Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
broombroom

r9 driver vs the r11 driver whats better and whats the difference?

10 posts in this topic

You can get an R9 driver for about 150 £ or about 230$ i think. The R11 is about twice that price. Is there actually much difference in them and what are the differences.  Would you rather buy the r9 now at half the price or just get the R11 because its that good?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!



Originally Posted by broombroom

You can get an R9 driver for about 150 £ or about 230$ i think. The R11 is about twice that price. Is there actually much difference in them and what are the differences.  Would you rather buy the r9 now at half the price or just get the R11 because its that good?


I think it comes down to how well you hit one versus the other. If there isn't a major difference, save a few dollars and get the R9. Both can be customized to fit your swing (the R11 more so) but until you hit both, it's hard to recommend one over the other.

Good luck with your choice!

Alan

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Which iteration of the r9?  I'm going to go with the original:

The r11 comes with a stock Fujikura Blur 60 shaft.  The r9, a Fujikura Motore 65.  Shafts are overated, and there's only 5g difference between the two, so make of that what you will.

The stock lie angle for the r11 is 57*; the r9, 59*.  Lie also isn't as important for drivers (because of its length, if the shaft is the proper flex it'll droop at impact in a "just right" lie angle).  You could say that the r9 is more slice-corrective, because of the more upright lie angle, but all other specs would have to be the same.

They both have the TM 360 grip

The r11 is 440cc; the r9 is 430cc.  If you can tell a difference by look and playability, you need to be on Tour.

They'll both be too long for you, unless you're very tall and/or have incredible hand-eye coordination.

Obviously, the r11 has a white crown.  If that's a big deal, so be it.

The r11 also has that sole bumper.  As I said, if you're properly fit for shaft flex, the lie at impact will take care of itself.  So again, if this is a big deal for you, so be it.

Other than that, there isn't much difference.  The r9 was/is a very good club... so why not game it?  All you'd be "missing out on" (using that phrase lightly) would be 10cc head size, 2* lie/the sole bumper (see above) and a newer "it" shaft (no big deal)... oh, and a white crown.  If that's worth an extra $200, that's your decision to make.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a feeling if he is talking about a new r9 it's probably the r9 460 which obviously is a 460cc head.  Those can still be found in golf shops and sell for about $150 US compared to $300 a year ago.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just the standard r9.  The 460 cc doesnt have the weight technology.  I have the r7 quad ht with an aldila nv shaft and am just contemplating if the new drivers with more customizable technology will make a big difference. I think the idea of the customization is great and that it does actually work but will it actually be worth it me buying a new driver?I dont get how people can go out and buy the newest thing all the time when they dont actually change that much.  Like if I hook it a lot I can just set mine up for fade or even just set my stance up for a fade and vice versa which just renders the custom feature useless or better yet fix the problem with my game!  I can also set mine to go lower or higher which is what the r11 does anyway.   The demo clubs around me are scarce so I cant even try the r9 nd r11 but tried the vr pro and i thought it was ok maybe just the tiniest bit more forgiving than mine but it didnt go noticeably further or anything.  I love my driver head but do think I need a stiffer shaft which will cost nearly the same as a new driver anway.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

they are both great clubs... the minor upgrades between the r11 and the r9 arent worth that much to me... i think we would all be suprised with the amount of circulation the r9 still has on tour... its still the best driver i ever hit...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree the R-9 is the best Diver I've ever hit also. I've tried a 9 and 10.5 R11 drivers and 10.5 performed better then the 9 but just something about the R-11, its cool looking.  I had to put my shaft in the R11 to even come close to performing as well as my R9.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the R9 driver and just recently purchased the R11. I also swung the R11s but for the price i went with the R11. A buddy of mine told me about the company Shotly they were bar none the cheapest on the driver I could find, I think I paid $300 for the R11 9.0 Stiff Flex shipped. My club speed was a little faster with the R11. I tried the clubs out at Dick's and purchased online. Love the R11 and was very happy with the purchase from Shotly.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was looking at an R11s in the Pro Shop the other day, I don't think I could get along with the white Crown, I realise performance comes before looks (or should do) but its a shame they dont offer the same club with a Black Crown, i'd be straight on it!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Take some gloss black paint in a can and spray it, its a small surface so you'll be able to do a perfect job with a few light coats. And the matte finish will make the new paint stick great.

