• Announcements

    • iacas

      GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Contest   09/22/2016

      Join our GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Challenge to win an autographed GAME GOLF, a Pebble Steel watch, and many more great prizes!
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Chilli Dipper

Well, Wimbledon's Gone Plumb Loco This Year

16 posts in this topic

They're not even finished with the second round of tennis, but there's been enough bizarro goings-on in London for several years. To recap:

  • After seemingly returning to his old form by cruising to the French Open title, Rafael Nadal loses in straight sets on the first day of the tournament to the 130th-ranked player in the world, Steve Darcis of Belgium. The men's draw had Nadal on track to face Roger Federer in the quarterfinals.
  • This would seem to be a good break for Federer's Swiss compatriot, Stan Wawrinka, to make his first quarters appearance at Wimbledon, but he also loses in the first round, to 2002 champion Lleyton Hewitt.
  • An opportunity for hard-serving American John Isner, then, to make his deepest run at a Grand Slam? No - Isner injures his knee minutes into his second-round match and retires.
  • With the carnage going on in his quarter of the bracket, it can be assured that Federer will reach the semifinals for the ninth time, right? Wrong! Federer loses in the second round to the 116th-ranked player in the world, Serhiy Stakhovsky of Ukraine.
  • Perhaps, then, this will be a crazy year like 2001 when a long-past-his-prime Goran Ivanisevic came out of nowhere to win the title. Circumstances may play into the hands of crafty veteran like Hewitt...if only he didn't lose his second-round match to Jamaican-German qualifier Dustin Brown.
  • If not Hewitt, then 34-year-old Radek Stepanek, who looked sharp in the first round...but also who, like Isner, retired due to injury shortly into his second-round match.
  • So let's look again at the man-who-beat-Nadal-and-would-also-be-Cinderella, Darcis: he didn't even take the court for his second-round match because of a shoulder injury.

All of this means that, instead of Federer or Nadal emerging from their quarter of the bracket, one semifinalist will come from a group of eight men, the highest-ranked of the group being 15-seed Nicolas Almagro, of whom only two (Almagro and Jurgen Melzer) have ever made a major quarterfinal.

Meanwhile, with 6-seed Jo-Wilfried Tsonga and 10-seed Marin Cilic both retiring with knee injuries in the second round, and the quarter above him blown apart, the tournament is wide open for Andy Murray to make the Wimbledon final for the second year in a row. After winning Olympic gold and the US Open title in the late summer of 2012, the British public expects nothing less than victory from Murray, and this may be his best chance to deliver it. As for Novak Djokovic's half of the bracket, who play their second-round matches tomorrow? Watch out.

The carnage tore through the women's tournament today as well, as 2-seed Victoria Azarenka became yet another top-ranked player to retire with a knee injury, and 3-seed Maria Sharapova lost to qualifier Michelle Larcher de Brito of Portugal. While the loss of established players only adds to the intrigue of the men's draw, for the women, this only makes the rest of the fortnight a foregone conclusion, as a Serena Williams walkover of the field to the title is likely inevitable at this point. Then again, stranger things have already happened this week at Wimbledon.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Yeah, it's been a crazy day. I was glad Sloane was able to hang on and advance. I'm hoping Murray can win it since it's on "home soil".

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Viewership for Wimbledon will definitely drop now that Federer and Nadal are out and not to mention the massive let down for the top ranked women's players. In the men's finals, I already see Djokovic and Murray. I'll root for Murray on this one, but who knows the other no-names are going to do.

With no other competitor in the women's side to contend against Serena, I'm just waiting for next Saturday for Serena to steam roll her opponent in the finals and raise the trophy.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by RPMPIRE

Viewership for Wimbledon will definitely drop now that Federer and Nadal are out and not to mention the massive let down for the top ranked women's players. In the men's finals, I already see Djokovic and Murray. I'll root for Murray on this one, but who knows the other no-names are going to do.

With no other competitor in the women's side to contend against Serena, I'm just waiting for next Saturday for Serena to steam roll her opponent in the finals and raise the trophy.

Yeah. I think Murray definitely has an easier road to the finals than Djokovic, but I'd be surprised if either of them don't make it. I really hope Sloane Stephens can make it deep into the tournament. I think she has a pretty manageable path to the semis, but she'll have to play better than she did at times today.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I really hope Sloane Stephens can make it deep into the tournament. I think she has a pretty manageable path to the semis, but she'll have to play better than she did at times today.

I would hope so, too, since Sloane is probably the only woman left in the field who can beat Serena. It would be in the final.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by geauxforbroke

I really hope Sloane Stephens can make it deep into the tournament. I think she has a pretty manageable path to the semis, but she'll have to play better than she did at times today.

