Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Anyone play Adams CMB's? (also, when to know you need easier-to-hit clubs)


Recommended Posts

Posted

I played these on rental clubs a few years ago (when my index was ~8), and went out and bought them a few months later cuz I loved them so much.  It's weird cuz I'm asking for reviews on this club, when they're my only set of clubs right now.  But sometimes you lose perspective on how much better/worse other clubs may be when you only swing one set all the time.  I can't tell if I still love em' cuz I don't know how any other clubs feel (occasional stall hitting @ the local golf store doesn't really compare to time on the course).

I guess my general question is if they're too good a club for me.  I fluctuate between an 8 and a 14 index in the past  years (took a 5 month break), I'm a shorter but "more accurate" player when comparing myself to others w/ similar indexes (swing regular shafts, 7i- 145 yards, Driver 240 yards w/roll).  I do like to shape shots, but wouldn't say I'm particularly good/consistent at it.

Was just considering if I go out and by a set of giant cavity backs, if I'll play better at this stage.

Just soliciting thoughts, as I have no intention of spending the $ on a club fitting (unless ya'll convince me otherwise).

Thanks


Posted

My own thoughts on clubs:  I used to be a big believer in getting "players" clubs once one had a semi-competent swing.  I played Mizuno MP-57s for three years, all the while with a handicap typically in the high teens (and it never got under 15, except for one half month where it was 14.8).  

In late 2011, I knew I'd be playing very little golf for the next two years, and I got a set of more forgiving irons.  Even though I'm now better than I was when I played the MP-57s, I can't see switching.  I don't need to control trajectory often enough, I don't shape shots nor do I often desire to, and GIR is just too important for me to consider getting something that may make doing that harder.

  • Upvote 1

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Tour Edge Exotics C723 21 degree hybrid.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 9/24/2016 at 7:14 PM, Shindig said:

In late 2011, I knew I'd be playing very little golf for the next two years, and I got a set of more forgiving irons.  Even though I'm now better than I was when I played the MP-57s, I can't see switching.  I don't need to control trajectory often enough, I don't shape shots nor do I often desire to, and GIR is just too important for me to consider getting something that may make doing that harder.

A recurring story I hear during scrambles: Golfer X used player's irons in college, playing the rather well. But, five years later X has gone to GI irons: the forgiveness of GI helps his scores more than the uber-workability of Player's irons, which he didn't have time to practice.

That said, I did a little hunting around on the Adams Idea CMB Forged irons. TST did not review the 2013 Golf D. Hot List iron, so I borrowed this Adams CMB Review from another site.

The multi-player review team gave the CMB high marks as very playable Player's iron. Also, the head has tungsten weight ports - spoiler - on the toe to prevent twisting on impact. Ping S-series irons had a similar feature.

Spoiler

cmb.jpg

Also, the CMB shot pattern was quite compact in distance for the better player in the group. @bones75, if you avoid working the ball, other than to create your dominant shot shape, you might be OK if you avoid the fancy shots.

Next, tell us what shaft you have on the CMBs. Stock shafts were the steel KBS Tour C-Taper, and the graphite Matrix Ozik Program 8.1. It you have a C-Taper - even in R-flex - this is a rather harsh shaft for a lot of golfers. If you're fighting the shaft a bit, this may be part of your problem. Your 145-yd. 7-iron distance is decent, but you don't fall into the long hitter category.

Tell us what shaft you have, and we can make better suggestions.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha B16 OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:  image.png.0d90925b4c768ce7c125b16f98313e0d.png Inertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  :srixon: QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

@WUTiger  I have the C-tapers.  I really don't know much about golf technology, like even what different shafts means.  When hit well, I like the shot shape/spin on the CMBs, and can get all my irons to stop on the green.  I can also draw/fade these irons pretty easily (which is one of the main factors of when I bought them)...although it starts to get iffy at my longer irons (4&5).  Also, note my index of 8-14.  I'm not hitting tons of greens anyways, averaging only 6-7 per round.  Again, if someone were describing me as a golfer, they'd say "He's the shorter, but more accurate golfer.".

Edited by bones75

Posted

I had read really good things about them but Adams didn't release them for lefties so I couldn't try them.  For a while I played the Adams CB3's which many claimed were similar to the CMB's and I liked them a lot.   Adams made some nice forged mid-handicap and players irons before TM acquired them.    

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, bones75 said:

@WUTiger  I have the C-tapers. ...    I'm not hitting tons of greens anyways, averaging only 6-7 per round.  Again, if someone were describing me as a golfer, they'd say "He's the shorter, but more accurate golfer.".

R-flex C-Taper = 110 grams, low trajectory and low spin shaft / FCM = 5.2, slightly firm for R-flex.

Some more questions...

  • How many fairways do you hit per round?
  • For the greens you miss, what is the pattern on the misses, or less-than-square shots? Are you missing greens from fairway, or usually when you have to  scramble?
  • For short to medium Par 3 holes (reachable with iron shots), how many GIR? Do you often get up-and-down on non-GIR Par 3s? 

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha B16 OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:  image.png.0d90925b4c768ce7c125b16f98313e0d.png Inertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  :srixon: QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

@newtogolf It's too bad they didn't make CMB's for lefties.  Yea, I really loved them when I first got them, I just can't tell if I still do.

@WUTiger

- I hit a lot of fairways.  Average around 12.  It's not unusual I'll hit 14.

- I miss only slightly more often when scrambling. meaning I think I've got some strokes gained from scrambling.

- When I miss greens it's usually I don't miss by much(within 10 yards), and don't have a usual type of miss... maybe 3-4 times a round for approaches I will do an epic push, overdraw, light hook or chunkymonkey (irons), or an unintentional fade or small slice (woods).  I don't pick up penalties strokes very often (1 every 4 rounds maybe?).  Short game is also one of of my strengths.

- Also just read the non-TST review you referred to.  Pretty strong review, makes me think I got me some good clubs.  :)   I'm just not sure I'm good enough for them.


Posted

Possibly your preferred shot shape is the draw? Just guessing from your last post.

What you might do is get some face impact decals for irons and go to the range. After a brief warm-up, hit 10 shots each with 5i, 7i, and 9i. If the impact points are all over the face (which I doubt given your handicap), you might have a swing wobble.

If the points cluster in one area, and its away from center face, you might need a tweak to your irons, such as shaft length or lie angle. Also, launch monitor session could give you specific data to combine with impact decal patterns. 

If you have clean hit problems mainly with the 4i and 5i, you might consider softstepping these shafts. This would bring the FCM down to 4.9 for the two clubs (just a touch under 5.0 which is theoretically "average" R-flex), and would help with launch.

Any other ideas from low-HDCPers? @Club Rat? @TourSpoon? @Spitfisher?

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha B16 OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:  image.png.0d90925b4c768ce7c125b16f98313e0d.png Inertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  :srixon: QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I have played them for last 2 years. C-taper S flex. 4-GW.

They are definitely not a GI iron but are very high quality 'player's' iron comparable to any other top notch MB or players CBs. They work great for me.

But I will say this, if you are in the market today for new irons, I would look for slight more forgiveness and hotter face. Doesn't have to be the 'giant' CBs you are talking about. Think Titliest AP2s, Callaway APEX pros or even last years' XR pros, TM RSis, etc., type of irons if you can't stand bulky heads and huge GI/SGI offsets. They are still fairly slim but SO much easier to game. Especially anything over 6 iron. For one thing, the shafts are lighter (on some models) and even though initially big shaft weight change will throw you off you will adjust after a few rounds and will have an easier time pushing the ball around the park.

BTW, I wouldn't put too much stock in statements that you need small headed irons to fade/draw ball.

 

  • Upvote 1

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 9 years later...
Posted

recently introduced to the cmb's and love them.   got me started looking at the a12 pros and the cb1's.

 

any input on either of these?     


