Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5522 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
For you who have played at Pebble beach before, how do you rate the course difficulty?
Is it fun to play there? Tell me your stories....

Is there anyway to play at Pebble Beach without paying the 400 $ green fee?? :P
Whats in my Golf Bag:
Driver: Nike Sumo 5000
5 Wood: Mizuno MP-001
Iron: Mizuno MX-950 5-PW
Wedge: Cobra FP 60 degrePutter: Odyssey 2-BallBall: Yellow balls

Posted
Obviously course conditions come into play here, too.

Golf Digest ran a special article for the 2010 US Open, and the course sounded pretty treacherous. I'd imagine it's a huge challenge even playing non-tournament tees and normal conditions, given the wind, rough, and difficult-to-read greens and enormous pot bunkers.

It's certainly on my bucket list.

In the Bag: TaylorMade R11 TP - TaylorMade R7 TP TS - Cleveland Halo - TM TP 2009 3-PW - Vokey SM 52 - Vokey SM 60 - Rife Barbados CS - ProV1x 


On the Computer:  Analyzr Pro 
 


Posted
Obviously course conditions come into play here, too.

In Golf Digest Open Challenge at Pebble Beach, the best score is Mark Walbergh (98)... I wonder if I got the spot, can I score under 100 too?

Whats in my Golf Bag:
Driver: Nike Sumo 5000
5 Wood: Mizuno MP-001
Iron: Mizuno MX-950 5-PW
Wedge: Cobra FP 60 degrePutter: Odyssey 2-BallBall: Yellow balls

Posted
In Golf Digest Open Challenge at Pebble Beach, the best score is Mark Walbergh (98)... I wonder if I got the spot, can I score under 100 too?

Honestly, if I could break 100 in those conditions I'd probably consider it a good day.

In the Bag: TaylorMade R11 TP - TaylorMade R7 TP TS - Cleveland Halo - TM TP 2009 3-PW - Vokey SM 52 - Vokey SM 60 - Rife Barbados CS - ProV1x 


On the Computer:  Analyzr Pro 
 


Posted
Honestly, if I could break 100 in those conditions I'd probably consider it a good day.

Really? Ok it wouldn't be easy but surely you wouldn't shoot +28. Thats bogeying every second hole, and doubling the others. and you'd probably have a few pars in there so i reckon you would break 100. You could play every par 4 as a 3 shotter and probably still break 100

Driver: Taylormade R11 set to 8*
3 Wood: R9 15* Motore Stiff
Hybrid: 19° 909 H Voodoo
Irons: 4-PW AP2 Project X 5.5
52*, 60* Vokey SM Chrome

Putter: Odyssey XG #7

Ball: Titleist Pro V1x


Posted
When those guys were trying to break 100 wasn't the difficult part about it being on live t.v. ?

Posted
Really? Ok it wouldn't be easy but surely you wouldn't shoot +28. Thats bogeying every second hole, and doubling the others. and you'd probably have a few pars in there so i reckon you would break 100. You could play every par 4 as a 3 shotter and probably still break 100

and of course the 4th isnt very long so it would be a clear 2 shotter


Posted
I no people who have played it and said it;s amazing!
I also no people have played tornys on there, they said it's hard, but not anything extreme.
Ive also herd the greens are never really that good there. When I say that, I mean it in the nice'st way. They are still great compard to probs what most people would play on, but not special greens. They say they get a bit bumpy.

Driver: 909D3 8.5* Diamana White Board X
3 Wood: MP 630 15* GRAFALLOY PROLAUNCH RED X
Hybrid: 909H 19* "Real" VooDoo X
3 - P: MP-68 KBS Tour Black Nickel X
56* 10 Wedge Vr60* 06 Wedge: VrPutter: Custom Made.Golf Ball: TOUR B330SI am the greatest, I said that even before I knew I was....


Posted
The answer to "Is PB a hard course?" is......it depends. PB's toughness is largely tied to two things: the weather and if they're growing US Open rough. Under normal circumstances the rough isn't too bad. It will punish errant tee shots and wayward approach shots, but not brutally so as it leaves you with the chance to recover. If the weather is real benign, then Pebble isn't all that tough from the tee as the fairways are pretty generous. Good iron shots are still needed into the greens as the greens are quite small and well guarded. A fair but not overly hard test of golf.

