Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4866 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Anyone see the show on Golf Channel with an hour-long conversation between Jack, Arnie, Gary, and Lee?  I watched it tonight and enjoyed it thoroughly.  I'm guessing they will be replaying it so catch it if you can.  Some great stories from the past, how they each viewed the various majors, how the media was different in their day, etc.    They are all getting old so they might not have the opportunity to do this again.  What really impressed me was the depth of the friendship these competitors and rivals have with each other.  Jack said that they were not only proud of their own careers, they were proud of each other's accomplishments.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by turtleback

Anyone see the show on Golf Channel with an hour-long conversation between Jack, Arnie, Gary, and Lee?  I watched it tonight and enjoyed it thoroughly.  I'm guessing they will be replaying it so catch it if you can.  Some great stories from the past, how they each viewed the various majors, how the media was different in their day, etc.    They are all getting old so they might not have the opportunity to do this again.  What really impressed me was the depth of the friendship these competitors and rivals have with each other.  Jack said that they were not only proud of their own careers, they were proud of each other's accomplishments.

What, they couldn't invite Tom Watson?

In My Bag:

Adams Super LS 9.5˚ driver, Aldila Phenom NL 65TX
Adams Super LS 15˚ fairway, Kusala black 72x
Adams Super LS 18˚ fairway, Aldila Rip'd NV 75TX
Adams Idea pro VST hybrid, 21˚, RIP Alpha 105x
Adams DHY 24˚, RIP Alpha 89x
5-PW Maltby TE irons, KBS C taper X, soft stepped once 130g
Mizuno T4, 54.9 KBS Wedge X
Mizuno R12 60.5, black nickel, KBS Wedge X
Odyssey Metal X #1 putter 
Bridgestone E5, Adidas samba bag, True Linkswear Stealth
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

All 4 of those guys have exhibited great class over their entire careers. Can't help but think that is not the case with MOST of the players today. But man would it be awesome to see a legendary conversation 30 years from now with Tiger, Phil, Vijay, and Ernie. Certainly only Tiger is on the legend level of Player, Palmer, Nicklaus, and Trevino, but damn that could be a great conversation. Surely none of them are close friends like the older guys, but could really see some interesting discussion.

:tmade: R1 Driver
:tmade: Burner 18.5 Wood
:tmade: Rocketballz 19 Rescue

:mizuno: MP-59 4-PW Irons
:cleveland: CG16 52, 56
:cleveland: Classic Mallet Putter

:bridgestone: e5 Ball


Posted

While the deep friendships between them seem apparent now, much of that has developed as they became the old guys and not so much while they were still trying to beat each others' brains out on the course.   There was a respect for each other as competitors, but the friendships emerged more with the wisdom of age.

As to class throughout their careers, these guys have mostly been that way, and probably few in all of sports epitomize the meaning of the word "class" as much as Arnie.    But Trevino isn't always the jocular image he projects.    An acquaintance of mine was a fairly good friend with Lee for many years, and tells that Lee had a pretty hard, bitter edge to him.   One day after a tournament in Lee's early Senior Tour career a kid approached Lee for an autograph after the round in the area it was accepted to do so.   Lee looked at the kid's autograph book, tossed it on the ground at the kid's feet, and said "I don't do that anymore" and walked off.    My friend confronted Lee about his behavior, and Lee's response was that he had to sign autographs for much of his playing career and he was sick of it and just wouldn't do it anymore.    The incident ended their friendship.

  • Upvote 1

Posted
Really enjoyed the televised discussion, in particular the ever feisty Gary Player. All supreme competitors in their primes, even Mr. Nicklaus appears to have mellowed--but not Gary. I can see how Mr. Player's unrelenting competitiveness could be annoying, but I find it admirable and entertaining . I fully expected him to jump onto the table and do single arm push ups.

HiBore XLS Tour 9.5*
Adams Fast10 15* 3W
A2OS 3H-7iron 60* LW
8iron Precept Tour Premium cb
9iron and 45* PW 50* GW 56* SW m565 and 455 VfoilPutter Anser Belly Putter Ball in order of preference TPblack e5 V2  AD333


Posted

What a great combination of characters.  One of the things I absolutely love about golf.  I too wonder which guys we'll be watching give these interviews in 30 years, and what they'll be nostalgic about.  I can see Tiger ripping Phil, Vijay, and Ernie about when they switched to belly putters, and Ernie coming back with "well, I won that Open in 2012 with a belly putter while you were lining up your third putt!"

Kevin

Titleist 910 D3 9.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Titleist 910F 13.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Adams Idea A12 Pro hybrid 18*; 23* with RIP S flex
Titleist 712 AP2 4-9 iron with KBS C-Taper, S+ flex
Titleist Vokey SM wedges 48*, 52*, 58*
Odyssey White Hot 2-ball mallet, center shaft, 34"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by uttexas

Really enjoyed the televised discussion, in particular the ever feisty Gary Player. All supreme competitors in their primes, even Mr. Nicklaus appears to have mellowed--but not Gary. I can see how Mr. Player's unrelenting competitiveness could be annoying, but I find it admirable and entertaining . I fully expected him to jump onto the table and do single arm push ups.

