Jump to content
IGNORED

Golf Handicap System Explained for Newbie


Bunkerman125
Note: This thread is 4022 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Originally Posted by sacm3bill

They may spend the same, but don't get in my face if you just won with a gross 90 to my 85. On that I agree with the OP.

I play with people that are a bit more mature than that - I could argue that it is BS that half my tourney money goes into a gross pool that I have no chance in while a low HC could still possibly win in net (it happens more often that not that somebody in the top 2 or 3 gross also finishes in the top 3 net)

Follow me on twitter

Chris, although my friends call me Mr.L

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

A what? Sorry, my English isn't that great anymore, as I've lived in France for nearly 15 years, so I apologise for any upset, it's all inferred and not implied, I assure you.

Sacm3bill's advice seems the most pragmatic and helpful, as it I think it seems that I don't have to have a handicap score in order to play golf.  Unless, it's on a country by country basis?

If I can just play 'normally' ie I can tell if I'm getting better if I score less over a round, which seems like a simpler methodology, I'll give it a go!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


So, when someone with a higher handicap 'beats' someone else, even though they didn't actually beat them, it's not a serious win.

I promise you, when I get beat by someone, even if I had to give them a bunch of strokes, I consider it to be serious! That's the great thing about this game. If, and it's a big IF, the handicaps are correct and honestly derived, any player can compete on a relatively level playing field with any other player. Does that mean that the player with the higher handicap is a better player if he wins? No. It does mean that he played better relative to his skill level than the other guy did though. [quote name="Bunkerman125" url="/t/65436/golf-handicap-system-explained-for-newbie#post_819421"] If I continue to play golf to a level that I'd actually like to win, rather than pretend I've won, what are my options? Can I play without a handicap system until I'm good enough to not have one? [/quote] You can ABSOLUTELY play against anyone you like without a handicap. Just don't forget to bring your checkbook! :-D

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Hmmm...I don't think the OP is serious.

I knew how handicaps worked long before I ever thought about bowling or playing golf. Hard for me to believe that someone else doesn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by Bunkerman125

Sacm3bill's advice seems the most pragmatic and helpful, as it I think it seems that I don't have to have a handicap score in order to play golf.  Unless, it's on a country by country basis?

There are a few high-end or prestigious courses that require you to show a handicap card before playing, but they are rare.

Originally Posted by Bunkerman125

If I can just play 'normally' ie I can tell if I'm getting better if I score less over a round, which seems like a simpler methodology, I'll give it a go!

Here's something to seriously consider Bunkerman: If you really want to accurately track whether you're getting better or not, keeping a handicap is the best way to do it. You can either sign up with an organization that you can post your scores to and will do it for you, or you can keep track of it on your own if you're reasonably good at arithmetic. Either way, it's often much easier to look at that single handicap number and see whether it's going up or down, than to look at a bunch of scores over a period of time, which will vary widely especially if you're just starting out, and which may be from different courses (some being more difficult than others), and try to figure out if you're getting better or not.

Point is, you can track your handicap simply to track your progress - you don't have to use it to compete against others.

Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I completely get at what the OP is getting at.  I understand the handicapping system, but I believe his point is that either you are good or not.  If you want to play for money you should be betting that you can beat the person you are betting against.  If you don't think you can win don't bet.

I don't play tournaments and my handicap is only calculated by my score keeping device.  It is not official.

I think the OP's philosophy is that it doesn't make sense for a golfer with a higher score to beat a golfer with a lower score.  If you are not good enough to compete then don't, like many other sports.

It doesn't really effect me and I don't know what the answer is, but I understand his thought process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by ndb8fxe

I completely get at what the OP is getting at.  I understand the handicapping system, but I believe his point is that either you are good or not.  If you want to play for money you should be betting that you can beat the person you are betting against.  If you don't think you can win don't bet.

I don't play tournaments and my handicap is only calculated by my score keeping device.  It is not official.

I think the OP's philosophy is that it doesn't make sense for a golfer with a higher score to beat a golfer with a lower score.  If you are not good enough to compete then don't, like many other sports.

It doesn't really effect me and I don't know what the answer is, but I understand his thought process.

But what you miss, is that the handicap system is what makes golf such a beautiful game.  Sure, nobody is going to contend that a higher handicap player is actually better than a higher handicap player, but the handicap system allows them to compete on a "level" playing field and determine which player plays better, relative to their individual skill level.  I can bet against friends that are scratch golfers and I can bet against guys who are 15 shots higher than me.

No other sport really allows you to do this.

Titleist 910D3 8.5* Aldila RIP
Titleist 910F 13.5* Diamana Kai'li
Nickent 4DX 20* and 24*
Tour Preferred 5-PW
52.08, 56.14, 60.04 Titleist Vokey

Odyssey Metal-X #9 Putter

Pro V1x

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by ndb8fxe

I think the OP's philosophy is that it doesn't make sense for a golfer with a higher score to beat a golfer with a lower score.  If you are not good enough to compete then don't, like many other sports.

Anybody heard about a head start? Used to level racing/gaming between unequal competitors. This is no different to that. Everybody knows the lower HC is better as a player, but if higher HC happens to win with lower net score, then both knows that he/she played better than expected. And both can be happy for that achievement. (unless there had been some sandbagging)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by chriskzoo

But what you miss, is that the handicap system is what makes golf such a beautiful game.  Sure, nobody is going to contend that a higher handicap player is actually better than a higher handicap player, but the handicap system allows them to compete on a "level" playing field and determine which player plays better, relative to their individual skill level.  I can bet against friends that are scratch golfers and I can bet against guys who are 15 shots higher than me.

No other sport really allows you to do this.

Like I said, I understand the handicap system and understand the benefits..  I'm just mentioning that I understand the OP's thoughts on it.  I do agree with the op that it seems strange from an outsiders standpoint.

Originally Posted by luu5

Anybody heard about a head start? Used to level racing/gaming between unequal competitors. This is no different to that. Everybody knows the lower HC is better as a player, but if higher HC happens to win with lower net score, then both knows that he/she played better than expected. And both can be happy for that achievement. (unless there had been some sandbagging)

See above, however I haven't seen many other competitions that allow head starts or allow the mediocre to claim a victory.  Again, I get it, but also understand the OP's point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


See above, however I haven't seen many other competitions that allow head starts or allow the mediocre to claim a victory.  Again, I get it, but also understand the OP's point.

That's probably because virtually every other sport is a team sport or an individual sport where you are in direct competition with your opponent. In golf you are playing against the course, which doesn't change and can sort of measure it's difficulty. Thus allowing a system of handicapping to work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by SCfanatic35

Quote:

Originally Posted by ndb8fxe

See above, however I haven't seen many other competitions that allow head starts or allow the mediocre to claim a victory.  Again, I get it, but also understand the OP's point.

That's probably because virtually every other sport is a team sport or an individual sport where you are in direct competition with your opponent. In golf you are playing against the course, which doesn't change and can sort of measure it's difficulty. Thus allowing a system of handicapping to work.

Certainly you *can* play against the course (or par) on your own, but then handicaps wouldn't be necessary. What we're talking about here is indeed competing against your opponent - that's why both your and your opponent's handicaps are relevant.

Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Certainly you *can* play against the course (or par) on your own, but then handicaps wouldn't be necessary. What we're talking about here is indeed competing against your opponent - that's why both your and your opponent's handicaps are relevant.

I understand exactly what your talking about. My reply was to why in other games no one is spotted points or given an advantage to make bad players equal to good players. In most other sports, individual or team, you are directly competing against your opponent. Not every team competes against the same quality of opponent. It makes it next to impossible to determine what the handicap, if you will, would be when competing like that. How would go about calculating handicaps in other sports? IMO you couldn't in most, which is why they don't do it in other games/sports.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by SCfanatic35

Quote:

Originally Posted by sacm3bill

Certainly you *can* play against the course (or par) on your own, but then handicaps wouldn't be necessary. What we're talking about here is indeed competing against your opponent - that's why both your and your opponent's handicaps are relevant.

