Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5792 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yeah, it's women trouble, well, not really. It's more like, I just want to talk about this for a minute. How many times do you hear this line:

"I don't care what a man looks like, as long as he's smart and funny, blah blah blah..."

Bull. Women are more shallow than men I say. I was 290 lbs a while ago, and I couldn't find a woman to save my life. I started working out and running, and dropped a ton of weight, and suddenly every woman on the planet seems interested in me, and now, I'm torn between two of them.

Seriously, have you met any overweight women who can't get a date? I knew a girl that was 300 lbs (who was in love with me, btw, but she was too messed up even for me), and we ended up as friends. She had more men all on her than white on rice. It was simply amazing, good looking guys too! She rejected this one guy I remember, tall, built really good, totally nice guy too.

If you're ugly, they find something, like, "there's no spark," or, "I'm just getting out of a relationship." Look, just tell me it's my weight for the love of god, don't lie to me! That's worse than at least being able to feel as if she's a shallow person. Do you guys think women are more vain than men on the issue of looks? I mean, don't get me wrong, there are tons of men who are terrible about it, but damn, women seem to just lie and justify everything about you.

Now, how the hell do I decide which of these two women to keep?


  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Now, how the hell do I decide which of these two women to keep?

Simply ask each one of them that question and changes are that you won't have to decide. They'll both be gone.

But if one stays, you'll know she really has a thing for you.... Or, I guess you could use clubhousehero's advice.

In my bag:
Driver X460 TOUR OPTIFIT 10.5* Graphite
FW 3W BIG BERTHA DIABLO 13* Graphite
FW 5W BIG BERTHA DIABLO 18* Graphite
Irons X-22 IRONS 5 - PW & SW GraphitePutter Odyssey Dual Force Rossie IIUnder my bag: 2007 EZGO ~ Customized


Posted
Whichever one has the bigger tits.

Thanks man, now I have to clean up the coffee I just spit all over my computer!!


Posted
Whichever one has the bigger tits.

Is there any other way to find a good one? lol

Kyle Paulhus

If you really want to get better, check out Evolvr

:callaway: Rogue ST 10.5* | :callaway: Epic Sub Zero 15* | :tmade: P790 3 Driving Iron |:titleist: 716 AP2 |  :edel: Wedges 50/54/68 | :edel: Deschutes 36"

Career Low Round: 67 (18 holes), 32 (9 holes)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
TTIWWP.

Which one is lower maintenance?

In the blue Colts bag:

Driver - FT-5 10°
Hybrids - 4DX 15.5°, 20°
Irons/Wedges - CI-7 4-GW, SW | "Free" Warrior 60° LWPutter - TiffanyBalls - various


Posted
TTIWWP.

You mean they actually make low maintenance women these days?

In my bag:
Driver X460 TOUR OPTIFIT 10.5* Graphite
FW 3W BIG BERTHA DIABLO 13* Graphite
FW 5W BIG BERTHA DIABLO 18* Graphite
Irons X-22 IRONS 5 - PW & SW GraphitePutter Odyssey Dual Force Rossie IIUnder my bag: 2007 EZGO ~ Customized


Posted
I'd say women and men are probably about the same when it comes to superficiality. I think the OP makes a valid point in that women in general don't like being labled superficial when it comes to looks, but indeed they are. Every guy who has pined away for some chick only to be thought of as a "friend" (read: no sex) knows this to be true. Wait till they start shooting you down because you aren't good enough in bed. If you think the trash talk guys do is bad hang around with a bunch of women. Women who tell each other everything. Everything.

Nike Vapor Speed driver 12* stock regular shaft
Nike Machspeed 4W 17*, 7W 21* stock stiff shafts
Ping i10 irons 4-9, PW, UW, SW, LW AWT stiff flex
Titleist SC Kombi 35"; Srixon Z Star XV tour yellow

Clicgear 3.0; Sun Mountain Four 5


Posted
There is one thing that will help you attract hot women even if you're not a great looking guy..............money

Posted
You mean they actually make low maintenance women these days?

Note I said lowER. :)

In the blue Colts bag:

Driver - FT-5 10°
Hybrids - 4DX 15.5°, 20°
Irons/Wedges - CI-7 4-GW, SW | "Free" Warrior 60° LWPutter - TiffanyBalls - various


Posted
Seriously, have you met any overweight women who can't get a date?

Yes many. I don't know how you can let yourself go like that.

