Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

2012 US Open at Olympic Club Discussion Thread


Note: This thread is 4916 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

That's a great sight.  Good pics of each approach.  Aerial illustrations.  Flyovers.  There's even something about playing a virtual round.  Darn Flash, I'll have to wait till I get home.

Driver:  Callaway Diablo Octane 9.5*
3W:  Callaway GBB II 12.5*, 5W:  Callaway Diablo 18* Neutral
3H:  Callaway Razr X, 4H:  Callaway Razr X
5-PW:  Callaway X Tour
GW:  Callaway X Tour 54*, SW:  Callaway X Tour 58*
Putter:  Callaway ITrax, Scotty Cameron Studio Design 2, Ping Anser 4


Posted

One of the unique traits of Olympic are fairways that slope the opposite of the hole shape. For example, a dogleg left with a left-to-right sloping fairway & vice versa.


Posted
Originally Posted by bplewis24

Not sure what you're seeing, but just aim at the tree on the right side, and the ball will ricochet onto the green.  Easy peasy.

Edit: the 17th looks pretty interesting.  Short-ish par 5, but the fairway slopes left-to-right, and the tee box has been moved to the left.  So that sounds like it calls for a draw?  But does left-to-right slope mean it slopes up from left-to-right or down from left-to-right?

Brandon

Looks like the trick to 17 is lots of slope.  And it also usually plays into a headwind.

Driver:  Callaway Diablo Octane 9.5*
3W:  Callaway GBB II 12.5*, 5W:  Callaway Diablo 18* Neutral
3H:  Callaway Razr X, 4H:  Callaway Razr X
5-PW:  Callaway X Tour
GW:  Callaway X Tour 54*, SW:  Callaway X Tour 58*
Putter:  Callaway ITrax, Scotty Cameron Studio Design 2, Ping Anser 4


Posted
Originally Posted by zipazoid

One of the unique traits of Olympic are fairways that slope the opposite of the hole shape. For example, a dogleg left with a left-to-right sloping fairway & vice versa.

No "speed slots" there.  Very tricky.  That combined with 6 inch rough is going to make for some really embarrassing numbers.

Driver:  Callaway Diablo Octane 9.5*
3W:  Callaway GBB II 12.5*, 5W:  Callaway Diablo 18* Neutral
3H:  Callaway Razr X, 4H:  Callaway Razr X
5-PW:  Callaway X Tour
GW:  Callaway X Tour 54*, SW:  Callaway X Tour 58*
Putter:  Callaway ITrax, Scotty Cameron Studio Design 2, Ping Anser 4


Posted
That 18th hole isn't driveable. Look at the approach to the green:

I didn't say you or I could do it. [VIDEO]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGErdxFu4C0[/VIDEO] [VIDEO]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01QOqyAw7oU[/VIDEO] (at 1:25)


Posted
Originally Posted by brocks

I didn't say you or I could do it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGErdxFu4C0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01QOqyAw7oU

(at 1:25)

I'm sure some of those guys have the length to do it.  I'll be very surprised if one of them tries.  Seems like an easy bogey or double bogey if you miss that green and land in the 6 inch rough.  Even if you are close in 1.

Driver:  Callaway Diablo Octane 9.5*
3W:  Callaway GBB II 12.5*, 5W:  Callaway Diablo 18* Neutral
3H:  Callaway Razr X, 4H:  Callaway Razr X
5-PW:  Callaway X Tour
GW:  Callaway X Tour 54*, SW:  Callaway X Tour 58*
Putter:  Callaway ITrax, Scotty Cameron Studio Design 2, Ping Anser 4


Posted
Originally Posted by Mr3Wiggle

No "speed slots" there.  Very tricky.  That combined with 6 inch rough is going to make for some really embarrassing numbers.