I understand exactly what your talking about. My reply was to why in other games no one is spotted points or given an advantage to make bad players equal to good players. In most other sports, individual or team, you are directly competing against your opponent. Not every team competes against the same quality of opponent. It makes it next to impossible to determine what the handicap, if you will, would be when competing like that. How would go about calculating handicaps in other sports? IMO you couldn't in most, which is why they don't do it in other games/sports.

Ok, I see what you're saying but I would describe it differently. I would say that handicaps are possible in any sport where measurement of individual performance is possible.  In golf or bowling for example, you can play on your own and get a score, and the history of those scores can be used to establish a handicap. But while those two sports are the only ones I know of where that method is used, it could also theoretically be applied to sports like swimming, rowing, running, cycling, auto racing, etc - basically any sport where you're measured by how long it takes you to travel a certain distance. You could use that time measurement, just as you use the scoring measurements in golf and bowling, to establish a handicap.  For those time-based sports, when you compete against someone you'd get a head start (or, an adjustment to your time if you weren't racing head to head) equal to the difference in your handicaps.

As you correctly point out though, that wouldn't be possible for sports like basketball, football, fencing, etc. But I think that you *could* have handicaps in sports other than golf or bowling - there just isn't a lot of interest in doing so. (At least not in an organized/structured way, but people still use the "head start" and "spotting points" methods in informal contests.)

Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Ok, I see what you're saying but I would describe it differently. I would say that handicaps are possible in any sport where measurement of individual performance is possible.  In golf or bowling for example, you can play on your own and get a score, and the history of those scores can be used to establish a handicap. But while those two sports are the only ones I know of where that method is used, it could also theoretically be applied to sports like swimming, rowing, running, cycling, auto racing, etc - basically any sport where you're measured by how long it takes you to travel a certain distance. You could use that time measurement, just as you use the scoring measurements in golf and bowling, to establish a handicap.  For those time-based sports, when you compete against someone you'd get a head start (or, an adjustment to your time if you weren't racing head to head) equal to the difference in your handicaps.  As you correctly point out though, that wouldn't be possible for sports like basketball, football, fencing, etc. But I think that you *could* have handicaps in sports other than golf or bowling - there just isn't a lot of interest in doing so. (At least not in an organized/structured way, but people still use the "head start" and "spotting points" methods in informal contests.)

I agree. This has probably already been stated but IMO the reason they use hdcps in golf is because of the possibility of winning is so low or impossible if they didn't use them. My brothers hdcp is around 9, mine is almost 19. In my 37 years on this earth I have never beaten him on straight up. I tied him once, about 2 months ago he played the worst round ever just for the tie to occur. I have beaten him in every other sport because of ability, luck, whatever the reason. But in golf it just doesn't happen that often. That and also so it makes betting possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Ok, I see what you're saying but I would describe it differently. I would say that handicaps are possible in any sport where measurement of individual performance is possible.  In golf or bowling for example, you can play on your own and get a score, and the history of those scores can be used to establish a handicap. But while those two sports are the only ones I know of where that method is used, it could also theoretically be applied to sports like swimming, rowing, running, cycling, auto racing, etc - basically any sport where you're measured by how long it takes you to travel a certain distance. You could use that time measurement, just as you use the scoring measurements in golf and bowling, to establish a handicap.  For those time-based sports, when you compete against someone you'd get a head start (or, an adjustment to your time if you weren't racing head to head) equal to the difference in your handicaps.  As you correctly point out though, that wouldn't be possible for sports like basketball, football, fencing, etc. But I think that you *could* have handicaps in sports other than golf or bowling - there just isn't a lot of interest in doing so. (At least not in an organized/structured way, but people still use the "head start" and "spotting points" methods in informal contests.)

