Jump to content
IGNORED

In Hand Pics! TaylorMade RocketBladez Tour and RocketBladez irons! New Pics Added! 1-3-13


Note: This thread is 4305 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Originally Posted by ZigZag

Hopefully this means the RBZ irons are coming down in price soon. Love to get a set of those.

They have already on Golfsmith.com

Ron :nike: GOLF Embracing my Angry Black Male :mad:


From Wilsons Facebook page, a direct call out to Taylormade

  • Upvote 1

Ron :nike: GOLF Embracing my Angry Black Male :mad:


Originally Posted by GaijinGolfer

Ummm....those arent blades and its a joke that TM would name them, "RocketBladez".

Anyone buying these who is gullible enough to think they're buying blades probably won't care what the polymer insert does over time because they'll be getting suckered into something else long before it's an issue. Anytime I see a commercial with  "Dustin Johnson demonstrating the new . . . " I change the channel.


Originally Posted by RonTheSavage

From Wilsons Facebook page, a direct call out to Taylormade

Awesome!  I'm surprised they responded to a tweet with that formal of a comeback! LOL

.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

Hit the 6 iron today and took some video.  On good shots I wouldn't say that I hit it that much farther but definitely longer on mis hits.  Sound is slightly hollow which is just the construction of the head.  Has more of a "thwack" sound, almost like some hybrids.  Very easy to hit high but the ball doesn't balloon even with the stock 85 gram shaft.  I like the look at address, easy to line up, large head but not chunky, very similar to the Tour Burner from a few years back.  Distance control was great, for me my pattern was consistent even out of different lies.  Must say, it was a lot of fun to it

  • Upvote 1

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Hate to say it, but it looks fantastic. I even like the sound. Thanks for posting

Ron :nike: GOLF Embracing my Angry Black Male :mad:


Hahaha, I love one of the comments on that thread: "OlderBladez".

Originally Posted by RonTheSavage

From Wilsons Facebook page, a direct call out to Taylormade


Wow, Taylormade replied to a guy who posted ^^^ that pic on their Facebook page.  Kind of impressed that they took the time to reply:

Quote:
The Wilson Reflex iron was introduced more than 30 years ago. Iron design has progressed significantly from that time. The Reflex incorporates a slot that enhances face flexibility to increase COR (a term that wasn’t used back then). All i ron heads back then were rigid, with a COR measuring around .760. The Reflex measured around .800. RocketBladez COR is about 20 points higher.
Also, the Reflex didn’t have enhancements like the RocketBladez’ complex face design, Inverted Cone, high MOI and low and centered CG location. The Reflex had a constant face thickness of about 3mm, while RocketBladez’ varying face thickness is 1.6 mm at its thinnest. The Reflex’s vertical CG was relatively high, about 20 mm above the ground, and the set didn’t employ progressive head design in terms of topline, sole width and MOI.
  • Upvote 3

I remember these! If I'm not mistaken, they were determined to be "illegal" by the USGA due to the "trampoline effect". I think they filled the hollow slot behind the clubface with some sort of plastic later on, but the Reflex didn't sell well enough to survive.

Originally Posted by RonTheSavage

From Wilsons Facebook page, a direct call out to Taylormade


Originally Posted by glock35ipsc

Wow, Taylormade replied to a guy who posted ^^^ that pic on their Facebook page.  Kind of impressed that they took the time to reply:

So what TaylorMade is saying is that - the Reflex design was ahead of its time? Because while TaylorMade lowered the CG - the COR only improved by 20pts from .800 to .820.  LOL

.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'd say the advance over the Wilson irons is timing, tuning the sound, and providing a more user friendly leading edge. Take any irons from the 1970s or 1980s, grind down the leading edge, put on fresh grips, and they'd be completely playable. With the smaller head sizes they'd all be players irons though.


