Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5202 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Has anyone had the chance to hit the new G20 driver?

A lot of the people I play with have always loved their ping drivers and I am in the market for a new driver myself.

I am currently leaning towards the RAZR Hawk or R11.


Posted

I don't think it comes out until tomorrow but I'm sure there will be a ton of people who are fans of it. Ping always has great drivers buuuuut If your looking at the R11 I would say that's the way to go.


Posted

To my knowledge, it's not actually in stores yet.  In my opinion I think that it's ugly but PING does have a good reputation with regards to their drivers so I'm sure it'll have it's shares of fans.

Tristan Hilton

My Equipment: 
Titleist TSR2 Driver (Fujikura Pro 2.0 TS; 10.5°) · PXG 0211 FWs (Diamana S+ 60; 15° and 21°) · PXG 0211 Hybrid (MMT 80; 22°) · Edel SMS Irons (SteelFiber i95; 5-GW) · Edel SMS Pro Wedges (SteelFiber i110; 56°, 60°) · Edel Classic Blade Putter (32") · Maxfli Tour Ball · Pinned Prism Rangefinder · SuperStroke Grips · Flightscope Mevo · TRUE Linkswear Shoes · Vessel Player V Pro 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Correct, I think it releases or preorders are tomorrow maybe.

I just wasn't sure if anyone maybe had a chance to hit one at a demo day or something.


Posted

I went to Golfsmiths Ping premier thingy on Thursday and the Ping rep was there with a ton of clubs you could hit without taping up and what not. I found the irons feel just like my G15's. The Anser wedges didn't feel any different then the Tours or Eye 2's. However the driver was awesome. It has a very hot face, much more so than my R11. Swing speed was a little higher but the club seemed a little lighter too. At address everything sets up just like the G10/15. What surprised me was the launch angles, this thing launched very high. I have my R11 jacked up to 11.5 degrees but if I were to purchase a G20 I would opt for the 10.5. Also at impact the sound is about the same as previous models, perhaps a little lower pitch but not as low as the R11. It's a winner if you don't want an adjustable club but the 5 yards or so I picked up will not end my love affair with the R11. Besides, I don't completely trust indoor launch monitors and would want to see real ball flight before dropping $325.

David


Posted
Thx for the review, anyone else had the chance to hit one yet. On a personal note tomorrow I am using a demo octane. Guess I'll get an opinion on that tommorrow.

Posted
Had the opportunity to hit the G20 Wednesday, I also brought in my own G15 to compare. I hit about a dozen with each. The data on the screen showed the G20 to be about 4 yards longer with a little tighter dispersion pattern. Not sure if the $299 price is worth 4 more yards. The G20 felt the same as my G15. Both have the stock shafts. Just my observations.

Posted

I thought the G20 looked and felt exactly like the K15 minus the heavy draw face. If you set them side by side you can see the head shade is identical but I haven't read the specs on either of them.

Driver: i15, 3 wood: G10, Hybrid: Nickent 4dx, Irons: Ping s57, Wedges: Mizuno MPT 52, 56, 60, Putter: XG #9 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I hit the G20 today and was really surprised by it.  It has a fairly square look at address, which took some getting used to, being a Titleist guy.  It was a demo 9.5 degree with the TFC 169 S shaft.  My average spin was around 1850 with a high of around 2000 and a low of around 1650.  I don't know what that shaft really is, but I've never had such low spin with an S flex.  Specs say it torques at 5.9, but my average launch angle was 15.5.   My current driver averages 8.3 seconds flight time.  This one was around 7.1 with way more distance...like 40 yards more.  I like my current driver/shaft combo because it is laser straight, but I get a little nervous with the high flight time.  It's just in the air way too long for comfort.  The G20 with the stock shaft had a little draw to it.  I'm hitting it so much squarer these days, I don't need the backspin to keep it on line, so I was looking for something different.  I may have found it....  Waiting for the price to drop.

[ Equipment ]
R11 9° (Lowered to 8.5°) UST Proforce VTS 7x tipped 1" | 906F2 15° and 18° | 585H 21° | Mizuno MP-67 +1 length TT DG X100 | Vokey 52° Oil Can, Cleveland CG10 2-dot 56° and 60° | TM Rossa Corza Ghost 35.5" | Srixon Z Star XV | Size 14 Footjoy Green Joys | Tour Striker Pro 5, 7, 56 | Swingwing


Posted
I purchased mine friday and i have only had time to hit it about ten times but so far I really like it. My brother in law made the comment about how much the ball jumped off of the face and he normally uses his razer hawk.

Posted

I can't speak for the G20 but I have hit the R11 and Razr Hawk and I didn't care for the R11 at all. My drives have significantly increased with the razr hawk, not only longer but I'm hitting more fairways too.

The worst day of golf beats the best day of work!


Posted

I traded in my 12 degree G15 for a 12 degree G20. I have only had one round with the G20 but what was obvious was that it was incredibly easy to get the ball off the tee and I seemed to be hitting more fairways than I previously did with the G15. I believe that this is due to the clubhead being more square at address.

STUART


Posted

I hit it yesterday at Golfsmith ... for my swing the K15 is still a better club on the monitor & what I hope to be playing soon.

John

Fav LT Quote ... "you can talk to a fade, but a hook won't listen"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Wasn't really in the market for a new driver but bid on a G20, with a low bid not really expecting to win, and the auction ended today and I won. It will be nice if it arrives before the weekend, I'll update after I get to hit it.


Posted

Tried the G20 again.  It's definitely longer than my driver.  I hit the stock 9.5 degree with the S shaft again just to see if it was a fluke.  I'm really surprised how much farther it hits the ball than pretty much any other driver at Golfsmith that I've tried.  I hit the Titleist 910D2 and my low/high was 280-295.  The G20 was 305-330 with around 5 swings.  I'm really shocked by it.  Same launch monitor, same position, same balls, just different club.  Part of it is the weight.  The G20 is a bit lighter than the Titleist.  That has always made a significant difference in my experience.  Dispersion seemed not quite as tight, so there was a price to pay for the extra distance.  Curious to try it in an X shaft to see if it will tighten up the lines a bit...

[ Equipment ]
R11 9° (Lowered to 8.5°) UST Proforce VTS 7x tipped 1" | 906F2 15° and 18° | 585H 21° | Mizuno MP-67 +1 length TT DG X100 | Vokey 52° Oil Can, Cleveland CG10 2-dot 56° and 60° | TM Rossa Corza Ghost 35.5" | Srixon Z Star XV | Size 14 Footjoy Green Joys | Tour Striker Pro 5, 7, 56 | Swingwing


  • Moderator
Posted

I'm really liking mine.  Have the 9.5* with the Tour D stiff.  Not a huge difference from the G15, in terms of performance just spins less.  I do like the color scheme, grey with the white half moon

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Mine arrived on Saturday and I went to the range that afternoon to hit a few balls. Sunday, I put the G20 in the bag and went to the course. The square club face is going to take some time to get used to. Most of my drives were to the left but I think with a little more time I can adjust. For only one round (7 drives) my average yardage was 10 yards shorter than my Nike Driver, but most of those were in the left rough and didn't much roll.

I'll get to the range again this week before playing this weekend and hopfully work out the kinks, I like the way the ball comes off the club and the feel, just need more time.


Note: This thread is 5202 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.