But when the wind blows Pebble becomes a very different animal altogether. Those generous fairways suddenly become very narrow, and those small greens start looking like little green floormats out in the distance.

And BTW, I haven't found the greens to be all that bumpy. They do have that odd poa annua appearance where their speed changes inconsistently towards the end of the day, but I found they still roll very true.

Oh, and the greens fee isn't $400. It's $495. And still worth it to do it at least once or twice.

Posted
I played there in April, two month before the Open. The fairways were already narrowed to US Open specs but not quite as high yet. The greens were much, much softer than they were during the Open. I would not say it is one of the harder courses I've played. But the wind was only blowing 10-15 that day. I will say its hard to concentrate on golf in such a beautiful place. With that being said I think I shot an 82 with 4 doubles. HA HA!

909 D3 with Diamana White X
909 F3 15degree with Aldila Vodoo
ZM Forged 2-PW
Voley 56 and 60
Studio Newport 1.5 PRo V1X


  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
The answer to "Is PB a hard course?" is......it depends. PB's toughness is largely tied to two things: the weather and if they're growing US Open rough. Under normal circumstances the rough isn't too bad. It will punish errant tee shots and wayward approach shots, but not brutally so as it leaves you with the chance to recover. If the weather is real benign, then Pebble isn't all that tough from the tee as the fairways are pretty generous. Good iron shots are still needed into the greens as the greens are quite small and well guarded. A fair but not overly hard test of golf.

I just played last Tuesday and agree with all of that. A cold front was coming through just as we tee'd off with winds 20 gusting 35 much of the day and two periods of very heavy rain that soaked my pants (too late for the waterproofs), so I would say the course was pretty tough. But Clambake is right, many of the tee shots give you room to deviate (on one side at least). I lost a ball, on the par 5 6th, to one of my classic big pushes into the beach/rocks. I should have played 3W off the tee almost all day like I did at Spyglass the day before, my driver just isn't there yet when it counts ..... Spyglass is much more demanding of accuracy off the tee than Pebble. On the other hand, many of the greens at Pebble are pretty small and very well protected, by bunkers and/or cliffs to the beach.

I didn't mind the weather so much really, it's part of the challenge and reminds you of what the pros have to deal with sometimes to win a tournament. You just deal with it. The sun did come out as we walked onto the 18th tee, where I proceeded to hit another big push that bounced off the cart path and into someone's garden according to my caddie. I didn't know that was possible ...... :) But I hit a decent 5W and 6i or something off the fairway and then 2 putted for bogie. On the greens: they were the best greens I've ever seen (Spyglass was equally good), better than Torrey for example. Very smooth. Since the whole course basically slopes towards the ocean off of the higher ground inland the ball almost always breaks that way. I was not putting at all well at either course - many 3 putts - but did nail one big left breaking downhill putt with the help of my caddie Mike. It was about a 6 footer and he said, "aim about 3 ft to the right and play for an 8 inch hole .... but hit the ball" so I did and the ball dropped in very nicely. Without him I'd have ended up way below the hole for sure. $495 is correct, with a discount for the season. Spyglass was $350.

Driver: Cobra 460SZ 9.0, med.
3 Wood: Taylor stiff
3-hybrid: Nike 18 deg stiff
4-hybrid:
Taylor RBZ 22 deg regular
Irons:5-9, Mizuno MP30, steel
Wedges: PW, 52, 56, 60 Mizuno MP30
Putter: Odyssey 2-ball


Posted
By far the best course I have ever played! I also played Spyglass and the Old Course St. Andrews, but Pebble beats both of them in in my opinion.

I think the first five holes at Spyglass were the best stretch of 5 holes I have ever played, but then it turns inland.

I played the tips at Pebble and shot 81, but remember, the challenge on TV was from the same tees as the US Open...big difference. Holes, 8, 9, 10 are as tough as they get!