Originally Posted by papswing

I was looking at an R11s in the Pro Shop the other day, I don't think I could get along with the white Crown, I realise performance comes before looks (or should do) but its a shame they dont offer the same club with a Black Crown, i'd be straight on it!



0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • He started off playing the first hole exactly how he should: fairway, 20-footer for birdie to the fat side of the green, tap-in par.
    • @iacas-Tho it is nice to be able to take your time and type out what you mean to say this is one of the downsides to a forum too-You have to respond to a whole bunch of crap and a person can get all of their thoughts out uninterrupted. If you were been sitting in a room with @natureboy and he started drawing that entirely stupid picture with the lines you could have cut him off and spared all of us the pain of having to watch him so badly miss the point. I bet @natureboy is still going to look at the response-And I bet he is still not going to see where he went wrong. But that is because he is just that way and he is unable to see how stupid his own posts are and how little they actually deal with golf swings. His stick drawing is exactly why you asked for a video-Even though he posted it after you asked. His errors and flaws and stupid thoughts would have been even more evident if he had actually tried to make a vid.
    • Or… golf is hard, and he got hot for awhile. Wouldn't be the first flash in the pan. We'll have to wait to see what the true version is. He could be quiet for ten years and then win a few majors.
    • That makes a great third bullet point. Or a first bullet point, bumping my two down.
    • This photo and the text above illustrate pretty well exactly why I and the entire moderation team is now done with you. The image fails on two levels: The center image is not representative of an actual good golf swing. The right hip is closer to the right foot in the center image, yet you maintain that it's farther away. Whether the second thing is done intentionally or accidentally I don't know. I don't care to know. But it's very representative of how you argue, and why you're now going to be prevented from arguing. You pervert arguments to the point where we're no longer discussing the golf swing. You get basic facts or concepts wrong (like when arguing about course rating, misunderstanding the radius vs. diameter in faulting the rating process for higher handicappers). You focus on some small thing - which often isn't even something anyone else has said - and lose sight of the forest or the big picture. You're not here to help golfers. You're here to "win" an argument, a goal that as yet is unmet, and you have to post absolute crap like the above to try to do it. I had a bit of free time this morning. So I responded to your last post in some detail. It, as one would expect, contains a number of typical @natureboy traits: cherry picking a photo while ignoring the concept, failure to understand basic points, perversion of the statements of others, putting words in the mouths of others, use of vague words like "a lot" (often in combination with the "putting words in the mouths of others), and hyper-focus on some small largely negligible point. Nobody else should waste their time to read the below, or open the spoiler and read that. It will not shed light on anything, it will not help you with your golf swing, and you will not glean any useful information. It exists simply as my last effort at illustrating to @natureboy a small part of the reason why we're tired of him… even though as I post it I know with certainty it too will fail. I gave you twenty warning points last night. It was made clear to you what you had to do, and you failed to do so, flaunting the requirement in several posts. The entire moderation team - @mvmac, @RandallT, @boogielicious, @jamo, @billchao, @nevets88, @mchepp, others - and myself have simply gotten sick and tired of your entire persona here. You're constantly and never-endingly arguing stuff to the point where you bastardize things so much you're no longer even talking about the golf swing, and you fail to comprehend or respond to what's written to you in response. You have two real choices once your current suspension is over: You can ignore these warnings, continue to be a belligerent arguer, and receive a final 50-point warning that will result in your permanent ban. You can avoid behaving in the manner that infuriates the entire moderation team. That will likely mean limiting the topics in which you post quite a bit, because though you fancy yourself to be capable of discussing the golf swing from a theoretical perspective, you've proven that you are not. Now, I want to be very clear about something. You're not being warned or "handled" because you disagree. You're being handled here because you contribute nothing positive. You're belligerent. You don't help people. You don't demonstrate anything. You pervert and distort topics in order to make a point that often has little or nothing to do with how people actually play golf. You're on a mission to "win" an argument, not to further the understanding. You speak as if you know and fail to ask questions, despite the holes in your logic and posts being constantly exposed as gaping. You quite often fail to read what's written, take a beat, and try to understand it. P.S. This requirement is anything but arbitrary. The list of reasons are long, the surface of which was only scratched in this post. Arbitrary would have been to say something like "to continue posting here you must dress up in a purple outfit and post a photo of yourself diving from a diving board into a pool of jello." Asking you to post a video illustrating your point is the opposite of arbitrary.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Catcher20
      Catcher20
      (27 years old)
    2. JD15
      JD15
      (52 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon