Jump to content
IGNORED

New Groove Rule


Jeepthrills
Note: This thread is 4970 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Replies 167
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Fourputt,

I don't think that is accurate. It will not effect any "normal" tourney until 2014. By normal I am talking about state and local, non-us am type.

We are fine for anything we can get into till 2014. I don't think many players here can really compete in elite events.

Brian

Link to comment
Share on other sites


That would be up to the individual association and competition committee. No way to make a blanket statement.

Fourputt,

If you are referring to my quote above, then this is my response to you:

The rule will be mandatory in 2014 for certain USGA sanctioned amateur events. It will be mandatory in 2024 for all amateur competitions played by the Rules of Golf. But that doesn't mean that it can't be optioned for specific competitions earlier than that. It will still be up to the individual competition committee if they want to institute the new rule. I wouldn't expect it to happen, but you never know. I'd read the entry forms carefully for any city or state wide tournaments.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

thats an interesting video. for those that dont have the time to watch it, it basically said that from the fairway, both the non-conforming grooves and the new conforming grooves perform similarly (ball checked-up and spun back 6-8 feet).

from the rough there is a quite a difference. the non-conforming wedges still check-up and spin back, but the new conforming wedges will not check-up and will roll forward when hit from the rough.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I thought there'd be more of a difference between them.

It'll be another reason for the pro'd to keep they're shots on the fairway I guess!

My Clubs
Driver - LV4 10* R flex
Wood - sam snead persimmon 2 wood (for windy days)
Hybrid burner tour launch 20* stiff flex.
Irons - Tour Mode 3i,4i stiffIrons - FP's 5-PW R-flexWedge - spin milled 54.14Wedge - spin milled 60.07Putter - Victoria Lowest round 2010: 79 (par 70)Latest rounds at...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I thought there'd be more of a difference between them.

Keep in mind that that was a 56° wedge. The difference will certainly be more pronounced with a 7 or 8 Iron. One thing I noticed from the video that wasn't mentioned. If the shots were taken from the same distance, the shots from the rough with the new grooves seemed to get a bit of a flyer effect... they seemed to carry farther onto the green than the ones made with the current grooves, then released 6-8 feet more. Another confirmation that the USGA is getting the effect it wants with the change.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

will high school golfers need the v grooves
DriverMonster Hi-Bore XLS/w Mintsubishi Diamana Fit-On M Gold Stiff 55g
Woods906F4 3 Wood/w Aldila VS Proto Fairway Stiff 80g
Hybrid3dx red 20 and 23 degree
Irons3dx red 5-pw
Wedgesharmonized sand wedge 56 degree loft and harmonize lob wedge 60 degree loftPutterWhite Hot XG SabertoothBallNoddle or ...
Link to comment
Share on other sites


will high school golfers need the v grooves

Eventually yes... just as eventually all players will need to to be within the rules. But I shouldn't imagine that they will be required before 2014 at the earliest, and probably not even then.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Keep in mind that that was a 56° wedge. The difference will certainly be more pronounced with a 7 or 8 Iron. One thing I noticed from the video that wasn't mentioned. If the shots were taken from the same distance, the shots from the rough with

yep, i noticed that too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I don't care. They will have to pry my irons from my cold, dead hands.

G10 Driver Grafalloy Pro Launch Blue 65 Stiff
G5 3-Wood Aldila NV65-Stiff
G15 20 Hybrid TFC stiff
I15 Irons 4-P
S/M Black Nickel 52 56 60 Marxman Mini 33" Tour B330 RXCarroll Valley Resort, Fairfield PA Rating: 72.3 Slope: 128www.carrollvalley.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 2 weeks later...
Here is a video from Cleveland Golf on the groove change. It's about the best explanation I've seen yet. It's clearly presented with no manufacturer bias. Click on the article titled "USGA Groove Rule Summary".

Here's the link: http://www.clevelandgolf.com/index.p...id=53207904001

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 4 weeks later...
For clubmakers,

are they supposed to sell 2010 USGA conformed iron & wedge heads?

Does this rule have significance for golfers who just like to participate in Club tournaments (non USGA) ?
Whats in my Golf Bag:
Driver: Nike Sumo 5000
5 Wood: Mizuno MP-001
Iron: Mizuno MX-950 5-PW
Wedge: Cobra FP 60 degrePutter: Odyssey 2-BallBall: Yellow balls
Link to comment
Share on other sites


For clubmakers,

Clubmakers can't sell non conforming wedges after 2009.