Driver: Taylormade R11 set to 8*
3 Wood: R9 15* Motore Stiff
Hybrid: 19° 909 H Voodoo
Irons: 4-PW AP2 Project X 5.5
52*, 60* Vokey SM Chrome

Putter: Odyssey XG #7

Ball: Titleist Pro V1x


Posted
[QUOTE=Shanks A Million;479519

Bull. Women are more shallow than men I say. [/QUOTE]

I don't buy it. You see a whole lot more guys with better looking chicks than the other way around. Most woman just want a guy with his stuff together, and isn't a complete ass. And there's not a whole lot of guys around that have that combination. I've talked to a bunch of girls about this. The hollywood romantic notion of meeting Mr. Right leaves after college, because the selection goes way down.

As far as which of the two woman to keep, just think it through logically. From what I've seen of you around here, you seem like a smart guy. Think about what are you looking for in a relationship, just getting some or love or something long term, and figure out whether or not the priorities of these women align with yours.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Flip a coin. Before it lands you'll probably be hoping it lands a certain way - go with that one.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
Think about what are you looking for in a relationship, just getting some or love or something long term, and figure out whether or not the priorities of these women align with yours.

Good advice.

Spend ample time with both. Don't commit! Don't settle for the best of only those two. There are lots out there and if you "settle" for one, you'll likely make a mistake that will cost you in the future. Guard your heart. Don't allow yourself to "fall in love". Know one thing about "falling in love".... You fall in holes and you fall out of trees! You don't "fall in love". Love is something you "choose" to do. That is why so many marriages fail. The couple thought they "fell in love" and then "fell out of love" when someone else came along that posed as the "greener grass" merely fell in and out of "infatuation" with each other. It doesn't matter what the other person is like, looks, color, etc., you can love them from now on as long as you "choose" to love them. You look like you're still young, Shanks. Just don't do like some older people and grab the first thing that comes along because you think you'll have to spend your golden years all alone. Take it one day at a time and when you come across the one that is right for you, then you'll know it and you'll be willing to do what it takes to keep them, and vise versa. Disclaimer: This advice might be worth only as much as you paid for it. On edit: Also try to align yourself with someone that has the same principles as far as money management, religion, political views, etc. This will cut down on the amount of arguments you have in the future.

In my bag:
Driver X460 TOUR OPTIFIT 10.5* Graphite
FW 3W BIG BERTHA DIABLO 13* Graphite
FW 5W BIG BERTHA DIABLO 18* Graphite
Irons X-22 IRONS 5 - PW & SW GraphitePutter Odyssey Dual Force Rossie IIUnder my bag: 2007 EZGO ~ Customized


Posted
Good advice.

I totally agree with all of this. Woman are the emotional ones. You have to be rational. Love has it's purpose, but before all things, be rational and think everything through.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I totally agree with all of this. Woman are the emotional ones. You have to be rational. Love has it's purpose, but before all things, be rational and think everything through.

Ha!

The first time I ever set eyes on my wife I knew she was a woman I wanted to be around. It wasn't love at first sight, but I knew right away she was a woman I wanted to pursue. After we got to know each other I knew she was a woman I wanted to be with (in pretty much every sense of the word). So to put this in relation to the OP's situation I'd say if you have to think twice about either of these women it's nothing serious. There is absolutely nothing wrong with seeing women you aren't serious about, but you need to be honest with them and yourself that you're keeping your options open.

Nike Vapor Speed driver 12* stock regular shaft
Nike Machspeed 4W 17*, 7W 21* stock stiff shafts
Ping i10 irons 4-9, PW, UW, SW, LW AWT stiff flex
Titleist SC Kombi 35"; Srixon Z Star XV tour yellow

Clicgear 3.0; Sun Mountain Four 5


Posted
Why settle for one? Tick a threesome off your bucket list.

:tmade: SLDR X-Stiff 12.5°
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Wood Stiff
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Hybrid Stiff
:nike:VR Pro Combo CB 4 - PW Stiff 2° Flat
:cleveland:588RTX CB 50.10 GW
:cleveland:588RTX CB 54.10 SW
:nike:VR V-Rev 60.8 LW
:nike:Method 002 Putter


Posted
What you talking about? You keep both...
THE WEAPONS CACHE..

