry 
    • So, Brendan Sorsby, Texas Tech transfer QB, was found guilty of sports betting by the NCAA. He admitted to it. He placed thousands of bets over multiple years while at Indiana and Cincinnati. This included betting on his own teams.  The NCAA rules ban athletes from betting on any sport (college or pro).  A retired visiting judge from Tarrant County, Texas has put an injunction on the NCAA ruling. He is a visiting judge because the first judge was a graduate and big fan of Texas Tech, and he recused himself. The judged ruled the following... "Under Curry's order, Sorsby is permitted to play for Texas Tech's 2026 season on the condition that he continues his treatment for a gambling and anxiety disorder and serves a two-game suspension (missing games against Abilene Christian and Oregon State)."  Don't get me wrong, I don't particularly care for the NCAA. That still doesn't mean that a college can choose when or where to say, "Yea we agree to these rules for all our sports, well except in this case." Here is a breakdown from S&W. The Hidden Weapon in Sorsby’s Injunction: How a Lubbock County Court Order Quietly Neutralized the NCAA’s Most Powerful Enforcement Tool - Law Offices of Snell & Wilmer By Ryan J. Regula On June 8, 2026, Lubbock County District Court Judge Ken Curry issued a temporary injunction in Brendan Sorsby v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, Cause No. DC-2026-CV-0791 (99th Judicial District... The main judgement made sense. Sorsby, I am going to have all this harm done to me if I don't get to play. The Judge, I agree. The penalty for gambling is too harsh, so here are all these things you must do, and I will grant this injunction against the NCAA. Basically, an analogy would be when a person goes into court for a DUI and they agree to all these other things to not end up in jail.  What sucks for the NCAA is the NCAA has appealed to Texas’ Seventh Court of Appeals, based in Amarillo. All four justices that preside over the court are graduates of Texas Tech University School of Law. It would be hilarious if all four of them had to recuse themselves 🤣. For those who like to read legal rulings...  
    • The chatter in my brain is when the distance is between clubs since I am pretty weak at shortened backswings, etc. I try to simply decide if being long or short is the better outcome and choose my club based on that and simply not even try for the “real” distance.  For me a full normal swing is what I strive for.
    • I saw this comment made in a golf article... "Most golfers stand over a 4- or 5-iron still negotiating with themselves. They think about how hard to swing, whether they have the right club, if they have the aim correct and more. It’s a lot to deal with and long irons punish the “half-in” golf swing." I am not sure the "most golfers" is correct regarding the bolded part. I can understand if there is a bunker, water, and/or OB that a lot of golfers would be fixated on that. I am not sure that leads to ending up more times there. Pending your level in golf, the variance is so large in outcomes, it could be just with in the expected outcomes. I can understand if have a big lake on the right side of the hole being one of the most terrifying shots for right-handed amateur golfers.  I am not sure many golfers are standing over the ball talking to themselves, "Ok, maybe I should step back and pull the 4-iron. Am I lined up right? Oh, the wind came up, should I swing harder? What am I going to have for dinner tonight, maybe steak. (Joking, somewhat 😛)" A question is that how much chatter do you get while standing over the ball. Are you questioning the everything about your golf shot?   
    • Wordle 1,816 5/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.