Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4658 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

So I notice there are a few options. REG 588, 588 RTX, and 588 RTX CB. I know the CB are cavity back wedges which should be used for the higher handicap players. But is the REG 588 just last years clubs?

For me I was thinking of going with a 52* 588 RTX CB (or a Cobra S3 max Gap 49* to match my other irons), 56* 588 RTX CB, and a 60* Standard bounce 588 RTX.

I usualy shoot in the mid to upper 90's so I was thinking the CB's for the lower loft wedges may help.

I am coming from a Hippo 52*, no name 56*, and dunlop target special 62*, so I am thinking these will be a huge upgrade... :-)

Thanks

Joel White

BTW if you like another brand better let me know. I have just read a ton about these clubs being good, so like I said anything would be an upgrade!

Driver - Cobra S3 10.5*

Hybrid/Rescue - Cobra Amp Cell 2-3

Irons - Cobra S3 Max 3H, 4H, 5-PW

Wedges - 54* and 58* Cleveland 588-RTX

Putter - Carbite Polar Balanced Mallet

 

 


Posted

If it's Cleveland, you have to go with the Niblicks, they currently come in 42*, 49* and 56* - you will find nothing more forgiving.

Follow me on twitter

Chris, although my friends call me Mr.L

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by meenman

If it's Cleveland, you have to go with the Niblicks, they currently come in 42*, 49* and 56* - you will find nothing more forgiving.


As long as you don't mind being able to hit one type of shot with your wedges..............  The Niblick did nothing for my game but take up a spot in the bag and make my bunker play go to crap.  It does nothing that you can't do with a standard wedge/9/8 iron.

Don't believe the Niblick hype.  Get a standard wedge.  Whatever looks best to you and you like the feel of.


Posted
Originally Posted by Bullitt5339

As long as you don't mind being able to hit one type of shot with your wedges..............  The Niblick did nothing for my game but take up a spot in the bag and make my bunker play go to crap.  It does nothing that you can't do with a standard wedge/9/8 iron.

Don't believe the Niblick hype.  Get a standard wedge.  Whatever looks best to you and you like the feel of.

The reason you struggled with it is because you assumed it was a one trick pony. The 56 degree plays just as well out of the sand as any other high bounce wedge. It is very forgiving on pitch shots. It cuts through thick rough like no other club and yes, it can be used in a putting motion from the fringe.

They are not for everyone - one of my playing partners bought one when he saw the success I had with mine - I'm waiting for him to drop the price to $25 before I buy it off of him - mainly because I dont need a 49 degree.

Follow me on twitter

Chris, although my friends call me Mr.L

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by meenman

The reason you struggled with it is because you assumed it was a one trick pony. The 56 degree plays just as well out of the sand as any other high bounce wedge. It is very forgiving on pitch shots. It cuts through thick rough like no other club and yes, it can be used in a putting motion from the fringe.

They are not for everyone - one of my playing partners bought one when he saw the success I had with mine - I'm waiting for him to drop the price to $25 before I buy it off of him - mainly because I dont need a 49 degree.


I did not assume it was a one trick pony.  I read all these miraculous club reviews, like you guys are trying to do again, years removed and bought into the hype.  I really wanted and expected it to work, but the facts are that it did nothing better than clubs I already had in the bag.  Hell, people call it a chipper, but I chipped as good or better with my 9 iron than the Niblick.

Like I said before, it's no miracle club that's going to drop 5 or 6 strokes off the average golfer's game like guys try to make it out to be.  Everyone I personally know that bought one has taken it out and given it away or it's sitting gathering dust somewhere.

I'm glad you like yours, but pushing it on others as some sort of miracle club for everyone is deceptive and simply isn't true.


Posted
Originally Posted by Bullitt5339

I did not assume it was a one trick pony.  I read all these miraculous club reviews, like you guys are trying to do again, years removed and bought into the hype.  I really wanted and expected it to work, but the facts are that it did nothing better than clubs I already had in the bag.  Hell, people call it a chipper, but I chipped as good or better with my 9 iron than the Niblick.

