Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5556 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Does anyone know how well the "smaller" company club heads (specifically driver) compare to the big name companies? Can some one point me to legit 3rd party literature?

Thanx

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Depends on the company. If its Maltby, Wishom (sp?), Alpha, KZG, SMT. there are more good componet companies, but those are the ones that come to mind frist. The aforementioned companies have excellent products.

Posted

If you spend $500 on a driver, it won't be 5x as good as a $100 driver. With that said, sometimes you get what you pay for. Then there is the quality of the shaft of course. One good way to pick up clubs on the cheap is in the marked down items on websites like Edwin Watts, The Golf Warehouse, Golfsmith, etc.. Also, Callaway Preowned. Got most my clubs from there and all were brand new in shrink wrap. Just buy items that are listed as "like new". Many ways to get premium drivers without buying a HAMMER. Ha ha... Pooooooooooooooooooooooooooow!!!!!!!!!!!

Skip forward to the one minute and ten second mark...




BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMMMMMMMMMM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



-Dan


Posted
There are some excellent component manufacturers. The companies that Blades4me mentioned are all excellent as well as Snake Eyes from Golfsmith. Over the past 1 1/2 I have come to play exclusively Maltby products as I like his designs and the quality is excellent. I have two of his drivers:

I use this driver head in a Motore F1 shaft. http://golfworks.com/product.asp_Q_pn_E_MA0124SW

Golfworks has it marked down to $44 which is an absolute steal. I bought mine for $99 a little over a year ago.

Glock 17


Posted
I am looking to build my next driver. I am not sure how much a maltby head vs a Ping head would make a difference. I have been shopping ebay but they warn people about buying just the head. I would really like to get a 7.5 Ping G10 head. I guess I have all winter to shop but if there is good literature out there showing a club making company with comparable or better to mainstream ones I would definitely consider it.

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
The problem with finding good or 3rd party literature out there is that most of the information is either bought and paid for by the companies, (big or small), and most of the rest is written by mortal humans trying out clubs who may mean well but suffer from being human. Ping, Taylor Made, Cobra and the other big companies make very good stuff, so do Maltby, Wishon, SMT, Alpha, Geek, Bang, Nakashima and many others. At a local golf course here one of the pros builds Wishon clubs, he also is big on Ping and of course sells many other brands. A friend of mine tried out both a Wishon and a Ping driver. He told me that time after time he hit the Wishon longer and more accurately than the PIng. He bought the Ping anyway because he admitted he couldn't get past the idea that Ping had the big name and the big price tag so it had to be better.
I'm currently hitting a R9 that I just got and I love it. Is it "better" than my SMT or my Maltby? Of course not, the longest drives of my life have been with the Maltby but the R9 is new and shiny and I'm a club ho.
You might want to at least have a conversation with someone like Rory at Indacup Golf, Ken at Victory Custom Golf, or Dave at Slickstix Golf. I've dealt with Rory personally and he's an informative and helpful guy, Ken and Dave both have good reputations from people I know. That's only 3 of many good shops across the country. They will all have their opinions and biases but you'll still learn something.

Posted
The problem with finding good or 3rd party literature out there is that most of the information is either bought and paid for by the companies, (big or small), and most of the rest is written by mortal humans trying out clubs who may mean well but suffer from being human. Ping, Taylor Made, Cobra and the other big companies make very good stuff, so do Maltby, Wishon, SMT, Alpha, Geek, Bang, Nakashima and many others. At a local golf course here one of the pros builds Wishon clubs, he also is big on Ping and of course sells many other brands. A friend of mine tried out both a Wishon and a Ping driver. He told me that time after time he hit the Wishon longer and more accurately than the PIng. He bought the Ping anyway because he admitted he couldn't get past the idea that Ping had the big name and the big price tag so it had to be better.

Thanks for the information. I am definitely going to pursue knowledge from those guys. I am just trying to gleam info until I make a comfortable decision. Obviously having the R & D behind TM or Ping is very alluring however I may not be able to tell the difference talent wise. I would like to see some unbiased iron byron tests.

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
We get into the problem of what's a name-brand, and what's a niche company which makes quality clubs for a small, limited clientele.

Tour Edge products the Exotic driver and fairway woods (FW go for about $200 each) and has been around for 20+ years. Bridgestone makes golf clubs, such as the J-series irons. And, you have Scratch golf, best known on this site for its wedges; Scratch also makes irons which go for $1,000 + a set.

Does the club manufacturer do its own research and have decent quality control, like Maltby and Tour Edge, or does it primarily make clones of other's clubs from three years back? If the clones are durable, that's OK, but quality control is always a problem with the lesser club makers.

