Jump to content
IGNORED

Do you judge your instructor by your own progress


Note: This thread is 4446 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Iacas has nailed it where he says

Once a week is fine IF:

1) Your real "lessons" are actually once every five to six weeks (or thereabouts)

2) Every other "lesson" is actually just supervised practice .

I recently read an article where a golfer said his instructor taught him the takeaway over and over for the first 10 lessons.  He wouldn't let him move on until he'd got it right because the ensuing chain reaction from a faulty takeaway would mess up his swing rendering the whole exercise pointless.  I was mightily impressed.  The golfer is now scratch.

So in a nutshell, if taking one lesson a week is causing a problem, then this is because the instructor is not impressing on you the futility of moving on until you are ready.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


If you were a 20 handicap before the lessons then you're not only trying to learn what your new instructor is telling you, but also possibly unlearning what you did in your old swing.  I've been taking lessons since March of this year.  My new instructor told me to get to the level I told him I desired he'd need to start from scratch as I developed too many bad habits.  As Erik (Iacas) stated, weekly mini lessons combined with major lessons every 4-6 weeks seemed to work well for me.

It took a lot of practice to break some of my bad habits and until I demonstrated a level of proficiency from my last lesson we didn't progress to the next.  He was very fair and during the mini-lessons charged me less if at all to point out some suggestions and drills to re-inforce what he wanted me to do.

If you're not making progress after nine lessons it seems like either you and him aren't on the same page or you're not getting enough time to practice between lessons.

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by GaryH

I recently read an article where a golfer said his instructor taught him the takeaway over and over for the first 10 lessons.  He wouldn't let him move on until he'd got it right because the ensuing chain reaction from a faulty takeaway would mess up his swing rendering the whole exercise pointless.  I was mightily impressed.  The golfer is now scratch.

Fantastic! That is the sort of instructor every golfer should have lessons from.

Since watching/studying the 5SK DVDs, I am now incorporating this technique into my teaching. I'd already realised I was guilty of trying to tackle too many pieces during a lesson but watching the DVDs really hit home. This afternoon I have my third lesson with a beginner and it will be the third lesson working on a steady head. I've already told her we cannot move on until we nail this piece. She can do it without a ball, she can do it chipping and pitching, but not with a full swing.

"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." – Winston Churchill

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I've taken lessons from 2 different pros.  One taught by feel and the other taught something very similar to The Golf Machine.  They were both good teachers and had won various regional awards for thier teaching abilities.  One guy confused the heck out of me and I barely improved at all in 8 lessons.  I felt like I would never "get it".  The other guy had me hitting it better than I ever have in just 4 lessons.

I don't think one was necessarily a better teacher than the other but one was a more effective teacher *for me*.  Which guy was better for me?  Believe it or not . .I am the kind of golfer who needs to be shown and told about positions.  The Golf Machine guy did it for me - the "Feel" guy confused the crap out of me.

Moral of the story is . . .go and go now.  Not because your teacher is bad but because he is not connecting with you.  $100 bucks is a lot to pay for no quantifiable improvement.  you should at least *feel* like you are making progress.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
Originally Posted by AmazingWhacker

They were both good teachers and had won various regional awards for thier teaching abilities.

A lot of that is political and has little to nothing to do with "how good" the instructor really is.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4446 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Ok, that makes sense. I was trying to wrap my head around that concept when I was writing my post.   
    • 78 today at Minnesott (36 front / 42 back) - a new first with an even par on the front.  A big day of up and downs for par.  Only 26 putts against 4 GIR and 5 nGIR.  Was a CPO (cart path only) day due to recent rains.  Overall game was on - until 18 where I was looking at having a first “no-sixes” and made a triple 7 (tee shot in the lake, 2nd tee in fairway, shot 4 approach to right of green pin high, shot 5 bogie on the green, long two putts for triple 7.  Still a solid round and new personal best. 
    • I believe that 76 bpms is the tour average (or somewhere around that). I think that's from taking it back to impact. I'm not 100% sure of exactly how it works since a typical pendulum is already moving when it starts going back. The putter on the throughswing ideally would work pretty much exactly like a pendulum though. To get the exact same time period from starting the putter back to impact, you'll have to accelerate it a lot faster on a longer putt right at the beginning until it gets to the speed it needs to be to make the putter move the right distance. Probably all way too much to think about while actually hitting a putt, but bottom line is I agree entirely that a metronome is a good thing to use if you're working on your putting tempo. As to the split between backstroke and downstroke, the tour tempo lot said 2:1 is the ideal. 3:1 for full swing. 2:1 for short game and putting. Whenever I go on a SAM I am about 1.7:1 I think and I can't for the life of me get my backstroke to be slow enough to get it to 2:1. Ho hum. Last comment - if you do have a perfect pendulum putting stroke and you have the ball slightly forward of the center of your stance, then the putter should be just starting to rise again at impact and with the way that pendulum motion works, it should be very slightly decelerating at impact, which I believe someone may have suggested once 😛 
    • Was going to chime in on Erik’s videos - they were and are solid teaching on better putting.  
    • I'm a big fan of the metronome. I forget what my actual numbers were, but something like 0.59 seconds: my backswings, regardless of the length of the putt, is 0.59 seconds (or 0.72 or whatever the actual number was). The period of a pendulum is determined by the length of the pendulum. So, to hit a putt harder, you take it back farther… in the same amount of time. So you have to swing it faster, and thus, it comes through faster. The putter head has to travel faster to travel farther in the same amount of time. Everyone tends to have a "beat" that they like. For some it's slower, and they have to make bigger backswings to make a putt go the same distance as someone like Brandt Snedeker. It also has a metronome IIRC. 😄 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...