Right. I remember the last time the Open was there in 1998 the pros specifically bitching about #17. You couldn't keep a drive in the fairway due to the slope - they'd land it on the left edge & it would kick sharply to the right & settle in the right rough. You gotta hit it right-to-left & run it 'up' the slope & hope it doesn't roll out to the right rough.


Posted
I personally didn't like the easy setup last year. I like it when if you finish -1 you win.

In my bag

Driver:      SLDR 10.5*

Hybrids:   Taylormade RBZ Stage 2

Irons:       NikeVR PRO 4-PW

Wedges:   Nike VR Pro 50* 54* 58*

Putter:      2014 Newport 2

Ball:          E6


Posted

It really would surprise me if the winning score would be under par, especially after last year's scores. But they have to walk the fine line between "hard, but fair" and "omg, omg, crazy hard". Really hope they get it right.


Posted
Originally Posted by Hoganwoods

I personally didn't like the easy setup last year. I like it when if you finish -1 you win.

I think Congressional is a crap course.  I'm from Maryland too, so I'm not just hating.  One of the worst setups I've ever seen was the one Els won there.

Driver:  Callaway Diablo Octane 9.5*
3W:  Callaway GBB II 12.5*, 5W:  Callaway Diablo 18* Neutral
3H:  Callaway Razr X, 4H:  Callaway Razr X
5-PW:  Callaway X Tour
GW:  Callaway X Tour 54*, SW:  Callaway X Tour 58*
Putter:  Callaway ITrax, Scotty Cameron Studio Design 2, Ping Anser 4


Posted
Originally Posted by Zwick

It really would surprise me if the winning score would be under par, especially after last year's scores. But they have to walk the fine line between "hard, but fair" and "omg, omg, crazy hard". Really hope they get it right.

It's shaping up to be insanely difficult.

6 inch rough

Longest par 5 in US Open history

Arguably the toughest opening 6 holes in major golf history

If those fairways and greens are playing really firm, I think even par is a winning number.

Driver:  Callaway Diablo Octane 9.5*
3W:  Callaway GBB II 12.5*, 5W:  Callaway Diablo 18* Neutral
3H:  Callaway Razr X, 4H:  Callaway Razr X
5-PW:  Callaway X Tour
GW:  Callaway X Tour 54*, SW:  Callaway X Tour 58*
Putter:  Callaway ITrax, Scotty Cameron Studio Design 2, Ping Anser 4


Posted
Originally Posted by Zwick

It really would surprise me if the winning score would be under par, especially after last year's scores. But they have to walk the fine line between "hard, but fair" and "omg, omg, crazy hard". Really hope they get it right.

Don't hold your breath -


Posted
Originally Posted by brocks

I didn't say you or I could do it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGErdxFu4C0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01QOqyAw7oU

(at 1:25)

@ 1:19

Worst.  Fist.  Pump.  Ever.

Originally Posted by zipazoid

Don't hold your breath -

Appropriately titled video.  Wow.

Brandon

Brandon a.k.a. Tony Stark

-------------------------

The Fastest Flip in the West


Posted

So if the fairways tilt opposite to the direction of the hole does that making being able to shape your tee shots in either direction more critical?

Making #1 a par 5 doesn't really make it a tougher hole, just changes expectations.  When it was a par 5 presumably everyone played it in such a way as to minimize their score  As a par 4 they need the mental discipline to do the same thing.  Nothing has changed except a number on the scorecard.   As a par 5 some guys would have hit an iron off the tee, hit a perfect lay-up, and tried to pitch and putt for their 4.  Will they have the mental discipline to do that when it is labeled a par 4?  That is the question.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by turtleback

So if the fairways tilt opposite to the direction of the hole does that making being able to shape your tee shots in either direction more critical?

Making #1 a par 5 doesn't really make it a tougher hole, just changes expectations.  When it was a par 5 presumably everyone played it in such a way as to minimize their score  As a par 4 they need the mental discipline to do the same thing.  Nothing has changed except a number on the scorecard.   As a par 5 some guys would have hit an iron off the tee, hit a perfect lay-up, and tried to pitch and putt for their 4.  Will they have the mental discipline to do that when it is labeled a par 4?  That is the question.