One big eason to stick with brand-name clubs: You can trade them in. Established golf shops won't even look at Brand X clubs at swar-out time. Clubs must be in the "PGA Book" (?) I think that's what it's called.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
If you are looking for a driver - I can't recommend the Nakashima brand highly enough. Japanese American based out of the West Coast. Playing casual rounds with friends my buddy and I offer "big brand driver" friends a hit of our Nakashima's - next week they have one in the bag.

Oh, and I am not involved with the company or know anyone from the company.

Driver: Nakashima 10.5 degree
3 Wood: 15 degree F2
Hybrids: 19 and 21 degree
Irons: MP-58, 4-9 iron
Wedges: Vokey sm 47.06, 53.08, 58.08Putter: studio select 2.5Ball: Pro Vx : Warren Golf Club 73.6 : 146


Posted
Golfworks has quite the selection of heads. To be honest though, I don't really like the look of any of them. So much of what the OEM companies do is appearance, but it seems like component companies don't do any of that.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
If you are looking for a driver - I can't recommend the Nakashima brand highly enough. Japanese American based out of the West Coast. Playing casual rounds with friends my buddy and I offer "big brand driver" friends a hit of our Nakashima's - next week they have one in the bag.

Thanks, I will check them out.

Golfworks has quite the selection of heads. To be honest though, I don't really like the look of any of them. So much of what the OEM companies do is appearance, but it seems like component companies don't do any of that.

I agree, they are not very attractive to look at which is somewhat of a deterrent sadly.

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5556 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • It sucks to carry around a lot of water, but ideally it should be way more than we think.  I buy those gallon jugs of water and hang them from my pushcart when I walk. I agree with the electrolytes as well. You don't just sweat out water, but you lose electrolytes as well. 
    • A 2010 study from the Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research compares the effects of different pre-round stretch routines for competitive golfers. Active Dynamic Warm-up: Swing Medicus driver, hit 3 shots each with selected clubs. Passive Static Stretches: Various athletic stretches such as hamstrings, chest stretch and reverse trunk twist. The subjects were collegiate golfers with a HDCP index of 5 or less who engaged regularly in strength and fitness routines. All golfers had two test days: one with active dynamic (AD) warmup, a second with AD followed by static stretches (SS). The results were then compared, within golfers and across golfers. For performance testing after the warmups, golfers hit three driver shots at time 0, 15, 30 and 45 minutes after the warmup. The study shows that static stretch formats produced poorer performance outcomes in the four measures shown in Table 5, which shows Time Zero results. The performance deficits under the PSS protocol decreased over time. Some suggestions on why the passive protocol was tied to lower performance than the active protocol: The passive stretches routine induced excessive range of motion,  basically producing wobbles in the golf swing. Other research indicates that the stretching produced slack in the tendons, lessening the amount of muscle force that could be transferred into the shot. One caveat: The study had good scientific controls and balancing of treatments (test routines). This was, however, an exploratory study and raises as many questions as it answers. Also, although the study was done back in 2010, it is still cited as a primary work in recent reviews. A quick online search did not reveal any follow-ups on the study. For those interested, the study PDF is below. PassiveStretchGOLF.pdf  
    • I have trouble with vertigo on occasion, but have gotten nutritional and biofeedback tips to keep it at bay. Dehydration can help trigger v-like symptoms so one recommendation, along with maintaining overall hydration, is to start with 8 oz. of water early in the morning. A meta-analysis on Golf As Physical Activity indicated that golf is rated as a moderately intensive physical activity. This scientific literature review came from the University of Edinburgh. The physical activity level ties into hydration. A former university colleague was a marathon runner who had published a couple of articles on endurance training. He likewise said that golf was a moderate physical activity especially when the round stretched past  the two-hour mark. For hydration he recommended switching from water to electrolyte drink on the back nine (past two hour point of exercise) to prevent cramping. At the two-hour point of moderate activity, water starts flushing electrolytes out of the body, which can lead to fatigue and cramping. (I have had trouble with leg cramps in the past during exertion.) During a round, I start out with water on the front nine and switch to sports drink on the back nine. If the day is unusually hot, I may drink 8 oz. of Pedialite concentrate before going to the course. Maintaining overall hydration plus on-course boosters keeps me going.
    • Personally I’d try booking direct first - either via the Vidanta golf reservations number/email or through the resort concierge - especially for Christmas/New Year. Vidanta’s main courses (Greg Norman and Nicklaus designs) are popular and can book out fast this time of year, so direct often gives you the best shot at your preferred tee times.
    • Wordle 1,677 5/6* ⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟩🟩 🟩⬜⬜🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.