Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6608 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
im looking for new irons after i got rid of my CG1 black pearls because i didnt like the shape of them, a little to long heal to toe for my liking. now, its between the nike blades and the rac mb tp. but on the titleist i came across the 680. but it is listed un 2005 models. and my question is, would i still be able to custom order the 680, as they are listed as custom order only. and my other question, for those that have hit the nike blades, how are they? how is the trajectory? im looking for a low trajectory, with a CG that is high and close to the face. thanks


adam

Posted

Hey, Ive never hit the CG1 but I have hit the nike blades, very hard to hit unless you strike the ball very very well. Tiger i believe is the only one on the NIKE team who plays those irons, most if not all the others play the pro combo tour's. BUT ive never seen you play or know how your iron play is.....I own the titleist 755 and they work like a blade with that lil extra forgiveness also you might want to look into the 690 cb i believe or the Taylor made tp's
maybe even the mizuno MP line. i hear those are very crisp and easy to hit for a blade type club. Go check out a demo day coming to your town or one close soon and hit those NIKE blades and see what you think.

Hope this helps. Sorry if i was a lil negitive but its a lot of money on new irons.

B

B.Nichols
10.2 HCP
Playing for 1.5 years on a once a week basis.

SasQuatch 9.5 SasQuatch 3 wood 15*755 Irons 3-PW +1 Inch 2* upright Vokey 52*Vokey Spin Milled 56* 10 Bounce CG10 60* XG9 ( Phil Replica)TP Black


Posted
my iron play is probably the best part of my game. im not worried about forgiveness. as a matter of fact, im looking for a very unforgiving iron, as i want to know when i make a mistake. i have hit the nike 9 and 6 blade at a demo day, i liked it very much. but it was the only iron i hit that day and so i didnt have anything to compare the trajectory with on that day. the only thing that is keeping me from getting them is the fact that they have a little more loft than standard and from what i heard is that they have a naturally high trajectory.

Posted
my iron play is probably the best part of my game. im not worried about forgiveness. as a matter of fact, im looking for a very unforgiving iron, as i want to know when i make a mistake. i have hit the nike 9 and 6 blade at a demo day, i liked it very much. but it was the only iron i hit that day and so i didnt have anything to compare the trajectory with on that day. the only thing that is keeping me from getting them is the fact that they have a little more loft than standard and from what i heard is that they have a naturally high trajectory.

Boeing747400,

Every blade on the market is weaker to loft compared to the cavity backs, since the clubs hit the ball lower, more loft is needed to increase trajectory and carry distance. Even the best ball strikers hit muscle backs too low without weaker lofts. The Nike Blades do not have a high trajectory in any way. I find it hard to believe anyone can hit them "too high" with a proper fit and swing mechanics. However, it is very easy to bring down trajectory further by bending the club strong. They are very good blades, clean lines, and are very high quality with consistent weights across the set (something Titleist and Mizuno can't say). Excellent club you really can't go wrong with. If you truly want a hard to hit blade with a low ball fight, the Bridgestone J33B is your ticket. They have a very long hosel which contributes to a very high and heel biased center of gravity. No other blade on the market hits the ball lower; however, no other blade is as difficult to hit.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
you are still able to buy the 680's. i would recommend the titleist blades over the nike blades because when i hit my friend's set i was able to to do anything i wanted to with it. as for the nike i wouldn't really recommend them but i did find that they were slightly more forgiving than the 680's. but you should take a look at some mizuno blades, they are some of the best feeling blades you'll hit especially the classic mp-33 or the new mp-67

Posted
My uncle have a set of Mizuno MP-33. I tried it on range, love the feel alot, might want to try mizuno out, they are known to make good irons.
Handicap Index: 16.4
Driver: Taylormade Burner 9.5 Degree
Wood: Nike Sasquatch 2 , Honshin Wood
Hybrid: Taylormade Rescue Dual 22 Degree
Iron: Macgregor Mactech M685 (4-PW)Wedge: Honshin Professional Wedge 56 Degree , Adam Golf Tom Watson 2007 Wedge 60 DegreePutter: Honshin PutterBall: Taylormade TP/Red

Posted
Ever thought about trying the Nike Forged Pro Combo Tour irons? I've owned the Nike Forged Blades, and although I like them, I like the Pro Combo Tours better. Longer and more consistent distances, at least for me.

  • 4 months later...
Posted
Hey, Ive never hit the CG1 but I have hit the nike blades, very hard to hit unless you strike the ball very very well. B

Well if I can hit them anybody can. Not at all difficult to hit.

Taylormade r7 460
Callaway X 3 Wood
Callaway X 5 Wood
Callaway X 7 Wood
Callaway X Hybrid (24*)TaylorMade r7 Irons (5-PW)Mizuno MP-R Series Wedges (52,58 degrees)Ping G2 Anser Putter


  • 6 months later...
Posted
I've hit Nike Forged blades (albeit only 4, 6 and 8-Iron) and they stack up very well against Mizuno MP67s and Titleist 690MBs....that is, in terms of contact .

How well they are for working the ball, I couldn;t tell you.
TaylorMade R9 460 9.5°
TaylorMade R9 13°
TaylorMade RAC TP MB 3-PW
TaylorMade RAC TP 54°.10 / 58°.10
Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2

Note: This thread is 6608 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.