HA! Now that would have been legendary!!

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by LuciusWooding

Quote:

Originally Posted by turtleback

Anyone see the show on Golf Channel with an hour-long conversation between Jack, Arnie, Gary, and Lee?  I watched it tonight and enjoyed it thoroughly.  I'm guessing they will be replaying it so catch it if you can.  Some great stories from the past, how they each viewed the various majors, how the media was different in their day, etc.    They are all getting old so they might not have the opportunity to do this again.  What really impressed me was the depth of the friendship these competitors and rivals have with each other.  Jack said that they were not only proud of their own careers, they were proud of each other's accomplishments.

What, they couldn't invite Tom Watson?

That was my first thought.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
I enjoyed the interview. I have seen all four of them play back in the 90s on the Senior Tour. Nicklaus could still hit that towering fade and Trevino was a master with the wedge.

Callaway AI Smoke TD Max 10.5* | Cobra Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4i | T100 5-P | Vokey 50/8* F, 54/10* S,  58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback 1


Posted
Originally Posted by LuciusWooding View Post

Originally Posted by turtleback

Anyone see the show on Golf Channel with an hour-long conversation between Jack, Arnie, Gary, and Lee?  I watched it tonight and enjoyed it thoroughly.  I'm guessing they will be replaying it so catch it if you can.  Some great stories from the past, how they each viewed the various majors, how the media was different in their day, etc.    They are all getting old so they might not have the opportunity to do this again.  What really impressed me was the depth of the friendship these competitors and rivals have with each other.  Jack said that they were not only proud of their own careers, they were proud of each other's accomplishments.

What, they couldn't invite Tom Watson?

Originally Posted by sean_miller

That was my first thought.

I suspect that it was because Watson's career didn't really overlap much with any of the prime of Arnie and, to a lesser extent, Gary.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

If there were a fifth person to join that group, Billy Casper would have been more appropriate.

At any rate, that sounds like an awesome interview! Will have to check that out.


Posted

gary player strikes me as a full on napoleon.

and i thought that arnie and jack dont really and never did really like each other?  that what seems like friendship is them being cordial and not wanting to seem like they hate each other?

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by zipazoid

If there were a fifth person to join that group, Billy Casper would have been more appropriate.

At any rate, that sounds like an awesome interview! Will have to check that out.


Yeah, but in the most important sense, Billy's career didn't really measure up to the others.  Despite having a huge number of tour wins, his resume was kind of light on majors for that era.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Quote:
Originally Posted by colin007 View Post

and i thought that arnie and jack dont really and never did really like each other?  that what seems like friendship is them being cordial and not wanting to seem like they hate each other?

Complicated relationship. They went from adversaries to cordial to partners to competitors in the course design business to elder statesmen. Here's a great book on their relationship thru the years -

http://books.google.com/books/about/Arnie_and_Jack.html?id=toKIEHepkIgC

Quote:
Surprisingly, one of sport’s most contentious, complex, and defining clashes played out not in the boxing ring or at the line of scrimmage but on the genteel green fairways of the world’s finest golf courses. Arnie and Jack. Palmer and Nicklaus. Their fifty-year duel, in both the clubhouse and the boardroom, propelled each to the status of American icon and pushed modern golf to the heights and popularity it enjoys today.

Arnie was the cowboy, with rugged good looks, Popeye-like forearms, a flailing swing, and charm enough to win fans worldwide. Jack was scientific, precise, conservative, aloof, even fat and awkward. Ultimately, Nicklaus got the better of Palmer on the course, beating him in major victories 18-7. But Palmer bested Nicklaus almost everywhere else, especially in the hearts of the public and in endorsement dollars. By the end of this page-turning narrative, we see that each man wanted what the other had: Arnold wanted the trophies. Jack wanted the love.

Posted
Originally Posted by turtleback

Anyone see the show on Golf Channel with an hour-long conversation between Jack, Arnie, Gary, and Lee?  I watched it tonight and enjoyed it thoroughly.  I'm guessing they will be replaying it so catch it if you can.  Some great stories from the past, how they each viewed the various majors, how the media was different in their day, etc.    They are all getting old so they might not have the opportunity to do this again.  What really impressed me was the depth of the friendship these competitors and rivals have with each other.  Jack said that they were not only proud of their own careers, they were proud of each other's accomplishments.

I have dvr'd it and have watched bits and pieces of it, and yes, what I've seen so far is excellent. So nice to see these four giants of the game get together and reminisce. True enough this may not happen ever again, though I hope it does.


Note: This thread is 4866 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I have a couple of trips planned, although golf was a secondary component in each.  In February we're going to visit some friends near Naples, so Mary Anne and I have added on a few days to stay and play at Streamsong.  Then In March we're going to Hawaii (again), and will almost certainly get in a few rounds there.
    • My next golf trip will probably be a short one, but I’m really looking forward to it. I’m thinking of staying relatively close, picking a spot with a few solid courses and making a long weekend out of it. For me, the best golf trips are about good courses, relaxed vibes, and time away with friends.
    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.