Like I said before, it's no miracle club that's going to drop 5 or 6 strokes off the average golfer's game like guys try to make it out to be.  Everyone I personally know that bought one has taken it out and given it away or it's sitting gathering dust somewhere.

I'm glad you like yours, but pushing it on others as some sort of miracle club for everyone is deceptive and simply isn't true.

Just educating a golfer looking for help.

Its no different than every *which driver/irons/putter/wedges/ball/underwear should I buy* thread where everyone suggests whatever is in their bag.

Follow me on twitter

Chris, although my friends call me Mr.L

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
So I notice there are a few options. REG 588, 588 RTX, and 588 RTX CB. I know the CB are cavity back wedges which should be used for the higher handicap players . But is the REG 588 just last years clubs? For me I was thinking of going with a 52* 588 RTX CB (or a Cobra S3 max Gap 49* to match my other irons), 56* 588 RTX CB, and a 60* Standard bounce 588 RTX. I usualy shoot in the mid to upper 90's so I was thinking the CB's for the lower loft wedges may help. I am coming from a Hippo 52*, no name 56*, and dunlop target special 62*, so I am thinking these will be a huge upgrade... :-) Thanks Joel White BTW if you like another brand better let me know. I have just read a ton about these clubs being good, so like I said anything would be an upgrade!

If I remember hearing correctly Charlie Beljan just placed second at Riveria last week using the 588 RTX CBs, so I wouldn't say they are made for high handicappers. If you feel confident with that club in your hand that's the club you should use.


Posted
Do you know the diff between the reg-588 and the 588-Rtx??

Driver - Cobra S3 10.5*

Hybrid/Rescue - Cobra Amp Cell 2-3

Irons - Cobra S3 Max 3H, 4H, 5-PW

Wedges - 54* and 58* Cleveland 588-RTX

Putter - Carbite Polar Balanced Mallet

 

 


Posted
Do you know the diff between the reg-588 and the 588-Rtx??

I believe the 588 last years are forged and the 588 RTX is not. The forged used TT tour concept shafts, the RTX just uses the wedge flex I believe. The new RTX face is getting pre groove rule spin with their new face design.


Posted

If you like Cleveland wedges, you might consider the CG14 with Tour Zip Grooves. This was a second-phase model cut with the post-2010 conforming grooves. (Original CG14s had a golf gel head insert, while the TZ version has black gel).

With recent price cuts, you could get a TZ 52*, 56* and 60* for $60 each. You can find original gold-gel CG14s here and there, but finding all three - Gap, Sand, and Lob - may be tough.

CG14 was one of most popular Cle wedges ever, making its way into both amateur and tour pro bags. If you're willing to work on your short game a little, the CG14 could do it for you.

CG15 wedges with a more muscleback head design are now under $80, but wouldn't be as forgiving as the CG14s.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I have always considered Cleveland wedges, but I have never pulled the trigger on buying them. I have a lot of friends who swear by them and they seem to be one of the most popular brand of wedges for a very long time.  I have Titleist Vokey SM4 wedges.  How do Cleveland wedges compare to the Vokey's? I'm not sure because I have never hit them.  I like the Vokey's but there is always room for improvement.


Posted
Originally Posted by SCfanatic35

I have always considered Cleveland wedges, but I have never pulled the trigger on buying them. I have a lot of friends who swear by them and they seem to be one of the most popular brand of wedges for a very long time.  I have Titleist Vokey SM4 wedges.  How do Cleveland wedges compare to the Vokey's? I'm not sure because I have never hit them.  I like the Vokey's but there is always room for improvement.

