Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4903 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
My playing partner was in a greenside bunker. He hit his shot and the ball hit the lip and came back at him. He took a frustrated swipe at the ball in mid air and the ball hit half way up the shaft and landed on the green. We classed it as a double hit, two strokes for the two hits plus a penalty stroke, but no one knew if this was correct. Does it make a difference whether the second contact is deliberate or accidental?

Posted

I honestly belive you made the right choice but I do not have a rule book in front of me so I am not sure either.  No matter the ruling there is definately a penalty there of some sort.  I would have also called it a double hit for the simple fact that the club was swung and the ball was struck a second time with the club before coming to a rest.  Someone else please let me know if this is the correct ruling as I would like to know as well.

Driver: CALLAWAY Diablo Octane 9.5*

Woods: CALLAWAY Diablo Octane 15*

Hybrid: CALLAWAY Diablo Edge 21*

Irons: CLEVELAND TA7 3-PW

Wedges: CLEVELAND 588 51*, 56*, and (60* on standby)

Putter: ODYSSEY DFX 1100 mallet

Bag: NIKE Performance Carry (Lime green/Grey)

Ball: NIKE One Tour D

 

 

 

 


Posted
Originally Posted by JP1111

My playing partner was in a greenside bunker. He hit his shot and the ball hit the lip and came back at him. He took a frustrated swipe at the ball in mid air and the ball hit half way up the shaft and landed on the green.

We classed it as a double hit, two strokes for the two hits plus a penalty stroke, but no one knew if this was correct. Does it make a difference whether the second contact is deliberate or accidental?

It does make a difference if it was deliberate or accidental. If it was accidental it would be one for the initial stroke and one penalty for the ball striking him.

As it was deliberate I'd say it falls under Rule 1-2. Exerting Influence on Movement of Ball or Altering Physical Conditions . The penalty is 2 strokes or disqualification if it is a serious breach. As his ball ended up on the green rather than back in the bunker it probably qualifies as a serious breach, although I'd defer to the more knowledgable rules gurus around here on where the line is around a serious breach.


Posted

Rule 1-2 is intent based.   Rule 14-4, Striking the ball more than once is not, (it's an accident).  Mordan is correct in that Rule 1-2 governs.  I would say a serious breach in stroke play....a DQ.  If it were match play I'm thinking no....so a loss of hole.

Just to clear up Rule 14-4 striking a ball twice .....it's a one stroke penalty and you play the ball where it lies.  Rule 19-2 covers if the ball strikes the player after a stroke.  Again a one stroke penalty and you play the ball as it lies. (Unless it wound up in your shirt, etc.)

1-2/0.5

Serious Breach of Rule 1-2

Q. Should the standard for determining whether a serious breach of Rule 1-2 has occurred be the same in match play and stroke play?

A. In deciding whether a player has committed a serious breach of Rule 1-2 , the Committee should consider all aspects of the incident. Given the different impact on players in match play and stroke play, it is possible for the same act to constitute a serious breach of Rule 1-2 in stroke play but not in match play. In many cases in match play (e.g., a player who intentionally stops his ball from entering a water hazard), a penalty of loss of hole is sufficient while in stroke play the player should be disqualified for a serious breach. In some cases (e.g., the purposeful act of damaging the line of putt referred to in Decision 1-2/1 ), a penalty of disqualification in match play may be appropriate. (Revised

Regards,

John

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4903 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 5/6* ⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛ ⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛ ⬛⬛🟧⬛⬛ 🟧🟧🟧⬛⬛ 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Now we’re getting all science-y.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.