Posted

Wow, 81 from the tips !!! ..... but but but, what was the weather like that day ??


For me, the back 9 at Spyglass may have been my best to date all things considered. Bogied every hole except for a double on the 11th (stupid lost ball - no caddie) and pars on 12 and 14.

Driver: Cobra 460SZ 9.0, med.
3 Wood: Taylor stiff
3-hybrid: Nike 18 deg stiff
4-hybrid:
Taylor RBZ 22 deg regular
Irons:5-9, Mizuno MP30, steel
Wedges: PW, 52, 56, 60 Mizuno MP30
Putter: Odyssey 2-ball


Posted
I'll throw my 2 cents in as well, the one time I played Pebble was in mid April. Got lucky as it was raining on the drive down from SF but cleared up by the time we played in the afternoon. Didn't play all the way back since it was for a practice match in high school, but I didn't think it was too tough all considered. Fairways are decently wide, which they purposely do (so I was told) to try and keep up the pace of play considering they have people coming from all over the world to play, ranging in skill level. Not sure how true that is, I'll buy it though.

Greens are small, pretty fast and yes, little bumpy in the afternoon, but still spectacular to putt on. From a shotmaking standpoint, there are definitely harder golf courses down in that area, most notably Spyglass. That's the toughest course I think I've ever played, whether its off the tee, approach shots or putting. They can get those greens going fast and it really penalizes you when you're above the hole. There's definitely more contour to the Spyglass greens compared to Pebble's which are just slick and tilted.

I know the price gets discussed a lot in this forum about being too much, obviously $495 is A LOT for golf, but please do yourself the favor at least once in your life if you really enjoy golf and pay it. I'm positive some of the naysayers have spent $495 in worse ways. Save up $10 a week for a year and theres your greens fee...and, BOOM GOES THE DYNAMITE!
  • Thumbs Up 1

Driver: Taylormade Burner TP (2007 model)
Fairway Wood: Callaway Steelhead III 4+
Hybrid: Sonartec MD 19
Irons: Mizuno MP 33s  4-PW
Wedges: Titleist Vokey Spin Milled wedges: 60, 56, 52Putter: Odyssey DFX 9900


Posted
Honestly, if I could break 100 in those conditions I'd probably consider it a good day.

Ive played it once, was an almost perfect day in early September, only slightly windy, temps in low 60s. I was carrying a 15-16 handicap at the time and shot 94. The course was hardly set up like a tournament, rough was modest, green speeds just average or a little above. I birdied the 18th with a long putt, my only birdie, only 2 pars, the rest were bogey or worse, including one I put in the Ocean giving me a triple. We probably should have played one more tee forward, we played a middle set of tees. At the time there were only 3 teeing positions available on most holes, the short par 3s only had two. I don't know if that is typical. Some of the tees needed reseeding, which suprised me a little. So 100 in tournament set up would be a good score, equivalent to 82 or so on my home course.

1W Cleveland LauncherComp 10.5, 3W Touredge Exotics 15 deg.,FY Wilson 19.5 degree
4 and 5H, 6I-GW Callaway Razr, SW, LW Cleveland Cg-14, Putter Taylor Made Suzuka, Ball, Srixon XV Yellow


Posted
I had so many up-and-down opportunities from near the fringe, at both Pebble and Spyglass, and made maybe two of them the whole blasted time - not even funny. Again, the ground was wet both days which really did me in chipping from the rough (not a San Diego phenomenon ... pathetic excuse really I know).

Getting to nearish the green in "regulation" isn't the problem really (just avoid the rocks/pine forest is all). But be ready to play some tricky little shots over a greenside bunker to a short pin on a small green with bunker + cliff/rocks behind, that type of thing.

practice practice practice.

Driver: Cobra 460SZ 9.0, med.
3 Wood: Taylor stiff
3-hybrid: Nike 18 deg stiff
4-hybrid:
Taylor RBZ 22 deg regular
Irons:5-9, Mizuno MP30, steel
Wedges: PW, 52, 56, 60 Mizuno MP30
Putter: Odyssey 2-ball


Note: This thread is 5522 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.