If you like your Vokey's don't worry about it.  Clevelands aren't that much different.  To be perfectly honest, other than Edel, I don't see much difference in any of the major brand wedges.  I liked my Clevelands, and I like my Pings, and I like the Callaways I've hit (except the 64 ... thats nuts).  I'm sure I would do fine with Vokeys or Mizunos or Tm, or whatever.

Heck, why don't you just take my old ones and try them out sometime if you want to experiment?  I have a 53, 56, and 60 Cleveland RTG (the cool looking rusty ones).

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Golfingdad

If you like your Vokey's don't worry about it.  Clevelands aren't that much different.  To be perfectly honest, other than Edel, I don't see much difference in any of the major brand wedges.  I liked my Clevelands, and I like my Pings, and I like the Callaways I've hit (except the 64 ... thats nuts).  I'm sure I would do fine with Vokeys or Mizunos or Tm, or whatever.

Heck, why don't you just take my old ones and try them out sometime if you want to experiment?  I have a 53, 56, and 60 Cleveland RTG (the cool looking rusty ones).

I will take your old ones, especially the 60*.  What is the bounce on the 60*?


Posted
I will take your old ones, especially the 60*.  What is the bounce on the 60*?

I don't know ... But it's not enough. ;) my current wedge is 59 and has 11 ... I know it's less than that.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
I ended up with a 54 and 58 RTX CB wedges and played with them today.... WOW! Stop me on a dime or run em if needed. Awesome!

Driver - Cobra S3 10.5*

Hybrid/Rescue - Cobra Amp Cell 2-3

Irons - Cobra S3 Max 3H, 4H, 5-PW

Wedges - 54* and 58* Cleveland 588-RTX

Putter - Carbite Polar Balanced Mallet

 

 


  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

I'd highly recommend the Precision Forged 588's.  I tried both those and the new CB Cleveland wedge, and although the CB felt great and was very forgiving, the Forged was also as forgiving and gave me a good 5-10 yards of consistent distance longer.

I now have been using the 50 degree, 8 degree bounce Black Pearl Forged 588, for about 5-10 rounds, and have consistently been putting the ball within 15 feet of the pin from 75-115 yards with the club.  I don't have to swing all-out with it at all, and with a controlled 3/4 swing I consistently get a great-feeling shot with a penetrating ball flight and the trademark Cleveland spin.

I've also added the 56 degree, 10-degree bounce Black Pearl Forged 588.  It's awesome from the sand, around the greens, and anywhere from 20-70 yards.  I also carry a 60 degree, 12 degree bounce Vokey SM4 that I feel is equivalent to the Clevelands in terms of performance.

I do think the grooves on the Cleveland wedges are better than the Vokey grooves, though.  The 56 degree Cleveland has stopped out of the sand for me on a dime from a few mid-trajectory, somewhat long sand shots.  Comparably, a mid-trajectory sand shot from an even closer distance with the Vokey 60 degree has shown to roll a bit more than with the Cleveland.

The level of control with the Forged wedge over the CB, and the added distance control will consistently help you score lower, and will help you develop your overall swing better, IMO.


Posted

the 588 is BY FAR the best feeling and performing Clevelend Wedge, imo. I had 588 DSG's a few years back, they were great. Nice looking head as well.

I LOL at the Niblick vote. Horrible wedges. Not made for delicate feel around the greens.

In the Ogio Kingpin bag:

Titleist 913 D2 9.5* w/ UST Mamiya ATTAS 3 80 w/ Harrison Shotmaker & Billy Bobs afternarket Hosel Adaptor (get this if you don't have it for your 913)
Wilson Staff Ci-11 4-GW (4I is out of the bag for a hybrid, PW and up were replaced by Edel Wedges)
TaylorMade RBZ 5 & 3 Fairway Woods

Cobra Baffler T-Rail 3 & 4 Hybrids

Edel Forged 48, 52, 56, 60, and 64* wedges (different wedges for different courses)

Seemore Si-4 Black Nickel Putter


Posted

588s are also beautiful

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4658 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.