Advertisement
Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
jmanbooyaa

trying out irons for 2013

5 posts in this topic

In a prevous post I had mentioned looking into some Mizuno Jpx800 pros. I went to Golfsmith today and while everyone was trying to hit the new R1 I was content messing around with a few irons. I hit the Vr Covert irons the best. Was hitting the 7 iron consistantly 176 with a slight fade. Nike had 2 degree and half inch longer to hit the ball seemed strangely high too me at least. Next up the x hot cally pros. loved the look of these. The feel was solid also. 6 iron 167 again with a slight fade. Sadly cally didn't have any shaft or lie options so I am not really sure without hitting my actual specs. Same thing for the Cobra amp line. No custom options or.new line yet. Lastly I was hitting the Mizuno 825 pros. Had the 1/2 inch longer shafts but no lie adjustment. Either way was not enjoying them. As of now I think I am siding towrds staying with my old set x 22 tours but the one thing that seems to be common is that I was enjoying the lighter shaft options. Anyone have any advice options anything? Thanks.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

are you considering reshafting your current sticks?  KBS Tour 90 shafts are lighter, and personally I like the way they feel.  But Feel is very much a preference thing.  The cost on the shafts online is around $25 a shaft (if I remember right) plus a grip plus labor, so it is worth considering how much you are really saving to keep your X22's.

4-G is 8 clubs * call it $40 a club for labor, shaft, and grip you are at $320.  After trade in, a new set might only cost you $500 or $550.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have considered re-shafting since I only use 6-pw of set. That being said I have a hybrid, putter, 7 wood and 2 sets if irons I could trade in so I am on the fence. I was fitted for 2 degrees upright 1/2 inch longer shafts and I like 3 wraps under grips. My main concern is will a new set even be noticeable to me besides shinyness. Would consider dynalite 90 shafts, kbs 90 and the new flighted 95. Thanks
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by clearwaterms

are you considering reshafting your current sticks?  KBS Tour 90 shafts are lighter, and personally I like the way they feel.  But Feel is very much a preference thing.  The cost on the shafts online is around $25 a shaft (if I remember right) plus a grip plus labor, so it is worth considering how much you are really saving to keep your X22's.

4-G is 8 clubs * call it $40 a club for labor, shaft, and grip you are at $320.  After trade in, a new set might only cost you $500 or $550.

Be careful with KBS tour 90s, they're not true to flex. They are designed for adding a lot of launch and aren't for people with average to above average distance. Kim Braly has said plainly that the tour 90 S is weaker than the Tour R flex by a fair bit. For someone who allegedly hits the 7 iron mid 170s, something in S flex would be minimal for control IMO. If you feel like the launch is a bit high it's probably because all the stock ones you hit probably didn't fit you well. The standard KBS tours are true to flex and feel very smooth, they might be worth trying, and the KBS C tapers in R or R+ will play like a legit stiff but at 110g. The 110g range is still pretty light feeling, especially the way KBS shafts are balanced, but the 90g range are not meant for people who hit the ball far.

I hit my 7i 170-180 myself and go with X flex C tapers soft stepped. I like a heavy weight and stable feel, so I'm a bit biased.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Thanks for the info. I don't hit my 7 iron over 160 ish I was shocked that I was knocking it 176 with the Vr covert 7 iron. But that was indoors and off a mat. Isolated to that specific club with a very high ball flight. Thanks.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Indeed. The icicles are melting though, with the 4 ft long (I'm not kidding) daggers starting to fall from the roofs of the buildings on campus. I should have the opportunity to play sometime soon again.
    • These are myths that I hear a lot. Some are just eye rolling trivia but some can hurt. 1. Tour pros continuously vary their shot shape based on hole demand. Not true. They have one predominant shot shape they play almost all the time. Only when in jail or extreme condition do they actually try anything out of their comfort zone - which is smaller than most folks think. 2. Tour pros are like swing doctors. They know everything there is to know about the golf swing. Nope - they are simply phenomenal listeners and executors. 3. You must understand the swing in it's entirety to learn and become better - Yeah, good luck on that path.   4. To have lag just hold the angle of the shaft to forearm until impact. - Lag is a result of good mechanics and club position and path. Can't force it. 5. You must have a superlight grip pressure (2-3 on a scale of 1 to 10) to hit good shots. - While white knuckling is just bad, you do need more grip pressure than you think.
    •   The problem is the twitter length version, get it as close to the hole as possible, is easy to read as, hit the longest club.  Really the argument in LSW (backed by stats), is around a multi-faceted risk assessment.  Simplifying less than the twitter version, hit it as far as possible without bringing "too much" risk into play.  The long version is basically a law of total probability argument, where you assess the probability of various outcomes with each current shot choice, and weight them by the average shots to hole out given each outcome, and choose the lowest. For example, you're sitting at 250 on a par 5.  You go through the potential outcomes of an 8i and 3i and estimate average shots to hole out from each: on target, slightly off target, chunk, blade, in jail, in hazard, open look but super penal rough, OB, whatever.  Then you think about the chances of these outcomes, and calculate the total expected score from each choice. The point in LSW is that you can't go through a bunch of equations for every shot, but if you're accurate about your average shot dispersions across clubs, then the typical bogey or better golfer is often overestimating the increase in risk from going for the longer shot, and underestimating the decrease in expected number of shots to hole out from getting it closer. The rule of thumb is that if there's not something in the layout that is a big risk at the longer distance but not at the short one – so in your case lateral hazard or big fairway thinning or big fairway bunker or much or penal rough or the like that starts at 75 yards out – then generally your lower expected total score is from hitting the longer club.  The strokes you lose when you do hit an errant long iron but wouldn't have hit an errant short iron are more than made up for by the strokes you gain from having an approach half as long when you don't hit an errant shot. Of course, it's always case by case and player by player.
    • I've been working on changing that for two years!
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Dragondrake
      Dragondrake
      (57 years old)
    2. Mistabigevil
      Mistabigevil
      (36 years old)
    3. Taylor56
      Taylor56
      (61 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon