Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5033 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've never had a HC and I don't fully understand it. BUT I was just wondering what a "bogey-golfer's" handicap might be around? Would it be 18? I know scratch golfers have a HC of "0," so to me the 18 makes sense. I usually get bogeys, with some pars mixed in and the occasional birdie but at the end of the rounds I usually average about a bogey per hole, sometimes a little less. It would be nice to see where I stand since I've never had one calculated. I don't know if there's other variables to it, like the difficulty of the course and what not?

Sorry If I sound clueless, I am about this handicap business.


Posted

Hi MacGregor9, I think you're right, a bogy golfer would be around an 18 handicap, depending on the golf course. On a more difficult golf course your handicap might actually be lower than that.

I setup a little website to help the average golfer calculate their handicap. This is far from scientific...but it gives you a real quick idea of where your scoring. See http://golfhandicapcalculator.ca.
It's a work in progress, meant for Canadians as I hope to add Canadian golf courses to it, so people don't have to actually lookup their course rating and course slope.

Posted

Oh and if your looking for something a little more serious, I highly recommend using http://golfshot.com. It's a really great iPhone/Android app that lets you record all your scores. It will then automatically calculate your handicap in a little more official way than my online tool. It's also great for providing stats about your game. It's a hoot. Have fun!

Golfshot for iPhone


Posted

If you want a real fast estimate of your handicap for a particular round, just subtract the course rating from your score.  Depending on the difficulty of the course/tees you play, 18 over par could range anywhere from 16 to 20 HDCP.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Golfingdad

If you want a real fast estimate of your handicap for a particular round, just subtract the course rating from your score.  Depending on the difficulty of the course/tees you play, 18 over par could range anywhere from 16 to 20 HDCP.


Nice!


Posted

Thanks guys, this has really helped me out. @Jonathan, I'll have to check out your site and the app. Thanks for posting it.


Posted


Originally Posted by MacGregor9

I've never had a HC and I don't fully understand it. BUT I was just wondering what a "bogey-golfer's" handicap might be around? Would it be 18? I know scratch golfers have a HC of "0," so to me the 18 makes sense. I usually get bogeys, with some pars mixed in and the occasional birdie but at the end of the rounds I usually average about a bogey per hole, sometimes a little less. It would be nice to see where I stand since I've never had one calculated. I don't know if there's other variables to it, like the difficulty of the course and what not?

Sorry If I sound clueless, I am about this handicap business.



From the USGA's handicap manual.

Bogey Golfer

A male " bogey golfer" is a player who has a Course Handicap of approximately 20 on a course of standard difficulty. He can hit tee shots an average of 200 yards and reach a 370-yard hole in two shots at sea level. A female bogey golfer is a player who has a Course Handicap of approximately 24 on a course of standard difficulty. She can hit tee shots an average of 150 yards and reach a 280-yard hole in two shots.

A " scratch golfer" is a player who can play to a Course Handicap of zero on any and all rated golf courses. A male scratch golfer , for rating purposes, can hit tee shots an average of 250 yards and can reach a 470-yard hole in two shots at sea level. A female scratch golfer , for rating purposes, can hit tee shots an average of 210 yards and can reach a 400-yard hole in two shots at sea level.

Regards,

John

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by Dormie1360

From the USGA's handicap manual.


Those are used for determining the course rating and slope. They're not actual "definitions" for people , they're definitions for the math used to determine those two numbers.

In practical, real-word terms a "scratch golfer" is one who has a 0 index or really close to it and a "bogey golfer" is one who is between a 15 and a 20 index, roughly.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by iacas

They're not actual "definitions" for people, they're definitions for the math used to determine those two numbers.

In practical, real-word terms a "scratch golfer" is one who has a 0 index or really close to it and a "bogey golfer" is one who is between a 15 and a 20 index, roughly.



Hi iacas,

Well........you have to remember the USGA is trying to base their ratings on real golfers.  (Scratch and Bogey)  They do quantify these terms with practical information in order to compute a course rating for "scratch golfers"  and a slope rating for "bogey golfers", however they are trying to describe the playing ability of real people .  If you look at  their handicap guidelines in their definition, you'll see it's pretty close to yours.

I think we would agree that a scratch golfer has the ability to shoot the course index which is usually close to Par.  (0 index)  A bogey golfer may or may not score a bogey on every hole, based on the difficulty of the course.  An average score for a bogey golfer would probably be in the low 90s.

Regards,

John

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

If you average around 90, so your good days are in the high 80s, maybe mid 80s every once in a while, then your handicap is significantly below 18 unless your home course is super super easy. HC calc (in the US at least) starts with your score minus the course rating, but then has two other adjustments that lower the HC score for that round, and you only use your best half.  Say your home course has rating slope of something like 70.5/120, then your handicap is probably something more like ~15 rather than 18.

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by Dormie1360

Well........you have to remember the USGA is trying to base their ratings on real golfers.  (Scratch and Bogey)  They do quantify these terms with practical information in order to compute a course rating for "scratch golfers"  and a slope rating for "bogey golfers", however they are trying to describe the playing ability of real people.  If you look at  their handicap guidelines in their definition, you'll see it's pretty close to yours.

I think we would agree that a scratch golfer has the ability to shoot the course index which is usually close to Par.  (0 index)  A bogey golfer may or may not score a bogey on every hole, based on the difficulty of the course.  An average score for a bogey golfer would probably be in the low 90s.


I know, and agree. I'm a course rater, so I know what the definitions actually "mean" (mathematically speaking). I know plenty of bogey golfers who hit the ball farther than the "definition" and a few scratch golfers who hit it both farther and shorter.


Those numbers in the "handicapping definitions" really just mean that a par 4 of 460 yards will affect the slope a fair amount and the course rating roughly 0 (because the "bogey golfer" isn't even getting there in regulation while the "scratch golfer" is).

I'm just trying to emphasize that we should use the "real world" definition over those examples.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Originally Posted by iacas

I know, and agree. I'm a course rater, so I know what the definitions actually "mean" (mathematically speaking). I know plenty of bogey golfers who hit the ball farther than the "definition" and a few scratch golfers who hit it both farther and shorter.

Those numbers in the "handicapping definitions" really just mean that a par 4 of 460 yards will affect the slope a fair amount and the course rating roughly 0 (because the "bogey golfer" isn't even getting there in regulation while the "scratch golfer" is).

I'm just trying to emphasize that we should use the "real world" definition over those examples.



This may be veering slighly off-topic (or maybe not - it is sorta handicap related) but ... do course raters also apply the hole handicaps as well?  It always seems to me that length plays a bigger role in the determination of the difficulty of a hole than anything else.  Courses frequently have a 460 yd par 4 or a 570 yd par 5 as a #1 handicap hole regardless of whether or not it has an enormous fairway, flat green, no water, whatever.  Likewise, it seems as though a 200 yd par 3 is never considered the hardest hole (although it usually is to me).

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Any Par 3 is usually the hardest hole on a course for me, especially a 200 yarder.

Originally Posted by Golfingdad

This may be veering slighly off-topic (or maybe not - it is sorta handicap related) but ... do course raters also apply the hole handicaps as well?  It always seems to me that length plays a bigger role in the determination of the difficulty of a hole than anything else.  Courses frequently have a 460 yd par 4 or a 570 yd par 5 as a #1 handicap hole regardless of whether or not it has an enormous fairway, flat green, no water, whatever.  Likewise, it seems as though a 200 yd par 3 is never considered the hardest hole (although it usually is to me).




  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by Golfingdad

This may be veering slighly off-topic (or maybe not - it is sorta handicap related) but ... do course raters also apply the hole handicaps as well?  It always seems to me that length plays a bigger role in the determination of the difficulty of a hole than anything else.  Courses frequently have a 460 yd par 4 or a 570 yd par 5 as a #1 handicap hole regardless of whether or not it has an enormous fairway, flat green, no water, whatever.  Likewise, it seems as though a 200 yd par 3 is never considered the hardest hole (although it usually is to me).


Nope. They don't.

Technically they're supposed to be determined by a study of cards. As in 500 cards turned in by golfers across the range of handicaps are fed into a computer, each hole score, etc. and the computer spits out the holes - obeying the rules that the odds are on the front nine and the evens are on the back nine - on which the higher handicapper needs strokes the most to the least.

That's how it's supposed to be done.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Originally Posted by iacas

Nope. They don't.

Technically they're supposed to be determined by a study of cards. As in 500 cards turned in by golfers across the range of handicaps are fed into a computer, each hole score, etc. and the computer spits out the holes - obeying the rules that the odds are on the front nine and the evens are on the back nine - on which the higher handicapper needs strokes the most to the least.

That's how it's supposed to be done.



Thanks, I did not know that (obviously).  The last part of you definition also cleared up why it probably leans toward length being a dominant factor.  It's not really the "hardest" holes, its the "holes on which the higher handicapper needs strokes the most..."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by Golfingdad

Thanks, I did not know that (obviously).  The last part of you definition also cleared up why it probably leans toward length being a dominant factor.  It's not really the "hardest" holes, its the "holes on which the higher handicapper needs strokes the most..."


Yeah. I know a course with a 260-yard par three (it's downhill, but still...). I think it's the #17 handicap hole because scratch golfers and bogey golfers alike are both going to tend to make the same score (a 4) because the hole plays as a drivable par four for both kinds of golfers.

It's not about "difficulty" it's about where the higher handicapper most needs strokes to make the match fair.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by iacas

I'm a course rater,

Oops.........you know a heck of a lot more than I do.

Having followed some course raters around a course I'm envious of your expertise.

I'll be quite.

Regards,

John

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5033 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.