Titleist 909 D2 9.5 Degree Driver| Titleist 906f4 13.5 degree 3-Wood | Titleist 909 17 & 21 degree hybrid | Titleist AP2 irons
Titleist Vokey Wedges - 52 & 58 | Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 Putter | ProV1 Ball

Note: This thread is 5792 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • No one should measure a joint mobility away from that joint. If you go to physical therapy, they are not measuring your knee mobility based on your midline. It is based at the joint. Shoulder mobility should be measured in reference to the shoulder joint. 
    • He's using a driver swing, while I used the iron swing. Bryson goes from about 65° B to 15° B, hence the 50°. If you bend your right elbow, you're going to pull your hands across your chest some. Conversely, if you abduct your right arm and hold onto a grip with your left arm, you can see how extending the right elbow as we do in the golf swing during the downswing will "pull" the right shoulder/humerus forward (adducting it, as going from 65° to 15° of abduction is). Even people who pull their right shoulder WAY too far around them eventually get it "back in front" when their right arm/elbow extends. So, such a motion shows up as shoulder adduction even though the movement that causes it is just widening the trail elbow. The left hand on the grip almost "pulls" the hands forward as the left arm can't stretch much (there's some shoulder protraction, but that's almost maxed out at P4). Oh, I downloaded it and watched it (and commented there) before he blocked me. It's what led to him posting the comment in the "update" above. 😄  Single shoulder range of 75°, and that's going out well into the follow-through. 50° Max range up to impact. Manavian's video is bad. He keeps saying "midline" which is just a horrible way to look at it. He also kept saying that the club was moving that amount — also wrong. Adding left and right together is really freaking dumb. Another golf instructor said "That's like saying the player has 100 degrees of knee bend (adding left knee bend to right knee bend) 🤦‍♂️" (similar to what the biomechanist said about squatting). Also, see my post above about elbow bend. That's why Plummer’s alignment stick demo is so intellectually dishonest. A golfer can't get anywhere near that position on the left with his left hand on the alignment stick (quoted below).  
    • That makes no sense at all.  so, I watched that Instagram. Here is a summary...  Bryson.... Address: Trail Shoulder 0 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 65-deg abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 15-deg abduction. P9: 10 degrees adduction. Rory... Address: Trail Shoulder 16 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 26 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 0 degrees abduction.  P9: 18 degrees of adduction.  DJ... Address: Trail Shoulder 4 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 42 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 2 degrees abduction.  P9: 15 degrees of adduction.  Their point is that arm doesn't stay on the trail side. That the arms have to get across the chest from P4 to P9. I mean they do. What matters is the rate of which it happens relative to the position of the swing. The trail shoulder at P9 is not abducted a lot. The range of that total abduction movement is like 40 to 70 degrees. Bryson might be an outlier. Rory might be an outlier as well.  A couple of points.  1. None of them had any adduction at impact. So, this tells me the trail arms stays on the trail side of the body at impact. Is it moving towards lead shoulder, yes. It doesn't happen till post impact. The right side of the body is moving towards the target, so the arms don't have to as much as people think.  2. Trail shoulder adduction from Impact to P9 is 18 to 25 degrees.  3. P9 adduction of the trail shoulder is only about 2 to 12 degrees more adducted than at address. The arms/hands stay in front of the chest a long-time post impact. If Rory, from his address position just rotated his body towards the target and raised up his arms so he is at P9. He basically didn't have to move his trail arm further across his chest than where he started at address. Visualize that for a bit. I bet for people who tend to stall and drag their arms across their body to hit the ball, that would emphasize how much the arms stay in front of the body and how much you have to turn.             
    • Do you know how Manavian is measuring his shoulder adduction-abduction that purports to demonstrate 50 degrees or motion in Bryson's downswing? I know the broader biomechanics research/scientific literature on this suggests shoulder adduction-abduction is only a modest contributor of force generation in the downswing, so I'm definitely not convinced by anything he's arguing, I'm just curious how different people can be claiming to use ostensibly the same "data" to tell a much different story.
    • I have an update… I don't have much of a response, because the fact that they would ADD the numbers for the lead and trail shoulder together… I mean, wow. I was giving them too much credit. Nobody would think to assume they were doing THAT. That's beyond comical. One of the biomechanists I talked to put it this way: "So if I squatted down and went from 180 to 90 deg knee angle, then I would say 180 deg range of motion because I have two knees?" I'd type more (maybe), but honestly, I'm laughing a bit too hard. 🤣 Update: Mini Manavian blocked me on Instagram, so I cannot see his post showing Bryson with about 50° of range of motion (with a driver) from P4 to P7, and 75° only if you go out to the mid-follow-through. What a terrible loss for me. 😉 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.