Jump to content
IGNORED

20' from the pin


Stargaze
Note: This thread is 4035 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I was listening to PGA golf on Sirius and the host kept correcting a caller who called the flagstick a 'pin'. They were talking about Tiger's drop problem.

I never knew and still don't know the difference between a flagstick and pin.

But as far as chipping is concerned, this guy explains exactly how I'm chipping. I use the ratio system SW 1:1, PW 2:1, 9 iron 3:1, 8 iron 4:1, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


It seems the OP is referring to a chipping scenario - and it sounds like it isn't too awful tough.  I think it is best to keep it simple as often as possible. I do 99% or more of my chipping with 2 clubs - a gap wedge and a sand wedge.  And I employ the Phil Mickelson 'hinge and hold' as best I can for every chip.  The only variation really is which club to use - the sand wedge if there isn't much green to work with - the gap wedge if there is.

I think getting too many clubs with too many variations of face-opening creates a nearly unlimited number of lofts / carries / runouts, etc.  It is just not something the average golfer has time to get good at.  I only have the 2 shots and still only have so much time to practice them.  I see so many people trying a different club every time and opening the face and such - and you can tell they don't actually know what to expect out of the shot.

That being said, and back to the OP's question, sounds like a hinge and hold with a sand wedge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'd recommend Shawn Humphries ratio system in precision chipping using 8,9,PW, SW. [URL=http://www.shawnhumphries.com/humpdays/chipping_ratios.php]http://www.shawnhumphries.com/humpdays/chipping_ratios.php[/URL]

I use my 56* and 60* pretty much exclusively around the green but on the rare occasion that I want to really run one out or hit a putt like chip I'll use this method. Never heard of Humphries but I learned the 'rule of 12'. Basically subtract the number of your club from 12 to get your ratio ex: 9 iron would be 12-9=3 so your 9 iron chip ratio would be 3 to 1. Your PW is really a 10 iron so: 12-10=2 your ratio is now 2 to 1. 3 iron will give you a 9 to 1 ratio. It works pretty well if you practice so you can correctly control your 'air time'. Of course this is all effected by slope and green speed but it's a good rule of thumb to work with.

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The ratio really allows you to have one, single chip stroke and the ball will run different lengths based on the clubs' lie. The system really works - I even use a 6-iron with this system.  It allows you to focus on one thing - hitting a spot (chipping to a spot). Simplifies short game and I'm getting more up and downs. But you're right, with undulating greens or uphill/downhill slanting greens, takes some feel.

Thanks for the Rule of 12 info - never thought of it like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'll use a different club depending on the slope of the green, if it's flat I'll probably go pw or nine iron. But if it's downhill I'll use a 56 or 60 depending on the speed. I read a great tip in golf magazine where they say that you should find a consistent landing zone for a chip shot less than ten feet in front of you, and then vary the loft depending on how far you want the ball to roll from there
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 4035 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • You’ve yet to propose anything else. And yet it was, and the rules tell you how to deal with it. Your question has been answered. The Committee can declare them GUR. I disagree with your assessment of common sense. 😀 And yet they didn’t really change this one. Looks like this is about wrapped up? “That Rule is So Unfair!” A Rules Geek’s Generalized Guide to Hot Takes and Overreactions | Rules Geeks I apologize for the length of this post. If I had more time I’d have written a shorter one. – Erik J...  
    • When you are penalized for hitting into the sand trap the penalty is having to hit it out of the sand, not out of three inches of water. A sand trap is not the same as a water hazard. A sand trap is not supposed to be under water. It is a unique condition caused  by weather and poor drainage. Most local leagues like ours allow the free drop in this type of situation, as long as there is no area in the bunker to legally drop. This is what I’m talking about, sometimes the official rules of golf don’t align with common sense. That’s why they are finally starting to change them. For example, when wind blows your ball off the green. That was a stupid rule. People being able to call the tv network to say they saw a players ball move. That was a stupid rule. I’m just saying, these are rules made up a long time ago, and it’s time to modernize them.
    • Consider it another way: normally, it's a two-stroke penalty to move your ball out of a bunker (unplayable). The ACC reduces it to just one.
    • No, hitting into a hazard that is supposed to be avoided and is designed to be penalizing is not the same as hitting it into the middle of the fairway.   You are penalized because you hit it into a hazard. Based on your logic let's say you hit it into a red staked penalty area and you could normally play it but it's in temporary casual water from rain. Would you expect a free drop from there too??
    • They could have declared it GUR, sure. It is. It's temporary water, and as I said before, an abnormal course condition (ACC). That's what rule 16 is about — ACCs. No, a bunker ≠ the middle of the fairway. You are penalized because you hit it into a bunker. As for the rest… let's stick to the topic. Yep.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...