Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5020 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted


Originally Posted by Dormie1360

I could do a short list of some of the most common myths regarding golf rules if anyone's insterested.  I'm new, so it may have been done already.

Regards,

John



Well, I am new as well so you'd have at least one interested party.  Plus you are already one for one in my book with your handicap knowledge on unfinished rounds.  So let's hear it!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by Dormie1360

Hey mtsalmela80,

With your example I would say you would be in breach of Rule 4-1b.  A club that conforms to the rules when new must not be altered, other than in the normal course of play, where the club in it's altered state would not confirm with the Rules.  As mentioned before, striking surfaces must be opposing on a putter.  I wouldn't think that you could create a new striking face on the toe, and at the same time declare the front of the Anser to be a non striking face when that's how it was originally designed.  Also, you now have a putter that has a much longer body front to back than it's striking surface, which is illegal.

Having said that, if a company designed a putter that just so happended to have a flat toe, I think, as long as the toe isn't identified as a striking surface, the club would probably be legal.

You're making my head hurt.

Do you really want to make a club like this?

Regards,

John


Yeah... my question is why are we wasting our time arguing about something so silly?

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

As an aside to the 'tap in' discussion, I've seen a few people miss them when being careless or unorthodox such as attempting it backhanded.  Also, many years ago  - probably in the mid 80s - one of the leading contenders in an Open Championship at St. Andrews had an air shot when standing awkwardly for a tap in. I think it might have been Hale Irwin.  My dim memory suggests that at the end he was one shot away from being in a play off.


Posted


Originally Posted by Alistair

As an aside to the 'tap in' discussion, I've seen a few people miss them when being careless or unorthodox such as attempting it backhanded.  Also, many years ago  - probably in the mid 80s - one of the leading contenders in an Open Championship at St. Andrews had an air shot when standing awkwardly for a tap in. I think it might have been Hale Irwin.  My dim memory suggests that at the end he was one shot away from being in a play off.



Irwin whiffed a 1-3 inch tap in (there is some debate on the actual length) in the 1983 Open Championship at Royal Birkdale and lost by one stroke to Tom Watson.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Irwin whiffed a 1-3 inch tap in (there is some debate on the actual length) in the 1983 Open Championship at Royal Birkdale and lost by one stroke to Tom Watson.



I saw Irwin do the same thing at the Champions Tour event in Austin TX. He yipped a three footer then angrily swatted at the tap in and whiffed it. Was in 2003 or 2004. I thought he wa going to beat his caddy to death with his putter.

Kevin

Titleist 910 D3 9.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Titleist 910F 13.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Adams Idea A12 Pro hybrid 18*; 23* with RIP S flex
Titleist 712 AP2 4-9 iron with KBS C-Taper, S+ flex
Titleist Vokey SM wedges 48*, 52*, 58*
Odyssey White Hot 2-ball mallet, center shaft, 34"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

No illegal, but when you try once and miss....you'll realize it's stupid and you won't do it again.

  • Upvote 2

Note: This thread is 5020 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
    • Hi Jack.  Welcome to The Sand Trap forum.   We're glad you've joined.   There is plenty of information here.   Enjoy!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.