I agree. This has probably already been stated but IMO the reason they use hdcps in golf is because of the possibility of winning is so low or impossible if they didn't use them. My brothers hdcp is around 9, mine is almost 19. In my 37 years on this earth I have never beaten him straight up. I tied him once, about 2 months ago he played the worst round ever just for the tie to occur. I have beaten him in every other sport because of ability, luck, whatever the reason. But in golf it just doesn't happen that often. That, and it also makes betting possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Bowling uses a handicap system as well

How do they calculate/use handicaps in bowling? Is it just finding your average or is it more complicated than that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by SCfanatic35

How do they calculate/use handicaps in bowling? Is it just finding your average or is it more complicated than that?

  1. Determine your average. In league bowling, a minimum of three games is required to establish an average. To calculate your average, take the total number of pins and divide by the number of games. If you scored a total of 480 through three games, your average is 160 (480 divided by three).
  2. Determine the basis score. Ask your league secretary, as the basis score varies from one league to the next. Ideally, the basis score will be higher than the highest average in the league. A typical basis score might be 210. Many leagues will take a percentage, for example 90%. If you ask your league secretary what the basis score is, you might hear, “90% of 210.”
  3. Subtract your average from the basis score. If your average is 160 and your basis score is 210, subtract 160 from 210. 210 – 160 = 50.
  4. Multiply by the percentage. Take 90% (or whatever percentage your league uses) of the difference between your average and the basis score. 50 x .9 = 45. Your handicap is 45.

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4022 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I did read the fine print tonight. It said replace with “similar features & function”.  8 yeas ago my purchase had features that today are available on the lower end models and the current version of my model has more “bells & whistles” than what I got 8 years ago.  So I am thinking they honored the agreement and I can’t argue the offer. since getting a credit for the full purchase price all I am really out over the past 8 years was the cost of the extended warranty, which was less than a low end  treadmill would have cost me. now the question is which model to replace with.  I’ll stay with Nordic Track or I forfeit the $1,463 credit so I will get Nordic Track.  And they honored the warranty and were not hard to work with which is a plus.
    • Generally speaking, extended warranties are a terrible deal and should almost always be avoided. They are a huge profit center for the companies that offer them, which should tell you almost everything you need to know about how much value most consumers get when purchasing them.  This is correct, and the old adage applies - only buy insurance when you can't afford the loss. This usually doesn't apply to most consumer goods.  To your second question, no I don't believe the offer is fair. They are replacing it, but it is not being replaced at "no cost to you". Since the amount being disputed (over $500) is non-trivial, I would probably push the issue. Don't waste your time on the phone with a customer service agent or a supervisor. They have probably given you all they have the authority to do. Rather, I would look at the terms of your agreement and specifically legal disputes. The odds are you probably agreed to binding arbitration in the event of a dispute. The agreement will outline what steps need to be followed, but it will probably look something like this.  1. Mail the Nordic Track legal department outlining your dispute and indicate you are not satisfied with the resolution offered.  2. Open up a case with the AAA (American Arbitration Association), along with the required documentation. 3. Wait about 4-5 weeks for a case to be opened - at which point someone from Nordic Track's legal department will offer to give you the new model at no cost to you.  They certainly don't want to spend the time and energy to fight you over $500. 4. Enjoy your new Nordic Track at no cost to you. I recently entered binding arbitration against a fairly large and well known company that screwed me over and refused to make it right. In my demand letter, I made a pretty sizeable request that included compensation for my time and frustration. Once it hit their legal department, they cut me a check - no questions asked. It was far cheaper to settle with me than to send their legal team to defend them in the arbitration.
    • I never thought of looking at it on multiple purchases like you said.  Yes, the extended may help me on 1 or 2 items but not the other 5 or 6.
    • Day 84 - Forgot to post yesterday, but I did some more chipping/pitching.    Back/neck were feeling better today, so I did a much overdue Stack session. 
    • Wordle 1,013 4/6 ⬛⬛🟩🟨⬛ 🟩⬛🟩⬛🟨 🟩🟩🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...