Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4567 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm looking for some advice on which wedges to go with my new set of x hot irons.

I currently have a pw (44*) and an aw (49*) that came with the set. I hit the pw around 110-115 and aw around 90-100.

I'm considering the following 2 options

1. 54* and 58*

2. 56* only

I'd like to hear some of your opinions on which wedges you would select and if you think that buying only 1 more wedge (not matching my iron set) would be too few choices.

Thanks.


Posted
Originally Posted by cars7

I'm looking for some advice on which wedges to go with my new set of x hot irons.

I currently have a pw (44*) and an aw (49*) that came with the set. I hit the pw around 110-115 and aw around 90-100.

I'm considering the following 2 options

1. 54* and 58*

2. 56* only

I'd like to hear some of your opinions on which wedges you would select and if you think that buying only 1 more wedge (not matching my iron set) would be too few choices.

Thanks.

First impression is that you need two additional wedges. 7 degrees is a large gap between wedges. Assuming you have room for two additional wedges, I would go with something like 54* and 58*. That way your degree spacing is fairly consistent. You can then have them bent to fine tune the yardages - consistent degree spacing does not equal consistent yardage gaps.

Tyler Martin

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I've never gotten along with the 54°, so I would go 55, 60. I don't mind bending 56 to 55 as long as the 56 has sufficient bounce

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Mr. Desmond

I've never gotten along with the 54°, so I would go 55, 60.

I don't mind bending 56 to 55 as long as the 56 has sufficient bounce

Either would work. Just get in the right ballpark, then bend as necessary. However, I would argue that a 20ish handicapper (like the OP) wouldn't be able to tell a difference in yardage between a 54 and 55.

Tyler Martin

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Either would work. Just get in the right ballpark, then bend as necessary. However, I would argue that a 20ish handicapper (like the OP) wouldn't be able to tell a difference in yardage between a 54 and 55.

You don't have to argue. I agree.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Mr. Desmond

You don't have to argue. I agree.

Sorry, just a figure of speech.

Tyler Martin

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by geauxforbroke

Sorry, just a figure of speech.

I was trying to be funny ... it didn't work.

The curse of the internet.

Back on topic ... I would advise the OP to go for 12-14 bounce in his 54-56 and 58-60 (the max that most OEMs have - try the new MacDaddy II, at least look at the specs - a C grind is one to look at). I would also look at relief (grinding) on the heel, toe, and back edge (i.e., the C Grind), and go for a thin-medium to medium sole instead of a wide sole. I have also evolved to a 60 because of the new groove rules. The more dynamic loft, the more spin.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Geaux and Mr. D brought up basic issues to consider.

I have an additional one: Four wedges is more hassle to "manage" than just three wedges. If you kept the XHot 49* AW and added a 56* SW, you might get by with three wedges.

And as Geaux said, you could bend the 49* if you ended up with an unusual yardage gap. And, he's right, degree differences don't always shake out in even yardage differences. I have X20 Tour irons and use the 46* PW. It has the same shaft length as my CG14 50* wedge, but the X20T is hotter, so there's about a 12 yard distance gap.

On the yardages, be aware that most wedges these days have 1/4" difference in shaft length, not 1/2" as between most numbered irons. So, wedge yardage gaps may be a bit smaller than for irons - that's why some golfers use 6* gaps between wedge lofts. Just something to think about, you'll learn the answer from test hits.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by WUTiger

On the yardages, be aware that most wedges these days have 1/4" difference in shaft length, not 1/2" as between most numbered irons. So, wedge yardage gaps may be a bit smaller than for irons - that's why some golfers use 6* gaps between wedge lofts. Just something to think about, you'll learn the answer from test hits.

Good point. And that extra shaft is going to make more difference in yardage than the 1* of loft.

Tyler Martin

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I like what WU and the Tiger have added -- I'll also add that as wedges have gotten stronger in loft, they've lost all meaning ... ... at least in the lower lofts.

Today's strong lofted PW (44-46) is not a PW - it only has the label - it's an iron that one uses for full shots. The 49-51 is a PW - it's job is to go high, drop, stop. I don't use it around the greens.

My specialty wedges are the 55 and 60 - they do all my work around the greens. It's not much of a decision for me. If the 60 is going to make me work too hard to keep it low or get it there, I'm going to pull out the 55. If I'm greenside, 8/10 times, I will pull out the 60.