For me, the slopes not matching the doglegs would make the holes play longer.  I love a good hard dog leg left with a fairway sloping right to left.  Hitting a hard draw there gets you a ton of roll and makes me feel like the fairway is a lot wider.

Driver:  Callaway Diablo Octane 9.5*
3W:  Callaway GBB II 12.5*, 5W:  Callaway Diablo 18* Neutral
3H:  Callaway Razr X, 4H:  Callaway Razr X
5-PW:  Callaway X Tour
GW:  Callaway X Tour 54*, SW:  Callaway X Tour 58*
Putter:  Callaway ITrax, Scotty Cameron Studio Design 2, Ping Anser 4


Posted

Here's a decent write up I just saw on the place:

"The yardage at 7154 and par 70 may seem short but Davis agrees with many that the course will play longer because of the proxmity to the Pacific Ocean which includes heavy air and prevailing winds off the ocean. Davis likes the Olympic Club because it requires players to work the ball in both right and left directions event with tee shots. Several holes feature dog-legs where the slope of the fairway is opposite to the dog-leg. The 4th hole dog-legs to the left, but the fairway slopes to the right and number 5 is a dog-leg right and the slope is to the left."

http://www.hookedongolf.com/blog.php?blog_id=321

Driver:  Callaway Diablo Octane 9.5*
3W:  Callaway GBB II 12.5*, 5W:  Callaway Diablo 18* Neutral
3H:  Callaway Razr X, 4H:  Callaway Razr X
5-PW:  Callaway X Tour
GW:  Callaway X Tour 54*, SW:  Callaway X Tour 58*
Putter:  Callaway ITrax, Scotty Cameron Studio Design 2, Ping Anser 4


Posted
Originally Posted by Mr3Wiggle

For me, the slopes not matching the doglegs would make the holes play longer.  I love a good hard dog leg left with a fairway sloping right to left.  Hitting a hard draw there gets you a ton of roll and makes me feel like the fairway is a lot wider.

That makes me think of 15 at Augusta.  Or is it 13?

It sounds like this hole is the opposite of that, which I wouldn't even know how to play.  I'm guessing the ideal play is something high that lands softly.  But my driver shot is kinda low and rolls out a lot.  The more it rolls, the more likely to end up in the rough, right?

Brandon

Brandon a.k.a. Tony Stark

-------------------------

The Fastest Flip in the West


Posted

I think Stricker may have a good shot at this one.  You don't need to be too long, but you must be extremely accurate.  Of course if Tiger plays his irons like he did at Memorial he also has a good shot.


Note: This thread is 4916 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 430 - 2025-12-04 Slow motion backswings (with chippy shots) with AlmostGolf balls.
    • Day 24 (4 Dec 25) - Spent about an hour working with the new 55° wedge in the backyard.  Kept all shots to under 20yds.  Big focus - not decelerating thru downswing and keeping speed up with abbreviated backswing.  Nothing like hitting a low flighted chip with plenty of check spin and then purpose to float a pitch of similar distance.  
    • Day 114 12-4 Put some work in on backswing, moving the hips correctly, then feeling over to lead side. Didn't hit any balls was just focused on keeping flowy and moving better. I'll probably do another session tonight and add in some foam balls.
    • Didn't say anything about your understanding in my post.  Well, if you are not insisting on alignment with logic of the WHS, then no.  Try me/us. What do you want from us then?? You are not making sense. You come here and post in an open forum, question a system that is constructed with logic, without using any of your own and then give us a small window of your personal experience to support your narrative which at first sight does not makes sense.  I mean, if you are a point of swearing then I would suggest you cut your losses and humor a more gullible audience elsewhere. Good heavens.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.