Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
upah

Dynamic Gold SL

10 posts in this topic

I recently became aware that the shafts in my irons are really heavy, comparatively speaking. I play DG S300 now and settled on them versus the PX 5.5 because I like the lower (again, relatively) ballflight they give me. Relative to some of my playing partners, I feel that my irons weigh maybe 20-30% more.

On to the question: who has experience with the SL series? Do they play the same, only lighter? Or will my ballflight increase? I wouldn't mind the extra yardage (currently 155yd 8i) but don't want to mess with the occasional sky-ball...
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

You win some, you lose some.

Heavier shafts mean more control, and it always will be.

The SL has the same core concept of the True Temper family---- meaning while the shaft itself is lighter than other model from True Temper, it still has high kick point. Now if you compared the SL to DG, you will see the club that is lighter by at least 20 grams. The SL is 106 grams in all flexes, while the DG starts at 123 up to around 130 grams. That's a lot of weight missing from each one of your clubs.

If you have no problem with accuracy, changing to lighter shafts can be nice.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the SLs in my Adams A4s and really like them. They are not too flexible even though the are lighter. My swing speed for a 6 iron is around 80 - 85 and I have no control issues. I've tried the DG and PX 5.5 and like the SLs better.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

You win some, you lose some.

Thanks for the info.

How does the GS95 compare to the SL? Dan
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The GS 95 has very similar weight range when compared with the SL. However, these 2 models provide different ball flights. The GS 95 would give you a higher ball flights, while the SL leans more towards piercing trajectories.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My X20 irons have the stock Uniflex shaft - midkick and 106 to 120 grams in weight.

Clubfitter where got them suggested I might consider reshaft with DG R300 SL - keep ball a bit lower, and pick up clubhead speed with less weight. SL weight is 106 grams, and trims to just under 100 grams.

The True Temper website contains weight, performance and trim info on all its shafts.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

That's where I got the background. Has anyone played both shafts in the same flex that can testify whether or not the ballflight will be higher with the SL?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From a science fair standpoint, the SL - Superlight - would hit the ball slightly higher because it generates more clubhead speed than a standard weight DG. But, I don't know if you would notice it with the naked eye - would probably need comparable launch monitor readings to tell the difference.

If you got the HL - high launch - this would create a higher ball flight.

BTW, if you want testimony, find a golf shop with a demonstrator kit (Mizuno, Titlelist) that allows you to interchange shafts. Try the 6 iron in both SL and standard DG shaft - see if the monitor picks up a height difference.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The only experience I have with a DGSL300 shaft is in my 2 iron. The ball flight I believe is higher than my 3 iron when comparing the two. SL shafts feel very light which I wouldn't mind in something long like the 2 iron but definitely would not want it in a shorter iron where accuracy is important.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

According to Titleist's shaft matrix: http://media.titleist.com/images/titleist/pdfs/US/2013/sales/2013_Custom_Options_Book.pdf

The DG SL launches lower than the standard DG.

I play DG S300 and love them, but I do sometimes wonder what advantages a lighter iron shaft might offer especially in the longer irons.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • The course with my absolute favorite greens is Eaton Country Club which, despite the name, is far cheaper golf than most courses. A membership is something around $100 a month with no initiation fee or food requirement if I remember correctly. Play golf once a week and you're paying only $25 a round with cart for 18 holes, which is a far better deal than any other course in the area (the 9 hole course I work at is the cheapest in my city at $25 for 9 holes with cart). The greens at this course stimp between 11 and 12 on a daily basis and are the smoothest that I've ever set foot on. Their maintenance crew is fantastic about fixing every little imperfection in the greens. They go over them with a fine-toothed comb every evening to fix anything on the green.  I know there must be some kind of limit to how much play a green like this could sustain, but the course has looked this way every time I've played it (including weekends, weekdays, and such). It's not an enormously busy golf course though, and I don't think it would work on the courses that regularly see 200 or more golfers. I would be willing to bet good money though that, given equal traffic, good maintenance will definitely produce a much higher quality putting surface. The course I used to work for had two people assigned to fix ball marks on the course once a week, both of which had issues with their backs that made bending over for any extended period of time uncomfortable. The greens at that course clearly showed it, with unfixed or only partially fixed ball marks marring every putting surface. The course I currently work at has a maintenance crew that fixes marks whenever they're out to water as well as marshalls that are assigned a couple of holes to maintain during their shifts and I notice that the greens here have many fewer ball marks across the greens. The maintenance crew is also diligent when it comes to regularly verticutting, needle-tining, etc. all of the greens to ensure that they're in top shape. They water the greens up to four times a day depending on the weather conditions as compared to the old course only watering in the evenings and sometimes mornings to save money. As a result the greens at my current course are much more lush and smooth than those at the course I used to work and play at, and I know the difference is the care and attention to the maintenance of the greens (they have similar player traffic).
    • To clarify, I have a push cart. I don't have an umbrella, yet. That probably would have done loads of good keeping the sun from beating down on me. I've got one picked out, but just haven't pulled the trigger yet.  Shooting an 86 was a "decent" to "good" round for me. I felt like I played well. My ball striking was above average today. I had 7 GIR and 7 nGIR. I had 37 putts today, which was my score killer. Oddly enough, most of my 3 putts were on my GIRs! I say this because in the super heat I would think that ball striking would be the first to go, but it didn't for me. Putting was mainly because I'm still working on breaking old habits I had with my old putter and moving to my new putter. Lines were always spot on but I would go back to "popping" the ball like I did with my old putter and would lose it way past the hole.  Definitely need to pick up that umbrella. I imagine that would help a ton. I'm 28 years old and in pretty darn good health/shape and I would have probably died had I actually carried my bag today... lol. Even my lighter "carry" bag.
    • For irons, last year at a Titleist fitting they said I should get the AP1's with the XP 90 gram shaft with a +1/2.  This year I did another free open fitting and they said they wouldn't need to adjust the shaft but I don't remember what shaft they recommended.  Just got fit for a driver last Thursday but i don't think that helps. Scheduled a fitting for Saturday afternoon but who knows if the clubs will still be available then. 
    • I would say nicer golf courses tend to have better greens because of the money it takes to maintain them.  I would say that greens that can routinely hold up to being cut short probably have a healthier denser grass with stronger root systems that allow it to resist damage from pitch marks. I've played on course in Dayton where a pitch mark will just tear up the green versus another course where it just leaves a slight indentation. 
    • Give that man an icy cold beer, stat! I'm relatively young, and I'd take the cart for the breeze between shots and holes as well as the portable shade. What's the point in suffering unless you are practicing for competition in similar conditions? For anyone, I think the physical metabolic toll of moving all that water through to stay cool would tend to lower scores. But you do get longer drives than typical playing conditions, and you may feel extra limber. Older folks face potential heat stroke risk, because they aren't as efficient with heat regulation as a healthy adult. If you are healthy and that's your only day free to play, why not.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. chriswuk
      chriswuk
      (25 years old)
    2. Gero
      Gero
      (73 years old)
    3. SUPGolfer
      SUPGolfer
      (46 years old)
  • Blog Entries