If Stephens gets the opportunity to face Serena in the finals, I just hope the match isn't lopsided, like 6-0, 6-1. What a poor, one-hour match that would be.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Djoko had a small scare in his first set today, but will probably win in straight sets. Would be interesting if Reynolds held on in the first set tie break.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't watch any of Djokovic's second round match, but looks like he cruised after the first set.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Crazy stuff.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm pretty sure that Serena Williams could kick my ass...
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

And....Sarena is out. It's official, it's all gone loco. Plumb loco.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Well this is one Wimbledon to remember.

So who's left in the women's draw? I say Radwanska vs. Stephens in the finals.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well this is one Wimbledon to remember. So who's left in the women's draw? I say Radwanska vs. Stephens in the finals.

Don't rule out Petra Kvitova: she's only two years removed from winning the women's title. Marion Bartoli's a Wimbledon finalist as well. The winner of the Radwanska-Li Na quarter should advance the final, assuming a post-upset letdown by Lasicki. Being the only part of the women's draw to have gone according to script thus far, though, I hesitate to make any predictions.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Chilli Dipper

Don't rule out Petra Kvitova: she's only two years removed from winning the women's title. Marion Bartoli's a Wimbledon finalist as well.

The winner of the Radwanska-Li Na quarter should advance the final, assuming a post-upset letdown by Lasicki. Being the only part of the women's draw to have gone according to script thus far, though, I hesitate to make any predictions.

I'm doing predicting the matches. Kvitova and Stephens are both out. Lisicki cruised through her match so if she makes it to the finals, it at least shows that beating Serena wasn't a fluke. At least we know there will be a new Wimbledon champion.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember when I said the upsets on the men's draw made the tournament wide open, and the upsets on the women's side made a victory by the odds-on favorite inevitable? Strike that. Men's final: 1-seed vs. 2-seed. Women's final: 15-seed vs. 23-seed.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Clearly what happened is that he spent 4-5 hours learning Tiger's balls and it adversely affected him playing with his own balls 
    • 2 weeks ago... I would have said an 'out of nowhere' slice off the tee.  I'd be hitting shots into the fairway (or just off the fairway), and suddenly, I'd hit a 50 yard slice that ends up in somebody's cereal bowl in a kitchen.  

      Currently... a wild hook from the tee.  It started recently and I can't figure it out... at all.  Luckily it hasn't seemed to hurt me too badly (yet), but... it makes it tough because my typical shot shape (for years) has been a fade, so... I prefer to aim at the left side of the fairway.  Now, with this hook, I feel like I can't aim at the left side because it could put me in trouble... so I aim up the right and, when I hit a straight shot, it's a big push.  

      ... shrug ...

      CY
    • Definitely... DEFINITELY don't be the creepy 'cart girl is hot' guy.  It gets awkward in a hurry.  In 2004, I was playing with a club that played all around the area I was living in.  I was 25 at the time and, by far, one of the younger guys in the club.  I often got paired with the guys that were mid 40's and would make completely inappropriate comments about the cart girls.  Seeing as how many of the girls were in my age range, it was always very awkward to hear what they were saying and, truthfully, I never respected anybody who made comments like that.  

      Beyond that... I enjoy playing with people who have personalities.  I enjoy conversation beyond the typical pleasantries.  If I'm going to be on the course with you for 4+ hours... I'd expect to know something about you by the end of the round and vice-versa.  

      If you're willing to trade barbs back and forth (golf related or otherwise) and laugh about them... you're my kinda guy and I can see us playing together more in the future.  Being a big sports fan... I love playing with people who can talk trash AND take it without getting hurt feelings.  There's nothing worse than getting paired with someone who makes a comment about my Giants ball marker or my Mets hat, starts talking trash... and then says they're a Lions fan or something, but gets bent out of shape when I talk trash back.  

      CY
    • Thanks you.  So many people on this site misread, or completely miss the true point of a response.  Shooting29 is another perfect example. I've been in a couple of 5-hour rounds the past few seasons.  I don't go to those courses anymore.  My normal rounds on weekends with my guys all happen at 4 hours or a bit shorter. My point was exactly as you read.  No sense in trying to get ahead of the group in front only to wait on the next group and have the group of you passed waiting on you.  Sometimes there is simply no way to escape slow play other than exiting the course. dave
    • Well that 16-19-1 record isn't going to explain itself away, now is it?
  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. mahariji_slice
      mahariji_slice
      (35 years old)
  • Blog Entries