Shops can still sell whatever stock they have left. And club tournaments won't be affected until 2024

My Clubs
Driver - LV4 10* R flex
Wood - sam snead persimmon 2 wood (for windy days)
Hybrid burner tour launch 20* stiff flex.
Irons - Tour Mode 3i,4i stiffIrons - FP's 5-PW R-flexWedge - spin milled 54.14Wedge - spin milled 60.07Putter - Victoria Lowest round 2010: 79 (par 70)Latest rounds at...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
Clubmakers can't sell non conforming wedges after 2009.

Yeah they can. They can't CREATE non-conforming clubheads. Titleist, TaylorMade, etc. can still assemble and sell clubheads that exist prior to December 31, 2K9.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't care. They will have to pry my irons from my cold, dead hands.

I'm with you. 2024 is a long way down the road and I will worry about it then. There will be new non-conforming clubs for sale for many years to come for those of us that need them in the secondary market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 4 weeks later...
what is the exact deal with the new grooves, i know that they create more spin, but what is the best strategy, and where can i find them cheap.

big bertha driver
3,5 wood
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 Iron
SQ Sumo2 Hybrid
sand and pitching wedgeputterpro V1 balls burner ballsCallaway Tour Authentic Diablo Staff Bag

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Ummmm, the new grooves create LESS SPIN, not more. The new grooves are V in shape, instead of U in shape. The new grooves don't "catch" the ball as much as the old grooves, thus less spin on it.

The USGA designed this rule to basically make the game of golf a bit harder. Yippee. They figured you should be punished a bit more for hitting it into the rough, and the new grooves make it very hard to spin the ball out of the rough.

TM R11/Titleist 910F 15*/ Nike SQ2 20* & 23*/ Nike CCi 5-PW/ Nike SV 52* & 56*/ SC Newport 2 Studio Style 32.5"
Nike 20XIx/Pro V1x

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 4970 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Yeah, I agree that some of the charts are hard to make sense of. That short game chart is showing how often a short game shot ends up within a certain distance. The orange bar is all shots, the green bar is for shots within 25 yards, and the blue bar is for shots between 25 and 50 yards. I just play around with all of it and will figure it out. I would suggest just diving in and see what jumps out and work on that.
    • PGA Tour players weight shift to their lead foot way sooner and to a higher % than amateur. I would say it is something like close to 90% lead foot at impact for PGA Tour player. For Amateurs it could be under 50%. You need to get the weight transfer over more and sooner. You can't rely on the feeling of finishing on the lead foot as validation you did so. 
    • Just because it's a small league at a county course doesn't mean their couldn't be a small group of people who take on the role/responsibility of ensuring the rules are properly enforced and being the rules committee for your league   That's the whole point of GUR. It's a temporary thing. Also like I mentioned before, since you're playing on the same course it's highly likely this isn't the first time this sort of thing has happened to a bunker on this course.   There's nothing that needs changed though. There is the rule for how the situation is supposed to be handled as well as an alternative for how it could have been handled differently via a committee. Just because your league chooses not to have a committee doesn't mean the rules of golf need changed for everyone.   Absurd logic. You and your opponent can't just agree on rules and make things up as you go. If it's just a 1v1 match for fun, sure do whatever you want. In an actual league with other competitors, no shot. Everyone needs to play by the same rules. How would you feel if someone else in the league took a casual drop on a different hole and their playing partner agreed with it but you didn't agree with it and you found out about it later?
    • I suggest you actually read some of the Rules, either online or on the USGA (or R&A) phone app.  Here's the Definition of Committee: You have a small league, whoever is in charge of that league is the Committee.  This would be the same person (group) who might decide that you should play Lift Clean and Place (Modal Local Rule E-3), to institute the "leaf rule", (MLR F-14), or that you should move a ball out of aerification holes (MLR E-4).  
    • Website. And yeah I was asking about the specifics within those sections under the performance tab. I guess the strokes gained by distance like you noted is probably a good place to start. This would indicate that my wedges need practice, which I figured as much so I'm not surprised by that   Some of the other ones specifically around the short game I struggle to make sense of what it actually means. Like I know this chart is measuring the percentage of the time that I get the ball within certain proximity ranges but I don't know from a quick glance at this where I need to improve.   But then again I guess these two would seem to indicate that it's chipping inside 25yds from the rough that has the most room for improvement? Does it seem like I'm interpreting that right?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...