Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1122 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yeah sorry didn't see you on the range. Next time you practice, post a video or send it to me and I'll give you my take.


Will do. Thanks Mike!

"If you watch a game, it's fun. If you play it, it's recreation. If you work at it, it's golf."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Well, shot this back in February and haven't had time to post it, but after a pretty disappointing round this morning, thought I'd get these up and see if anyone has any thoughts. IIRC, the first two swings are PW, two 7 or 8 irons, and two 4h.

Thanks in advance...

"If you watch a game, it's fun. If you play it, it's recreation. If you work at it, it's golf."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Not from the video, but from watching this morning, one thing I notice (that may be nothing at all) is that you have a really narrow stance.  Granted, we're hitting mostly wedges, but even then it seemed a little narrow.

I think a little wider separation between the feet would lead to a little more stability and balance.

  • Upvote 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Got any face on video?


Unfortunately not at the moment. Will shoot some next time I get to the range.

"If you watch a game, it's fun. If you play it, it's recreation. If you work at it, it's golf."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Unfortunately not at the moment. Will shoot some next time I get to the range.

Shoulda mentioned it this morning!  I would have taped a few swings during the round.

Next time. :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 8 years later...
Posted

Posting a quick video in preparation for meeting my 2023 goals. Looking back over this thread, I see a lot of the same issues are still there: too flat a swing plane with the shoulders, too much hip turn. Good news is that it looks like my hands are in a better place, but still a lot of work to be done. Really just leaving this here as a before shot in the hopes that I'm able to improve the picture in '23. 

52 degree wedge from 105, hit it just long and left @ Monarch Dunes Challenge Course #9

"If you watch a game, it's fun. If you play it, it's recreation. If you work at it, it's golf."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

Wow, okay, so eight years later! Welcome back. 🙂

01.jpg02.jpg

You're gonna wanna do a lot to address the top two images… that elbow gets REALLY far around you, and you spend a LOT of energy just trying to get the ball back to the front.

  • Informative 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Still working on getting the backswing sorted. Really need to work on the takeaway, but seems like the top is better....Thoughts guys? 

 

 

"If you watch a game, it's fun. If you play it, it's recreation. If you work at it, it's golf."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

@jefkve, what are you trying to do?

Your elbow is still really far around, and your backswing looks almost the same as before.

01.jpg02.jpg03.jpg

Might I recommend another topic for you?

 

  • Thumbs Up 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
32 minutes ago, iacas said:

@jefkve, what are you trying to do?

Your elbow is still really far around, and your backswing looks almost the same as before.

@iacas I've been drilling on keeping my right elbow more in front of me. It's a very different 'feel', but agreed that the result is not very different. Need  to keep working on takeaway, backswing, and early extension. 

As far as grinding, I do spend what little free time I get working on swing feels, but again, results are lacking...

 

TBC...

"If you watch a game, it's fun. If you play it, it's recreation. If you work at it, it's golf."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

So I'll be blunt, and I'll trust that you know I'm trying to help you here.

Let's say for this particular thing, your swing is a 1. That's just the starting point, so, it's a 1. Let's say "perfect" is a 5. Just for this piece that you're trying to work on, that is.

I see little to no point in making swings that are 1s, 2s, or even 3s. You need to make almost every swing you make (while working, not while playing) as 4s and 5s. If they were all 5s, you're going too slowly, but a mixture of 4s and 5s is the sweet spot.

That is what the grind is: having the discipline to make swings that produce 4s and 5s until you can go a little faster and still produce 4s.

So, post a swing some time of you doing a 4 or a 5. Let's see it.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

@jefkve Thanks for sharing your journey! I wish you the best of luck going forward.

Iacas said two of the most poignant things an instructor could say/ask:

  • What are you trying to do?
  • I see little point in making practice swings that are 1s, 2s or 3s.

I am not an Instructor, but taught tennis for several years.  Did an instructor provide a drill for keeping your elbow in front of you? If not, and you have been working on things yourself, minor feel changes to you often have little to no effect on your swing at your handicap level. The reason why is we personally overestimate the difference in feel on our swings.

If you follow Mike Adams, he believes that your backswing should bisect your shoulder if your wingspan matches your height in golf shoes.  Your backswing is much more shallow, indicating very short arms, which you don’t appear to have. Your takeaway appears to be outside, and then you flatten the backswing.  This forces you to early extend in order to give you room to hit the ball. I suspect you still hit strong draws with shorter clubs, probably through the gap wedge, but push slice your driver because the club is too long and/or flat?

I would defer to an instructor, but one drill I would suggest is the pump drill to eliminate the backswing issues. Take the club to the top of your desired backswing, and we will target the shoulder since that is a neutral position versus your current through your upper arm.  Pump the arms downward once, return to the original position, and then swing away. DJ Tomasi helped popularize this drill and you could find a video.  
 

I wish you the best of luck!

  • Informative 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
9 hours ago, iacas said:

Let's say for this particular thing, your swing is a 1. That's just the starting point, so, it's a 1. Let's say "perfect" is a 5. Just for this piece that you're trying to work on, that is.

"The best drill is doing it right."

  • Informative 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1122 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.