Doing a little fun research, it looks like the patent on this was first granted in 1983 and assigned to Pepsico, who at the time was the owner of Wilson Sporting Goods.      Patent #4,398,965 claimed an iron with a " front striking face and slot space rearwardly from the striking face " and that this would " store energy when striking....and transfer energy to the ball as the ball leaves the striking surface ".      This appears to be a follow on from their work patented in 1976 using a flexing slot on the insert in their wood clubs.

Since the original Pepsico patent on the iron slot was granted in mid-1983, they would have received 17 years of protection on that concept and their patent would have expired in summer 2000.

Subsequently, a number of other patents with various manufacturers have played off this theme as well.     Nike has patents for a "bridge slot"; Callaway has some patent activity for the slot concepts, and Taylormade has some patents going back to 2001 on similar concepts.

The Wilson patent, however, wasn't the first in this field.    A 1976 patent with Shamrock Golf Company had a similar concept with the slot extending almost through the club, and even before that there was a patent granted in 1962 with a slot going through the club.

  • Upvote 1

  • Administrator
RocketBladez did not give Mike the Tourette's Syndrome you see as part of his takeaway. I think his constant contact with Canadians did that to him.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Tour RocketBladez [URL=http://thesandtrap.com/content/type/61/id/62013/] [/URL]

Ooh, I didn't see that picture until just now. Those look pretty nice.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Maybe I'm a poser, but I could almost see myself playing the Tour version.


Originally Posted by Datsyuk

Maybe I'm a poser, but I could almost see myself playing the Tour version.

For as much as I seem to bag on TMaG, I do like these.  But it's going to be many years before I shell out that kind of cash on a set of irons.


  • Moderator
Originally Posted by iacas

RocketBladez did not give Mike the Tourette's Syndrome you see as part of his takeaway. I think his constant contact with Canadians did that to him.

Kids were born in the USA, only Canadian is the wife.  My "tourette's" is from from having 27 swing thoughts, down from 35

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 5 weeks later...

I hit the 7 iron at Golf Galaxy last night.

Didn't get any more distance than my JPX 800 Pro, was consistently going 150-155 for me.

In the Puma Orange Formation Stand Bag:

Driver: TaylorMade RBZ (10.25)

Fairway Woods: Callaway Diablo Octane (3,5,7,9)

Irons: Mizuno JPX 800 Pro (6-PW) 

Wedges: Mizuno JPX (50, 55, & 60)

Putter: Odyssey Versa #1

Ball: Titleist DT Solo

 


Note: This thread is 4305 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 336 - Back to some full swing work. Focus was on a hips-towards-the-target finish, chest higher up. Partial swings working up to full swings. 
    • Day 79 - 2024-12-18 Got some work in before lessons while finishing the charging of the R50.
    • Matt, the equation is simple from my perspective. Stronger the grip, greater the potential of application for twist torque at impact. And if it it is combined with an extreme outward path as you say, god help you. Not too many skilled players with super strong grips, are there? Sure, it's all about match-ups but the connection to super strong grips and duck hooks is common from what I see and have dealt with myself.
    • Day 154: not feeling great, so just 5 minutes of mirror work. Working on backswing stuff still. 
    • I have been a big follower of this technology ever since I saw Positive Putters display at a golf show in the Revealer they invented and patented. That would have been around 2000. It made sense to me that staying target line balanced was a better way of balancing.  Early models of these putters were often too flat for me and I struggled to hole more putts. I was fascinated by all of them - Positive Putters, the Railgun, the SeeMore blades and the Backstryke. I have tried the DF1, which was great for long putts, and currently use the DF3. I am still really good at long putts with the DF3 3, having made a 90’ putt and a 34’ putt in my last two rounds. My first round with the DF3 I only had 24 putts making almost 200’ of putts. I don’t quite use the putter the way they suggest- I don’t swing harder, and only a little longer, on longer putts. All my putts are at the same tempo, or strive to be. Therefore, I am swinging harder on longer putts. I do love putting with the DF 3 and I have become much better at putting through 50-60 mm gates at home, rarely hitting the sides.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...