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Let's continue on… Cool. The thing is, nobody's claiming par is "reliable" and par's inclusion piggy-backs in the course rating, which is awfully close to par and, thus, brings par in to make it make sense. Once again, for those in the back… (CR - Par) just makes it really easy to know what kind of score you need to shoot to best, match, or play worse than your handicap index. Yes, when par is different, the players from the higher par tees get an extra stroke (72 vs. 71, the 72s get an extra stroke. That makes sense and is a small complication (more info at https://www.usga.org/content/usga/home-page/handicapping/roh/Content/rules/Committee%20Content/USGA/LG_R6d.htm). However, most of the time, this adjustment will not be needed, as many courses play to the same par for the same genders from all sets of tees. And, the rare times it is needed, par (measured in whole numbers, integers) and strokes (also whole numbers/integers) map easily and the idea is easily grasped. Dean seems to be unaware of the fact that most every golfer carries something orders of magnitude more powerful than the highest end desktop computers available the last time he consulted with the USGA in their pockets. While it is quaint that his club puts printouts by the first tee… get with the times, Dean. Look up your handicap index and course handicap in the GHIN app and get on with it. It's a better system than the one that didn't account — at all — for a difference in the playing conditions (via an algorithm, not a judgment). Dean's assertions about the "less precise system because of par" continues to make absolutely zero sense. Right, it still changed tee to tee. Now it just changes differently… and in a way that more accurately reflects the score you need to shoot to play to your handicap. Previously, a 1.1 index would get 1 stroke on a 66.7/122 par-72 course. Now they give four strokes back to the course and must shoot 68 to play to their handicap. This makes way more sense. The 18-shot difference is a pretty extreme example. Maybe a long course that also offers a par-three set of tees could play that long, but… man, that's not going to be super common. Sensationalistic much, Dean? Also, once those unhappy (complete assumption) golfers realize a) what the change shows them (playing to net par = playing to your index) and b) realizes that their differential is going to be the same… I think they'll get over their initial questions. No. And yet… if he shoots the same scores, he'll get the same handicap index he has now. But he'll know on each course what score he needs to shoot to "play to his handicap." Sheesh, Dean. This stuff isn't that hard to figure out. Enough with the sensationalistic stuff. I don't find it "unacceptable" at all. Then again, I'm not nearly 80 and seemingly incapable of doing basic math these days. No. This literally makes no sense, as that part of the differential calculation and the course handicap calculation remains identical. Good! No. Categorically wrong. They should have been adjusting their handicaps all along. Previously it was by subtracting the course ratings. Which… is still basically what's done, with the addition of the course rating being "baked in" to the course handicap calculation. Dean is wrong here, or doing some math heretofore unknown by the world. When par is the same, what determines the difference in handicaps? The course rating, which Dean loves! Sheesh! You had to things when players were in situations like this before, too. This is getting exhausting. He keeps using words like "less precise" and "unfair" but does not seem to understand what they mean. This is like the Princess Bride meme: "you keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." The caps reduce upward movement. Committees have reign to reduce a player's handicap, and there's still an automatic Exceptional Score Reduction. I'm going through these more quickly now because… well, it's silly how badly Dean misses the mark with this blog post. Dean is literally confusing the upward movement (with the soft and hard caps) here with the exceptional score reduction which is used when lowering handicaps due to an exceptionally good score. The creators of the WHS are handicap experts. They know more about the current state of handicaps/handicapping than the Pope Emeritus. It's been shown to have almost no effect across all handicaps. Yes, some 36s under the old system are now 35s under the new system. Yawn. He should have stopped there. It's easier to apply and makes more sense. This makes no sense. It's "not complex" but players will have to guess? And, for men or women, the stroke index of each hole doesn't change because they play a different set of tees. They get a different number of strokes, but it's always been true that when you get 14 strokes you apply a stroke to stroke index holes 1-14, and when you get 11, to just holes with a SI of 1-11. Objection, your honor. Assumes facts not in evidence. Dean's just out here continuing to make shit up about "the inaccuracy of par" and ignoring that with Par (an integer) came the Course Rating, which he agrees is precise and accurate. No. No, this is inaccurate. Also, as noted, you can randomly assign stroke indexes, and so long as all the low numbers or all the high numbers are not clumped together at the beginning or ends of the 18 holes, matches generally work out the same. This is inaccurate. It is an algorithm that looks at scores. That's it. Also, this is better than a system like the prior one where no such thing existed at all. Wildly inaccurate and off-base. Did they do actual testing? No need. They have millions and millions of rounds and ran many, many, many simulations. That's testing. Dean seems to continue to be unaware of the fact that computers are more powerful now than they were in 2002. But, he's nearly 80, so we can understand if not going so far as to give him a pass on how much he gets wrong. Cool. Noted. For the most part that was because many countries haven't been able to rate enough of their courses. :sigh:
    • Day 3 (3 Jun 26) - More work on keeping arms connected today - hard foam balls with 7i and 5w…..
    • Day 274 6-3 flow drill getting chest through, arms in front. Arms get a little pinned to the side, not as much in front as I want them when I add speed. 
    • Shot 48 yesterday.  For me bogey golf is good.  I was 10 over through 7 and figured with a Par 3 and 4 coming on all I needed was birdie / par to get my 45. I had a great tee shot on #8 and sunk  a 5 footer for birdie, game was coming together, now just needed par on #9. Had a great tee drive and the green was within range for a hoped GIR or nGIR.  But I pulled the shot left into tall weeds and needed to take a drop.  So much for par, but a bogey for 46 is still good for me. I hit my lob wedge to get over a small tree and saw the ball riding nicely  on line to the pin when my club hit the ball a 2nd time on my follow through causing the ball to change directions and ended up @ pin high but along the same tall weeds I just took an unplayable out of.  had no room for a backswing, Just hacked at it and it shot across the green to the rough on the far side.  Needed a chip & 1 putt got a triple bogey. you can see the hole fall apart in the screenshot below.  
    • Day 68: Quick work with some foam balls. Trying to combine not making my right leg into a pole with slightly earlier weight forward. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.