Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3798 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I recently saw a commercial for the Garmin Approach series of watches; does anyone use these or know anyone who does? They seem to be pretty cool and they appear to have a lot of potential of being useful, but I don't know if anyone has had any great success with it actually helping their game.

This entire thread just talked about it....

:titleist: 913 D2 w/ Oban Kiyoshi Purple :ping: G25 3 Wood w/ Graphite Design Tour AD-DJ6 :titleist: 913H 21* w/ Diamana Blue :ping: G25 4 - PW :vokey: SM4 Oil Can - 52, 56, 60 :cameron: Studio Select Newport 2 :golflogix: :bushnell: Tour V3


Posted

Did the commercial show the watch strap with tape holding it together? I'd avoid the S1 at all costs until they either change the design so the strap can be replaced or they beef up the watch strap material they use.


Posted
Originally Posted by saturday

This entire thread just talked about it....

I realize that now, I didn't post in here originally, I made a separate thread for it, and my post got moved here.


  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I have been trying to get Garmin to answer my e-mails and would like to know how to talk to a real person??  I bought my wife a Garmin S1 for her birthday July 27th 2013.  She has tried the Garmin 3 times and I have once, we both have laser's and find them very accurate within 1-3 yards.  Her S1 is not even close to being accurate- as much as 25 to 30 yards off.  I did see where Garmin can sometimes update courses and wonder if our course Glendale Golf and Country Club, Bellevue, WA might need an update??


Posted

My s1 works perfectly, yes there is sometimes a variance of a few yards when you measure it against sprinkler heads, or fairway markers or stakes. I trust the s1 yardage. simply the markers are often measured not as the crow flies , but down the center of the fairway and ten to the center of the green, most fairways I play can have some jog or slight curve of the fair way as it approaches the green.

The second reasons is the measuring devices, including the personnel can make mistakes or be inaccurate. Garmin does their calculations with satellite and claims accuracy within 1 foot for 300 yards

I chose the s1 because some of the feature sets in the s2 and s3 just are not important to me. Just way too much information is given to you- most you already know from your own eye sight. IMO


  • 3 months later...
Posted

I was going to get this watch for xmas/birthday. Reviews I have heard are very good and looks smart.

The only thing putting me off is people say it suffers from bad condensation. Has anyone had this problem and if so how bad is it?


Posted

And the durability of the straps is an even bigger issue. Avoid at all costs from my experience unless Garmin improve:

-the quality of the strap/or make it replaceable

-their customer service.

Both of the above ranked a poor 1/10 for me and many others have posted similar problems/experiences.


Posted

And the durability of the straps is an even bigger issue. Avoid at all costs from my experience unless Garmin improve:

-the quality of the strap/or make it replaceable

-their customer service.

Both of the above ranked a poor 1/10 for me and many others have posted similar problems/experiences.

How tight do you wear the watch?

Do you sweat much when playing?

Do you have big wrists?

The shop near me has a demo one so I am gonna try it on before I buy.


  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
I have had my S1 for over a year. No issues with the strap or condensation. The only issue is a rather clunky setup for charging and you can only get one round of golf on a full charge. Shot distance measurement is easy, easy to read and accurate distance. When this one dies, I would seriously consider the Neo X. It has hazard/layup yardages and better batter life at a lower price.

Posted

I have had my S1 for over a year. No issues with the strap or condensation. The only issue is a rather clunky setup for charging and you can only get one round of golf on a full charge. Shot distance measurement is easy, easy to read and accurate distance. When this one dies, I would seriously consider the Neo X. It has hazard/layup yardages and better batter life at a lower price.

I have been looking at the Neo X (neo plus in UK) and the battery life seems to be a lot longer than the s1.

Does anyone know if the S3 battery life is any better?


  • 1 year later...
Posted

Hi there - don't suppose you can remember the instructions when you had the 'no courses near' message?

Thanks

Brian


Note: This thread is 3798 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
    • Hi Jack.  Welcome to The Sand Trap forum.   We're glad you've joined.   There is plenty of information here.   Enjoy!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.