Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Question for low handicappers who play/played with high handicappers


Note: This thread is 5493 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

For me..I enjoy playing with alot of higher handicapped guys.  I play in a weekly game and most of them are 7-18 handicappers, I can play my game and enjoy the round with these guys.

a few things that drive me crazy, from playing with others.

1.  Do not take yourself so seriously, last time I checked that Master's wasnt calling.  There is no need for banging your clubs, cart or strings of obsenities becasue you missed a 20 footer or did not stick it tight from 150 yds.  Enjoy the game and play within yourself.

2.  If I pull out a 3 wood and go for it 265 out....you do not have to match me, especially since it is you 3rd or 4th shot.

3.  When I hit a bad shot, for the love of God, do not give me advise!

4.  Keep the pace of play going.

5.  Know the rules of golf and understand how to score things.  I hate getting to the end of the round and some crazy score comes out of their mouth because they didnt count some of those pesky penatly strokes.

6.  Lastly, because I card a 68 or 69 on the round I am not ready for the Tour...of any kind!

  • Upvote 1

Posted


Originally Posted by Bigtank

For me..I enjoy playing with alot of higher handicapped guys.  I play in a weekly game and most of them are 7-18 handicappers, I can play my game and enjoy the round with these guys.

a few things that drive me crazy, from playing with others.

1.  Do not take yourself so seriously, last time I checked that Master's wasnt calling.  There is no need for banging your clubs, cart or strings of obsenities becasue you missed a 20 footer or did not stick it tight from 150 yds.  Enjoy the game and play within yourself.

2.  If I pull out a 3 wood and go for it 265 out....you do not have to match me, especially since it is you 3rd or 4th shot.

3.  When I hit a bad shot, for the love of God, do not give me advise!

4.  Keep the pace of play going.

5.  Know the rules of golf and understand how to score things.  I hate getting to the end of the round and some crazy score comes out of their mouth because they didnt count some of those pesky penatly strokes.

6.  Lastly, because I card a 68 or 69 on the round I am not ready for the Tour...of any kind!



You are my kind of guy...great points, especially #1 and #6.  With #6, they have no idea and you know that is not taking anything away from a +2 either.  In my regular group we have have from +2 to 7, and luckily everyone knows how to keep score or will ask if not sure.  In my backup group, I am low man and the guys are 12-18.  These guys are ultra sticklers for rules and are harsh.  I like that in a golfer!

Callaway AI Smoke TD Max 10.5* | Cobra Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4i | T100 5-P | Vokey 50/8* F, 54/10* S,  58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback 1


Posted

I'm about a 9... so I guess I qualify.  I play with the guys I play with because of the kind of guys they are... not their score.  Last round I played the foursome was 78, 89, $1.03 and $1.05 or something like that.

Had a blast!

 :macgregor: V Foil 8.5*    :tmade: Mid Rescue 16*  -- :wilsonstaff: RM  2 thru Wedge -- :vokey: 56/10  -- :scotty_cameron: Studio Design 2  & a  :srixon: Z Star 


Posted



Originally Posted by TourSpoon

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bigtank

For me..I enjoy playing with alot of higher handicapped guys.  I play in a weekly game and most of them are 7-18 handicappers, I can play my game and enjoy the round with these guys.

a few things that drive me crazy, from playing with others.

1.  Do not take yourself so seriously, last time I checked that Master's wasnt calling.

5.  Know the rules of golf and understand how to score things.  I hate getting to the end of the round and some crazy score comes out of their mouth because they didnt count some of those pesky penatly strokes.

. . .  In my backup group, I am low man and the guys are 12-18.  These guys are ultra sticklers for rules and are harsh.  I like that in a golfer!


Just be aware that #1 and #5 are not always 100% compatible. If an 18 handicapper can't take on a 5.7 capper based on talent, he can always trot out the rulebook and ding him for something irrelevant. And since he's bleeding strokes left and right already, you might be tempted to cut him some slack. That group sounds like a real hoot.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted

As long as they play quick, I don't have a problem. And most high handicappers I know do just that when playing with me. It's the 15 handicapper that spends 2 minutes over each shot that I have a problem with.

My Tools of Ignorance:

Driver: Ping I20 9.5*
Woods/Hybrids: Cobra AMP 3W and 3 HY

Irons: Cobra AMP 4-GW

Wedges: Callaway Forged Copper 56* and 60*

Putters: Scotty Cameron  35" (Several of the flow neck blade variety)

Ball: Bridgestone B330-RX and Srixon Z-Star

Bag: Nike Performance Carry


Posted

Pace of play is the biggest issue in my experience.  I don't care what your handicap is, there's no excuse for s..l..o..w play.

Another biggie is when a high capper gets really upset every time they chunk a shot or something, even though it's obvious they're a weekend warrior.  I feel like saying (but never do of course), "I've been watching your play for an hour - what's the big surprise already ...".

By which I mean that golfers should not hold themselves to an unreasonable standard.  It's a very very difficult game to play consistently well, esp. if you don't play every day, so give yourself a break.  Enjoy the good shots you occasionally make and smell the roses.   Yesterday I didn't do well on the front nine but spent time watching a couple of turtles sunning themselves by a pond - without slowing the pace of play of course!

Driver: Cobra 460SZ 9.0, med.
3 Wood: Taylor stiff
3-hybrid: Nike 18 deg stiff
4-hybrid:
Taylor RBZ 22 deg regular
Irons:5-9, Mizuno MP30, steel
Wedges: PW, 52, 56, 60 Mizuno MP30
Putter: Odyssey 2-ball


Note: This thread is 5493 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.