Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3938 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Originally Posted by Ollie78

I am handicap 20 but as I explained in a post, I have more difficulties with woods than irons as I play more often on Par3 for different reasons.

I was thinking of pro versions because where I live in Spain, I can only test clubs in a general sports superstore and the regular 825 come only in graphite shaft and I have always played steel shaft and I do not like graphite ones.

So the steel options were JPX825 Pro, AP2, Ping Anser and Inesis td tour 901 (Inesis is the brand for the superstore which is played by Thomas Levet). All these irons are forged and honestly feeling is so much better. Of course, mishits are punished in a stronger way but still I have a much better feeling. Reg JPX825 feel much harder...

Finnaly, I discarded AP2 and Ping Anser as not fitting in my price range so my next step is to go to a local pro shop and get fitted for JPX Pro but they no longer sell JPX800 Pro so I wanted to know if there were many differences justifying the price difference (130$).

Well, I hope it clarifies a little bit. English is not my mother tongue so I can get quite confusing with my explanations.


You make complete sense.  Some people just feel the need to always tell other people they aren't good enough to play X clubs and others feel the need to step in set them straight.  Its a sideshow that repeats itself on every thread where people ask about buying a particular set of clubs.

I was trying to decide between JPX Pros and i20s, and was also looking to see whether I could save money by getting the 800's instead of the 825's.  I never compared them side by side, but the look of the 800s didn't bother me and they felt just as nice.  Everything I read says the only real difference is looks.  So it comes down to whether the difference in looks is enough to justify the price difference.  Nobody can really help you with that one, unfortunately.

In my googling, I found a much bigger price difference.

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Looks is always very subjective. JPX800 pro look a bit thicker but still very nice to me so it would not be a deal breaker.

Is the shaft so important ???

If so, I may not have that much choice dependig on the fitting results. JPX800 Pro only come with Dynalite Gold XP while JPX825 Pro have several shaft options.

From the clubs I tested, I noticed the NS pro 950 gh shaft felt really nice but the others were not "bad".

As living in Europe, I am looking on UK websites to avoid paying extra custom fees. Could it be that Mizuno is cheaper in Europe ?


Posted
Originally Posted by Ollie78

Looks is always very subjective. JPX800 pro look a bit thicker but still very nice to me so it would not be a deal breaker.

Is the shaft so important ???

If so, I may not have that much choice dependig on the fitting results. JPX800 Pro only come with Dynalite Gold XP while JPX825 Pro have several shaft options.

From the clubs I tested, I noticed the NS pro 950 gh shaft felt really nice but the others were not "bad".

As living in Europe, I am looking on UK websites to avoid paying extra custom fees. Could it be that Mizuno is cheaper in Europe ?

I dont know about the price differences across the ocean, but on ebay here the 800s are cheaper.

I think the shaft is very important.

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

On ebay, I just purchased a a set (5 -GW) of JPX800pro irons with Project X 4.5 graphite shafts for $350. They are little used in excellent condition.  I haven't had a chance to play them yet, but the feel is fantastic.  I did hit balls in an About Golf simulator.  My distances seemed to be shorter than with my Caloway Razr X's, but accuracy seemed better.  The jury is out until we get out on the golf course.

Anyway, the point is you do have more options on shafts.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

comparing distances, always be sure to check the lofts.  not all 7 irons are the same loft, one companys 6 iron might have the same loft as anothers 5.

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by colin007

comparing distances, always be sure to check the lofts.  not all 7 irons are the same loft, one companys 6 iron might have the same loft as anothers 5.

Well, yea, I know the shafts are shorter on the JPX's than the Calloway's.  I don't know about the lofts.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I am handicap 20 but as I explained in a post, I have more difficulties with woods than irons as I play more often on Par3 for different reasons. I was thinking of pro versions because where I live in Spain, I can only test clubs in a general sports superstore and the regular 825 come only in graphite shaft and I have always played steel shaft and I do not like graphite ones. So the steel options were JPX825 Pro, AP2, Ping Anser and Inesis td tour 901 (Inesis is the brand for the superstore which is played by Thomas Levet). All these irons are forged and honestly feeling is so much better. Of course, mishits are punished in a stronger way but still I have a much better feeling. Reg JPX825 feel much harder... Finnaly, I discarded AP2 and Ping Anser as not fitting in my price range so my next step is to go to a local pro shop and get fitted for JPX Pro but they no longer sell JPX800 Pro so I wanted to know if there were many differences justifying the price difference (130$). Well, I hope it clarifies a little bit. English is not my mother tongue so I can get quite confusing with my explanations.

Yeah, that's cool and makes sense. Despite what some think I was just curious because I am also a 20 and just recently got the regular 825s. For me, I was hitting a "tour iron" and found them to be a little too unforgiving. I liked how I hit the 825s and the price was right for me. I didnt even really consider the pros. Hope you enjoy your new sticks whatever you chose.


  • 2 months later...
Posted

I just went through the task of finding replacements for my PCB Tour MacGregors.  I have some MP-14s and MP Grads as well -- I know all older sets.  I needed more forgiveness as I don't play as much as I used to, and was looking to update my irons as far as technology.  I hit both the 900 pro and 925 pro back to back.  I could see a slight difference in club head size, sole grind, badges, and topline thickness, but not enough for twice the price difference between new 825 pros vs hardly hit, used 800 pros. I hit them the same distances as well. So I went with the 800 pros.  I might add that I also did the Mizuno shaft optimizer first to find out that I was great fit for the stock XP S300.  I will be getting my clubs this Friday.

In a staff blue  Aerolite III

Razr Hawk 10.5* (BB 63 S)
Orig Steelhead 4W 16.8* (F)
Orig Steelhead 7W 20* (M-10)

 JPX-800 Pro 4-pw (XP S300)

 MP-T Blk Ni 51.06, MP-T Blk Ni 56.14, MP-T Blk Ni 58.10

  Bettinardi BC-1 (34")

TM TP Black


  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
Originally Posted by Dave H

Yeah, that's cool and makes sense. Despite what some think I was just curious because I am also a 20 and just recently got the regular 825s. For me, I was hitting a "tour iron" and found them to be a little too unforgiving. I liked how I hit the 825s and the price was right for me. I didnt even really consider the pros. Hope you enjoy your new sticks whatever you chose.

If you are left handed, it's an easy decision.....you aren't getting any "Pro's", and that really sucks!


  • 2 years later...
Posted
I just took out a set of used jpx800 pros Monday for a test round bought them on the spot (had been swooning over some 825 pros with blue graphite shafts looked great as I tried them in another store on the mat with all the monitors, ect.) went out yesterday with the 800's again shot 5+. I know this is not much help I very satisfied with the 800's if I get some extra money ............ (Blue shafts ???)

Note: This thread is 3938 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • StuM,  I have, in the past, added a left handed club. (Ususally a 7 iron) However, I usually take a stroke penalty and move the ball to where I want it.  I play for fun and in a pinch can use theback side if my club if I don't want the penalty stroke.    RetiredOldMan,  Terry 
    • So, Brendan Sorsby, Texas Tech transfer QB, was found guilty of sports betting by the NCAA. He admitted to it. He placed thousands of bets over multiple years while at Indiana and Cincinnati. This included betting on his own teams.  The NCAA rules ban athletes from betting on any sport (college or pro).  A retired visiting judge from Tarrant County, Texas has put an injunction on the NCAA ruling. He is a visiting judge because the first judge was a graduate and big fan of Texas Tech, and he recused himself. The judged ruled the following... "Under Curry's order, Sorsby is permitted to play for Texas Tech's 2026 season on the condition that he continues his treatment for a gambling and anxiety disorder and serves a two-game suspension (missing games against Abilene Christian and Oregon State)."  Don't get me wrong, I don't particularly care for the NCAA. That still doesn't mean that a college can choose when or where to say, "Yea we agree to these rules for all our sports, well except in this case." Here is a breakdown from S&W. The Hidden Weapon in Sorsby’s Injunction: How a Lubbock County Court Order Quietly Neutralized the NCAA’s Most Powerful Enforcement Tool - Law Offices of Snell & Wilmer By Ryan J. Regula On June 8, 2026, Lubbock County District Court Judge Ken Curry issued a temporary injunction in Brendan Sorsby v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, Cause No. DC-2026-CV-0791 (99th Judicial District... The main judgement made sense. Sorsby, I am going to have all this harm done to me if I don't get to play. The Judge, I agree. The penalty for gambling is too harsh, so here are all these things you must do, and I will grant this injunction against the NCAA. Basically, an analogy would be when a person goes into court for a DUI and they agree to all these other things to not end up in jail.  What sucks for the NCAA is the NCAA has appealed to Texas’ Seventh Court of Appeals, based in Amarillo. All four justices that preside over the court are graduates of Texas Tech University School of Law. It would be hilarious if all four of them had to recuse themselves 🤣. For those who like to read legal rulings...  
    • The chatter in my brain is when the distance is between clubs since I am pretty weak at shortened backswings, etc. I try to simply decide if being long or short is the better outcome and choose my club based on that and simply not even try for the “real” distance.  For me a full normal swing is what I strive for.
    • I saw this comment made in a golf article... "Most golfers stand over a 4- or 5-iron still negotiating with themselves. They think about how hard to swing, whether they have the right club, if they have the aim correct and more. It’s a lot to deal with and long irons punish the “half-in” golf swing." I am not sure the "most golfers" is correct regarding the bolded part. I can understand if there is a bunker, water, and/or OB that a lot of golfers would be fixated on that. I am not sure that leads to ending up more times there. Pending your level in golf, the variance is so large in outcomes, it could be just with in the expected outcomes. I can understand if have a big lake on the right side of the hole being one of the most terrifying shots for right-handed amateur golfers.  I am not sure many golfers are standing over the ball talking to themselves, "Ok, maybe I should step back and pull the 4-iron. Am I lined up right? Oh, the wind came up, should I swing harder? What am I going to have for dinner tonight, maybe steak. (Joking, somewhat 😛)" A question is that how much chatter do you get while standing over the ball. Are you questioning the everything about your golf shot?   
    • Wordle 1,816 5/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.