It's not a big deal ... but I also recognize that all of us choose our own road to comfort on a golf course ... so your choices may vary. I try to make simple choices, and this is my road.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Mr. Desmond

Today's strong lofted PW (44-46) is not a PW - it only has the label - it's an iron that one uses for full shots.

LOL.  I can say with all honesty here that I had never thought of that.

But it's totally true.  By and large, people do not use a PW for pitching.

Honestly, they should probably just start referring to it as a 10 iron.

For the record, my PW (45.5) is NEVER** used for anything but regular full swing shots, and for that matter, neither is my UW (50).  Certainly as I fine tune my game I might be able to find uses for those clubs outside of full swings, but for now they really only have the one purpose.

**I will, on rare occasions, break out the PW or UW for that awkwardly long (30-50 yard) greenside bunker shot.

  • Upvote 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Golfingdad

LOL.  I can say with all honesty here that I had never thought of that.

But it's totally true.  By and large, people do not use a PW for pitching.

Honestly, they should probably just start referring to it as a 10 iron.

For the record, my PW (45.5) is NEVER** used for anything but regular full swing shots, and for that matter, neither is my UW (50).  Certainly as I fine tune my game I might be able to find uses for those clubs outside of full swings, but for now they really only have the one purpose.

**I will, on rare occasions, break out the PW or UW for that awkwardly long (30-50 yard) greenside bunker shot.

Yeah I'll use my 50* for a 30+ bunker shot if I don't have a clean lie. Other than that, the 60* is the only wedge I hit less than full with any regularity.

Tyler Martin

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Mr. Desmond

... My specialty wedges are the 55 and 60 - they do all my work around the greens. It's not much of a decision for me. If the 60 is going to make me work too hard to keep it low or get it there, I'm going to pull out the 55. If I'm greenside, 8/10 times, I will pull out the 60. ...

Played golf Friday with a visiting threesome of a young club pro, and a couple of his co-workers. All were in their mid-20s.

We started talking about wedges, and all three mostly use the SW or LW around the green. One guy said it depended on how much green he had to work with, a second said it was distance to pin, and the pro said it depended a lot on grass texture.

But all three said it was usually SW or LW around the green.

As for the meaning of wedges , I played with Ping Eye2 clones until 2008. The lofts were:

  • 9i = 44*
  • PW = 50*
  • SW = 56*
  • LW = 60*
  • Upvote 1

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by Mr. Desmond

Today's strong lofted PW (44-46) is not a PW - it only has the label - it's an iron that one uses for full shots.

Again, just because the loft is stronger does not mean that the ball launches lower, etc.

Two things primarily produce higher launch angles with the same "loft":

1) Firmer golf balls (balata versus a modern golf ball?)

2) Lower CG in the clubhead

I guarantee you that I could build a 44° club that launched the ball higher than a 49° club of old with a matching golf ball. Especially when you build it with squarer grooves and sharper corners.

Loft is but one piece (an important one, but nowhere near even, say, 3/4 of the whole) when determining launch angles of the golf ball.

TL;DR: the modern pitching wedge is more like a pitching wedge than a 9-iron because you need to consider far more than a static loft measurement.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Thanks for all of the replies. That was a lot of good info. I think I'm going to try a 54 and 58 wedge. I'm leaning towards the Cleveland 588 rtx cb because I like the idea of a little more forgiveness from the cavity back.

Posted
Thanks for all of the replies. That was a lot of good info. I think I'm going to try a 54 and 58 wedge. I'm leaning towards the Cleveland 588 rtx cb because I like the idea of a little more forgiveness from the cavity back.

Forgiveness in a 54 and 58? Those clubs are more about precision than big, full swings. I'd say you're okay with the blade.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Cleveland CG16. Just got mine a few days ago, and i love it. Although I never had a sand wedge before but this thing is awesome. Sets the ball up great and can land it soft.

Note: This thread is 4567 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
    • Day 23 - 2026-01-12 Finally outdoors again with 10 minutes of 7 iron work in the net. Also mirror work. Excited to get back on the range tomorrow and maybe do some film.
    • Day 10: 2026.01.12 Hit 25 balls at the range, working on rotating right hip during backswing.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.